Did South Carolina’s 2007 act set Sumter school district boundaries for taxes, attendance, and elections?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
The Attorney General concluded that Act No. 155 of 2007 defined the boundary lines of Sumter County School Districts 2 and 17 for taxation, student attendance, and elections at the time of the opinion. The act established new single-member trustee election districts, and the office found no legislative statement preserving the prior outer school district lines. It followed its earlier analysis of similar reapportionment acts.
The office expressly qualified its answer by later legislation concerning the two districts, including a planned consolidation. Its conclusion addressed the lines as they stood in February 2010.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 2010. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Common questions
Q: Were the new trustee election maps relevant beyond school board elections? A: The opinion said the 2007 act also defined district lines for taxation and attendance because it found no indication that the outer boundaries stayed unchanged.
Q: Did the AG ignore later Sumter school legislation? A: No. It made its conclusion subject to later acts addressing the districts and their consolidation.
Q: Did the opinion say those district lines would last indefinitely? A: No. The office described the lines as presently defined in 2010 and discussed legislation planning to abolish the two districts.
Background and statutory framework
A senator asked whether the 2007 school district election act also established school district boundaries for other purposes. The opinion applied a 2005 interpretation of similar election-district legislation and considered subsequent consolidation measures.
Citations and references
The original opinion text below quotes Act No. 155 of 2007 and discusses Acts Nos. 387 and 388 of 2008 and Act No. 112 of 2009.
Source
- Landing page: https://www.scag.gov/opinions/opinions-archive/february-16-2010/
- Original PDF: https://www.scag.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/leventis-p-p-os-9018-2-16-10-lines-of-sumter-county-school-districts-2-17.pdf
Original opinion text
HENRY McMASTER
A:rrC>RNEY GENERAL
February 16, 2010
The Honorable Phil P. Leventis
Senator, District No. 35
P. 0. Box 142
Columbia, South Carolina 29202
Dear Senator Leventis:
In a letter to this office you referenced the provisions of Act No. 155 of 2007 and have questioned whether such Act defines the lines of Sumter County School Districts 2 and 17 for tax, attendance and election purposes. The provisions of such Act are as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 2A of Act 620of1992, as added by Act 466 of2002, is amended to read: "Section 2A. There are created seven defined single-member election districts from which members of the Board of Trustees of Sumter County School District 2 are elected. Members must be elected from the seven election districts by the qualified electors of that district which are shown on the official map designated as S-85-02-07 prepared by and on file with the Office of Research and Statistics of the State Budget and Control Board. The Office of Research and Statistics of the State Budget and Control Board shall provide an official copy of the map to the school district and the Sumter County Board ofElections and Registration. The official map must not be changed except by an act ofthe General Assembly or by a court of competent jurisdiction." SECTION 2. Section 2A of Act 741 of 1990, as added by Act 468 of2002, is amended to read:
REMBERr c. DENNIS BUILDING • POST OmcE Box 11549 • COLUMBIA, SC 292 1l-l549 • TELEPHONE 803-734-3970 • FACSIMILE 803-253-6283
The Honorable Phil P. Leventis
Page2
February 16, 2010
"Section 2A.
There are created seven defined single-member
election districts from which members of the Board of Trustees of Sumter County School District 17 are elected. Members must be elected from the seven election districts by the qualified electors of that district which are shown on the official map designated as S-85-17-07 prepared by and on file with the Office of Research and Statistics of the State Budget and Control Board. The Office of Research and Statistics of the State Budget and Control Board shall provide an official copy of the map to the school district and the Sumter County Board of Elections and Registration. The official map must not be changed except by an act of the General Assembly or by a court of competent jurisdiction." The act took effect upon approval by the Governor on June 8, 2007. Subsequent to the passage of such Act, other legislation has been enacted pertaining to Sumter County School Districts 2 and 17. Act No. 387 of2008 calls for the abolishment of School Districts 2 and 17 on July 1, 2011 and the election of a new board of trustees at the same time as the general election of 2010. It also calls for the creation of a Sumter Consolidation Transition Committee to coordinate the consolidation of Districts 2 and 17. Act No. 388 of 2008 prohibits these school districts from entering into contracts to construct buildings or otherwise improve real property at a cost of five hundred thousand dollars or more without approval of the Sumter Consolidation Transition Committee established by Act No. 387 of2008. Act No. 112 of2009 also makes provisions regarding members of the Sumter Consolidation Transition Committee. An opinion of this office dated September 15, 2005 dealt with legislation, Acts Nos. 466 and 468 of 2002, which reapportioned election districts in both Districts 2 and 17. The question was raised as to whether in enacting this legislation reapportioning the election districts in both districts were the school district lines themselves changed. The opinion stated as follows: Acts Nos. 466 and 468 do not themselves specifically refer to the boundary lines for Districts 2 and 17. However, in establishing the reapportioned election districts there was no provision stating that the boundary lines of Districts 2 and 17 were themselves not altered. I have been informed that in many instances in legislation dealing with the clarification or alteration of boundary lines for election districts of a particular school district the following type language was inserted: The boundaries of... (a particular school district) ... are not altered by the provisions of this act. These school district lines are as defined by
The Honorable Phil P. Leventis
Page3
February 16, 2010
law and any census blocks which may be divided are done so only for statistical purposes and to establish a population base. No such language was included in Acts Nos. 466 and 468 dealing with the Sumter school districts. Inasmuch as there has been no expression oflegislative intent that the school district lines for Sumter Districts 2 and 17 were not to be altered by the reapportioned election district lines within such districts, it is the opinion of this office that the district lines for Districts 2 and 17 should be considered altered so as to conform to the reapportioned election district lines. Therefore, I agree with your conclusion that the district lines for these districts have been changed. Similarly, with the passage of Act No. 155 of 2007, I am unaware of any expression of legislative intent that the boundary lines for Districts 2 and 17 were not also altered. Therefore, it appears that district lines were established by Act No. 155. As a result, in the opinion of this office, subject to any relevant provisions of Acts Nos. 387 of2008, 388 of2008 and 112 of2009 pertaining to School Districts 2 and 17, Act No. 155 of 2007 presently defines the lines of Sumter County School Districts 2 and 17 for tax, attendance and election purposes.
If there are any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
Henry McMaster
Attorney General
cfw1dd UaJ2 ~
By:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
jJrL;rtJ .Cot;-fi_
Robert D. Cook
Deputy Attorney General
Charles H. Richardson
Senior Assistant Attorney General
What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2010. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace