Can the NC DMV refuse to accept any proof of a name change for a driver's license except a court order or register-of-deeds filing, or does common-law name change still count?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ask about yours and see what current North Carolina law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
The North Carolina DMV Commissioner asked whether the Division could make a register-of-deeds record or official court document the only way to prove a name change for a driver license or identification card. The AG answered no. In the opinion’s words, “Other methods of satisfactory proof should be acceptable where documents of legal proceedings are not available or name was changed pursuant to common law without legal proceedings.”
The AG explained that Chapter 101 provides a statutory name-change procedure, but is not exclusive. The opinion quotes In re Mohlman: “At common law, then, a person may lawfully change his name at will and assume a new name so long as it is not for a fraudulent or illegal purpose.” The AG treated that continued common-law route as the reason DMV could not insist on documents from a formal proceeding in every case.
The opinion does not list specific alternative documents or determine whether a particular applicant’s evidence is satisfactory. It states the AG office’s view on the proposed exclusive-document policy as of 1988.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1988. It does not address current DMV procedures, identification requirements, or REAL ID rules. Check current requirements for a present application.
Background and statutory framework
The opinion describes Chapter 101 as a useful formal route to change a name. It relies on In re Mohlman for the narrower point that Chapter 101 did not abolish name changes at common law. On that basis, the AG concluded that DMV could not make proof from a register of deeds or official court documents the sole method for updating the name on driver licenses and identification cards.
Common questions
Did the AG say DMV must accept a name change without any evidence?
No. The opinion calls for “other methods of satisfactory proof” when formal legal-proceeding documents are unavailable or no proceeding occurred. It does not define what evidence is satisfactory.
Does this opinion tell me which documents DMV accepts today?
No. It evaluates a proposed policy in 1988 and gives no present-day document list. Check current DMV instructions for a current application.
Does the opinion apply only to driver licenses?
The question and answer name both driver licenses and identification cards. They do not discuss another agency’s records.
Source
Original opinion text
Requested By: William S. Hiatt, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Question: Does the Division of Motor Vehicles have the authority to establish a policy to require documented proof from the Register of Deeds or official court documents for a name change on driver licenses and identification cards as the only method of establishing a name change?
Conclusion: No.
Chapter 101 of the General Statutes outlines the statutory procedure for changing the name of a person. This is the logical, most effective way to achieve a name change but, as the one appellate case that dealt with this law states, it is not the only way to effect a name change. In re Mohlman, 26 NC App 220 (1975). This case is the only case that has interpreted this statute and is still good law. As former Chief Judge Morris stated on page 225 of the opinion, "At common law, then, a person may lawfully change his name at will and assume a new name so long as it is not for a fraudulent or illegal purpose." The opinion goes on to state that this common law principle is still enforced in this State and that the statute merely provides another means of effecting a name change but is not the exclusive means. It is the opinion of this office that the Division could not require documented proof from the Register of Deeds of official court documents for a name change on the driver's license and identification cards as the only manner of proving a name change. Other methods of satisfactory proof should be acceptable where documents of legal proceedings are not available or name was changed pursuant to common law without legal proceedings.
LACY H. THORNBURG
Attorney General
Mabel Y. Bullock
Assistant Attorney General
What does North Carolina law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 1988. Ezel checks the current North Carolina statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace