Did the Missouri AG approve the fiscal note for Winston Apple's 2019 statutory initiative creating a state-run health insurance cooperative (file 20-096)?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2019. Ask about yours and see what current Missouri law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
Petition 2020-096 was Winston Apple's statutory initiative to create a state-run health insurance cooperative through the Department of Health and Senior Services. The full mechanics are described in the companion summary-statement opinion 161-2019.
Under § 116.175 RSMo, the State Auditor prepares a fiscal note explaining the petition's expected revenue and cost effects. The AG then reviews the fiscal note's "legal content and form" under § 116.175.4 RSMo. The AG approves form, not accuracy, of the auditor's numbers.
The fiscal note approved here projects no state-government costs from creating the cooperative, with possible savings of an unknown amount if state employees switch their coverage from the existing state-employee health plan to the new cooperative. Local governments expect no costs and possible savings. AG Schmitt's letter approves the legal form of that fiscal note.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 2019. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
The exact fiscal-note summary the AG approved
State governmental entities expect no costs from this proposal and may have savings of an unknown amount if some state employees switch health care coverage to this new health insurance plan. Local governmental entities expect no costs from this proposal and expect savings of an unknown amount.
Common questions
Q: Why no costs to state government?
A: The petition's cooperative model relies on member premiums (called "membership dues") to fund itself. The auditor concluded the new cooperative would not need state appropriations to start up or operate, at least at the level of detail the auditor could analyze. That conclusion would likely have been litigated.
Q: Why "possible savings" if state employees switch? A: Missouri's existing state-employee health plan costs the state money on the employer side. If state employees opt into the new cooperative instead, the state could spend less on employee health benefits. The amount depends on how many employees switch and what the cooperative charges.
Q: Why does the AG say the review does not examine "fairness or sufficiency"? A: § 116.175.4 RSMo limits AG review to legal content and form. Whether the auditor's number is the right number is a separate question.
Q: Did the petition reach the ballot?
A: The opinion does not say. Apple's 2019 petitions do not appear to have advanced to the 2020 ballot.
Background and statutory framework
Chapter 116 RSMo lays out the initiative-petition pipeline. This opinion sits at step 3:
- Proponent files the petition with the Secretary of State.
- AG reviews sufficiency as to form under § 116.332 RSMo.
- State Auditor prepares a fiscal note; AG reviews under § 116.175.4 RSMo (this opinion).
- Secretary of State drafts a summary statement; AG reviews under § 116.334 RSMo.
- Petition certified for circulation.
Citations and references
Statutes: § 116.175 RSMo (the operative provision); Chapter 192 RSMo (Department of Health and Senior Services).
Companion opinion on the same petition (2020-096): 161-2019 (summary statement review).
Source
- Landing page: https://ago.mo.gov/other-resources/ag-opinions/
- Original PDF: https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/attachments/140-2019.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Original opinion text
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI
ERIC SCHMITT
July 26, 2019
OPINION LETTER NO. 140·2019
The Honorable Nicole Galloway
Missouri State Auditor
State Capitol, Room 121
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Dear Auditor Galloway:
This office received your letter of July 17, 2019, submitting a fiscal note and fiscal note summary prepared under § 116.175, RSMo, for an initiative petition submitted by Winston Apple (20·096). The fiscal note summary that you submitted is as follows: State governmental entities expect no costs from this proposal and may have savings of an unknown amount if some state employees switch health care coverage to this new health insurance plan. Local governmental entities expect no costs from this proposal and expect savings of an unknown amount. Under § 116.175.4, RSMo, we approve the legal content and form of the fiscal note summary. Because our review of the fiscal note summary is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the initiative petition or as the expression of any view regarding the objectives of its proponents. Very truly yours,
ERIC S. SCHMITT
Attorney General
Supreme Court Building
207 W. High Street
P.O. Box 899
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: (573) 751-3321
Fax: (573) 751-0774
www.ago.mo.gov
OP-2019·0165
What does Missouri law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2019. Ezel checks the current Missouri statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace