When a federal agency like DCSA or DoD asks a South Carolina sheriff or court for someone's arrest history for a security clearance, do they have to provide it?

Short answer Yes. The AG says qualifying South Carolina criminal justice agencies must provide criminal history record information to a covered federal agency when the subject has given written consent. Section 9101 expressly preempts conflicting state or local law.
State
South Carolina
Issued
September 3, 2025
Issued by
Office of the South Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
Requested by P.J. McCann III, Special Agent, Law Enforcement Liaison, Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2025. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official South Carolina Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed South Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) liaison asked whether South Carolina criminal justice agencies must provide criminal history record information (CHRI) to covered federal agencies under 5 U.S.C. § 9101. His letter reported that some South Carolina police departments, sheriff's offices, courts, and other agencies had declined requests.

The AG concludes that state and local law enforcement agencies, courts, and other qualifying criminal justice agencies are authorized and required to comply when a covered federal agency requests CHRI and the subject has given written consent. Section 9101(b)(1) requires disclosure on request, and § 9101(b)(4) expressly preempts conflicting state or local law. A local agency may ask for a copy of the consent if it is not presented with the request. If the local agency charges a fee, § 9101(b)(3) caps it at the reasonable cost of providing the information.

The requester said unresolved noncompliance must be reported to Senate and House oversight committees. The opinion does not analyze a court enforcement action or prescribe a route for resolving a particular refusal.

What this means for you

If you handle records for a South Carolina criminal justice agency

Check whether the request comes from an agency covered by § 9101(a)(6), concerns CHRI as defined in § 9101(a)(2), and has the subject's written consent. The AG says a qualifying state or local agency must comply with such a request. You may ask the requester for a copy of the consent if it was not supplied. Any fee must stay within the statute's reasonable-cost limit.

If you conduct federal background investigations

The AG's conclusion supports a request for CHRI from a qualifying South Carolina agency when the subject has consented in writing. The opinion says DCSA's investigators request information an agency already has on file; the requester's letter says they do not ask a local agency to search state or national databases for them.

If the records concern you

The federal statute requires written consent before a covered agency requests your CHRI. The opinion says the receiving federal agency's further use and disclosure are limited by § 9101(d), which also permits sharing the information with the subject on request.

Common questions

Does state law block a covered federal request for CHRI?

The opinion says § 9101(b)(4) expressly preempts state or local law that conflicts with the federal disclosure duty.

What if the agency did not receive a copy of the consent?

The AG says it may ask the covered federal agency for a copy. The subject must have provided written consent under § 9101(c).

Can a local agency charge a fee?

Yes. Section 9101(b)(3) limits the fee to the reasonable cost of providing the information.

What information counts as CHRI?

The opinion quotes § 9101(a)(2): identifying descriptions and records of arrests, indictments, formal charges and dispositions, sentencing, correctional supervision, and release.

Does the opinion identify a federal lawsuit or injunction for noncompliance?

No. The requester's letter mentions reporting unresolved noncompliance to congressional oversight committees. The AG answers the disclosure question without discussing judicial remedies.

Background and statutory framework

Section 9101 defines covered federal agencies, qualifying criminal justice agencies, and CHRI. The opinion quotes the statute's requirement that criminal justice agencies “shall make available all criminal history record information regarding individuals under investigation by that covered agency” on request. It also cites the preemption clause, the written-consent condition, a reasonable-cost fee limit, and restrictions on subsequent use or disclosure.

The AG notes that its office ordinarily does not address federal-law questions. It addressed this question because South Carolina agencies routinely receive requests under § 9101.

Citations and references

  • 5 U.S.C. § 9101(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(6): definitions of criminal justice agency, CHRI, and covered agency.
  • 5 U.S.C. § 9101(b)(1), (b)(3), (b)(4): disclosure duty, fee limit, and preemption.
  • 5 U.S.C. § 9101(c), (d): written consent and restrictions on subsequent use or disclosure.

Source

Original opinion text

ALAN WILSON
ATTORNEY GENERAL

September 3, 2025

P.J. McCann, III

Special Agent, Law Enforcement Liaison
Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency
Law Enforcement Liaison Office

1900 E. Street NW

Washington, DC 20415

Dear Special Agent McCann:

obtain

Attorney General Alan Wilson referred your letter to the Opinions section for a response. On behalf of the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA), you seek assistance “to resolve issues that Federal Special Agents and Investigators are experiencing when trying to Criminal History Record Information (CHRI) from Criminal Justice Agencies (CJA)

throughout South Carolina.”

Housed within the United States Department of Defense, DCSA is the largest security

agency in the federal government. As your letter explains:

DCSA conducts 3.8 to 4 million national security personnel vetting investigations each year safeguarding the integrity and trustworthiness of the federal workforce for over 140 federal agencies, including such personnel assigned to the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; and the United States Marshals Service, This includes any South Carolina State, Local, Campus, or Tribal law enforcement officer assigned to these agencies Federal task forces. DCSA connects, engages and protects 13,000+/- contractor facilities, companies and research educational institutions cleared for access to classified information (121 facilities in South Carolina, including Clemson University and the University of South Carolina) that collaborate with the U.S. Government’s defense involving critical technologies, research, production, and supply chains. Obtaining CHRI from Federal, State, and Local CJA is vital to the safety and security of our Nation, these facilities, and personnel.

BUILDING « POST OFFICE RON 11549 « COLUMBIA, SC 29211-1849 2 ‘Perge

DYR-794.3070

lho J Spe

ZAP 8 PACSIMUILE €G5-245-6183

Special Agent P.J. McCann, III
Page 2
September 3, 2025

All investigations are conducted with the knowledge and consent of the individual being investigated. Upon request, the Special Agent / Investigator is mandated by law to provide all CHRI repositories and CJA with a release of information document signed by the individual authorizing our agency to obtain the record information. Title 5 of the U.S, Code, Chapter 91, §9101 does not require any additional release or releases to be provided. Additionally, the standard release signed by the individual being investigated states that the individual authorizes any Investigator, Special Agent, or other duly accredited representative of OPM, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of State, and any other authorized Federal agency, to request criminal record information about the individual of investigation from CJA for the purpose of determining eligibility for assignment to, or retention in, a national security position, in accordance with Title 5 of the U.S. Code, Chapter 91, §9101.

You advise that when a covered agency requests CHRI about an individual, the request will only be for information that a criminal justice agency has on file regarding any arrests, detentions, or other contacts with the individual with respect to criminal activity. You specifically note that DCSA Special Agents and Investigators will not request a criminal justice agency to use any state or national databases to respond.

You report in your letter that eight police departments, five sheriff's offices, nine courts of record, and two state or county CJAs in South Carolina are not complying with requests made pursuant 5 U.S.C. Section 9101. You warn that when a CJA fails to comply with proper requests for CHRI, DCSA National Security investigations are incomplete and decisionmakers are forced to make risk determinations without needed information, “unnecessarily putting our Nation and communities at peril.” Additionally, if DCSA is unable to resolve a CJA’s lack of compliance, congressional mandate requires the noncompliance be reported to the Federal Senate and House oversight committees.

With this background in mind, you ask whether Criminal Justice Agencies in South Carolina “are authorized and required to release criminal history record information to covered federal agencies,” including DCSA, under Title 5 of the United States Code Section 9101. As discussed more fully below, it is the opinion of this office that all South Carolina state and local Criminal Justice Agencies are authorized and required to comply with such requests.

Law/Analvsis

This office is required to offer advisory opinions on the law to the Governor, the General Assembly, state officers, and the Public Service Commission. S.C. Code Ann. § 1-7-90 (Rev. 2005) (Attorney General required to provide advice and opinions on questions of law to the

Special Agent P.J. McCann, III
Page 3
September 3, 2025

General Assembly and Governor); S.C. Code Ann. § 1-7-100 (Rev. 2005) (Attorney General required to advise solicitors regarding the duties of their offices); S.C. Code Ann. § 1-7-110 (Rev. 2005) (Attorney General required to advise Secretary of State, State Treasurer, Adjutant General, Comptroller General, other state officers, and the Public Service Commission regarding legal questions related to their official business). Additionally, as a courtesy, this office provides advice and opinions on legal matters to local governments. Ordinarily, this office does not address issues of federal law. Op. S.C. Att’y Gen., 2023 WL 4918024 (July 26, 2023). However, because agencies across South Carolina routinely receive requests for criminal history record information pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 9101, we offer this opinion to help guide those receiving such requests on how to respond.

Originally enacted in 1985, 5 U.S.C. Section 9101 outlines access to criminal history records for national security and other purposes. A report regarding the need for the legislation noted that a majority of states and local governments were already cooperating by voluntarily providing CHRI when requested by the relevant federal agencies, but some were not cooperating either because of policy or state laws limiting access to such information. H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 99-373 at 24, 25 (1985). The statue was designed “provide a mandatory mechanism” for access to criminal history record information needed for national security purposes without discouraging existing voluntary cooperation. Id. at 25. The statute provides that “[u]pon request by a covered agency, criminal justice agencies shall make available all criminal history record information regarding individuals under investigation by that covered agency... .” 5 U.S.C. § 9101(b)(1). To emphasize the need for covered agencies to gather the requested information, the statute contains a clear expression that it is intended to preempt any state or local law. 5 U.S.C. § 9101(b)(4).

Requests are made by a covered agency, which can be any of the following:

(A) The Department of Defense.

(B) The Department of State.

(C) The Department of Transportation.

(D) The Office of Personnel Management.

(E) The Central Intelligence Agency.

(F) The Federal Bureau of Investigation.

(G) The Department of Homeland Security.

(H) The Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

(1) An Executive agency that--
(i) is authorized to conduct background investigations under a Federal statute; or (ii) is delegated authority to conduct background investigations in accordance with procedures established by the Security Executive Agent or the Suitability Executive Agent under subsection (b) or (c)(iv) of section 2.3 of Executive Order 13467 (73 Fed. Reg. 38103), or any successor thereto.

(J) A contractor that conducts a background investigation on behalf of an agency described

in subparagraphs (A) through (1).

Special Agent P.J. McCann, [I
Page 4
September 3, 2025

5 U.S.C. § 9101(a)(6). Criminal justice agencies that receive the requests include state and local courts and any state or local agency, or subunit thereof, “which performs the administration of criminal justice pursuant to a statute or Executive order, and which allocates a substantial part of its annual budget to the administration of criminal justice.” 5 U.S.C. § 9101(a)(1). Criminal history record information, or CHRI, is defined in the statute as “information collected by criminal justice agencies on individuals consisting of identifiable descriptions and notations of arrests, indictments, informations, or other formal criminal charges, and any disposition arising therefrom, sentencing, correction supervision, and release.” 5 U.S.C. § 9101(a)(2).

When a South Carolina law enforcement agency, court, or other criminal justice agency receives a request for CHRI from a covered agency, it must comply. 5 U.S.C. § 9101(a)(1). A covered agency will only request CHRI on a subject after receiving that person’s written consent. 5 U.S.C. § 9101(c). It is our understanding the consent is customarily presented with the request, but if not the state or local agency is entitled to ask for a copy. If the state or local agency chooses to charge a fee for the requested information, the fee must not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the information. 5 U.S.C. § 9101(b)(3). Once the information is shared, the covered agency may only disclose or use it for the purposes approved in the statute,! but can also share it with the subject of the information on request. 5 U.S.C. § 9101(d).

' Requests for CHRI are made for the purpose of:

(A) determining eligibility for--
(i) access to classified information;
(ii) assignment to or retention in sensitive national security duties or positions; (iii) acceptance or retention in the armed forces; or (iv) appointment, retention, or assignment to a position of public trust while either employed by the Government or performing a Government contract; or

(B) conducting a basic suitability or fitness assessment for Federal or contractor employees.

eg

(C) credentialing under the Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (dated August 27, 2004); and

(D) Federal Aviation Administration checks. . . .

5 U.S.C. § 9101(b)(1).

Special Agent P.J. McCann, III
Page 5
September 3, 2025

Conclusion

South Carolina’s state and local law enforcement agencies, courts, and other criminal justice agencies are authorized and required to comply with any request for criminal history record information made by a covered federal agency provided that the subject of the information has provided written consent.

Sincerely,

Sabrina C. Todd
Assistant Attorney General

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Oi GAZ

Robert D. Cook
Solicitor General Emeritus

What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2025. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace