Could South Carolina count an absentee ballot if the voter died after returning it but before election day?

Short answer The AG concluded in 2008 that such a ballot was subject to challenge because voting occurred on election day. Poll managers did not have to investigate every voter's status, but had to challenge a ballot when they knew of the death.
State
South Carolina
Opinion
2008-october-23-2008
Issued
October 23, 2008
Issued by
Office of the South Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
Marci Andino, Executive Director, South Carolina State Election Commission

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2008. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official South Carolina Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed South Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The State Election Commission asked whether an absentee ballot returned on time should be counted when the voter died before election day. The South Carolina Attorney General's office concluded in 2008 that the ballot was subject to challenge. It reasoned, relying on decisions and opinions from other states, that an absentee ballot was prepared earlier but officially cast on election day; by then the deceased voter lacked elector qualifications.

The opinion drew a procedural distinction. Poll managers did not have a general duty to verify that every absentee voter remained alive. But if a manager learned of a particular voter's death before the election, the opinion read the challenge statute as requiring that manager to challenge the ballot. The challenged ballot would then be handled under the cited challenge procedure, rather than opened and counted with unchallenged ballots.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2008. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Was a timely returned absentee ballot automatically counted after the voter died?

The AG said the ballot was subject to challenge if the voter died before election day. Timely return did not settle the voter's eligibility on the day the ballot was officially cast under the opinion's analysis.

Did election managers have to check every absentee voter's vital status?

No. The opinion found no general duty to make that investigation for every ballot.

What if a manager knew the voter had died?

The office said the manager had a duty to challenge the ballot under the cited statute, and the ballot would follow the challenge procedure.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion found no South Carolina statute or decision directly answering the death-before-election question. It quoted State ex rel. Peacock v. Latham from Florida on absentee ballots being cast on election day. S.C. Code Ann.§ 7-15-420 described tabulation and handling of challenged absentee ballots. The office read section 7-13-810 as assigning a challenge duty when managers knew or suspected a voter was unqualified and section 7-13-830 as providing the process for a challenged ballot.

Citations and references

  • S.C. Code Ann.§ 7-15-420: absentee ballot tabulation and challenge handling.
  • section 7-13-810: challenges to votes of potentially unqualified voters.
  • section 7-13-830: procedure for a challenged ballot.
  • State ex rel. Peacock v. Latham, 170 So. 475 (Fla. 1936): election-day timing relied on by the opinion.

Official title

Questioning as to “whether or not to count an absentee ballot cast by a voter who died after submitting the ballot.”

Requester

Marci Andino, Executive Director, South Carolina State Election Commission

Source

Original opinion text

H EN RY M CMASTER
ATrORNEY G ENERA L

October 23, 2008

Marci Andino, Executive Director
South Carolina State Election Commission
Post Office Box 5987
Columbia, South Carolina 29250
Dear Ms. Andino:
We understand from your letter that you desire an opinion of this Office on behalf of the Charleston County Registration and Election Office as to "whether or not to count an absentee ballot cast by a voter who died after submitting the ballot." In addition, you provided us with the following
·
infonnation:
In this instance, the county had determined the person was a qualified elector eligible to vote using an absentee ballot for the upcoming election. The absentee ballot was returned in a timely manner. The county has since been notified of the death by a family member and the media. The SEC has the responsibility to remove the names of persons who have died from the list ofregistered voters. The SEC receives a report each month from the Bureau ofVital Statistics containing information on persons who have died. As required by SC Code of Laws Section 7-3-20(C), the executive director (state) shall delete the names of any elector who is deceased. Since the death occurred recently, we have not received notification from the Bureau of Vital Statistics at this time.

Law/Analysis
Chapter I 5 of title 7 of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2007), governing absentee registration and voting, does not specifically address how absentee ballots of deceased voters are to

REMBl;:RT c. DENNIS B UILDING

•

POST OFFICE Box 11 549

•

COLUMBIA, SC 292 J 1- 1549

•

TELEPHONE 803-734-3970

•

FACSIMLLE 803-253-6283

Ms. Andino
Page2
October 23, 2008

be handled if the voter dies prior to the date of an election. Furthermore, in our research, we were unable to find any South Carolina case law addressing this issue. While little case law exists on this matter in other jurisdictions as well, we located an opinion issued by the Florida Supreme Court in which that Court discussed when an election begins and whether or not a change in the form of a ballot may occur after absentee voting began, but before the date of the election. State ex rel. Peacock v. Latham, 170 So. 475 (Fla. 1936). In discussing when an election begins, the Court commented as follows: The Constitution (article 18, § 9) provides that the general election shall be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November and not at any other time. No ballots have been cast nor will be cast by absentee voters until that date arrives. The law has merely provided for the accommodation of those who will not be present at their respective election precincts on that day that they may prepare a ballot which will be cast for them on that day, but, if a person preparing such a ballot and depositing it to be cast as the law directs should die before election day, the authority vested in the county judge to cast that ballot for such elector will cease to exist, and so also if, after preparing such a ballot to be cast in the general election, that proposed elector should be convicted of a felony, his right to suffrage will cease and his ballot cannot lawful,ly be cast. Id. at 480. The Kentucky Attorney General addressed whether the absentee ballot of a deceased voter may be counted in a opinion issued in 1977. Op. Ky. Atty. Gen., November 3, 1977. First, the Kentucky Attorney General stated "the general rule is that absentee ballots are considered as being cast on election day even through they are actually voted prior to that time." Id. Moreover, the Kentucky Attorney General relied on the language quoted above in Peacock in forming the following conclusion:
[S]ince a voter who dies before the election obviously cannot vote on election day, such person would not at that time retain the qualifications for voting eligiblity required under § 145 of the Constitution and KRS 116.025 and would not remain a legally registered voter under KRS 116.045. Under the circumstances, we believe that where a person applies for an absentee ballot and proceeds to vote and return the ballot to the clerk's office by mail as the statutes require but dies before election

Ms. Andino
Page3
October 23, 2008

day, such ballot should be rejected by the board when it proceeds to review and count the absent votes under KRS 117.335, upon information submitted, pursuant to a written challenge or by the board's own information, to the effect that the absent voter was deceased.

In South Carolina, the November general election is set by statute. See S.C. Code Ann. § 713-10 (1976). Thus, we presume a South Carolina court would conclude that even though absentee ballots are prepared and received prior to the date of the election, they are not officially cast until election day. If the voter submitting the absentee ballot dies prior to the date of the election, the voter lacks the qualifications to be an elector. See S.C. Code Ann. § 7-3-20(C)(2)(a) (Supp. 2007) (calling for the executive director of the election commission to remove deceased voters from the master file of qualified electors); § 7-5-340 (calling for the State Election Commission to develop a program by which qualified electors who die are removed from the list of eligible voters). Accordingly, we are of the opinion that an absentee ballot cast by a voter who dies prior to the date of the election is subject to challenge as the voter lacked the qualifications to vote when he or she cast the vote. Section 7-15-420 of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2007) governs the tabulation and reporting of absentee ballots. This provision states: The county election commission, municipal election commission, or executive committee of each municipal party in the case ofmunicipal primary elections is responsible for the tabulation and reporting of absentee ballots. At 9:00 a.m. on election day, the managers appointed pursuant to Section 7-13-70, and in the presence of any watchers who have been appointed pursuant to Section 7-13-860, may begin the process of examining the return-addressed envelopes that have been received by the county registration board making certain that each oath has been properly signed and witnessed and includes the address of the witness. All return- addressed envelopes received by the county registration board before the time for closing the polls must be examined in this manner. A ballot may not be counted unless the oath is properly signed and witnessed nor may any ballot be counted which is received by the county registration board after time for closing of the polls. The printed instructions required by Section 7-15-370(2) to be sent each absentee ballot applicant must notify him that his vote will not be counted in either of these events. If a ballot

Ms. Andino
Page4
October 23, 2008

is not challenged, the sealed return-addressed envelope must be opened by the managers, and the enclosed envelope marked "Ballot Herein" removed and placed in a locked box or boxes. After all return-addressed envelopes have been emptied in this manner, the managers shall remove the ballots contained in the envelopes marked "Ballot Herein", placing each one in the ballot box provided for the applicable contest. Beginning at 9:00 a.m. on election day, the absentee ballots may be tabulated, including any absentee ballots received on election day before the polls are closed. If any ballot is challenged, the return-addressed envelope must not be opened, but must be put aside and the procedure set forth in Section 7-13-830 must be utilized; but the absentee voter must be given reasonable notice of the challenged ballot. Results of the tabulation must not be publicly reported until after the polls are closed. S.C. Code Ann.§ 7-15-420. According to this provision, the poll managers are to count absentee ballots as long as the envelope containing the ballot includes a properly signed and witnessed oath and so long as the county registration board received the ballot prior to the time for closing of the polls. This provision does not mention a requirement that the poll manager verify the qualifications of the voter submitting the absentee ballot. Thus, we do not believe that the poll manager is responsible for verifying that the person submitting the absentee ballot is alive. However, section 7-15-420 states that if the ballot is challenged, it is not tabulated along with the other absentee ballots, but in accordance with section 7-13-830 of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2007), the ballot is treated as a provisional ballot. Furthermore, we note that section 7-13-810 of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2007) places responsibility on poll managers, electors, and poll watchers to challenge "the vote of a person who may be known or suspected not to be a qualified voter." Accordingly, while we do not believe a poll manager has the duty to verify that an absentee voter is alive, if a voter's death comes to his or her attention prior to the election, section 7-13-810 indicates that the poll manager has a duty to challenge the vote. Conclusion

Relying on the law of other jurisdictions, we believe our courts would conclude that while a voter prepares an absentee ballot prior to the date of the election, the voter does not cast the ballot until the date of the election. Because death would render a voter disqualified from voting, we believe a ballot submitted by voter who dies after submitting his or her absentee ballot, but prior to the date of the election, is subject to challenge. While we do not believe poll managers have a duty to determine whether each voter casting an absentee ballot is alive on election day, pursuant to section 7-13-810, if that manager has knowledge of an absentee voter's death, he or she is

Ms. Andino
Page 5
October 23, 2008

responsible for challenging the vote in accordance with section 7-13-830 on the basis that the voter does not meet the qualifications of an elector. Very truly yours, Henry McMaster Attorney General

"m.~

By:

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

~);),~
Robert D. Cook
Deputy Attorney General

Cydney M. Milling
Assistant Attorney General

What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2008. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace