Could South Carolina’s Manufactured Housing Board require continuing education to renew licenses?

Short answer The 2017 AG opinion said the board had express and implied authority to require continuing education for licensed manufactured home retail dealers, salespersons, contractors, installers, and repairers. It found no conflict between that authority and the manufactured housing code.
State
South Carolina
Opinion
2017-march-20-2017
Issued
March 20, 2017
Issued by
Office of the South Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
The Honorable Chip Huggins, Member, South Carolina House of Representatives.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2017. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official South Carolina Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed South Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

In 2017, a South Carolina House member asked whether the Manufactured Housing Board could require continuing education for retail dealers, salespersons, contractors, installers, and repairers to keep their licenses. The Attorney General said yes. It read the general licensing board statute as expressly empowering the board to set continuing education requirements, and found implied authority to carry out its licensing duties as well.

The AG also said the manufactured housing code did not conflict with that general board power. It connected the proposed training requirement to the legislature's stated concern for safety and fair business practices in the industry. The opinion addressed the board's authority to adopt a requirement, rather than the details of any particular course or rule.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2017. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could the board require training as a condition of continued licensure?
A: The AG said the 2017 statutes gave it that authority.

Q: Did the manufactured housing code override the general board authority?
A: The opinion found no conflict between them on continuing education.

Q: Did the opinion prescribe a course or number of hours?
A: No. It answered the board's authority question.

Background and statutory framework

The AG read general regulatory board powers alongside the Uniform Standards Code for Manufactured Housing. It concluded the board had both an express power to require continuing education and powers implied by its licensing responsibilities.

Citations and references

  • The conclusion said S.C. Code Ann. § 40-1-70(5) provided authority “to mandate continuing education requirements.”
  • It said the manufactured housing code did not conflict with that provision.

Official title

On continuing education requirements for manufactured housing licenses (S.C. Code Ann. Sections 40-29-5 to -380).

Requester

The Honorable Chip Huggins, Member, South Carolina House of Representatives.

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain — the linked PDF is authoritative.

ALAN WILSON
ATTORNEY GENERAL

March 20, 2017

The Honorable Chip Huggins, Member
South Carolina House of Representatives
District No. 85

308 Wayworth Court

Columbia, SC 29212

Dear Representative Huggins:

Attorney General Alan Wilson has referred your letter dated February 23, 2017 to the Opinions section for a response. According to your letter, you request an opinion regarding whether the South Carolina Manufactured Housing Board (SCMHB) has statutory authority to require licensed manufactured home retail dealers, retail salespersons, contractors, installers, and repairers (“Licensees”) to complete continuing education requirements in order to maintain their respective manufactured housing licenses. By way of background, you explained that the SCMHB desires to require continuing education requirements for its Licensees as a condition of continued licensure. You explained that as the quantity and complexity of rules and regulations applicable to the manufactured housing industry, and therefore to its Licensees, has significantly increased in recent years, in addition to significant safety issues in the industry both to the public as well as to the Licensees, the SCMHB believes it would be not only beneficial, but also prudent, to mandate continuing education requirements for its Licensees.

The South Carolina Manufactured Housing industry is administered by the Division of Professional and Occupational Licensing, South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation (LLR)' and governed by the South Carolina Uniform Standards Code for Manufactured Housing.’ Unless otherwise provided in the Uniform Standards Code for Manufactured Housing, Board regulation of professions and occupations® specifically applies to the regulation of manufactured home manufacturers, retail dealers, sales persons, and contractors, installers, and repairers. S.C. Code Ann. § 40-29-5. In the event of conflict between the South Carolina Uniform Standards Code for Manufactured Housing and Board regulation of professions and occupations,’ the provisions of the Uniform Standards Code for Manufactured Housing control. S.C. Code Ann. § 40-29-5.

' S.C. Code Ann. § 40-1-40.

? Uniform Standards Code for Manufactured Housing, S.C. Code Ann. §§ 40-29-5 to -380.
> See S.C. Code Ann. §§ 40-1-10 to -220.
‘ia,

ReniBert C. DENNIS BUILDING * Post OFFICE Box 11549 + COLUMBIA, SC 29211-1549 TELEPHONE 803-734-3970» FACSIMILE 803-253-6283

The Honorable Chip Huggins
Page 2
March 20, 2017

With regard to your question concerning whether the SCMHB has authority to require licensed manufactured housing retail dealers, retail salespersons, contractors, installers, and repairers to complete continuing education requirements in order to maintain their required manufactured housing licenses,’ we look to relevant statutory authority. First, we note that S.C. Code Ann. § 40-1-70, which addresses the powers and duties of regulatory boards and specifically applies to the SCMHB,’ provides:

The powers and duties of regulatory boards include, but are not limited to: (1) determining the eligibility of applicants for examination and licensure;

(2) examining applicants for licensure including, but not limited to: (a) prescribing the subjects, character, and manner of licensing examinations; (b) preparing, administering, and grading the examination or assisting in the selection of a contractor for the preparation, administration, or grading of the examination;

(3) establishing criteria for issuing, renewing, and reactivating the authorizations to practice of qualified applicants, including the issuance of active or permanent, temporary, limited, and inactive licenses, or other categories as may be created;

(4) adopting a code of professional ethics appropriate to the profession or occupation which it licenses or regulates;

(5) evaluating and approving continuing education course hours and programs;

(6) conducting hearings on alleged violations of this article and regulations promulgated under this article;

(7) resolving consumer complaints, where appropriate and possible;

(8) disciplining persons licensed under this article in a manner provided for in this article;

(9) promulgating regulations which have been submitted to the director, at least thirty days in advance of filing with Legislative Council as required by Section 1-23-30.

S.C. Code Ann. § 40-1-70 (emphasis added). As this Office has noted, “[t]he cardinal rule of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to legislative intent,” and “[t]ypically

5 §.C. Code Ann. § 40-29-30 provides licensure requirements for manufactured home retail dealers, salespersons, manufacturers, contractors, installers, and repairers.
® S.C. Code Ann. § 40-1-40(B).

The Honorable Chip Huggins
Page 3
March 20, 2017

legislative intent is determined by applying the words used by the General Assembly in their usual and ordinary significance.” E.g., Op. S.C. Att'y Gen., 2010 WL 4391640 (Oct. 7, 2010) (internal citations omitted). Accordingly, it is this Office's Opinion that the plain words of the statute provide authority for the SCMHB to require licensed manufactured home retail dealers, retail salespersons, contractors, installers, and repairers to complete continuing education requirements in order to maintain their required manufactured housing licenses.

Further, the Uniform Standards Code for Manufactured Housing enumerates the applicant requirements for licensure as follows: “An applicant for licensure shall:

(1) demonstrate financial responsibility as required by Section 40-29-95;

(2) for a retail dealer, provide a financial statement reviewed by a licensed certified public accountant;

(3) not have engaged illegally in the licensed classification;

(4) demonstrate familiarity with the regulations adopted by the board concerning the classification for which application is made;

(5) if a corporation, have complied with the laws of South Carolina regarding qualification for doing business in this State or have been incorporated in South Carolina and have and maintain a registered agent and a registered office in this State;

(6) submit proof of registration with the Department of Revenue and submit a current tax identification number;

(7) where applicable, pass an examination administered by the board or its designated test provider in the license classification for which application is made;

(8) where applicable, complete training as described by the board.”

S.C. Code Ann. § 40-29-200(B)(1)-(8) (emphasis added). Also, the statutory scheme governing the manufacturing housing industry further contemplates training in the industry, as it provides that “[nJo manufactured home retail dealer or salesperson, contractor, installer, or repairer may be issued a license until the person or representative of the entity successfully completes any training prescribed by the board.” S.C. Code Ann. § 40-29-210(D). While technically applicable to license applicants, S.C. Code Ann. § 40- 29-200(B)(8) and § 40-29- 210(D) demonstrate a legislative intent to promote training in the industry, as opposed to contradicting any training requirements, making application of these statutes to license renewals, as well as applicants, rational and- compliant with legislative intent.

The Honorable Chip Huggins
Page 4
March 20, 2017

Additionally, the South Carolina General Assembly has declared, due to the possible “hazards to the life and safety of persons and to the safety of property unless properly manufactured,” as well as “the possibility of defects not readily ascertainable when inspected by purchasers,” it to be “the policy and purpose of this State to provide protection to the public against those possible hazards and for that purpose to forbid the manufacture and sale of new manufactured homes which are not constructed so as to provide safety and protection to their owners and users and further to require that the business practices of the industry are fair and orderly.” §.C. Code Ann. § 40-29-330. Thus, the SCMHB's proposed implementation of mandatory continued education requirements for its Licensees also comports with South Carolina’s policy to protect the public from the possible hazards to life, safety, and property from manufactured homes which are not safely and properly constructed, see S.C. Code Ann.
§ 40-29-330, as well as the purpose of the various professional and occupational licensing boards within the LLR, which is to “protect the public at large through the regulation of professional and occupational licensees and the administration of boards charged with the regulation of professional and occupational as ” §.C. Code Ann. § 40-1-40 (2011 & Supp. 2015).

In a somewhat comparable situation, this Office rendered an Opinion concerning the South Carolina Nursing Board’s authority to require licensed nurses in South Carolina to submit to a state and federal finger-print based criminal background check. Op. S.C. Att'y Gen., 2010 WL 3505055 (Aug. 30, 2010). In that Opinion, we enumerated the powers and duties of regulatory boards, as set forth i in S.C. Code § 40-1-70, as well as additional powers and duties of the Board of Nursing.’ We particularly noted that the powers and duties of the Board of Nursing included, inter alia, the authority to “develop minimum standards for continued competency of licensees continuing in or returning to practice;” “use minimum standards as a basis for evaluating safe and effective nursing practice;” and “collect any information the board considers necessary, including social security numbers or alien identification numbers, in order to report disciplinary actions to national databanks of disciplinary in formation.” S.C. Code § 40-33-10(1)(2),(8),(1 1) (Supp. 2009). We determined, based on, inter alia, the powers and duties of the Board of Nursing cited supra, that the South Carolina Nursing Board “implicitly ha[d] the authority to require licensed nurses to participate in a finger-print based criminal records check.” Op. S.C. Att'y Gen., 2010 WL 3505055 at 3 (Aug. 30, 2010). We further stated that “[t]he authority of an administrative body to enact rules and regulations within the scope of the law governing the administrative agency is clearly established.” Id. at 2. In the Opinion of this Office, the SCMHB plainly has authority to require continuing legal education for its Licensees pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 40-1-70(5). Furthermore, the SCMHB has such authority implicitly as well, as “it is not to be doubted that [a governmental body of limited powers] possesses not merely the powers which in terms are conferred upon it, but also such powers as must be inferred or implied in order to enable the agency to effectively exercise the express powers admittedly possessed by it.” Beard-Laney, Inc. v. Darby, 213 S.C. 380, 389, 49 S.E.2d 564, 567 (1948).

7 §.C. Code § 40-33-10(1).

The Honorable Chip Huggins
Page 5
March 20, 2017

Conclusion

It is the opinion of this Office that the plain words of the statute, S.C. Code Ann. § 40-1- 70(5), which express clear legislative intent, provide the SCMHB authority to mandate continuing education requirements for its Licensees. It is also our opinion that the South Carolina Uniform Standards Code for Manufactured Housing do not conflict with S.C. Code Ann. § 40-1-70(5). Furthermore, in this Office's opinion, the SCMHB also possesses implicit authority to mandate such continuing education requirements as such power is necessary in order to effectively exercise its express powers.

Sincerely,

“Robert D. Cook
Solicitor General

What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2017. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace