Could Winnsboro ticket a driver for a loud car radio under its sound-amplification permit ordinance?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2004. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
Winnsboro’s municipal judge asked whether police could ticket drivers for loud car radios under an ordinance requiring permits for public-address systems and sound-amplification equipment on town streets. The AG said the undefined equipment term did not appear to include an ordinary car radio. The ordinance’s written application asked for a planned purpose, date, time, and location, which fit public-address uses better than car-radio operation.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 2004. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Was a loud car radio covered by the permit ordinance?
A: The AG said it did not appear to be covered as sound-amplification equipment.
Q: Why did the permit language matter?
A: The AG said an application specifying the time, purpose, and place of use pointed to equipment such as a public-address system.
Q: Did the opinion address every possible noise law?
A: No. It interpreted the identified Winnsboro ordinance, not other possible rules.
Background and statutory framework
The ordinance named public-address systems and sound-amplification equipment but did not define the latter term. The AG interpreted it in context with the required written permit and concluded that a car radio did not fit.
Citations
Source
- Landing page: https://www.scag.gov/opinions/opinions-archive/march-30-2004-1/
- Original PDF: https://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/04fmarch30johnson.pdf
Original opinion text
The State of South Carolina
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
HENRY Mc:MAs'rER
March 30, 2004
ATfORNEY GENERAL
The Honorable Faye Johnson
Municipal Judge, Town of Winnsboro
Post Office Box 209
Winnsboro, South Carolina 29180
Dear Judge Johnson:
In a letter to this office you questioned whether police officers may ticket drivers pursuant to Winnsboro city ordinance 7-2001 for playing a car radio too loud. Such ordinance provides that
'
;
'
la-o
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate or play any public address system or sound amplification equipment upon the streets of the town for the purpose of advertising, making announcements, playing music, amplifying political speeches or announcements, or for any other purpose whatsoever unless and until the person has obtained from the town manager a written permit to operate or use the system or equipment. The permit issued by the manager may be unlimited or limited as to the date, time and area during which the equipment may be used. Application for permission to use any sound equipment must be in writing and set forth the name of applicant, for what purpose equipment will be used, the time and date when the equipment will be used, whether the eq'uipment will be mobile or stationary, and where it will be operated within the town.
As to your situation regarding playing a car radio, for purposes of the referenced ordinance, a radio would have to come within the definition of "sound amplification equipment". The term "sound amplification equipment" is not separately defined by the ordinance. However, other provisions of the ordinance are useful in arriving at an understanding as to what type of equipment is probably contemplated by such term. As set forth by the ordinance, in order to use such equipment, a written permit must be obtained. That permit application must specify the time and date the equipment will be used, the purpose for use and specify whether the equipment will be mobile or stationary. Such characteristics do not appear to support the construction of the term "sound amplification equipment" as including a car radio. Moreover, the term "sound amplification equipment" is compared to a public address system, a type of equipment more in keeping with the
/,A, .... ~~~ING
• Posr OmcE Box 11549 • CoWMBv.. s.c. 29211-1549 • TEl.EPHON.C: 803-734-3970 • FACSIMILE: 803-253-6283
The Honorable Faye Johnson
Page 2
March 30, 2004
requirements set forth regarding the obtaining of a permit, specifying the use of the equipment, and whether the equipment will be mobile or stationery. Therefore, in my opinion, it does not appear that a car radio would come within the definition of"sound amplification equipment" for purposes of the referenced ordinance. Sincerely,
I
I
m~11aSL_
Charles H. Richardson
Senior Assistant Attorney General
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
~J2=1~
Robert D. Cook
Assistant Deputy Attorney General
What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2004. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace