Could a South Carolina town impose council term limits by ordinance or local referendum?

Plain-English summary

The Attorney General concluded that a South Carolina municipal council could not impose term limits on its own members by ordinance or local referendum. It reasoned that the legislature created municipal councils and had not delegated power to them to limit members' service.

The opinion also rejected a proposed route specific to Edisto Beach: a local legislative grant of term-limit authority to that town would be an unconstitutional special law, in the office's view. It distinguished that from a statewide statutory change, which it said the General Assembly could make.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2010. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could a town council adopt term limits for its members by ordinance? A: The opinion said no, because council lacked legislative authority to limit its own members' terms.

Q: Would putting the same limit to a town referendum solve the authority problem? A: No. The office said the answer was the same whether the proposed method was ordinance or referendum.

Q: Could the legislature authorize Edisto Beach alone to enact term limits? A: The opinion said a town-specific grant would be an unconstitutional special law, while a statewide statutory grant remained possible.

Background and statutory framework

Edisto Beach's counsel asked about local term limits and a possible special statute authorizing only the town to adopt them. The office applied earlier county-council term-limit opinions to municipal councils and considered state constitutional limits on special laws.

Citations and references

The original text below discusses S.C. Code§ 5-7-160, S.C. Const. Art. VIII, § 7, and Art. III, § 34.

Source

• Landing page: https://www.scag.gov/opinions/opinions-archive/march-26-2010/
• Original PDF: https://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/duffie-e-o-iii-os-9022-3-26-10-term-limits-municipal-council.pdf

Original opinion text

HENRY MCMASTER
ATTORNEY G ENERAL

March 26, 2010

Elbert 0. Duffie, Ill, General Counsel
Town of Edisto Beach
P. 0. Box 1215
Walterboro, South Carolina 29488
Dear Mr. Duffie:
We received your letter requesting an opinion of this Office concerning term limits for a municipal council. You asked ''whether a municipal council in the State of South Carolina can enact term limits on its council members, whether the method be by ordinance or by referendum vote." You also asked, " if the answer to the previous question is no, ... [can] the General Assembly[,] by local legislation, grant the Town of Edisto Beach the ability to enact an ordinance establishing term limits for its council members." As noted in your request, prior opinions ofthis Office have addressed the question of whether term limits can be enacted. This opinion will address those prior opinions regarding term limits for council members, as well as other relevant opinions, caselaw, and statutes. Law/Analysis

On numerous occasions, we have opined that county councils do not have the authority to set term limits forits members. SeeM:_, Ops. S.C. Atty. Gen., July21, 2009; August 14, 1995; June24, 1993. In Hospitality Ass'n of South Carolina. Inc. v. County of Charleston, 320 S.C. 219, 464 S.E.2d 113 (l 995), the South Carolina Supreme Court provides background information on local government authority. "For generations, legislative delegations ofthe General Assembly controlled virtually every aspect oflocal government." Hospitality Ass'n, 320 S.C. 219, 224. However, a study committee was created in the mid-1960s to recommend amendments to the Constitution. By 1969, the Committee decided to amend the Constitution and "place the control and management of county and municipal affairs in the hands of duly elected local officials." Hospitality Ass'n, 320 S.C. at 224-25. Although the General Assembly adopted what is popularly referred to as "home rule," Art VIII of the South Carolina Constitution "left it up to the General Assembly to decide what powers local governments should have. Id. at 225-26. Therefore, the General Assembly, acting under its authority, "enacted various statutes regarding the powers of counties and municipalities." Id.

REMBERT

c. DENNIS B UlLOING • POST OFFICE Box 11549 • COLUMBIA , SC 29211- 1549 • TELEPHONE 803-734-3970 • FACSJM!LE 803-253-6283

Mr. Duffie
Page2
March 26, 2010

Article I, section 5 of the South Carolina Constitution (2009) provides that: All elections shall be free and open, and every inhabitant of this State possessing the qualifications provided for in this Constitution shall have an equal right to elect officers and be elected to fill public office. While the Supreme Court has held in McClure v. McElroy, 211 S.C. 106, 44 S.E.2d 101 (1947) that the constitutional provision quoted above only applies to constitutionally created offices, it has been repeatedly recognized that "an office created by legislative action is wholly within the control of the Legislature."Op. Atty. Gen., July 21, 2009. County councils were "created by the Legislature and the Legislature did not provide for term limits[;]" therefore, county councils do " not have the authority to impose term limits. Op. Atty. Gen., July21, 2009 (quotingMcLure, 211S.C.106, 117). In another opinion of this Office dated June 24, 1993, we concluded that the General Assembly did not enact term limits, therefore the council itself may not enact term limits. We analyzed that position as follows: The General Assembly created the [office] of county council ... pursuant to the Home Rule Act, Act No. 283 of 1975 .... Section 4-9-90 sets the term of office for county council members at either two or four years. However, neither § 4-9-90 nor any other Code section specifies a limit on the number of terms or number of years which a county council member may serve. Thus, we conclude that the General Assembly has not limited the length of service of a county council member. We can locate no express authority for a county council
... to adopt such a limitation on service on a county council. Thus, we must conclude that a county council would not have the statutory authority to limit the number of terms or number of years which a county council member might serve. Under S.C. Code§ 5-7-160, the General Assembly deemed that powers of municipalities are vested in their councils. Hence, city councils, town councils, and county councils alike were all established by the General Assembly though general law. Hence, the Edisto Beach Town Council, like the county councils mentioned in the July 21, 2009 and June 24, 1993 opinions, lacks the authority to establish term limits for its council members. As for the second question, "nothing would prevent [the General Assembly from enacting] statutory authority limiting the terms of council members." Op. Atty. Gen., June 24, 1993. However, such a change would have to be made state-wide; the General Assembly could not specifically grant the Town of Edisto Beach authority to enact such an ordinance. The South Carolina Constitution explains that"[ n ]o laws for a specific county shall be enacted and no county shall be exempted from the general laws." S.C. Const. Art. VIII,§ 7. The Constitution further explains that special laws are usually prohibited; "where a general law can be made applicable, no special law shall be enacted." S.C. Const. Art. III, § 34.

Mr. Duffie
Page3
March 26, 2010

Conclusion
Based on the reasoning presented in prior opinions of this Office, we believe that because municipal councils were created by the Legislature, only the Legislature may limit the number of terms a member might serve. A municipal council does not have the authority to enact term limits on its council members, regardless of the method - by ordinance or referendum vote. The General Assembly is unable to grant the Town of Edisto Beach special authority to enact a term limit ordinance because doing so would be classified as the creation of a special law and therefore unconstitutional. S.C. Const. Art. VIII, § 7 and Art. III, § 34. Sincerely, Henry McMaster Attorney General

By:

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

/Jv?vl' ;91 UrJh__. .
Robert D. Cook
Deputy Attorney General

Leigha Blackwell
Assistant Attorney General