Which general election would carry a Summerville referendum on Sunday alcohol permits under the 2002 law?

Short answer The 2002 AG said the referendum belonged at the next available state, county, or municipal general election in which Summerville’s registered voters could participate. It did not have to wait specifically for the next municipal election.
State
South Carolina
Opinion
2002-july-24-2002
Issued
July 24, 2002
Issued by
Office of the South Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
The Honorable Converse A. Chellis, III, Member, House of Representatives

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2002. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official South Carolina Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed South Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

After Summerville received a petition for a Sunday alcohol-permit referendum, a legislator asked what “next general election” meant. The State Election Commission had pointed to the city's May election. In a July 2002 informal opinion, the AG read the statute more broadly: the referendum should appear at the next available state, county, or municipal general election in which the municipality's registered voters were eligible to vote.

The letter relied on the election-law definition of “general election,” which included regular elections for state, federal, county, municipal, and other offices. It applied that definition because the alcohol statute itself directed that state election laws govern the referendum.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2002. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Did the referendum have to wait for Summerville's next municipal election? A: No. The AG said the next qualifying state or county general election could also carry it.

Q: Would any election count as a “general election”?
A: The opinion used the state election-law definition and focused on a regular general election open to the municipality's registered voters.

Q: What triggered the referendum timing rule?
A: The letter addressed the statute's requirement after a municipality received a proper petition.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion interpreted §61-6-2010's “next general election” language through Section 7-1-20(1)'s definition. It concluded that Summerville's voters could participate in Dorchester County and statewide general elections as well as a town election.

Citations and references

  • §61-6-2010: alcohol-permit referendum.
  • Section 7-1-20(1): general-election definition.

Source

Original opinion text

The State of South Carolina

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
CHARLES M. CONDON
AITORNEY GENERAL

July 24, 2002
r

L

The Honorable Converse A. Chellis, III
Member, House of Representatives
119 Parkwl10d Drive
Summerville, South Carolina 29483

Re:

Your Letter of July 17, 2002
S.C. Code Ann. §61-6-2010

Dear Representative Chellis:
In your above-referenced letter, you relate that the " ... Town of Summerville has been presented with a petition to conduct a referendum regarding the sale of alcoholic beverages on Sundays pursuant to Section 61-6-201 O." This Section of the Code requires that upon receipt of such a petition, a municipality must conduct a referendum "at the next general election." You indicate that "[t]here is considerable concern as to the interpretation of 'the next general election as used in this section.'" Given this concern and at the request of the Town Attorney for Summerville, you ask that this Office issue an opinion on the following question:

I

Where a proper petition for a referendum regarding the sale of alcoholic beverages on Sundays is received by a municipality pursuant to South Carolina Code Annotated
§61-6-2010, should the referendum be placed on the ballot for the next statewide general election, county general election or municipal general election? With your letter, you have attached materials you received from the Town Attorney and the State Election Commission. The materials indicate that the State Election Commission was presented with the same question as posed above. By letter dated July 15, 2002, the State Election Commission responded that it is their" ... position that the intent of the law is for the referendum to be conducted at the next general election held in either the municipality, county or statewide general election ... [therefore] ... since it is the city of Summerville wishing to conduct the referendum, the referendum would be placed on the ballot in May during the city's general election."

./J

REMBERT

'K<A.u,,J/;

c. DENNIS B.UILDING

/--v

,.#;;';

•

POST OFFICE B ox 11549

•

COLUMBIA, S.C. 292 11-1549

•

TELEPHONE: 803-734-3970

•

FACSIMILE: 803-253-6283

The Honorable Converse A. Chellis, III
Page 2
July 24, 2002

LawI Analysis
When interpreting the meaning of a statute, a few basic principles must be observed. The cardinal rule of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent. State v. Martin, 293 S.C. 46, 358 S.E.2d 697 (1987). Most often, legislative intent is determined by applying the words used by the General Assembly in their usual and ordinary significance. Martin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 256 S.C. 577, 183 S.E.2d 451 (1971). Resort to subtle or forced construction for the purpose of limiting or expanding the operation of a statute should not be undertaken. Walton v. Walton, 282 S.C. 165, 318 S.E.2d 14 (1984). Courts must apply the clear and unambiguous terms of a statute according to their literal meaning. State v. Blackmon, 304 S.C. 270, 403 S.E.2d 660 (1991). S.C. Code Ann. §61-6-2010 provides that the S.C. Department of Revenue may issue temporary permits to allow the possession, sale, and consumption of alcohol. Subsection (C)( 1) of 61-6-2010 provides, in pertinent part, that:

I

Permits authorized by this section may be issued only in those counties or municipalities where a majority of the qualified electors voting in a referendum vote in favor of the issuance of the permits ... The referendum must be conducted at the next general election ... The state election laws shall apply to the referendum, mutatis mutandis. (Emphasis added). Title 61 contains no definition of the term "general election." However, Section 61-6-2010 does provide that the "state election laws shall apply to the referendum." Generally, the state election laws are found in Title 7 of the Code. Within Title 7, general definitions are found in Section 7-120. Specifically, subsection 7-1-20(1) provides that '"General election' means the election provided herein to be held for the election of officers to the regular terms of office provided by law, whether State, United States, county, municipal or of any other political subdivision of the State, and for voting on constitutional amendments proposed by the General Assembly."

r

!

As Section 61-6-2010 contains no specific definition and as the state elections laws are made applicable to the referendum, it seems logical that the legislature would have intended the definition of general election contained in Section 7-1-20(1) to apply to Section 61-6-2010. It would further seem logical, consistent with the position of the State Election Commission, that the Legislature would have intended for the phrase "next general election" to mean any general election for either State, United States, county or municipal offices. Given this determination of legislative intent, it now must be determined how the statute applies to the question at hand. A similar situation has been addressed by the Tennessee Attorney General's Office. In 1982, the Tennessee Attorney General was asked the meaning of the phrase "next general election" with reference to filling vacancies on city council. The requester asked if the phrase refers only to municipal elections or to all general elections. The Tennessee Attorney General opined that the

The Honorable Converse A. Chellis, III
Page 3
July 24, 2002

phrase refers to any general election "which all registered voters in the city are eligible to participate." See TN. OP. ATTY. GEN. DATED APR1L 21, 1982 (reaffirmed August 27, 1998). This logic is compelling and seems applicable to an interpretation of S.C. Code Ann. §61-6-2010.

Conclusion

L

The Town of Summerville is part of Dorchester County and the State of South Carolina. Registered voters residing in Summerville will be eligible to vote in any countywide general election involving Dorchester County and any statewide general election. Accordingly, given the determination that the legislature intended the phrase "next general election" to mean any State, county or municipal general election, it is the opinion of this Office:- that a municipal referendum held pursuant to Section 61-6-2010 should be held at the next general election in which the registered voters of the municipality are eligible to vote. In other words, it is our opinion that upon receipt of a proper petition as provided for in Section 61-6-2010, the municipality should hold the referendum in the next available general election whether it be State, county or municipal.

David K. A vant1
Assistant Attorney General

I
DK.A/an

What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2002. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace