Could a Georgia judge lawfully officiate a marriage ceremony in South Carolina?

Short answer The AG said it knew of no authority for a Georgia judge to perform a South Carolina marriage ceremony under the cited statute. The office expressly said it could not declare the particular marriage invalid.
State
South Carolina
Opinion
2004-july-1-2004
Issued
July 1, 2004
Issued by
Office of the South Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
The Honorable Carl C. Brown, Jr., Judge Superior Courts, Augusta Judicial Circuit

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2004. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official South Carolina Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed South Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A Georgia Superior Court judge told the South Carolina Attorney General that he had performed a marriage ceremony in Aiken at a former secretary's request. The AG quoted Section 20-1-20, which limited who could administer marriage ceremonies in South Carolina, and said it knew of no authority allowing a Georgia judge to do so. It expressly declined to declare the particular marriage invalid because the office lacked that authority.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2004. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Did being a Georgia judge automatically authorize the Aiken ceremony?
A: The AG said it knew of no authority giving a Georgia judge that power under the South Carolina statute it cited.

Q: Did the opinion void the marriage that had already occurred?
A: No. The letter expressly said the AG's office could not declare a marriage invalid.

Background and statutory framework

Section 20-1-20 listed ministers of the Gospel, accepted Jewish rabbis and officers authorized to administer oaths in South Carolina as permitted officiants at the time. The letter addressed only the described out-of-state judge's authority and did not adjudicate the couple's marital status.

Citations

  • Section 20-1-20

Source

Original opinion text

The State of South Carolina

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
HENRY McMASIER

July 1, 2004

ATTORNEY GENERAL

The Honorable Carl C. Brown, Jr.
Judge Superior Courts
Augusta Judjcial Circuit
320 City-County Building (11)
Augusta, Georgia 3091 1

I

Dear Judge Brown:
In a Jetter to this office you indicated that at the request of your former secretary, as a judge, you performed a marriage ceremony in Aiken, South Carolina on April 7, 2004. According to your letterhead, you are a judge of the Superior Courts for the Augusta, Georgia Judicial Circuit.

S.C. Code Ann. Section 20-1-20 (1985) provides that "(o)nly ministers of the Gospel or accepted Jewish rabbis and officers authorized to administer oaths in this State are authorized to administer a marriage ceremony in this State." While this office has no authority to declare a marriage invalid, I am unaware of any authority providing that a Georgia judge has the power to perform a marriage in South Carolina. With kind regards, I am, Very truly yours,

(}£C<-</< f./lJ cJ-_
Charles H. Richardson
Senior Assistant Attorney General

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

IN&·~

Robert D. Cook
Assistant Deputy Attorney General

' ()I~

h I '1A

J r:!i.d61.1

~r~ERTC.

D ENNIS BUU.OING

•

POST0FFTCE 80X 11549

•

COLUMlllA, S.C. 29211-1549

•

T ELEPHONE: 803-734-3970

•

FACSIMUJ:: 803-253-6283

What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2004. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace