TX JM-103 December 29, 1983

Could Somervell County pay a nonprofit committee to operate a senior service center?

Short answer: Only for authorized county purposes. JM-103 said the county could contract for a center providing public recreation, health care, or support for indigent residents if controls ensured a public purpose, but could not fund general assistance for elderly residents.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1983. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1983
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority in Texas courts but are not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. The opinion dates from 1983 and construes former county-authority and public-purpose provisions; verify current local-government law before relying on it.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Texas AG Opinion JM-103: County Funding for a Senior Service Center

Plain-English summary

JM-103 concluded that Somervell County could contract for a senior center's operation when the center carried out an authorized county function: public recreation, health care, or support for indigent residents. Contractual and other controls had to ensure that the expenditure achieved a public purpose.

"Somervell County may contract for the operation of a center for the aged for recreational, health, or indigent support purposes if contractual and other controls insure that a public purpose will be achieved."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

The county could not fund general assistance for elderly residents merely because of their age. The opinion found no statute authorizing that broader service.

"However, a county does not have the authority to provide for the general assistance of elderly residents."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

"Although there are many provisions of state law which confer certain privileges and benefits upon the elderly, there is simply no statutory authority for a county to provide services generally to elderly individuals."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

The request did not describe the center's actual programs, so JM-103 assumed for its analysis that the center offered social and recreational programs for elderly people.

"You have not stated the purpose or nature of the Senior Service Center, but for purposes of this opinion we will assume that it offers social and recreational programs designed for the enjoyment of elderly people."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1983. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Could a county contract with a private organization to provide authorized services?

Yes. JM-103 said a county could use a private contractor if the agreement and other controls ensured that the authorized public purpose would be achieved.

"A county may contract with a private entity for the performance of these services, so long as contractual and other controls insure that an authorized public purpose of the county will be achieved."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

Could a recreation center be designed mainly for older residents?

Yes, but it had to remain open to the public. JM-103 said the county could contract with a facility primarily designed for elderly residents as long as no member of the public was excluded.

"As long as the facility about which you inquire is open to the public, i.e., as long as no member of the public is precluded from its use notwithstanding that it may be primarily designed to assist the elderly, we believe the county might contract with it."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

"A county may, however, provide recreational facilities for the elderly so long as it is not to the exclusion of other county residents."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

Could the county fund medical or health services at the center?

JM-103 said article 4418f authorized county spending from general revenue for public health and sanitation. It therefore found authority to contract with a center designed to provide medical or health care.

"If the senior service facility is designed to provide medical or health care, we believe that the county would have the authority to contract with it pursuant to article 4418f."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

"The Commissioners Court of any County shall have the authority to appropriate and expend money from the general revenues of its County for and in behalf of public health and sanitation within its County."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

Could the county support indigent elderly residents?

Yes, within its statutory duty to support people unable to support themselves. JM-103 cited prior authority allowing a county to contract for a residential convalescent home for indigent elderly residents.

"Counties also have the responsibility to 'provide for the support of paupers . . . who are unable to support themselves.'"
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

"In Attorney General Opinion C-246 (1964) this office concluded that a county could contract for the operation of a residential convalescent home for the indigent aged as permitted by article 2351."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

Background and legal framework

The Somervell County Auditor asked whether the county could pay county money to the Somervell County Committee on Aging for operation of the Senior Service Center.

"Whether or not Somervell County may legally pay county monies to the Somervell County Committee on Aging for their operation of the Senior Service Center."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

JM-103 began from the rule that a Texas county could act and spend only when authorized by the state constitution or statutes. Article 1015c-1 authorized counties to establish and operate recreational facilities and programs, alone or jointly with other governmental units.

"It is well established that counties in Texas may pursue activities and expend county funds only when authorized by the state constitution or statutes."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

"[A county] may establish, provide, acquire, maintain, construct, equip, operate, and supervise recreational facilities and programs, either singly or jointly in cooperation with one (1) or more other governmental units."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

Funding any other general assistance for elderly residents would likely have violated constitutional provisions against giving away public funds without a proper public purpose.

"Any other assistance to elderly people by a county would likely be found unconstitutional under the multiple provisions which prohibit the giving away of public funds or property in absence of a proper public purpose."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

Holding

"Somervell County may contract for the operation of a center for the aged for recreational, health, or indigent support purposes if contractual and other controls insure that a public purpose will be achieved."
Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1983/jm0103.pdf

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain. The linked PDF is authoritative.

The Attorney General of Texas

JIM MATTOX
Attorney General

December 29, 1983

Ms. Winnie P. Gibson
Somervell County Auditor
P. O. Box 612
Glen Rose, Texas 76043

Opinion No. JM-103

Re: Use of county funds for operation of senior service center

Dear Ms. Gibson:

You have requested our opinion on the following question:

Whether or not Somervell County may legally pay county monies to the Somervell County Committee on Aging for their operation of the Senior Service Center.

You have not stated the purpose or nature of the Senior Service Center, but for purposes of this opinion we will assume that it offers social and recreational programs designed for the enjoyment of elderly people.

It is well established that counties in Texas may pursue activities and expend county funds only when authorized by the state constitution or statutes. Article 1015c-1, section 3, V.T.C.S., provides that a county

may establish, provide, acquire, maintain, construct, equip, operate, and supervise recreational facilities and programs, either singly or jointly in cooperation with one (1) or more other governmental units.

Article 6081t, section 2, V.T.C.S., permits any political subdivision to enter into a joint agreement with another political entity to

establish, provide, maintain, construct, and operate jointly with another governmental unit located in the same or adjacent counties, playgrounds, recreation centers, athletic fields, swimming pools, and other park and recreational facilities located on property now owned or subsequently acquired by either of the governmental units.

See Attorney General Opinion MW-60 (1979) (county may contribute to zoo); H-1170 (1978) (county may contract with city for the operation of museum, park or recreational facility); H-413 (1974) (county may participate jointly with school district for the construction of a swimming pool). It was pursuant to article 1015c-1 that this office concluded in Attorney General Opinion H-127 (1973) that a county could contract with a non-profit corporation to use federal revenue sharing money for the operation of a recreational facility designed for the elderly. We said that

the county may, itself, construct and maintain a recreational facility for the use of the public and primarily for the use of the aged, under reasonable regulations.

A county may contract with a private entity for the performance of these services, so long as contractual and other controls insure that an authorized public purpose of the county will be achieved. Attorney General Opinion C-334 (1964) (hospital district contracting with private hospitals for indigent care). As long as the facility about which you inquire is open to the public, i.e., as long as no member of the public is precluded from its use notwithstanding that it may be primarily designed to assist the elderly, we believe the county might contract with it.

If the senior service facility is designed to provide medical or health care, we believe that the county would have the authority to contract with it pursuant to article 4418f, which provides in part as follows:

The Commissioners Court of any County shall have the authority to appropriate and expend money from the general revenues of its County for and in behalf of public health and sanitation within its County.

Cf. art. 5547-201 (MHMR center).

Counties also have the responsibility to "provide for the support of paupers . . . who are unable to support themselves." V.T.C.S. art. 2351. See also art. 4430, V.T.C.S. (county responsibility for hospital care of indigent sick). In Attorney General Opinion C-246 (1964) this office concluded that a county could contract for the operation of a residential convalescent home for the indigent aged as permitted by article 2351.

However, a county does not have the authority to provide for the general assistance of elderly residents. Such assistance may be provided only if the county is pursuing its authority to provide recreational areas, health care, or support for the county's paupers. Any other assistance to elderly people by a county would likely be found unconstitutional under the multiple provisions which prohibit the giving away of public funds or property in absence of a proper public purpose. See Tex. Const. art. III, §52; art. VIII, §3; art. XI, §3. State v. City of Austin, 331 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. 1960); Attorney General Opinion MW-22 (1979) (state may not pay utility bills for needy aged individuals).

In Attorney General Opinion H-1244 (1978) this office concluded that a county was not authorized to provide daycare services for children generally. Similarly, it was found in Attorney General Opinion H-1189 (1978) that there was "no statute authorizing the commissioners court to provide day care for all children in the county." We believe that these two opinions would apply to individuals on the other end of the age spectrum and would prohibit a county from providing a comparable facility for the elderly. A county may, however, provide recreational facilities for the elderly so long as it is not to the exclusion of other county residents. Although there are many provisions of state law which confer certain privileges and benefits upon the elderly, there is simply no statutory authority for a county to provide services generally to elderly individuals. A county's authority is limited to the provision of recreational facilities, health care, and support for the poor. It is only in pursuit of these statutory provisions that Somervell County would be empowered to contract for the operation of a "Senior Service Center." Of course, a county may not gratuitously grant public funds to a private entity for any purpose.

SUMMARY

Somervell County may contract for the operation of a center for the aged for recreational, health, or indigent support purposes if contractual and other controls insure that a public purpose will be achieved.

JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas

TOM GREEN
First Assistant Attorney General

DAVID R. RICHARDS
Executive Assistant Attorney General

Prepared by David Brooks
Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE

Rick Gilpin, Chairman
Jon Bible
David Brooks
Colin Carl
Susan Garrison
Jim Moellinger
Nancy Sutton
Bruce Youngblood

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1983 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.