Could town police use radar from outside town limits to ticket speeding inside the town?

Short answer The AG said the Pinewood officer could not make the described stop from a radar position outside town limits without another grant of authority. A county deputy could do so because the deputy's jurisdiction covered both the town and the rest of the county.
State
South Carolina
Opinion
2003-september-4-2003-2
Issued
September 4, 2003
Issued by
Office of the South Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
The Honorable Daisy M. Moore, Magistrate, Sumter County

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2003. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official South Carolina Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed South Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

In 2003, South Carolina's Attorney General said a Pinewood police officer stationed outside town limits could not use radar pointed into town as the basis for the described speeding arrest, absent some other grant of extraterritorial authority. The officer was outside municipal jurisdiction when observing the alleged violation. The statute allowing pursuit up to three miles beyond town limits did not help because that exception required pursuit begun from within the municipality.

A Sumter County deputy in the same outside-town position had a different answer. The AG said the deputy's authority covered the whole county, including Pinewood, and therefore permitted an arrest based on radar aimed at a speeding violation inside the town.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2003. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Historical summary

Municipal police officers

The opinion treated the radar location as critical. An officer outside town could not rely on the three-mile pursuit exception to observe a speeding violation inside town and initiate a stop, because the pursuit had not begun within municipal limits. The AG noted that other statutory grants could produce different facts.

Sheriff deputies

The AG said county deputies could patrol throughout the county and retained jurisdiction inside incorporated towns. A deputy outside Pinewood could therefore use radar directed into town for the described state-law speeding offense.

Common questions

Could the Pinewood officer ticket a driver from the outside-town radar position?
The AG said not under the facts supplied, absent a separate source of authority beyond town limits.

Did the three-mile pursuit rule authorize the town officer's setup?
No. The opinion said the officer had to begin pursuit from within the municipality for that exception.

Could a county deputy use the same radar position?
Yes. The AG said countywide jurisdiction covered the deputy's location and the alleged speeding inside Pinewood.

Background and statutory framework

A magistrate described two officers using radar from a point outside Pinewood to detect speeding within it. The AG assumed a state-law speed limit and applied Section 17-13-40's municipal pursuit rule to the town officer. It contrasted Section 23-13-70's countywide sheriff-deputy patrol authority for the deputy.

Citations and references

The opinion discussed Section 17-13-40 and Section 23-13-70.

Official title

Relating to arrests for alleged speeding violations occurring within the corporate limits of the Town of Pinewood which are detected by radar units positioned outside the town limits.

Requester

The Honorable Daisy M. Moore, Magistrate, Sumter County

Source

Original opinion text

The State of South Carolina

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
HENRY MCMASTER
ATTORNEY GENERAL

September 4, 2003

The Honorable Daisy M. Moore
Magistrate, Sumter County
P. 0. Box 1428
Sumter, South Carolina 29151-1428

"'•·

Dear Judge Moore:
In a letter to this office you raised questions relating to arrests for alleged speeding violations occurring within the corporate limits of the Town of Pinewood which are detected by radar units positioned outside town limits. I assume that the speed limits cited are set by State law.

In your first situation, a town police officer positions his radar approximately a city block outside the town limits, pointing back to an area within the town limits. At that point, the radar locks in on the speed of a vehicle traveling within the town limits. At the point outside the town where the officer is positioned the speed limit is 55 miles per hour; however, the speed limit within the town where the radar is pointed is 35 miles per hour. You questioned whether the town police officer would be authorized to make an arrest for speeding for violation ofthe 3 5 mile per hour speed limit which he observes in an area outside the municipal limits.

I

Generally, the jurisdiction of a municipal police officer does not extend beyond the territorial limits of the municipality. State v. Harris, 299 S.C. 157, 382 S.E.2d 925 (1989). An exception to this rule is provided by S.C. Code Section 17-13-40(2003) which authorizes a municipal officer to arrest an offender at a place within a radius of three miles of the municipal limits when that officer is in pursuit of that offender for a violation of a municipal ordinance or State statute committed within the corporate limits of the municipality. 1 However, in the situation you addressed, the officer is acting outside his jurisdiction in observing the violation within the municipal limits. The three mile limit extra-territorial authority

1

Other statutory exceptions also exist. See, e.g., S.C. Code Ann. Section 5-7-110 (1977) (contracting for police protection beyond the corporate limits); S.C. Code Ann. Section 23-1-215 (1989) (criminal investigation in another county or municipality by agreement of the law enforcement agencies involved); S.C. Code Ann. Section 17-13-45 (2003) (responding to distress call in adjacent jurisdiction).

lill.JBEJIT

_ff

c. DENNIS 8UllJ)JNG • POST OFFICE Box 11549 • COLUMBIA, s.c. 29211-1549 • TELEPHONE: 803-734-3970 • FACSIMILE: 803-253-6283

{./, /J-

The Honorable Daisy M. Moore
Page2
September 4, 2003

would not be applicable in that the officer must be within the municipal limits when initiating pursuit. See: Op. Atty. Gen. dated September 15, 2000. Absent a grant of authority to act outside the municipal limits, it does not appear that the town officer would be authorized to position his radar outside the town limits so as to point back within the town limits to formulate the basis for a traffic stop. Therefore, the town officer would not be authorized to make an arrest for speeding in violation of the 35 mile per hour limit in the situation you addressed. There may be situations, however, where a municipal officer, stationed outside his jurisdiction when he observes a criminal offense within the municipal limits, would be entitled to make an arrest. For instance, in certain situations an officer has the right to act as a private citizen beyond his jurisdiction. In those situations, the officer's actions would be lawful if they could have been undertaken by a private citizen. Harris, supra. S.C. Code Ann. Sections 17-13-10 and 17-13-20 (2003) set forth the authority when any person may make a warrantless arrest. For instance, pursuant to Section 17-13-10 any person may make an arrest under the following conditions: Upon (a) view of a felony committed; (b) certain information that a felony has been committed or (c) view of a larceny committed, any person may arrest the felon or thief and take him to a judge or magistrate to be dealt with according to law. However, a citation for a speeding offense does not fall within the guidelines of Section 1713-10or17-13-20. Speeding is a misdemeanor offense. S.C. Code Ann. Section 56-5-1520 (Supp. 2002). A recent decision of the State Supreme Court indicated that "South Carolina recognizes no common law right of a citizen to arrest, without a warrant, for a misdemeanor. State v. McAteer, 340 S.C. 644, 646, 532 S.E.2d 865 (2000). Furthermore, in the situation you addressed, there would not be any action in the guise of a private citizen in that the officer in using his radar would be utilizing methods typically not granted private citizens.

I

You next asked about a situation where a deputy sheriff also positions his radar at a point approximately a city block outside the municipal limits pointing back to an area within the municipal limits. The speed limit within the municipality is 35 miles per hour. The speed limit at the point where the deputy sets up his radar is 55 miles per hour. You have asked whether the deputy sheriff may make an arrest for speeding for a violation of the 35 mile per hour speed limit using his radar which is positioned so as to point back to an area within the town limits. S.C. Code Ann. Section 23-13-70 (1989) authorizes a deputy sheriff to "patrol the entire county". An opinion of this office dated July 9, 1998 commented that "since the sheriff is a county officer, his authority extends over the entire county, and includes all...(political subdivisions) within his county." That opinion further commented that "the county sheriff and his deputies retain ... the authority and jurisdiction to pursue and arrest offenders in incorporated areas of their home county as part of their full countywide jurisdiction." Another opinion of this office dated May 17, 2001 determined that " ... the sheriff would technically have jurisdiction (concurrent with the municipal police department) over any violation of state law occurring within the municipality." Inasmuch as

The Honorable Daisy M. Moore
Page3
September 4, 2003

the deputy sheriff has jurisdiction anywhere within the county, it appears that a deputy sheriff would be authorized to make an arrest for speeding using his radar positioned so as to point back to an area within town limits.

If there are any questions regarding the above, please advise. Sincerely,

Charles H. Richardson
Senior Assistant Attorney General

What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2003. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace