MS 2021-05-K-Gilchrist-May-14-2021-Service-area-of-community-hospital-1 May 14, 2021

Can a Mississippi community hospital provide services in another state if that's part of its service area?

Short answer: The 2021 opinion concluded that a Mississippi community hospital could provide authorized services outside the state, as long as the location was within the hospital's 'service area.' A 2019 amendment to § 41-13-10(f) broadened the definition of 'service area' to expressly include 'areas outside of the State of Mississippi.' This modified an earlier 2011 opinion (Philips) that had read the law more restrictively.
Disclaimer: This is an official Mississippi Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Mississippi attorney for advice on your specific situation.

Plain-English summary

Magnolia Regional Medical Center's attorney asked whether a Mississippi community hospital could provide services outside the state, as long as the location was within the hospital's defined "service area."

The AG read the current statute and said yes. Section 41-13-10(f) defines "service area" as "that area in which a community hospital may provide services and perform the activities in Section 41-13-35(5), as determined by a board of trustees by its patient origin studies, and may include areas outside of the State of Mississippi" (emphasis added).

The italicized phrase was added by a 2019 amendment (S.B. 2892, 2019 Regular Session). Before that amendment, a 2011 AG opinion (Philips) had said community hospitals couldn't operate in another state. The 2019 amendment changed the law, and the 2021 opinion modified the older Philips opinion to that extent. Hospitals could now legitimately serve out-of-state patients and operate facilities (e.g., clinics, satellite locations) outside Mississippi, as long as the area was within the hospital's service area as determined by the board's patient-origin studies.

The opinion was narrow: it answered the service-area definition question only. It did not address whether other state or federal laws (e.g., licensing in the other state, certificate-of-need requirements, federal Stark Law, EMTALA, etc.) would also apply to the hospital's operations across state lines. Those were separate analyses.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2021. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

What the opinion said for each audience, at the time

For Mississippi community hospitals near state borders

The 2021 opinion was significant for hospitals serving border populations: hospitals along the Tennessee, Alabama, Louisiana, or Arkansas line could legitimately treat the surrounding population and even operate outpatient clinics or specialty offices in those neighboring states. Patient-origin studies showing referrals from out-of-state were now meaningful documentation that supported expansion across the border.

For hospital boards of trustees

The board's "patient origin studies" became the documentary foundation for service-area determination. Hospitals expanding cross-border had to:
1. Document patient origin patterns showing draw from the proposed expansion area.
2. Adopt a board resolution defining the service area to include the cross-border location.
3. Comply with the other state's licensing and regulatory requirements separately.

For health-system attorneys

The 2021 opinion modified Philips (2011), which had been a barrier to cross-border operations. The 2019 statutory amendment was the substantive change; the 2021 opinion just confirmed the AG's reading. Attorneys advising community hospitals on expansion strategy now had clear AG guidance that the Mississippi enabling statute permitted cross-border service.

For competing private and out-of-state hospitals

A Mississippi community hospital coming into a neighboring state's market would compete on the merits, but couldn't be barred by Mississippi law. Out-of-state competitors might have more leverage under the other state's regulatory framework (CON requirements, licensure rules), but the source-state Mississippi authority was now clear.

For federal compliance officers

The opinion only addressed Mississippi's enabling statute. Federal compliance was unchanged: Stark Law, anti-kickback, EMTALA, HIPAA, and Medicare/Medicaid certification all continued to apply. The AG specifically noted "[w]e offer no opinion on the applicability of any other state or federal laws to a Mississippi community hospital operating in another state."

Common questions

Q: What is a "community hospital" in Mississippi?
A: Hospitals organized under §§ 41-13-10 to 41-13-47 of the Mississippi Code. These are typically county- or city-affiliated public hospitals (sometimes operated by hospital districts or trusts) governed by a board of trustees. They have specific authority granted by the enabling statutes, including authority to operate hospitals, clinics, ambulance services, and related healthcare facilities.

Q: What's a "patient origin study"?
A: A documented analysis of where patients come from. Hospitals track ZIP codes of admissions to understand their drawing area. The study supports the board's service-area determination by showing actual patient flow patterns. A hospital that draws 20% of its patients from a neighboring state has documentation supporting cross-border service-area inclusion.

Q: Did the law require AG approval for the cross-border expansion?
A: No. The board of trustees determines the service area through patient-origin studies. The AG opinion was about whether the statute allowed cross-border operation; once that was settled, the board's own determination was the operative authority.

Q: How was the law before the 2019 amendment?
A: Section 41-13-10(f) defined "service area" but didn't expressly authorize cross-border operations. The 2011 Philips opinion read the absence of cross-border authority restrictively, concluding community hospitals could not operate in another state. The 2019 amendment expressly added the cross-border language.

Q: What kinds of services count?
A: Section 41-13-35(5) lists the services a community hospital can provide. Those include hospital, clinic, ambulance, nursing home, and related healthcare services. Whatever services are authorized under § 41-13-35(5) become eligible for cross-border provision after the 2019 amendment.

Q: Could a Mississippi community hospital open a full hospital in another state?
A: The opinion did not address this directly. It addressed "providing services" within a service area that included out-of-state areas. Operating a fully separate hospital might raise different questions about acquisition authority, the other state's CON laws, and bond-financing implications. The 2021 opinion was limited to "providing services," which would include outpatient clinics, telehealth, and similar arrangements.

Background and statutory framework

Mississippi's community hospital enabling legislation (Title 41, Chapter 13) is one of the more comprehensive frameworks for public hospitals in the country. It gives community hospitals broad authority to operate clinics, ambulance services, nursing homes, and related healthcare facilities, all under a board-of-trustees governance structure.

The 2019 amendment to § 41-13-10(f) reflected the reality that healthcare often crosses state lines. Patients travel for specialty care, hospitals build ambulatory networks across borders, and rural hospitals serve communities on both sides of state lines. The pre-2019 reading (per the Philips opinion) was an obstacle to that pattern. The amendment recognized the modern healthcare landscape.

The 2021 opinion's modification of the Philips opinion was procedural housekeeping. AG opinions can be modified or overruled when the underlying statute changes. The Philips opinion correctly stated the law as of 2011; the 2019 amendment changed the law; the 2021 opinion confirmed the new framework. Hospitals with operations in border states can now point to the 2021 opinion as the operative interpretation.

Citations and references

Statutes:
- Miss. Code Ann. § 41-13-10, definitions for community hospital chapter
- Miss. Code Ann. § 41-13-10(f), definition of "service area" (post-2019 amendment includes out-of-state areas)
- Miss. Code Ann. § 41-13-35(5), authorized activities of community hospitals
- Miss. Code Ann. § 41-13-47, end of community hospital chapter

Prior AG opinions cited:
- MS AG Op., Philips (Feb. 18, 2011), pre-2019 amendment opinion that community hospital could not operate in another state (modified)

Bill referenced:
- S.B. 2892 (Reg. Sess. 2019), amended § 41-13-10(f) to include out-of-state areas in service-area definition

Source

Original opinion text

May 14, 2021

Kathryn R. Gilchrist, Esq.
Attorney for Magnolia Regional Medical Center
609 Steed Road
Ridgeland, Mississippi 39157

Re: Service area of community hospital

Dear Ms. Gilchrist:

The Office of the Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion.

Question Presented

Can a community hospital provide services outside of Mississippi, so long as it operates within its "service area"?

Brief Response

Yes. A community hospital may provide authorized services within the hospital's "service area," which "may include areas outside of the State of Mississippi."

Applicable Law and Discussion

Mississippi Code Annotated Sections 41-13-10 through 41-13-47 govern community hospitals. Section 41-13-10 provides, in part:

For purposes of Sections 41-13-10 through 41-13-47, the following words shall have the meanings ascribed herein, unless the context otherwise requires:
...
(f) "Service area" means that area in which a community hospital may provide services and perform the activities in Section 41-13-35(5), as determined by a board of trustees by its patient origin studies, and may include areas outside of the State of Mississippi.

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-13-10 (emphasis added).

As your request notes, our office has previously been asked to opine as to whether a community hospital could operate in another state, so long as it operates within its "service area." MS AG Op., Philips (Feb. 18, 2011). There, we found that a community hospital could not operate in another state because the community hospital enabling legislation did not allow for such operation. While Philips is a correct interpretation of the law as it existed in 2011, Section 41-13-10(f), the definition of "service area," was amended during the 2019 Regular Legislative Session to specifically state that a community hospital's authorized service area "may include areas outside of the State of Mississippi." S.B. 2892, Reg. Sess. (Miss. 2019).[1]

Based on a plain reading of Section 41-13-10(f), as currently written, a community hospital's service area may include areas outside the State. Therefore, so long as the hospital is performing services that it is otherwise authorized to perform, it may do so outside the State of Mississippi, providing such location is within the hospital's service area.[2]

If this office may be of any further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL

By: /s/ Phil Carter
Phil Carter
Special Assistant Attorney General

[1] Our Philips opinion is modified to the extent that it is inconsistent with current law and this opinion.

[2] This opinion is limited to an interpretation of the term "service area," as was amended during the 2019 Regular Legislative Session. We offer no opinion on the applicability of any other state or federal laws to a Mississippi community hospital operating in another state.