Did cigarettes passing through a South Carolina bonded warehouse need a listing in the state tobacco directory?

Short answer The Attorney General concluded that a brand manufactured elsewhere and shipped through a South Carolina bonded warehouse to other states did not need a South Carolina Tobacco Directory listing when it was not sold at retail to South Carolina consumers. The opinion tied certification and listing to cigarettes sold in the state.
State
South Carolina
Opinion
2010-april-29-2010
Issued
April 29, 2010
Issued by
Office of the South Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
The Honorable Kent M. Williams, South Carolina Senate

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ask about yours and see what current South Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official South Carolina Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed South Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Attorney General concluded that a cigarette brand shipped from another state into a South Carolina bonded warehouse and then to other states for retail sale did not have to appear in South Carolina's Tobacco Directory when no cigarettes of that brand were sold at retail to South Carolina consumers. The opinion read the manufacturer certification and directory provisions as applying to cigarettes sold in the state.

Its answer depended on the described distribution route and absence of in-state retail sales. The opinion also discussed separate licensing and tax rules for cigarette distribution, but did not treat mere transit through a bonded warehouse as the retail sale that triggered directory listing.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2010. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Did warehousing alone require the brand to appear in the South Carolina directory? A: No. Under the facts presented, the opinion said no listing was required because the brand was sent elsewhere for retail sale.

Q: What fact controlled the directory answer?
A: The office focused on whether the manufacturer's cigarettes were sold in South Carolina to consumers.

Q: Did the opinion say South Carolina cigarette sales would be treated the same way? A: No. It quoted the certification and directory provisions for brands whose cigarettes were sold in the state.

Background and statutory framework

A senator asked about a brand manufactured out of state, shipped to a bonded South Carolina warehouse, and then shipped to other states for retail sale. The opinion applied the Tobacco Escrow Fund Act and the related manufacturer-certification and directory provisions to that route.

Citations and references

The original text below discusses Section 11-47-30 and quotes Section 11-48-30(A).

Source

Original opinion text

HENRY MCMASTER
ATIORNEY GENERAL

April 29, 2010

The Honorable Kent M. Williams
Senator, District No. 30
Post Office Box 142
Columbia, South Carolina 29202
Dear Senator Williams:
In a letter to this office you presented the following question: Is a cigarette brand that is manufactured in another state and shipped to a bonded warehouse in South Carolina, where such cigarette brand is then shipped to other states for sale at retail, required to be listed on the South Carolina Tobacco Directory maintained by the Attorney General's office when the cigarette brand will not be sold at retail in South Carolina to consumers of this State? S.C. Code Ann.§§ 11-47-10 et seq. is this State's "Tobacco Escrow Fund Act." Included in such provisions is Section 11-47-30 which requires that "[a]ny tobacco product manufacturer selling cigarettes to consumers within the State (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer, or similar intermediary or intermediaries)" to either "become a participating manufacturer" or "place into a qualified escrow fund" a sum based upon the ''units sold" 1 within South Carolina of the tobacco products manufacturer in the previous year. 2 1

The term "units sold" is defined by Section 11-47-20(j) as " .. .the number of individual cigarettes sold in the State by the applicable tobacco manufacturer (whether directly or through a distributor, retailer or similar intermediary or intermediaries) during the year in question, as measured by excise taxes collected by the State on packs (or 'roll-you-own' tobacco containers).... " 2

Additionally, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-660, "[e]very person engaged in the (continued ...)

REMBERT c. DENNIS BUILDING •

POST OFFICE Box 11549 • CoLUMBfA, SC 29211-1549 • TELEPHONE 803-734-3970 • FACSJMILE 803-253-6283

The Honorable Kent M. Williams
Page2
April 29, 2010

Also enacted in order to deter violations and promote the enforcement ofthe Tobacco Escrow Fund Act were S.C. Code Ann. §§ 11-48-10 et seq. Section 11-48-30(A) states that
[eJach tobacco product manufacturer whose cigarettes are sold in this State, whether directly or through a distributor, retailer, or similar intermediary or intermediaries shall execute and deliver on a form or in the manner prescribed by the Attorney General a certification to the Attorney General...that, as of the date of this certification, the tobacco product manufacturer either is a participating manufacturer or is in full compliance with Section 11-47-30 .... Pursuant to subsection (B) of such provision,
[t]he Attorney General shall develop and make available for public inspection or publish on the office web site a directory listing all tobacco product manufacturers that have provided current and accurate certifications conforming to the requirements of subsection (A) and all brand families that are listed in the certifications .... Additionally, pursuant to subsection (C)(l),
[i]t is unlawful for any person to:
(a) affix a stamp to a package or other container of cigarettes of a tobacco product manufacturer or brand family not included in the directory if such a stamp is required by law; or (b) sell, offer, acquire, hold, own, possess, transport, import or cause to be imported, for sale in this State cigarettes of a tobacco product

2

continued)
business of purchasing, selling or distributing ... cigarettes ... atwholesale ... within the State ... shall file with the Department of Revenue an application for a license permitting him to engage in such business." Furthermore, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-735, "[ e]ach person or distributor of cigarettes taxable under this article, first receiving untaxed cigarettes for sale or distribution in this State is subject to ... [the excise tax]. .. [A]nyperson or distributor making shipments of cigarettes to retail locations in and out of this State shall apply to the department for a license which enables them to purchase cigarettes free of tax, and report and pay tax as provided in this section on sales of cigarettes sold to locations in this State." I am referring to these provisions simply for the proposition that the sale of contraband cigarettes by a licensed distributor to a non-licensed entity constitutes a sale in this State and, therefore, is contraband. ( •••

The Honorable Kent M. Williams
Page 3
April 29, 2010

manufacturer or brand family not included in the directory, or to import such cigarettes for personal consumption.... (emphasis added). In the situation you addressed, a cigarette brand is manufactured in another state, shipped to a bonded warehouse in South Carolina, and then shipped to other states for sale at retail. Consistent with the above-referenced statutory provisions, in the opinion of this office, such cigarette brand would not be required to be listed on the South Carolina Tobacco Directory maintained by this office when the cigarette brand is not sold at retail in South Carolina to consumers of this State. Pursuant to Section 11-48-30(A), "[e]ach tobacco product manufacturer whose cigarettes are sold in this State" must make certification to this office as set forth. Subsection (B) of such provision requires that this office "develop and make available for public inspection or publish on the office web site a directory" listing all tobacco product manufacturers that have provided certifications pursuant to subsection (A), again, which is limited to manufacturers "whose cigarettes are sold in this State."

With kind regards, I am,
Very truly yours,
Henry McMaster

JZ;y°;;µ~
By:

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

~Z2_,Cr4-Robert D. Cook
Deputy Attorney General

Charles H. Richardson
Senior Assistant Attorney General

What does South Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2010. Ezel checks the current South Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace