Did South Carolina's 2009 school-spending website rule cover athletics and booster clubs?

Short answer For the 2009–10 fiscal year rule, the AG said school districts had to post expenditures over one hundred dollars, including qualifying publicly funded athletic or booster spending. The Act did not require posting revenue, and separate nonprofit organizations were outside its reporting rule.
State
South Carolina
Opinion
2011-february-17-2011
Issued
February 17, 2011
Issued by
Office of the South Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
The Honorable Glenn G. Reese, Member, SC Senate

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2011. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official South Carolina Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed South Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

In 2011, the South Carolina Attorney General explained a 2009–10 fiscal-year school district transaction-register rule. Districts had to post expenditures over one hundred dollars from any source on a public website, with the amount, payee, and a detailed description. The Act did not require a register of revenue generated by games or other events.

Whether athletic departments and booster clubs fell within the rule depended on their organizational status and funding. The AG said a publicly funded athletic department's qualifying expenditures had to be reported; a separate nonprofit athletic department was not covered by this Act. It similarly distinguished separate nonprofit booster clubs from clubs receiving public funds. The district bore responsibility for maintaining the register and, for entities within the district, appeared to control the posted expenditure information. The AG could not determine factual questions about individual school accounts.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2011. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later
AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current
legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy
mentioned here.

Common questions

Did the 2009–10 rule require schools to post ticket or event revenue? A: No. The AG said Act 86 addressed expenditures over one hundred dollars, not gross money generated or revenue from events.

Were athletic-department expenses included?
A: The AG said expenses over one hundred dollars were reportable when an athletic department was publicly funded. It said a separately formed nonprofit department was outside this Act.

Did booster clubs have to publish their income and spending?
A: The Act did not require revenue reporting. The opinion said a separate nonprofit booster club was not covered, but if a club received public funds, the school district had to report its qualifying expenditures.

Who maintained the online transaction register?
A: The opinion placed that duty on the school district and said district offices appeared to control disclosures for entities within the district. It did not determine the facts of any school's individual accounts.

Background and statutory framework

The state senator asked six questions about online disclosure for schools, athletics, booster clubs, events, and school accounts. Act 86 of 2009 required a public transaction register for the 2009–10 fiscal year, listing expenditures over one hundred dollars from any source and for any purpose. The opinion also noted the Act's separate website requirement for monthly official-use credit-card statements.

Citations and references

The opinion quoted Act 86, § 5(A)( l) on the school district transaction register and discussed its credit-card-statement requirement.

Official title

Concerning the portion of Act 86 of 2009 which requires school districts to maintain a transaction register of funds expended on the district’s website.

Requester

The Honorable Glenn G. Reese, Member, SC Senate

Source

Original opinion text

ALAN WLLSON
AITORNEY G ENERAi..

February 17, 2011

The Honorable Glenn G. Reese
South Carolina Senate, District 1 I
P.O. Box 142
502 Gressette Senate Office Building
Columbia, SC 29202
Dear Senator Reese:
We received your letter requesting an opinion of this Office concerning the portion of Act 86 of 2009 which requires school districts to maintain a transaction register of funds expended on the district's website. Specifical ly, your questions are as follows: l.

Do public schools and district offices have to disclose their online gross money generated and expenditures that flow through their Athletic Departments for all their events?

  1. Do they have to disclose Revenue generated and expenditures by any and all events online?
  2. Do they have to disclose all expenditures related to any and all events?
  3. Do their Booster Clubs for all entities have to disclose their Revenues and expenditures onJine?
  4. Do the District Offices control all these onl ine disclosures of Revenues generated and
    expe nditures paid out by all entities, including Athletic Departments, Booster Clubs and any and all organizations?
  5. Do the District offices have to disclose online how the Revenues are stored in various accounts
    and do the schools have accounts controlled by each school that must be disclosed on line? In relevant part, Act 86, l l81h Gen. Assem., Reg. Sess. (S.C. 2009) provides: "For the 2009-201 0 fiscal year, school districts must maintain a transaction register that includes a complete record of alJ funds expended over one hundred dollars, from whatever source for whatever purpose." Further, Act 86 requires the register to be " prominently posted on the district's Internet website and made available for public viewing and download ing." Act 86, § 5(A)( l). Section 5(A)(2)(a) of Act 86 requires that for each

REMBERT

c. D ENNIS BOILOING • POS'f OFFICE Box 11549 • CoLUMBlA. SC 29211-1549 • TELEPf-LONE 803-734-3970 • FACSIMILE 803-253-6283

The Honorable Glenn Reese
Page 2
February 17, 2011
expenditure the register must include: "(i) the transaction amount; (ii) the name of the payee; and (iii) a statement providing a detailed description of the expenditure." With regard to your first question, the Act does not apply to "gross money generated," but only to any expenditure over one hundred dollars. Moreover, many athletic departments are formed as non-profit organizations, to which Act 86 would not apply. Accordingly, the answer to your question depends on whether the athletic department is funded by public funds or is formed as a non-profit organization. If the athletic department is supported by public funds, then any expenditure over one hundred dollars must be reported on the transaction register on the district's Internet website. If the athletic department is formed as a separate non-profit organization, Act 86 is inapplicable and thus there is no reporting requirement pursuant to the Act. With regard to your second question inquiring as to whether "they have to disclose revenue generated and expenditures by any and all events online," the school district must report any expenditure over one hundred dollars online, i.e. on the district's Internet website. Act 86 does not require the reporting of revenue. As to your third question concerning whether "they" must "disclose all expenditures related to any and all events," the school district must disclose" all funds expended over one hundred dollars, from whatever source for whatever purpose." (Act 86) (emphasis added). Accordingly, if the expenditure is over one hundred dollars, it must be included in the transaction register on the district's website. As to whether booster clubs are required to disclose their revenues and expenditures online, as stated previously, Act 86 does not require the disclosure of revenues. Furthermore, as with athletic departments, many booster clubs are formed as non-profit organizations and, accordingly, are not considered part of the school district and hence not subject to Act 86. However, if a booster club receives public funds, the school district is required to report its expenditures over one hundred dollars. With regard to your fifth question, the language of Act 86 places the onus of the maintenance of the transaction register on the school district. Therefore, it would appear that the district offices would control the online disclosures of expenditures by all entities within the school district. 1 As noted earlier, whether the athletic departments or booster clubs fall within disclosure requirements depends on the nature of said organizations. Lastly, with regard to your sixth question regarding whether the district offices must "disclose online how the Revenues are stored in various accounts," as noted previously, this Act does not require the disclosure of revenue. Furthermore, your inquiry as to whether the schools "have accounts controlled by each school that must be disclosed online" appears to be, at least in part, a factual inquiry. This Office cannot make factual determinations. See Op. S.C. Att'y Gen. (December 12, 1983). However, as noted, the Act requires that the school districts disclose a "complete record of all funds expended over one hundred dollars, from whatever source for whatever purpose." Section 5(A)(l) Obviously, funds expended from the schools within the district are included in this requirement. Further, the Act requires each school district to "maintain on its Internet website a copy of each monthly statement for all of the credit cards "The Comptroller General must establish and maintain a website to contain the information required by this section from a school district that does not maintain its own Internet website." Act 86 § S(C)(l). 1

The Honorable Glenn Reese
Page 3
February 17, 2011

maintained by the entity, including credit cards issued to its officers or employees for official use." Act 86, § 5(B)(l ).

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

~
Assistant Attorney General
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

1:?~<!9/~

RObert D. Cook
Deputy Attorney General

What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2011. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace