How did South Carolina’s 1994 video-gambling law limit cash payouts for free-game credits?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
The state revenue department asked how a statute governing coin-operated video-gambling machines limited cash payouts for free-game credits. The AG agreed with the department that the statute set two maximums: no more than 2,500 free-game credits redeemed for cash per player per location during a 24-hour period, and no more than five cents for each redeemed free-game credit.
The opinion distinguished a credit earned in a free game and redeemed for cash from a credit bought to play the machine. It said the cited provision did not regulate what an owner or operator charged a player to play. The statutory payout ceilings did not vary with how much the player had paid into the machine. Asked about refunding unused purchased credits, the AG repeated the limits on free-game cash redemption but did not separately state a refund rule.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1994. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Common questions
Could a location pay cash for more than 2,500 free-game credits in one day?
No under the 1994 provision as the AG read it. The cap applied per player, per location, during a 24-hour period.
Could each redeemed free-game credit be worth more than five cents?
No. The AG treated five cents as the maximum cash value for each such credit.
Did the five-cent payout limit cap the price of a credit purchased to play?
No. The AG said the cited statute did not purport to regulate what a location charged to operate or play a machine.
Did the opinion authorize refunds for unused credits a player bought?
The letter did not give a separate answer approving or forbidding those refunds. It reiterated that the statutory cash-redemption limits applied to free-game credits regardless of the player's spending.
Background and statutory framework
Section 12-21-2791 addressed both the number of free-game credits redeemable for cash and the maximum cash value per redeemed credit. The AG read “limit” as setting a maximum, agreed with the revenue department's interpretation, and said the statute did not make either maximum depend on the number of credits a player purchased. The archive's title uses a different section number; the PDF's request and analysis repeatedly identify Section 12-21-2791.
Citations and references
- Section 12-21-2791: the free-game credit redemption limits analyzed in the letter.
Archive topic (corrected from listing)
Requesting a ruling on the interpretation and application of the video-gambling credit limits. The linked archive heading has a section-number error; the PDF repeatedly analyzes Section 12-21-2791.
Requester
A. Crawford Clarkson, Jr., Chairman, South Carolina Department of Revenue
Source
- Landing page: https://www.scag.gov/opinions/opinions-archive/october-3-1994/
- Original PDF: https://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/94oct3clarkson.pdf
Original opinion text
ll. llraut• •iblaclt
Attaratlf jJrniral
B03-73ll-397D
Attnm.ev '6.en.entl
{
Q!alumbta 29211
October 3, 1994
['
I
I
Mr. A. Crawford Clarkson, Jr.
Chairman
South Carolina Department of Revenue
and Taxation
P. o. Box 125
Columbia, South Carolina 29214
Re:
l
Ii
s. c. Code Ann. S 12-21-2791 (1993 Cum. Supp.)
Dear Chairman Clarkson:
You have asked this Office for its ruling relative to the
interpretation and application of s. c. Code Ann. S 12-21-2791
(1993 Cum. Supp.). Your inquiry raises a series of related questions. I first advise that when the Office of Attorney General is requested to issue its opinion concerning the interpretation of a statute, our approach is to determine, to the extent possible, how the courts of this state will ultimately interpret the statutory provision. Thus, we are guided by the same rules of statutory interpretation that serve as guideposts for the courts. The cardinal rule of statutory intlerpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent. Horn v. Davis Electric Contractors, Inc., 307 s.c. 559, 416 S.E.2d 634 (1992); State v. Martin, 293 S.C. 46, 358 S.E.2d 697 (1987). Most often, legislative intent is determined by applying the words used by the General Assembly in their usual and ordinary significance. Martin v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, 256 S.C. 577, 183 S.E.2d 451 (1971). The words of a statute must be given their plain and ordinary meaning without resort to subtle or forced constructions. State v. Blackmon, 304 S.C. 270, 403 S.E.2d 660 (1991); Bryant v. City of Charleston, 295 S.C. 408, 368 S.E.2d 899 (1988). Where there. is no ambiguity in the words used by the General Assembly, the courts have no right to look for or impose another meaning. Perry v. Minute Saver Food Stores of South Carolina, Inc., 255 s.c. 42, 177 S.E.2d 4 (1970); Wynn v. Doe, 255 s.c. 509, 180 S.E.2d 95
f
I
Mr. A. Crawford Clarkson, Jr.
Page 2
October 3, 1994
(1971).
On the other hand, if the statute is susceptible to
various interpretations, the construction of a statute by the
agency charged with its administration is entitled to most respectful consideration and should not be overruled absent compelling reasons. Jasper County Tax Assessor v. Westvaco, 305 s.c. 346, 409 S.E.2d 333 (1991); William c. Logan and Associates v. Leatherman, 290 S.C. 400, 351 S.E.2d 146 (1986).
I
I
I
By its literal text, Section 12-21-2791 regulates two aspects
of video gambling. First, the General Assembly regulated the number of free game credits that can be redeemed for cash: "Any location which operates or allows the operation of coin-operated machines pursuant to Section 12-21-2720 (A) (3) which provides payouts authorized pursuant to Section 16-19-60 shall limit the cash payouts for credits earned for free games to two thousand five hundred credits per player per location during any twenty-four hour period." Next, Section 12-21-2791 regulates the cash value of each redeemed free game credit: "The cash value of credits for each free game shall be limited to five cents." I.
E
•
b
Does Section 12-21-2791 set the maximum cash payouts for
credits earned for free games at two thousand five
hundred credits with the maximum cash value for each
credit earned being five cents?
...
With regard to question number one, we concur with the interpretation suggested by the Department of Revenue that the term "limit" or "limited" 1 as used in this context prescribes, respectively, the maximum number of free game credits that can be redeemed, and the maximum amount of cash for each redeemed free game credit. Thus, a location is not authorized to redeem for cash credits more than twenty-five hundred free game credits per player per location during any twenty-four hour period. Moreover, the value of each free game credit redeemed cannot exceed five cents. Again, this Office concurs in the Department of Revenue's interpretation of this provision. We believe that not only is the Department of Revenue's interpretation supported by the text of the statute, it accurately reflects the legislative intent.
1
The term "limit" is ordinarily defined in this context as
prescribing a maximum amount, quantity or number.
See Webster's
Third Int. Diet., p. 1312. We perceive no ambiguity in its use in
Section 12-21-2791.
Mr. A. Crawford Clarkson, Jr.
Page 3
October 3, 1994
II.
I
I
I
The statute limits the 'cash value of credits for each
free game ... to five cents.' Does this limit the amount
a player can pay for a credit?
In other words, can a
machine be programmed to charge more than five. cents a
credit for each credit that a player purchases (e.g. 25
cents per credit) even though the payout for 'credits
earned for free games' is limited to five cents per
credit?
Section 12-21-2791 does not purport to regulate the amount of
money a location or "owner/operator" charges a player to operate or play a coin-operated machine. III. How is the 'cash payout for credits earned for free games' calculated? In other words, is the cash payout based upon 'gross credits' - the total number of credits remaining on the machine when the player finishes playing
- or is the cash payout based upon 'net credits' - the
total number of credits remaining on the machine when the
player finishes playing minus the number of credits purchased by the player? Or is some other method of calculation required by the statute?
r
As noted~in answer number one herein, Section 12-21-2791 regulates only those free game credits that are redeemed for cash. The prescribed maximum limitations upon the number of free game credits that can be redeemed and the cash value for each redeemed free game credit are not qualified nor in any manner dependent upon the amount of money expended by the player in operating or playing the coin-operated machine.
l
IV.
If the 'cash payout for credits earned for free games' is
calculated based upon 'net credits' - the total number of
credit remaining on the machine when the player finishes
playing minus the number of credits purchased by the
player, may a player be refunded for any credits he purchased that remain on the machine at the end of his play? For example, if player 11 A 11 has 2, 700 credits remaining on the machine at the end of his play, 200 of which he purchased during the course of his play, may player "A 11 receive a refund for the 200 credits he purchased in
Mr. A. Crawford Clarkson, Jr.
Page 4
October 3, 1994
i
f
L
I
addition to his cash payout for the 2,500 credits he won?
If so, is the value of the refund for the credits the
player purchased limited only by the amount the player
originally paid for the credits or is it limited to five
cents per credit?
I again reference response number one herein. Section 12-212791 prescribes the maximum number of free game credits that can be redeemed for cash, and the maximum amount of cash that can be paid for each free game credit redeemed. The statutory language does not qualify or modify these regulations regardless whether the player deposits a large or small amount of money in the coinoperated machine, or regardless whether the player deposits more or less money in the machine then he may seek to redeem in credits. Should you have any further questions, With best regards, I am
TTM/shb
r
b
please contact me.
What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 1994. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace