Who filled a McCormick County school-board vacancy under the 2013 South Carolina AG opinion?

Plain-English summary

In 2013, the South Carolina Attorney General explained that an unexpired McCormick County school-board term was filled by a gubernatorial appointment on the county council’s recommendation. The local act let the council ask for and receive the school board’s recommendation but did not require it to accept that recommendation. The board’s vacancy policy did not override the act. The AG believed the board’s advertised application and questionnaire process was likely lawful, assuming the questions served a legitimate constitutional purpose and the nominee met applicable qualifications. The office had not seen every question and declined to resolve factual disputes. It also concluded a special election was not the proper method for the two vacancies described.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2013. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Could the school board appoint a trustee for the unexpired term? A: No. The opinion said the local act gave the appointment to the governor following McCormick County Council’s recommendation. The board could propose a candidate to the council.

Q: Did county council have to accept the board’s nominee?
A: No. The AG said council could accept or reject the nominee.

Q: Did the policy for full-term vacancies control an unexpired term? A: Only where consistent with the local act and other higher authority; the policy could not replace the appointment procedure.

Q: Did the AG approve every questionnaire item?
A: No. It had not received all nine questions, and its favorable view depended on lawful questions and a qualified nominee.

Background and statutory framework

The superintendent asked about two unexpired trustee terms and the board’s policy of using the same manner as for full-term vacancies. The AG read the local act as controlling the appointment and council recommendation. It also explained that a nominee had to be a qualified county elector and that compatible board qualifications could apply.

Citations and references

The opinion quotes South Carolina Act No. 185 of 1997 section I and discusses the qualified-elector requirements in S.C. Code § 7-5-120.

Source

• Landing page: https://www.scag.gov/opinions/opinions-archive/january-10-2013/
• Original PDF: https://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/smiley-e-c-os-9523-1-10-13-mcormick-co.-sch.-dist.-policy-language-re-fulfillment-of-unexpired-term.pdf

Original opinion text

ALAN WILSON
A'ITORNEY GENERAL

January l 0, 2013

Earlean C. Smiley, Ed .D.
Superintendent, McCormick County School District
82 l N. Mine Street
McCormick, South Carolina 29835
Dear Dr. Smiley:
Attorney General Alan Wilson has referred your letter of December 17, 2012 to the Opinions section for a response. The following is our understanding of your question presented and the opinion of this Office concerning the issue based on that understanding.

Issue: I) Was the process in accordance with the law by which the McCormick County [School] Board of Trustees nominated a candidate to McCormick County Council to fill a vacancy on the Board of Trustees or did it conflict with their own policy? 2) What is the meaning of the McCormick County [School] Board of Trustees' policy that ·" [a]ny vacancy will be filled for the unexpired pottion of the term in the same manner provided for vacancies for full terms?"

Short Answer: This Office does not answer factual questions, so this Office will not address the factual issues but is able to analyze the underlying legal issues. Based on the information provided to this Office,

a court is likely to find McCormick County [School] Board of Trustees' process of nominating a candidate is in accordance with the law. This Office's interpretation of the meaning of the policy is discussed below.

LawI Analysis:
By way of background, as you mentioned in your letter, McConnick County [School] Board of Trustees currently has two vacancies for unexpired terms to fill. South Carolina Act No. 185 of 1997 section I provides: In the event that candidates do not offer in the general election for any full-term vacancies on the board as specified above, the Governor shall appoint the trustee or trustees to fill any such vacancies upon recommendation of the McCormick County Council. Any vacancies shall be filled for the unexpired portion of a term by appointment by the Governor upon recommendation of the McCormick County Council. In making recommendations for appointments to fill full-term or unexpired-term vacancies, the McCormick County Council may request and receive recommendations from the Board of Trustees.

R EMBERT

c. D ENNIS B UILDING • POST O FFICE Box 11549 • COLUMBIA, SC 292 11 -1549 • T ELEPHONE 803-734-3970 • FACSIMILE 803-253-6283

Dr. Smiley
Page 2
January l 0, 2013
As it is clearly written in the Act, McCormick County Council "may" receive recommendations from the McCormick Board of Trustees (hereinafter "the Board"). Based on Act No. l 85, McCormick County Council is not required to seek any recommendation from the Board in making its recommendation to the Governor. As an aside, special elections must be statutorily authorized. Op. S.C. Atty. Gen., July 5, 2012 (2012 WL 2950118) (citing Op. S.C. Atty. Gen., 1987 WL 342816 (March 5, 1987)). South Carolina Code § 7-13190 limits vacancies in office filled by special election to the following reasons : l) Death, 2) Resignation, or 3) Removal.

rf there is no vacancy due to death, resignation or removal, there cannot be a special election. Id. In the current situation Act No. 185 delineates the proper method for filling the two vacancies for their unexpired terms. Therefore a special election would not be proper in this situation. 1) The first issue presented in your letter is whether the process by which the McCormick County Board of Trustees nominated a candidate to McCormick County Council to fill a vacancy on the Board was in accordance with the law. To better answer this question, let us address the second issue first. 2) The second issue presented in your letter is the meaning of the McCormick County Board of Trustees' policy that " [a]ny vacancy will be filled for the unexpired portion of the term in the same manner provided for vacancies for full terms." This policy is found in Policy BBE Unexpired Term Fulfillment/Vacancies issued 6/07 (hereinafter the " Policy''). The purpose is " [t]o establish the basic structure for filling vacancies prior to the end of a term." The Policy says, in part,: Any vacancy will be filled for the unexpired portion of the term in the same manner provided for vacancies for full terms. Policy BBE Unexpired Term FulfillmentNacancies (issued 6/07) McCormick County [School] District Board of Trustees. We must next look to the manner in which vacancies for full terms are provided for. Vacancies for full terms on the Board are provided for in Policy BBB Board Membership- Elections. It says that " [a]ll candidates will be qualified electors of the county and will file a statement of candidacy with the board of election and registration by August 15 of the election year." However, the Board 's policy of filling vacancies for unexpired terms does not override Act No. 185 which requires the Governor to appoint a trustee to fill each vacancy upon the recommendation of McCormick County Council. Nevertheless, the requirement that all candidates be qualified electors is in both Policy BBB and Act No . 185 and therefore would apply. A qualified elector would entail three requirements for a candidate: I) He/she is at least eighteen ( 18) years old; 2) He/she is registered to vote; and 3) He/she is a resident of the county. S.C. Code § 7-5-120 ( 1976, as amended). Therefore, the Board must stipulate that these three requirements are met for any candidate they recommend. The Board must also follow its own

Dr. Smiley
Page 3
January 10, 2013
requirements for qualifications for board members as long as it does not violate any superseding authority. This would include Policy BBBA Board Member Qualifications (issued 11/00) which requires a board member to have "a genuine interest in and devotion to public education, a willingness to give time and effort to the work, a capacity for understanding people, and ability to work cooperatively with others." Having analyzed the second issue and determined the Board must follow the requirements of Act No. 185 in addition to its own policies (as long as they do not conflict with the Act or other superseding authority), let us now return to the first issue. Based on the information provided to this Office by you, it appears the process the Board used to nominate a candidate was to publish an ad in the McCormick County Messenger and had the candidates fill out a questionnaire with nine questions. This Office was not provided with all the questions, but assuming the questions were all in alignment with the Board' s policies and had a legitimate, constitutional purpose, it is likely a court would allow such questions to screen applicants in order for the Board to narrow down to a single candidate to recommend. If the Board' s candidate met the requirements of an elector, a court is not likely to strike down the process by which the Board an-ived at a nomination, nor is it likely a court would find the Board did not act in accordance with the law. The Board has to have some method by which it narrows down the applicants to one if it is charged with the task of nominating a single candidate to the McCormick County Council. If the McCormick County Council is dissatisfied with the candidate or the process by which the Board of Trustees arrived at the candidate, Act No. 185 is clear in allowing County Council to reject the recommendation of the Board and to recommend its own candidate.

Conclusion: Based on the information provided and the conclusion that the McCormick County [School] Board of Trustees' process of nominating a candidate was in accordance with the law, McCormick County Council is free to accept or reject that nomination. However, this Office is only issuing a legal opinion. Until a court or the legislature specifical ly addresses the issues presented in your letter, this is only an opinion on how this Office believes a court would interpret the law in the matter. If it is later detennined otherwise or if you have any additional questions or issues, please let me know.

Sincerely,

Anita Smith Fair
Assistant Attorney General
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Deputy Attorney General