How did the 1998 South Carolina AG say Duncan Chapel Fire District should fill a board vacancy?

Short answer The 1998 AG said the vacant elected seat should be filled by election for the rest of the term. Because the district's founding acts gave no vacancy procedure, it applied the general special-district rule and favored a special election rather than waiting for the next general election.
State
South Carolina
Opinion
1998-march-26-1998
Issued
March 26, 1998
Issued by
Office of the South Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
The Honorable Dwight A. Loftis, Member, House of Representatives

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official South Carolina Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed South Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A legislator asked how to fill a vacancy on Duncan Chapel Fire District's Board of Fire Control. The Attorney General said the district's 1970 and 1974 acts established elected board seats but supplied no vacancy rule. The general rule in Section 8-1-150 therefore required filling the remainder of the unexpired term in the same manner as the original election.

The AG then favored a special election, rather than leaving the position open until the next general election, because no district act chose between those timings and prior AG opinions favored filling public offices promptly. It pointed to Section 7-13-190 for special election procedures. The letter was informal and reflected the law as discussed in 1998.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1998. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could the fire board appoint someone to the vacant elected seat?
A: The AG said the general vacancy rule called for filling it in the same manner as the original election.

Q: Why did the letter favor a special election?
A: The creating acts gave no timing rule, and the AG relied on public policy favoring a prompt successor to a vacant office.

Q: Would the winner serve a new full term?
A: No. The provision quoted in the opinion addressed the remainder of the unexpired term.

Background and statutory framework

Acts No. 1027 of 1970 and No. 1085 of 1974 created and modified the district board without specifying how to fill vacancies. The opinion applied Section 8-1-150's general special-district vacancy rule and referred to Section 7-13-190 for election procedure.

Citations and references

  • Section 8-1-150, the general vacancy provision quoted by the AG.
  • Section 7-13-190, identified for special election procedures.
  • Act No. 1027 of 1970 and Act No. 1085 of 1974, the district's enabling acts.

Official title

As to the proper procedures to be followed in filling a vacancy on the Board of Fire Control for the Duncan Chapel Fire District.

Requester

The Honorable Dwight A. Loftis, Member, House of Representatives

Source

Original opinion text

The State of South Carolina

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
CHARLES MOLONY CONDON
ATTORNEY GENERAL

March 26, 1998

The Honorable Dwight A. Loftis
Member, House of Representatives
540 Sulpher Springs Road
Greenville, South Carolina 29611
Re:

Informal Opinion

Dear Representative Loftis:
Your opinion request has been forwarded to me for reply. You have asked for an opinion as to the proper procedures to be followed in filling a vacancy on the Board of Fire Control for the Duncan Chapel Fire District. In 1970, the General Assembly provided authority to conduct a referendum to create the Duncan Chapel Fire District in Greenville County and to provide for its creation in the event of a favorable vote. Act No. 1027 of 1970. The Act also established a board of fire control to be comprised of five members who shall be elected for terms of six years. Act No. 1027, Section 4. The Act was amended by Act No. 1085 of 1974. This Act altered the length of the term of office for the members elected in the 1974 general election. Unfortunately, neither of these acts provide a method for filling a vacancy in the office of board member. Thus, to find an answer to your question, attention must be focused on other provisions of law.

Problems, such as the one raised in your request, have been addressed by this Office in prior legal opinions. Specifically, in an opinion dated March 5, 1987, this Office was asked the proper procedure to fill a vacancy in the North Greenville Fire District's governing body. The enabling legislation of this District, like that of the Duncan Chapel Fire District, did not contain authority regarding the filling of vacancies on the board. This Office thoroughly researched the question and concluded that the law did not provide authority for the election or appointment of an individual to fill the

0.

REMBERT

c. DENN~UILI~~?

•

POST OFFICE Box 11549

. ·1cjf:vz.c J/ c. ~c.cLt'zc

•

COLUMBIA,

s.c. 29211-1549

•

TELEPHONE:

803-734-3970

•

FACSIMILE: 803-253-6283

The Honorable Dwight A. Loftis
Page 2
March 26, 1998
vacancy and, therefore, the best way to resolve this dilemma may be by the adoption of a general law by the General Assembly providing for the filling of such vacancies. The General Assembly provided clarification in this area through Section 8-1-150 of the South Carolina Code of Laws. This section provides:

I

Whenever a vacancy occurs in the membership of the governing body of a special purpose district or public service district, and the duties of the governing body are proscribed by law, and there is no provision for filling the vacancy, it must be filled in the same manner of original appointment or election for the remainder of the unexpired term. Having clarified that the remainder of the unexpired term is to be filled by election, a determination must now be made as to whether the vacancy should be filled by special election or at the next general election. The law generally abhors vacancies in public office. Op. Atty. Gen. dated August 20, 1986. In the event of a vacancy in office and the procedure for filling such vacancy is not specifically dictated by law, public policy supports the right of the people to elect a successor as soon as possible. Op. Atty. Gen. dated April 2, 1997. Based on the foregoing, it is my opinion that where, as here, the General Assembly has not specified whether the vacancy should be filled by special election or at the next general election, public policy would support a conclusion that the vacancy should be filled by special election. The procedures to be followed in conducting a special election are found in Section 7-13-190 of the Code of Laws.

I

This letter is an informal opinion only. It has been written by a designated assistant attorney general and represents the position of the undersigned attorney as to the specific questions asked. It has not, however, been personally scrutinized by the Attorney General nor officially published in the manner of a formal opinion. With kindest regards, I remain Very truly yours,

7JA!(J
Paul M. Koch
Assistant Attorney General

What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1998. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace