Could a South Carolina city administrator suspend a municipal judge without pay after a citizen filed a misconduct complaint?

Plain-English summary

A municipal judge asked whether a city administrator could suspend the judge without pay after a private citizen complained to the Commission on Judicial Standards. The Attorney General said in 2005 that he knew of no such authority. The statutes he reviewed provided for municipal judges' appointment but no specific city-administrator suspension power.

The opinion placed municipal judges within South Carolina's unified judicial system and under the Supreme Court's oversight. It described Rule 502's judicial disciplinary process, including suspension by the Supreme Court as a possible sanction. The AG concluded that any suspension on the facts posed would be considered through those disciplinary rules, rather than imposed by the city administrator merely because a complaint had been filed.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2005. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Could a city administrator suspend a municipal judge without pay when a citizen filed a complaint?
The AG found no authority for that action.

Who oversaw discipline of municipal judges in the opinion?
The South Carolina Supreme Court, through the judicial disciplinary rules discussed by the AG.

Did the AG say that filing a complaint automatically suspended the judge?
No. He described suspension as a possible sanction under the disciplinary process, not an automatic consequence of a complaint.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion cited municipal court statutes and the term provision for appointed municipal judges. It used the magistrate suspension statute by analogy and then turned to Rule 502's coverage of judicial officers and available discipline.

Citations and references

• Section 14-25-15: municipal judge appointment and term provision.
• § 22-1-30: magistrate suspension provision used by analogy.
• Rule 502, SCACR: judicial disciplinary rules applied to municipal judges.

Official title

Questioning whether a city administrator has the authority to suspend a municipal judge without pay in circumstances where a private citizen files a compliant with the Commission on Judicial Standards against the judge.

Requester

The Honorable Johnnie C. Edwards, Municipal Judge, City of Chester

Source

• Landing page: https://www.scag.gov/opinions/opinions-archive/november-17-2005/
• Original PDF: https://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/05nov17edwards.pdf

Original opinion text

I ,

{

The State of South Carolina

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
HENRY Mc.MAsn:R
ATT'ORNEY GENERAL

i
I

November 17, 2005

The Honorable Johnnie C. Edwards
Municipal Judge, City of Chester
523 McNinch Drive
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Dear Judge Edwards:

In a letter to this office you questioned whether a city administrator has the authority to suspend a municipal judge without pay in circumstances where a private citizen files a complaint with the Commission on Judicial Standards against the judge. I am unaware of any such authority. S.C. Code Ann. §§ 14-25-5 et seq. generally provide for the establishment of municipal courts in this State. A municipal judge is appointed pursuant to Section 14-25-15 " ... for a term set by the council of not less than two years but not more than four years and until his successor is appointed and qualified." No specific statutory provisions provide for the suspension of a municipal judge. However, by way of analogy, S.C. Code Ann. § 22-1-30 provides that a magistrate, a judicial office of similar jurisdiction,
...may be suspended or removed by order of the Supreme Court pursuant to its rules for incapacity, misconduct, or neglect of duty. A magistrate's failure to retire in accordance with Section 22-1-25 or a magistrate's failure to comply with the training and examination requirements of Section 22-1-1 0( C) may subject the magistrate to suspension or removal by order of the Supreme Court. Rule 502 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules set forth the Rules for Judicial Disciplinary Enforcement. A municipal judge as a judicial officer is subject to Rule 502, SCACR. Rule 2(r) of Rule 502, SCA CR defines a judge as " ... anyone, whether or not a lawyer, who is an officer ofthe unified judicial system, and who is eligible to perform judicial functions, including an officer such as a magistrate, master-in-equity or special referee, is a judge within the meaning of these rules. " As stated in a prior opinion of this office dated September 11 , 2003:

.. .it must be remembered that Article V ofthe South Carolina Constitution places the Municipal Courts, including the Municipal Judges thereof under the auspices and
• }

Ra.f!.£RYC.

~ BUil.DING • POST OFFICE Box 11 549 • CowMBlA. S.C. 29211 · 1549 • TEl..EPHONE 803-734-3970 • FACSIMILE: 803-253-6283

~.,-ti- ('YJ777,i

The Honorable Johnnie C. Edwards
Page2
November 17, 2005

control of the Supreme Court of South Carolina as part of the unified judicial system. Pursuant to Article V authority, the Supreme Court disciplines municipal judges for violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct. See, e.g., In the Matter of Martin, 315 S.C. 370, 434 S.E.2d 262 (1993); In the Matter of Derrick, 301S.C.367, 352 S.E.2d 180 (1990). And the Supreme Court maintains oversight over the Municipal Court and its judges as it does any other court in the unified judicial system.

I
I

Among the possible sanctions for misconduct by a judge is suspension by the Supreme Court. See: Rule 7(b)(2), Rule 502. SCACR. Consistent with the above, I am unaware of any authority for a city administrator to suspend a municipal judge without pay in circumstances where a private citizen files a complaint with the Commission on Judicial Standards against the judge. Instead, any such suspension would be a matter for consideration pursuant to the Rules for Judicial Disciplinary Enforcement.

If there are any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,

cttv-f,.,P'(b J._
Charles H. Richardson
Senior Assistant Attorney General
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

db
W 50; ~,.,£:
~r
Assistant Deputy Attorney General