Can a New York property owner whose land is inside the village but only gets fire protection (no streets, sidewalks, lights, sewer, or water) petition to be excluded from village boundaries?

Plain-English summary

The Village of Attica was about to receive a petition from property owners asking to be excluded from village boundaries. The petitioners' property did not get village streets, sidewalks, electric lights, sewers, or water works systems. They got just fire protection, which the Village provided to the entire village through a contract with the Attica Fire Department (an independent not-for-profit, though most of its equipment was owned by the Village). The Village Attorney asked whether fire protection alone could keep the property locked inside village boundaries against the owners' wishes.

Village Law § 18-1804 is the statute that governs diminishing village boundaries. The text is precise: village boundaries may be diminished by excluding from the village's corporate limits territory "not adjacent to nor benefited by either street or sidewalk improvements, electric lights, sewers, water works system or fire protection, when any of such benefits, improvements or system have been completed in a village." The phrase "any of such benefits" is the operative one. Receipt of any single listed benefit makes the property ineligible for exclusion. The AG cited its earlier Op Atty Gen (Inf) No. 95-42 for the same reading.

The AG concluded that the property at issue could not be excluded. The Village provided fire protection to the property through its contract with the Attica Fire Department, and that was enough to satisfy § 18-1804's "any of such benefits" clause. Whether the fire department was an independent entity or village-operated did not matter; the fire protection was being delivered to the property under village arrangement.

The opinion is a useful reminder of how narrowly courts and AGs read village-exclusion statutes. The five enumerated benefits in § 18-1804 are essentially the basic municipal services. As long as the village provides even one of them to a piece of property, that property cannot petition out. The owner who wants to escape village taxation but receives fire protection has no remedy under § 18-1804.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1998. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Does it matter who provides the fire protection?

No, per the AG's reasoning. The Attica Fire Department was an independent not-for-profit entity, but the Village had contracted with it and most of the equipment was Village-owned. The fire protection was being provided through Village arrangement, and that satisfied § 18-1804.

What if the property owner pays an independent fire department directly?

That would be a different fact pattern. § 18-1804's question is whether the village is providing fire protection to the property. If the village has no role and the property owner contracts directly with an independent fire entity, the village is not the provider. The opinion does not analyze that scenario, but the statute's text would support a different result.

What are the other listed benefits in § 18-1804?

Street improvements, sidewalk improvements, electric lights, sewers, and water works systems. Together with fire protection, those are the six enumerated benefits any one of which blocks exclusion.

What's the procedure for excluding territory from a village under § 18-1804?

Section 18-1804 (and other parts of Village Law Article 18) lay out the petition, hearing, and board-action steps. The opinion does not walk through the full procedural pathway because the substantive question (eligibility for exclusion) is dispositive: if the property is not eligible, there is no procedural pathway to take.

Can the property owners try again if the village stops providing fire protection?

Conceivably. § 18-1804's analysis is anchored to the village's current provision of services. If the village were to terminate the contract with the Attica Fire Department and the property were no longer receiving any of the listed benefits, the eligibility analysis could change. Whether a village would actually take that step is a political and practical question.

Background and statutory framework

Village Law Article 18 governs the structure and territorial mechanics of New York villages. Section 18-1804 specifically addresses diminishing village boundaries. The statute reflects a balance: villages have political interest in retaining their tax base, and individual property owners have political interest in opting out of village taxation. The Legislature drew the line by reference to services received. Property that is benefited by village services is presumed to have entered into the village relationship; property that is not is eligible for exclusion.

The six enumerated benefits cover the basics of municipal life. The AG's narrow reading (any one of them is enough) makes exclusion practically rare. Most property inside a village receives at least one of the six.

The 1998 opinion follows the AG's earlier opinion in 95-42, which had read § 18-1804 the same way. The textual reading is straightforward, and the policy logic (consistent treatment of properties that share in any village service) lines up with it.

Citations

• Village Law § 18-1804 (procedure for diminishing village boundaries; "any of such benefits" exclusion bar).
• Op Atty Gen (Inf) No. 95-42 (earlier opinion construing § 18-1804 the same way).

Source

• Landing page: https://ag.ny.gov/libraries-documents/opinions/opinions-year
• Original PDF: https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/I_98-52_pw.pdf

Original opinion text

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Page 1 of 2

Opn. 98-52
VILLAGE LAW § 18-804.
Property located within the boundaries of the Village of Attica may not be excluded from the boundaries
of the Village as long as it is benefited by fire protection services.
November 18, 1998
Timothy F. Moran, Esq.
Village Attorney
Village of Attica
2 Main Street
Post Office Box 268
Attica, New York 14011

Informal Opinion
No. 98-52

Dear Mr. Moran:
You have requested an opinion regarding whether certain property located within the boundaries
of the Village of Attica may be excluded from the boundaries of the Village.
You informed us that the Village will be receiving a petition signed by the requisite number of
individuals seeking to have their property excluded from the boundaries of the Village. The property at
issue is not serviced by Village streets, sidewalk improvements, electric lights, sewers or water works
systems. However, the Village does provide fire protection to the property and to the entire Village
through a contract with the Attica Fire Department. In a telephone conversation, you informed us that
the Attica Fire Department is an independent not-for-profit entity, but that most of the equipment used
by the Department is owned by the Village.
Village Law § 18-1804 provides the procedure for diminishing the boundaries of a village. This
section provides that:
[t]he boundaries of a village may be diminished by excluding from its corporate
limits territory not adjacent to nor benefited by either street or sidewalk improvements,
electric lights, sewers, water works system or fire protection, when any of such benefits,
improvements or system have been completed in a village.
The language of the statute is clear. As we stated in an earlier opinion, "[t]he receipt of any one of
[the improvements or services listed in Village Law § 18-1804], which has been completed by the
village, makes the property ineligible for exclusion from the boundaries of the village." Op Atty Gen
(Inf) No. 95-42. In this instance, because fire protection is provided to the property at issue through a
contract with the Attica Fire Department, the property may not be excluded from the boundaries of the
Village.
We conclude that as long as fire protection is provided to the property at issue, it may not be
excluded from the boundaries of the Village of Attica.
The Attorney General renders formal opinions only to officers and departments of State

http://www.oag.state.ny.us/lawyers/opinions/1998/informal/98_52.html

4/20/2006

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Page 2 of 2

government. This perforce is an informal and unofficial expression of the views of this office.
Very truly yours,
YVONNE M. HOVE
Assistant Attorney General
Return to the Index Page
Return to the Home Page

http://www.oag.state.ny.us/lawyers/opinions/1998/informal/98_52.html

4/20/2006