Can Mecklenburg County use its own local funds to pay for additional permanent assistant district attorneys or an additional superior court judge?

Short answer No. Legislative action is required to change the number of permanent full-time assistant district attorneys or resident superior court judges in a district. County funds may pay for temporary assistant district attorney positions approved and administered by the Administrative Office of the Courts. The Chief Justice may add special court sessions.
State
North Carolina
Opinion
NC AG Advisory Opinion (1996-04-15)
Issued
April 15, 1996
Issued by
Office of the North Carolina Attorney General
Requested by
Marvin A. Bethune (Mecklenburg County Attorney) for the County Commissioners

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current North Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official North Carolina Attorney General advisory opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. The court-funding statutes referenced here have been amended multiple times, and the relationship between state and local funding for the General Court of Justice has evolved. Consult a licensed North Carolina attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Mecklenburg County's commissioners asked whether local money could fund additional assistant district attorneys and a superior court judge. The Attorney General's office said only legislative action could change the statutory number of permanent full-time assistant district attorneys or resident superior court judges assigned to a district.

The opinion identified a temporary route for prosecutor staffing. Under G.S. § 7A-64, a district attorney who shows docket accumulation beyond the office's capacity to keep reasonably current may obtain temporary assistance. The Administrative Office of the Courts fixes the number, service period, and compensation of temporary appointees. County funds can pay for those appointees if the AOC approves and administers the funding.

The opinion also noted two other ways capacity could increase. A privately retained attorney may assist a prosecutor in a particular case at the trial judge's discretion. The opinion did not say the county could pay that attorney. The Chief Justice may add special sessions of superior court and determines whether a district needs them. The opinion did not say the county could fund those sessions.

Currency note

This opinion applied North Carolina law as it stood in 1996. Check current staffing statutes and Administrative Office of the Courts procedures before acting on its conclusions.

Common questions

Can a county create and pay for a permanent assistant district attorney position?

The opinion said the number of permanent full-time assistant district attorneys in a judicial district cannot change without legislative action. It allowed local funding for temporary appointees only with AOC approval and administration.

Who decides how many temporary assistants serve and for how long?

Under the statute as described in the opinion, the AOC fixes their number, length of service, and compensation after a district attorney shows the required docket accumulation.

Can county funds pay for an additional superior court judge or special session?

The opinion said legislative action is required to change the number of resident superior court judges. It said the Chief Justice may add special sessions, but did not authorize county funding of those sessions.

Source

Citations

  • N.C. Const. art. IV, § 9 (judicial districts; superior court judgeships)
  • N.C.G.S. § 7A-41 (resident superior court judges)
  • N.C.G.S. § 7A-46 (special sessions of superior court)
  • N.C.G.S. § 7A-60 (district attorneys)
  • N.C.G.S. § 7A-63 (permanent full-time assistant district attorneys)
  • N.C.G.S. § 7A-64 (temporary assistance)
  • State v. Best, 280 N.C. 413, 186 S.E.2d 1 (1972)
  • State v. Register, 133 N.C. 746, 46 S.E. 21 (1903)

Original opinion text

April 15, 1996

Mr. Marvin A. Bethune Mecklenburg County Attorney Ruff, Bond, Cobb, Wade and McNair, LLP Two First Union Center Suite 2100 Charlotte, N.C. 28282-8283

RE: Advisory Opinion: Local Funding of Additional Assistant District Attorneys and an Additional Superior Court Judge for Mecklenburg County; N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 7A-41; 7A-46; 7A-60; 7A-64; Constitution of North Carolina Art. IV § 9

Dear Mr. Bethune:

This letter is in response to your letter dated March 20, 1996 and in follow up to Vice-Chairman Tom Bush's letter dated January 15, 1996. Mr. Bush, and the other County Commissioners through your request, seek clarification on whether state law would allow local funding of assistant district attorneys and superior court judges.

Structurally, the General Court of Justice exists as a State-funded unified court system under Article IV of the North Carolina Constitution. A superior court judgeship is a statewide elected constitutional office. Pursuant to Article IV, Sec. 9 and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-41(a), the organization of judicial districts and number of resident superior court judges are allocated. The number of regular, elected superior court judges assigned to Mecklenburg County cannot be changed except by statute. Similarly, the number of permanent full-time assistant district attorneys in a judicial district cannot be changed absent legislative action. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-60(a1); § 7A-63. The number of resident judges or permanent full-time assistant district attorneys in a judicial district cannot be changed absent legislative action. Alternative means do exist, however, to increase prosecutorial and judicial capacity in a district or a temporary basis.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-64(1) provides temporary assistance when dockets are overcrowded. Under § 7A-64 the district attorney, upon a factual showing of docket accumulation beyond his capacity to keep reasonably current, can obtain temporary assistance. This can include temporarily appointing qualified attorneys to assist the requesting district attorney. The number, length of service, and compensation of the temporary appointee is fixed by the Administrative Office of the Courts. However, although county funds can be used to employ such appointees on a temporary basis, the funding must be approved and administered by the Administrative Office of the Courts. Alternatively, privately retained attorneys can assist the prosecuting district attorney on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the trial judge. State v. Best, 280 N.C. 413, 415-17, 186 S.E.2d 1 (1972). Finally, although the number of regular resident superior court judges sitting in a judicial district is fixed by statute and not alterable absent statutory authorization, court capacity can be increased without actually adding a resident judge. Special sessions of Superior Court are contemplated under the authority of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-46. A regular, special or emergency judge can be assigned to a special session. The power to order special terms can be necessitated by but is not restricted to the accumulation of cases on the docket. See, State v. Register, 133 N.C. 746, 46 S.E. 21 (1903). The Chief Justice determines the need for special sessions in a judicial district.

In summary, legislative action is the only way to change the number of permanent full-time assistant district attorneys or resident superior court judges assigned to a particular judicial district. However, based on particularized factual showings to the Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts, temporary assistant district attorney positions can be created by that agency and funded with local funds. At the discretion of the Chief Justice, special sessions can be added to a district's schedule. Your efforts to channel money into the court system to enhance the district's prosecutorial efforts must follow these statutory and constitutional guidelines.

We trust this fully answers your inquiry. Let us know if we can be of further assistance.

Ann Reed Senior Deputy Attorney General

Lars F. Nance Special Deputy Attorney General

What does North Carolina law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1996. Ezel checks the current North Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace