TX GA-0310 March 9, 2005

Does a Texas funeral home need a signed cremation authorization form if the deceased already chose cremation in a prepaid funeral contract?

Short answer: No. The opinion concluded that when a person who bought a prepaid funeral contract already specified in that contract that their remains be cremated, the funeral establishment does not also need a separate cremation authorization form signed by an authorizing agent under Health and Safety Code chapter 716, because the contract purchaser is themselves the authorizing agent under section 711.002.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2005
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority in Texas courts but are not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Statutes can be amended; verify current law before relying on anything here. Consult a licensed attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

TX AG Opinion GA-0310: Does cremation need a separate authorization form if a prepaid contract already says cremation?

Plain-English summary

The Texas Banking Commissioner, who administers prepaid funeral contracts, asked the Attorney General about a conflict that had started showing up in practice. Finance Code chapter 154 lets a person buying a prepaid funeral contract lock in cremation as the method of disposition, and bars changing that choice later. Separately, a 2003 law, Health and Safety Code chapter 716, says a crematory cannot cremate remains until it gets a "cremation authorization form" signed by an "authorizing agent." The problem: in some cases, the person who would otherwise be the authorizing agent, often next of kin, was refusing to sign the form for religious or personal reasons, even though the deceased had already specified cremation in writing in their own prepaid contract.

The opinion harmonized the two laws instead of treating them as conflicting. Chapter 716 defines "authorizing agent" by pointing back to Health and Safety Code section 711.002, the general law on who controls disposition of remains. Section 711.002 gives a list of people (spouse, adult children, parents, and so on) the right to control disposition, but only "unless a decedent has left directions in writing for the disposition of the decedent's remains," and it specifically says a person can provide those written directions, including a choice of cremation, in a prepaid funeral contract. So when someone has already written cremation into their own prepaid contract, they are the one who controlled the disposition decision under section 711.002, meaning no separate authorizing-agent signature is needed from anyone else. The opinion also flagged a constitutional wrinkle: applying the 2003 cremation-authorization-form law to override a prepaid contract signed before the law's September 1, 2003 effective date could violate the contract clauses of the U.S. and Texas constitutions, which bar laws that impair the obligation of contracts.

Because the opinion answered the first question no, it did not reach the requester's second question about what a funeral home should do if an authorizing agent refuses to sign.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2005. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Who this opinion affected (as of 2005)

Funeral establishments and crematories: The opinion told funeral homes they did not need to collect a separate cremation authorization form signed by an authorizing agent when the deceased's own prepaid funeral contract already specified cremation, since the contract itself satisfied the disposition-control requirement in section 711.002.

Consumers who prepaid for cremation: The opinion confirmed that a person's own written choice of cremation in a prepaid funeral contract controlled, and could not be blocked by a family member's later refusal to sign an authorizing-agent form.

The Texas Department of Banking: As the regulator of prepaid funeral contracts under Finance Code chapter 154, the opinion gave the Department a clear answer for funeral establishments asking how to reconcile the 2003 crematory-authorization law with their existing contractual obligations.

Common questions

If someone already chose cremation in their prepaid funeral contract, does the funeral home still need an authorizing agent to sign a cremation form?
No. The opinion concluded the contract purchaser who specified cremation in the contract is the person who controlled disposition under Health and Safety Code section 711.002, so no separate cremation authorization form signed by another authorizing agent is required.

What happens if a family member refuses to sign the cremation authorization form?
The opinion did not reach this question. Because it answered the threshold question (whether a form is required at all) no, it expressly declined to address what options a funeral establishment has if an authorizing agent refuses to sign.

Could the 2003 cremation-authorization-form law override an older prepaid funeral contract?
The opinion flagged a constitutional concern rather than deciding the point outright: applying section 716.052 to abrogate a prepaid funeral contract entered into before the law's September 1, 2003 effective date could implicate the contract clauses of the U.S. and Texas constitutions, which prohibit laws that impair the obligation of contracts.

Background and statutory framework

Finance Code chapter 154 ("Prepaid Funeral Services") puts the Department of Banking in charge of administering prepaid funeral contracts. Section 154.1551(a)(1)(A)-(B) provides that, if the purchaser is also the beneficiary, a contract that bars modification cannot later be changed, and a modification may not change the disposition method, burial, cremation, or another alternative, the purchaser specified.

Health and Safety Code section 711.002(a) lists, in priority order, who has the right to control disposition of a decedent's remains (a person named in a signed written instrument, the surviving spouse, adult children, parents, adult siblings, or the next degree of kinship), but that whole list is subject to an overriding qualification: it applies "unless a decedent has left directions in writing for the disposition of the decedent's remains." Subsection (g) confirms a person may give written disposition directions, including a cremation choice, in a will, a prepaid funeral contract, or a signed and acknowledged instrument, modifiable only by a later signed and acknowledged writing, and the person who otherwise controls disposition must faithfully carry out the decedent's directions to the extent financially able.

In 2003 the legislature added Health and Safety Code chapter 716 ("Crematories"). Section 716.051 bars a crematory from cremating remains until it receives a cremation authorization form signed by an authorizing agent and a death certificate or other death record permitting cremation. Section 716.001(1) defines "authorizing agent" as "a person authorized to dispose of a decedent's remains under Section 711.002." Reading chapter 716's authorizing-agent requirement together with section 711.002's recognition of the contract purchaser's own written cremation directions, and applying the harmonization principle that statutes on the same subject should be read together to give effect to all (Gov't Code § 311.026(a); Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Baker, 87 S.W.3d 526 (Tex. 2002); Acker v. Tex. Water Comm'n, 790 S.W.2d 299 (Tex. 1990)), the opinion concluded the contract purchaser is the authorizing agent for their own specified cremation, so chapter 716's signature requirement is already satisfied by the contract itself. On the retroactivity question, the opinion cited the contract clauses of the federal and state constitutions (U.S. Const. art. I, § 10, cl. 1; Tex. Const. art. I, § 16) and the rule that a contract must be legally enforceable and involve property interests of material value to receive that protection (Thompson v. Cobb, 65 S.W. 1090 (Tex. 1902); Mexican Nat'l R.R. v. Mussette, 26 S.W. 1075 (Tex. 1894)).

Citations

Statutes and constitutional provisions:

  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.051(a)-(b) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.002(g)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.102
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.151(a)
  • Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 154.1551(a)(1)(A)-(B)
  • Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 711.002(a), (g) (Vernon 2003)
  • Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 716.001(1) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05)
  • Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 716.051 (Vernon Supp. 2004-05)
  • Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 716.052(a)-(d)
  • Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 311.026(a) (Vernon 1998)
  • U.S. Const. art. I, § 10, cl. 1
  • Tex. Const. art. I, § 16

Cases:

  • Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Baker, 87 S.W.3d 526, 531 (Tex. 2002)
  • Acker v. Tex. Water Comm'n, 790 S.W.2d 299, 301 (Tex. 1990)
  • Thompson v. Cobb, 65 S.W. 1090, 1091 (Tex. 1902)
  • Mexican Nat'l R.R. v. Mussette, 26 S.W. 1075, 1077 (Tex. 1894)

Other authorities:

  • Act of May 8, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 178, 2003 Tex. Gen. Laws 253, 263-64

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain — the linked PDF is authoritative.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

GREG ABBOTT

March 9, 2005

Mr. Randall S. James, Commissioner
Texas Department of Banking
2601 North Lamar Boulevard
Austin, Texas 78705-4294

Opinion No. GA-0310

Re: Whether a funeral establishment must comply with a statutory requirement that it obtain a "cremation authorization form" signed by an "authorizing agent" when a purchaser in a prepaid funeral contract has previously specified disposition of the purchaser's remains by cremation (RQ-0271-GA)

Dear Commissioner James:

You ask whether a funeral establishment must comply with a statutory requirement that it obtain a "cremation authorization form" signed by an "authorizing agent" when a purchaser in a prepaid funeral contract has previously specified disposition of the purchaser's remains by cremation.[1]

Chapter 154 of the Finance Code, denominated "Prepaid Funeral Services," vests the administration of prepaid funeral contracts in the Department of Banking (the "Department") and authorizes the Department to adopt reasonable rules for such administration. TEX. FIN. CODE ANN. § 154.051(a)-(b) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05). A "person," defined as "an individual, firm, partnership, corporation, or association," id. § 154.002(g), must, in order to sell prepaid funeral contracts:

(1) file an application for a permit with the department on a form prescribed by the department;

(2) pay a filing fee in an amount set by the commission under Section 154.051; and

(3) if applicable, pay extraordinary expenses required for out-of-state investigation of the person.

Id. § 154.102. The Department is required to "approve a sales contract form for prepaid funeral benefits before the form is used." Id. § 154.151(a). Section 154.1551(a) provides, in relevant part:

(a) The funeral merchandise and services to be provided by the seller under a fully paid prepaid funeral benefits contract may be modified after the death of the beneficiary if the modification complies with Subsection (b) or is otherwise agreed to in a writing signed by the seller and the person charged with the disposition of the beneficiary's remains by Section 711.002(a), Health and Safety Code, except that:

(1) if the purchaser is also the beneficiary:

(A) the contracted funeral merchandise and services may not be modified if the contract contains a clause that prohibits modification; and

(B) a modification may not change the type of disposition specified by the purchaser in the contract, whether by burial, cremation, or another alternative by which the purchaser's remains attain their final resting place, as provided by Section 711.002(g), Health and Safety Code

Id. § 154.1551(a)(1)(A)-(B). Thus, chapter 154 of the Finance Code specifically declares that, where a purchaser of a prepaid funeral contract specifies in the document that, on death, the purchaser's remains shall be disposed of by cremation, and that such contract may not be modified, the decedent's remains must be cremated.

Section 711.002 of the Health and Safety Code imposes virtually the same requirement:

(a) Unless a decedent has left directions in writing for the disposition of the decedent's remains as provided in Subsection (g), the following persons, in the priority listed, have the right to control the disposition, including cremation, of the decedent's remains, shall inter the remains, and are liable for the reasonable cost of interment:

(1) the person designated in a written instrument signed by the decedent;

(2) the decedent's surviving spouse;

(3) any one of the decedent's surviving adult children;

(4) either one of the decedent's surviving parents;

(5) any one of the decedent's surviving adult siblings; or

(6) any adult person in the next degree of kinship in the order named by law to inherit the estate of the decedent.

. . .

(g) A person may provide written directions for the disposition, including cremation, of the person's remains in a will, a prepaid funeral contract, or a written instrument signed and acknowledged by such person. The directions may be modified or revoked only by a subsequent writing signed and acknowledged by such person. The person otherwise entitled to control the disposition of a decedent's remains under this section shall faithfully carry out the directions of the decedent to the extent that the decedent's estate or the person controlling the disposition are financially able to do so.

TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 711.002(a), (g) (Vernon 2003) (emphasis added). Again, where a purchaser of a prepaid funeral contract has therein designated cremation as part of that contract, the purchaser's preference may not be overruled or modified. We limit our discussion here to a situation in which a decedent has designated in a prepaid funeral contract that the purchaser's remains shall be cremated.

In 2003, the legislature added chapter 716, denominated "Crematories," to the Health and Safety Code.[2] Section 716.051 provides:

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a crematory establishment may not cremate deceased human remains until it receives:

(1) a cremation authorization form signed by an authorizing agent; and

(2) a death certificate or other death record that indicates that the deceased human remains may be cremated.

Id. § 716.051 (Vernon Supp. 2004-05). Section 716.052 describes the contents of a cremation authorization form. See id. § 716.052(a)-(d). It also requires a representative of the contracting funeral establishment to sign the form and directs a crematory establishment to "provide a cremation authorization form to an authorizing agent on request." Id. § 716.052(d).

You indicate that

[a] question has recently arisen regarding the relationship between statutory provisions that authorize a person to direct the disposition of [that person's] remains and prohibit a funeral provider from disposing of the remains in any other manner, and provisions that prohibit a funeral provider from cremating remains without written authorization from an authorizing agent. The question has arisen because, in some instances, the person who is the statutorily designated authorizing agent has refused, for religious or other reasons, to execute the required form, even though the decedent has provided written directions in a prepaid funeral contract specifying disposition by cremation.

Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1. You therefore ask whether, and if so how, these provisions may be reconciled. See id. at 2.

At first glance, section 716.051 of the Health and Safety Code, which prohibits a crematory establishment from cremating "deceased human remains until it receives . . . a cremation authorization form signed by an authorizing agent," would seem to be in irreconcilable conflict with both section 154.1551 of the Finance Code and section 711.002 of the Health and Safety Code, which require a crematory establishment to fulfill, upon a person's death, its contractual obligation to the purchaser of a prepaid funeral contract. We are admonished, however, to harmonize statutes concerning the same subject matter, if possible, so as to give effect to all. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 311.026(a) (Vernon 1998); Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Baker, 87 S.W.3d 526, 531 (Tex. 2002) (harmonizing Insurance Code and Labor Code provisions); Acker v. Tex. Water Comm'n, 790 S.W.2d 299, 301 (Tex. 1990) (harmonizing predecessor of Administrative Procedure Act and Open Meetings Act provisions). And in our view, these disparate statutes may be readily harmonized.

Section 716.001 of the Health and Safety Code, part of the 2003 legislation, defines "authorizing agent" as "a person authorized to dispose of a decedent's remains under Section 711.002." TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 716.001(1) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05). As we have indicated, section 711.002(a) lists a number of individuals who may control the disposition of a decedent's remains. But the wishes of such persons are subject to an overriding qualification: "Unless a decedent has left directions in writing for the disposition of the decedent's remains . . ." Id. § 711.002(a) (Vernon 2003). Moreover, subsection (g) of chapter 711 contemplates that "[a] person may provide written directions for the disposition, including cremation, of the person's remains in a prepaid funeral contract." Id. § 711.002(g). We therefore conclude that, (1) because section 716.051 requires the signature of an "authorizing agent," (2) because "authorizing agent" is defined by reference to section 711.002, and (3) because section 711.002 clearly permits the purchaser of a prepaid funeral contract to designate the disposition of the decedent's remains, no cremation authorization form is required in a situation in which a purchaser of a prepaid funeral contract has specified in that document the disposition of the purchaser's remains.

Finally, to the extent that the application of section 716.052 of the Health and Safety Code would purport to abrogate any provision of a prepaid funeral contract entered into prior to its effective date of September 1, 2003, it may contravene the contract clauses of the federal and state constitutions. See U.S. CONST. art. I, § 10, cl. 1; TEX. CONST. art. I, § 16. These provisions prohibit the state from enacting any law that would impair the obligation of contracts. In order to come within the protection of these constitutional provisions, a contract must be legally enforceable and must involve property interests that have a material value. See Thompson v. Cobb, 65 S.W. 1090, 1091 (Tex. 1902); Mexican Nat'l R.R. v. Mussette, 26 S.W. 1075, 1077 (Tex. 1894).

We conclude that a funeral establishment need not comply with a statutory requirement that it obtain a "cremation authorization form" signed by an "authorizing agent" when a purchaser of a prepaid funeral contract has previously specified disposition of the purchaser's remains by cremation, and therefore, we need not answer your second question as to options available to a funeral establishment if an authorizing agent refuses to sign the cremation authorization form.

SUMMARY

A funeral establishment need not comply with a statutory requirement that it obtain a "cremation authorization form" signed by an "authorizing agent" when a purchaser in a prepaid funeral contract has previously specified disposition of the purchaser's remains by cremation.

Attorney General of Texas

BARRY R. McBEE
First Assistant Attorney General

DON R. WILLETT
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel

NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee

Rick Gilpin
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee


Footnotes

[1] Letter from Mr. Randall S. James, Commissioner, Texas Department of Banking, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General (Sept. 7, 2004) (on file with Opinion Committee, also available at http://www.oag.state.tx.us) [hereinafter Request Letter].

[2] See Act of May 8, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 178, 2003 Tex. Gen. Laws 253, 263-64.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2005 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.