When the legislature gave the ECU Medical Faculty Practice Plan 'flexibility' to handle its own real property acquisitions, did that mean it no longer needs Council of State approval, Joint Legislative Commission consultation, or AG legal work for those transactions?

Short answer No. The Plan may make rules for property functions normally performed by the Department of Administration, but its transactions still require Governor and Council of State approval unless a previous Council rule exempts them. Consultation with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations applies when the opinion's $25,000 benchmark is met. Conveyances must use the State's name, and the Attorney General remains responsible for hiring outside counsel for acquisitions. The opinion applies the same interpretation to the parallel UNC Health Care provisions.
State
North Carolina
Opinion
NC AG Advisory Opinion (1999-03-01)
Issued
March 1, 1999
Issued by
Office of the North Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
Layton Getsinger (ECU Medical Faculty Practice Plan)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1999. Ask about yours and see what current North Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official North Carolina Attorney General advisory opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed North Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

In 1998 the General Assembly gave the East Carolina University Medical Faculty Practice Plan a "flexibility" package: more local control over personnel, purchasing, property, and construction decisions for the Plan's medical operations. The property provision, G.S. 116-40.6(d), let the board of trustees adopt rules to do what the Department of Administration normally does for state-property transactions. The Plan's lawyer asked the AG four questions about how the new statute worked.

The opinion says the Plan may perform property functions otherwise assigned to the Department of Administration. The statute does not itself exempt the Plan from the approval and consultation requirements discussed below.

Whose name goes on the deed. The Plan is not a separate corporate entity; it is a sub-agency within ECU. The State retains title. G.S. 146-24(b) requires all state real-property conveyances to be in the name of "State of North Carolina." Every deed must be executed in the State's name, signed by the Governor, attested by the Secretary of State, and bear the great seal of NC (G.S. 146-75 and 146-76). The Plan cannot acquire or dispose of property in its own name; the deed runs to or from "State of North Carolina."

Approval and consultation. The opinion concludes that acquisitions and dispositions for the Plan require Governor and Council of State approval unless a previous Council rule exempts them. Consultation with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations is required when the $25,000 benchmark applies: the opinion identifies non-transportation purchases of land and sales of land with an appraised value of at least $25,000. The statute's requirement to report a transaction after it is completed does not replace the applicable approval and consultation requirements.

Outside legal counsel. The opinion says private counsel may be employed only with the Governor's approval after the Attorney General has indicated that providing the service is impractical. The Attorney General remains responsible for employing outside counsel needed for the Plan's property acquisitions. A purchaser from the State is responsible for obtaining any legal services the purchaser wants.

Eminent domain is not authorized. The flexibility statute lists ways the Plan can acquire property: purchase, gift, lease, or rental. It expressly excludes condemnation and eminent domain. The Plan cannot use the State's eminent-domain power.

Encumbrance is not authorized. The quoted flexibility statute expressly says it does not authorize the board of trustees to encumber real property.

Same answer for UNC Health Care. G.S. 116-37(i) is nearly identical legislation for the UNC Health Care System, and G.S. 116-37(a)(4) lets the UNC Health Care board apply 116-37(i)'s rules to UNC Hospitals and the Chapel Hill clinic patient-care programs. The AG noted in a footnote that the same interpretation applies there.

For a proposed transaction. Check whether a previous Council of State rule exempts it from approval and whether the opinion's consultation threshold applies. The deed must use the State's name and be executed in the manner the opinion describes. The Attorney General remains responsible for hiring outside counsel needed for an acquisition.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1999. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

For a current transaction, check the current text of the cited statutes and any applicable Council of State rule before relying on this 1999 interpretation.

Common questions

Q: Does the Plan need Council of State approval for every property deal?
A: The opinion says Governor and Council of State approval applies to acquisitions and dispositions for the Plan unless a previous Council rule exempts the transaction. The Plan's authority to adopt its own property rules does not itself create an exemption.

Q: Which deals require consultation with the Joint Legislative Commission?
A: The opinion specifies purchases of land for a purpose other than transportation and sales of land when the appraised value is at least $25,000. Its conclusion directs the Plan to consult the Commission before proceeding when that benchmark applies.

Q: Can the Plan use its own name on a deed?
A: No. The opinion says the Plan is a sub-agency of ECU, not a separate corporate entity, and conveyances must be made in the name of the State of North Carolina.

Q: Can the Plan hire its own private lawyer for an acquisition?
A: The opinion says the Attorney General remains responsible for hiring outside counsel needed for acquisitions on the Plan's behalf. It also describes the conditions under G.S. 147-17 for employing private counsel.

Q: Does the same interpretation cover UNC Health Care?
A: Yes. A footnote applies the opinion's interpretation to the parallel UNC Health Care provisions identified there, including G.S. 116-37(i).

Background and statutory framework

The opinion describes the Department of Administration's ordinary process for acquiring and disposing of state property under Chapter 146. The State Property Office investigates proposed acquisitions, handles negotiations and brings proposed transactions to the Governor and Council of State. The ECU statute allows the Plan to adopt rules to perform functions otherwise assigned to the Department of Administration. The opinion then examines whether that change affects whose name is used on deeds, approval and consultation, or responsibility for outside counsel.

Citations

  • N.C. Gen. Stat. ch. 116 (Higher Education)
  • N.C. Gen. Stat. § 116-37(a)(4) (UNC Health Care board may apply 116-37(i) to UNC Hospitals and Chapel Hill clinics)
  • N.C. Gen. Stat. § 116-37(i) (UNC Health Care System property flex statute)
  • N.C. Gen. Stat. § 116-40.6(d) (ECU MFPP property flex statute)
  • N.C. Gen. Stat. ch. 146 (State Property)
  • N.C. Gen. Stat. § 146-22 (acquisition approval procedures, Legislative Commission consultation)
  • N.C. Gen. Stat. § 146-24(b) (conveyances to State of North Carolina)
  • N.C. Gen. Stat. § 146-27 (disposition approval procedures)
  • N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 146-75, 146-76 (form of deeds, Great Seal)
  • N.C. Gen. Stat. § 147-17(a), (b) (AG as state agency counsel; outside counsel limited)
  • 1998 N.C. Sess. Laws c. 212, s. 11.8(f) (enactment of ECU MFPP flex provisions)
  • Sutton v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259, 280 S.E.2d 759 (1989)
  • Savings and Loan League v. Credit Union Comm., 302 N.C. 458, 276 S.E.2d 404 (1981)
  • Food Town Stores v. City of Salisbury, 300 N.C. 21, 265 S.E.2d 123 (1980)
  • Milk Commission v. National Food Store, 270 N.C. 323, 154 S.E.2d 548 (1967)

Source

Original opinion text

Re: Advisory Opinion; Flexibility Legislation Pertaining to the Medical Faculty Practice Plan; Acquisitions and Dispositions of Real Property by the ECU Medical Faculty Practice Plan; N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d).

Dear Mr. Getsinger:

Section 11.8(f), Chapter 212 of the 1998 Session Laws enacted management flexibility legislation pertaining to the East Carolina University Medical Faculty Practice Plan (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan"). The legislation addressed four particular areas including (1) personnel, (2) purchasing, (3) property and (4) construction. The wording of N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) relating to property matters has raised certain questions for which you have sought the advice of this office.[1]

I. Procedures Normally Applicable to Acquisitions and Disposition of Real Property by the State and Agencies

With the exception of acquisitions and dispositions of highway rights-of-way, most acquisitions and dispositions of interests in real property by the State or its agencies are governed by Chapter 146 of the General Statutes. Pursuant to that Chapter, the State Property Office, acting on behalf of the Department of Administration, serves as the "clearing house" for acquisitions and dispositions of interests in real property by the State and its agencies. An agency desiring to acquire or dispose of an interest in real property submits a request to the State Property Office. In the case of acquisitions, the State Property Office investigates the proposed acquisition and determines if the property is needed and the acquisition is in the best interest of the State. The State Property Office will generally have the property appraised, negotiate with the owners for acquisition, obtain surveys when necessary and request the Attorney General's Office to have a title examination conducted with respect to the property. If negotiations for the purchase of the land are successful, the Department of Administration submits the proposed transaction to the Governor and Council of State for approval or disapproval. If the proposed acquisition is a purchase of land with an appraised value of at least $25,000.00, and for a purpose other than transportation, it may only be made after consultation with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations. N.C.G.S. § 146-22. In the case of dispositions, if it is determined that the disposition is in the best interest of the State, the State Property Office will proceed to sell the property in accordance with its normal procedures for conveying interest in State property. Every sale, lease or rental of land owned by the State or any State agency must be approved by the Governor and Council of State, and, if the proposed disposition is a sale of land with an appraised value of at least $25,000.00, it may only be made after consultation with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations. N.C.G.S. § 146-27. The final authority to approve or disapprove acquisitions and dispositions under Chapter 146, except in those circumstances where the authority has been otherwise delegated, is vested in the Governor and Council of State.

II. N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d)

N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) reads as follows:

(d) Property. – Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 6 of Chapter 146 of the General Statutes to the contrary, the board of trustees shall establish rules and regulations to perform the functions otherwise prescribed for the Department of Administration in acquiring or disposing of any interest in real property for the use of the Medical Faculty Practice Plan. These rules and regulations shall include provisions for development of specifications, advertisement, and negotiations with owners for acquisition by purchase, gift, lease, or rental, but not by condemnation or exercise of eminent domain, on behalf of the Medical Faculty Practice Plan. The section does not authorize the board of trustees to encumber real property. Such rules and regulations shall be implemented by a property office maintained by East Carolina University. The board of trustees shall submit all initial rules and regulations adopted pursuant to this subsection to the State Property Office for review upon adoption. Any subsequent changes to these rules and regulations shall be submitted to the State Property Office for review. Any comments by the State Property Office shall be submitted to the Chancellor of East Carolina University and to the President of The University of North Carolina. After review by the Attorney General as to form and after the consummation of any such acquisition, East Carolina University shall promptly file, on behalf of the Medical Faculty Practice Plan, a report concerning the acquisition or disposition with the Governor and Council of State.

In light of the General Assembly's enactment of this provision, various questions have been raised. Those questions and our responses follow:

Question: Should the "State of North Carolina" be named as the grantor/grantee in dispositions and acquisitions of real property on behalf of the Plan?

Answer: Yes

The Plan is not a corporate entity. It is a sub-agency within the East Carolina University System. N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) does not authorize or empower the Plan to either acquire or dispose of title to real property in its own name. N.C.G.S. § 146-24(b) provides that all conveyances of purchased real property shall be made to the "State of North Carolina". Every proposed conveyance in fee of State land must be executed in the name of the "State of North Carolina," and the deed must be signed by the Governor, attested by the Secretary of State and the great seal of the State of North Carolina must be affixed. N.C.G.S. § 146-75 and N.C.G.S. § 146-76.

Question: Under N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) is the Plan exempted from the requirements contained in N.C.G.S. § 146-22 and N.C.G.S. § 146-27 pertaining to consultation with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations and approval by the Governor and Council of State with regard to acquisitions and dispositions of real property?

Answer: No.

The cardinal rule of statutory construction is that legislation must be construed to accomplish the General Assembly's intent. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 325 N.C. 259, 265, 280 S.E.2d 759 (1989). The best indicia of legislative intention are the language of the statute, its spirit and purpose. Savings and Loan League v. Credit Union Comm., 302 N.C. 458, 276 S.E.2d 404 (1981). Moreover, when interpreting statutes, the words in the statute are to be given their ordinary meaning unless the General Assembly has specifically defined them or they have an acquired technical meaning. Food Town Stores v. City of Salisbury, 300 N.C. 21, 265 S.E.2d 123 (1980). Finally, when trying to determine legislative intent, the courts do not consider statements or testimony by members of the General Assembly as to the statute's purpose or its intended construction. E.g., Milk Commission v. National Food Store, 270 N.C. 323, 332-33, 154 S.E.2d 548 (1967).

N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) authorizes the Plan to establish rules and regulations to perform the "functions" otherwise prescribed for the Department of Administration in acquiring or disposing of real property. The functions prescribed for the Department of Administration in acquiring or disposing of real property require consultation with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations and obtaining Governor and Council of State approval of acquisitions and dispositions of real property as set forth in N.C.G.S. § 146-22 and N.C.G.S. § 146-27.

We find no language in N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) which specifically or impliedly exempts the Plan from these requirements. Although the last sentence in this section requires the Plan to file reports concerning acquisitions and dispositions with the Governor and Council of State following the consummation of the transactions, this provision cannot be interpreted as impliedly exempting the Plan from the requirements of N.C.G.S. § 146-22 and N.C.G.S. § 146-27.

Question: Under N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) is the Plan authorized to employ outside legal counsel to perform legal services in connection with the acquisition and dispositions of real property?

Answer: No.

The Attorney General is counsel for all departments, officer, agencies, institutions, commissions, bureaus or other organized activities of the State which receive support in whole or in part from the State. Private legal counsel may be employed only with the approval of the Governor after the Attorney General has indicated it is impractical for the Attorney General to render the legal service. N.C.G.S. § 147-17(a) and (b).

Pursuant to existing arrangements between the Governor and the Attorney General, the Attorney General is responsible for hiring outside legal counsel to perform legal services in connection with the acquisition of real property on behalf of the State and its agencies. Normally the office of the Attorney General performs all legal services on behalf of the State or its agencies with regard to the disposition of an interest in real property. The purchaser of real property from the State is responsible for obtaining any legal services desired by him in connection with the proposed acquisition from the State.

N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) in no way changes the responsibility for employment of outside legal counsel by the State or State agencies as set forth in N.C.G.S. § 147-17. Accordingly, the Office of the Attorney General will continue to be responsible for employment of outside legal counsel required in connection with acquisitions of real property pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d).

In conclusion, all acquisitions and dispositions pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) must be made in the name of the State of North Carolina. Deeds conveying real property shall continue to be executed in the normal manner for execution of deeds by the State. All acquisitions and dispositions on behalf of the Plan must be approved by the Governor and Council of State, unless exempted by a previous rule adopted by the Council of State, and when the $25,000.00 benchmark is applicable, the Plan must consult with the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations prior to proceeding with the acquisition or disposition. Lastly, the responsibility of hiring outside legal counsel in connection with any acquisition on behalf of the Plan will continue to be performed by the Office of the Attorney General.

Very truly yours,

Grayson K. Kelley
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Special Litigation/Education Division

Roy A. Giles, Jr.
Special Deputy Attorney General

Thomas J. Ziko
Special Deputy Attorney General

RAGjr/TKZ:fpt

cc: Ben Irons, II; Greg Hassler; Susan Ehringhaus


[1] Legislation almost identical to N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) was enacted with regard to acquisitions and dispositions of real property by the University of North Carolina Health Care System. See, N.C.G.S. § 116-37(i). In addition, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 116-37(a)(4) the Board of Directors of the University of North Carolina Health Care System is empowered to adopt policies that make the provisions of N.C.G.S. § 116-37(i) applicable to the University of North Carolina Hospitals at Chapel Hill and the clinic patient care programs of the School of Medicine of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with regard to acquisitions and dispositions of interests in real property. Accordingly, the opinions expressed herein with regard to the interpretation of N.C.G.S. § 116-40.6(d) are equally applicable to the provisions of N.C.G.S. §§ 116-37(a)(4) and 37(i).

What does North Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1999. Ezel checks the current North Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace