Could one South Carolina candidate win nominations from two parties using conventions?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
South Carolina’s Election Commission asked whether one candidate could be nominated by two political parties that both used conventions rather than primaries. The Deputy AG said convention candidates did not take the statutory oath required of primary candidates. Even so, the same basic problems arose because Section 7-11-10 barred a person defeated for nomination in a party primary or convention from appearing on the ensuing general or special election ballot. A candidate entering two conventions would have to win both to avoid that express problem.
The author presumed that a candidate who won one convention and lost another might still be listed for the party whose nomination was won, but said that issue was not free from doubt and could go to court. He also said both parties would have to agree to a shared candidate and observed that candidacy forms and replacement provisions assumed one party affiliation. His conclusion was that dual convention candidacy was not absolutely prohibited by statute, while its consequences remained unresolved. The letter was informal.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1998. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Did convention candidates have to sign the primary-candidate oath? A: The opinion said no; that oath applied to primary candidates.
Q: What if a candidate won one convention and lost another? A: The Deputy AG presumed the winner’s party could list the candidate, but said the issue was uncertain and could require a court decision.
Q: Did the statutes flatly ban seeking two convention nominations? A: No. The author said there was no absolute statutory prohibition, while identifying party-consent and ballot-access issues.
Background and statutory framework
Section 7-11-10 allowed nomination by party primary, convention, or petition but barred a candidate defeated for a party nomination from the ensuing ballot. The opinion also cited §7-11-210 for the primary oath and §7-11-15 for convention candidates’ statement of intention.
Citations and references
Statutes discussed: §7-11-210; Section 7-11-10; §7-11-15.
Source
- Landing page: https://www.scag.gov/opinions/opinions-archive/january-13-1998-1/
- Original PDF: https://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/98jan13hendrix.pdf
Original opinion text
The State of South Carolina
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
CHARLES M. CONDON
ATIORNEY GENERAL
January 13, 1998
James F. Hendrix, Executive Director
Election Commission
Post Off ice Box 5987
Columbia, South Carolina 29250
Dear Jim,
As a follow up to my letter to you of January 6, 1998, you have raised in a telephone conversation if there would be any prohibition to one candidate being the nominee of two parties both holding conventions, as opposed to primaries, to nominate candidates. Candidates nominated by convention do not sign an oath as primary candidates are required to do by statute. s.c. Code Ann.
§7-11-210 (Supp. 1996).
However, the same basic problems would
arise for both a convention and a primary candidate. Section 7-11-10 states in part that
[n]ominations for candidates for the offices to be voted on in a general or special election may be by political party primary, by political party convention or by petition; provided, no person who was defeated as a candidate for nomination to an office in a party primary or convention shall have his name placed on the ballot for the ensuing general or special election .... If a candidate allows his name to be put forward in two or more party conventions he would have to win in each of these conventions to avoid the statutory prohibition of a candidate
R EMBERT
c. DENNIS BUILDING
•
POST OFFICE Box 11549
•
COLUMBIA, S.C. 292 11 -1549
•
TELEPHONE: 803-734-3970
•
FACSIMILE: 803-253-6283
James F. Hendrix, Executive Director
January 13, 1998
Page 2
offering after being defeated. 1 Should a candidate be the nominee of one party's convention but lose the nomination in another party's convention it could become an issue for the courts as to whether that person could be placed on the ballot. I would presume the statutes would allow the candidate's name to be placed on the ballot for the political party's convention that the candidate did win; however, that issue is not free from doubt. As stated in my previous letter, the political parties would have to agree to one person being a candidate for more than one political party. This would be true regardless of whether the nomination is made by primary or convention method. The language of the statutes envisions a candidate affiliating with one party and offering to be a candidate in that one party. For example, the statutes set out how a nominee can be replaced if the nominee for that party dies or withdraws, §7-11-15, 7-11-50, see also, 7-11-10. Section 7-11-15 discusses the statement of candidacy that all candidates must fill out. 2 This statute provides in part that
[i]n order to qualify as a candidate to run in the general election, all candidates seeking nomination by political party convention must file a statement of intention of candidacy ... (1) Candidates seeking nomination for a statewide, congressional, or district office which included more than one county shall file their statements of intention of candidacy with the State Executive Committee of their respective party. ( 2) Candidates seeking nominations for the State or House of Representatives must file their statements of intention of candidacy with the County Executive Committee of their respective party ... (3) Candidates seeking nomination for a countywide or less than countywide off ice shall file their statements of intention of candidacy with the County Executive Committee of their respective party. (Emphasis added)
I
1
This would also
offering in two primaries.
2
present
a
problem
for
a
candidate
The candidates pledge that primary candidates sign is an additional requirement for candidates offering in a primary. s.c. Code Ann. §7-11-210 (Supp. 1996).
James F. Hendrix, Executive Director
January 13, 1998
Page 3
Even the statement of intention of candidacy envisions candidacy to be offered only in one party. The instructions inform the candidate to file with the" ... Executive Committee of your political party." The statement itself has the following first statement "I declare my intention to seek nomination by (Name of Party ... for the off ice of " political party) (Name of office sought)
~~~~~~~~~
I
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Although a convention candidate would not violate the oath of a primary candidate, both methods of election would raise the same basic issues and problems that were not addressed or envisioned by the statutes. Although offering as a candidate in two parties is not absolutely prohibited by statute, it does raise potential problems for the parties and the candidates. This letter is an informal opinion and represents only the opinions of the undersigned attorney. It has not, however, been personally reviewed by the Attorney General nor officially published in the manner of formal opinions. Very truly yours,
~<.UC:...
Treva Ashworth
Deputy Attorney General
TA:bvc
What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 1998. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace