What memorial-related ballot summary did the Missouri Attorney General approve for petition 2020-021?

Short answer The Attorney General approved the legal content and form of a proposed summary statement about certain historic memorials on public property. The statement says they could not be removed, renamed, or changed in certain ways unless provided by law. The letter does not decide how the proposed amendment would apply to a particular memorial.
State
Missouri
Opinion
Opinion No. 38-2019
Issued
February 7, 2019
Issued by
Office of the Missouri Attorney General
Requested by
The Honorable John R. Ashcroft, Missouri Secretary of State

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2019. Ask about yours and see what current Missouri law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Missouri Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Missouri attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of State submitted a proposed summary statement for Patricia Thomas’s petition 2020-021 to amend Article XIV, Section 1 of the Missouri Constitution. The statement asks whether certain historic memorials of any age on public property, including named or dedicated statues, schools, streets, bridges, and buildings, should be protected against removal, renaming, or certain other changes unless provided by law.

The Attorney General approved the statement’s legal content and form under § 116.334, RSMo. The letter expressly disclaims endorsement of the petition and a view on its proponents’ objectives. It does not decide which particular memorials would qualify, how a city or school board would act under the proposed amendment, or what “unless provided by law” would require.

Currency note

This letter was issued in 2019. Read the petition text and current law before relying on the proposal’s details or present rules.

The proposed summary statement

Do you want to amend the Missouri Constitution to require that certain historic memorials of any age on public property, such as statues, names of schools, streets, bridges and buildings named or dedicated in honor of any historic conflict, entity, event, or figure, may not be removed, renamed, or otherwise changed in certain ways unless provided by law?

Common questions

Q: Does this letter say every historic memorial on public property would be covered?
A: No. The proposed statement refers to “certain historic memorials” and does not define the full scope. The letter does not analyze which memorials qualify.

Q: Could a city or school board remove or rename a covered memorial?
A: The summary says the proposed restriction would apply “unless provided by law,” but the letter does not interpret that phrase or a local government’s authority. The petition text would be needed to assess a specific case.

Q: Did the Attorney General endorse the petition?
A: No. The letter approves the statement’s legal content and form and expressly disclaims endorsement of the petition or its proponents’ objectives.

Background and statutory framework

The Secretary of State requested review of a proposed summary statement under § 116.334, RSMo. The Attorney General approved that statement’s legal content and form. This letter does not review the petition’s substantive legal effect.

Citations and references

Statute cited: § 116.334, RSMo.

Constitutional provision identified: Article XIV, Section 1 of the Missouri Constitution.

Source

Original opinion text

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI

Eric Schmitt
Attorney General
JEFFERSON CITY
P.O. Box 899
65102
(573) 751-3321

February 7, 2019

OPINION LETTER NO. 38-2019

The Honorable John R. Ashcroft
Missouri Secretary of State
James C. Kirkpatrick State Information Center
600 West Main Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101

Dear Secretary Ashcroft:

This opinion letter responds to your request dated January 28, 2019, for our review under § 116.334, RSMo, of a proposed summary statement prepared for the petition submitted by Patricia Thomas regarding a proposed constitutional amendment to amend Article XIV, Section 1 of the Missouri Constitution, (2020-021). The proposed summary statement is as follows:

Do you want to amend the Missouri Constitution to require that certain historic memorials of any age on public property, such as statues, names of schools, streets, bridges and buildings named or dedicated in honor of any historic conflict, entity, event, or figure, may not be removed, renamed, or otherwise changed in certain ways unless provided by law?

Pursuant to § 116.334, RSMo, we approve the legal content and form of the proposed statement. Because our review of the statement is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition, nor as the expression of any view regarding the objectives of its proponents.

OP-2019-0028

Very truly yours,

ERIC S. SCHMITT
Attorney General

What does Missouri law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2019. Ezel checks the current Missouri statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace