Could Class 3-SLE officers work crowd control, court security, and prisoner transport in 2005?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
In 2005, the Attorney General deferred to the South Carolina public safety department’s interpretation that locally commissioned Class 3-SLE officers could perform the duties listed by Norway’s police chief. Those included sporting-event and fair traffic, crowd control, courtroom security, and prisoner transport. The AG found no state statute prescribing the officers’ duties and relied on the department’s training regulation and its interpretation.
The opinion described Class 3-SLE officers as having limited powers or special duties compared with regular officers. It also said the class had custodial arrest authority, despite that narrower scope.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 2005. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Common questions
Could these officers handle sporting events and crowd control?
The AG deferred to the department’s view that they could when commissioned by their local chief.
Did the opinion include courtroom security and prisoner transport?
Yes. Those were among the specific duties in the request that the department said this class could perform.
Did limited authority mean no custodial arrest power?
No. The AG said the regulation and department’s explanation recognized custodial arrest authority, while generally limiting their duties compared with regular officers.
Background and statutory framework
The AG found no state statute setting the specific duties of Class 3-SLE officers. He quoted Department of Public Safety Regulation 38-007 (c) on approved training for officers with limited arrest powers or special duties and followed the department’s interpretation.
Citations and references
- Department of Public Safety Regulation 38-007 (c): Class 3-SLE certification provision quoted in the opinion.
Official title
Questioning whether Class 3-SLE certified police officers may be used for duties such as sporting events, crowd control, traffic at fairs, football games, court room security and transportation of prisoners.
Requester
James A. Preacher, Chief of Police, Norway Police Department
Source
- Landing page: https://www.scag.gov/opinions/opinions-archive/january-25-2005-1/
- Original PDF: https://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/05jan25-Preacher.pdf
Original opinion text
The State of South Carolina
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
fuNRY McMAsTER
ATTORNEY GENERAL
January 25, 2005
James A. Preacher, Jr., Chief of Police
Norway Police Department
P. 0. Box 127
Norway, South Carolina 29113
Dear Chief Preacher:
ii
L
In a letter to this office you questioned whether Class 3-SLE certified police officers may be used for duties such as sporting events, crowd control, traffic at fairs, football games, court room security and transportation of prisoners. Based upon my review, there are no State statutes that comment on or prescribe the duties ofthe referenced officers. Department ofPublic Safety Regulation 38-007 (c) provides that Class 3 Certifications. Candidates for basic certification as law enforcement officers with limited powers of arrest or special duties shall successfully complete a training program as approved by the Department and will be certified as Class 3-SLE.
r
l
I discussed your question with Kevin Stogner with the Department and he informed me that the Department considers Class 3-SLE police officers as having the authority to perform the duties set out by you as referenced above when they are commissioned by their local chief. This office would defer to the Department's interpretation since they are the agency that generally oversees the training requirements for these officers. As Mr. Stogner noted, by the
11 )
REMBERT
'P?tK-1 /A~
I
C.· D~IS B UUDING • POST OFFICE Box 11 549 • C OWMSIA, s.c. 292 11-1549 • TELEPHONE: 803-734-3970 • FACS!Mll..E: 803-253-6283
V.'7°T6T ·
f
r
f
Chief Preacher
Page2
January 25, 2005
referenced Regulation, these officers while having limited powers of arrest do in fact have custodial arrest authority. These officers undergo training at the Criminal Justice Academy but are generally considered as having duties which are more limited in scope, such as those outlined above, than regular law enforcement officers such as deputies or State troopers. With kind regards, I am, Very truly yours,
I
I
Charles H. Richardson
Senior Assistant Attorney General
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Robert D. Cook
Assistant Deputy Attorney General
L
cc:
Mr. Kevin Stogner
Criminal Justice Academy
Certification Unit
P. 0. Box 1993
Blythewood, South Carolina 29016
What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace