What fiscal note summary did the Missouri Attorney General approve for Winston Apple’s petition 20-093?

Short answer The AG approved the legal content and form of a summary estimating no costs or savings for state and local government. The letter identifies no reason for that estimate and does not describe the petition’s terms.
State
Missouri
Opinion
Opinion No. 139-2019
Issued
July 26, 2019
Issued by
Office of the Missouri Attorney General (Eric S. Schmitt)
Requested by
Hon. Nicole Galloway, Missouri State Auditor

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2019. Ask about yours and see what current Missouri law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2019
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Missouri Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Missouri attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

On July 26, 2019, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt approved the legal content and form of a fiscal note summary for Winston Apple’s initiative petition (20-093). The summary says: "State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings from this proposal." The letter does not explain that estimate or describe the petition’s proposed legal changes. Official opinion.

The AG expressly says its mandated review should not be construed as endorsement of the petition or its proponents’ objectives.

What this means for you

Fiscal researchers and petition readers. This letter reports a no-cost, no-savings estimate from state and local entities. It provides no causal explanation or account of later ballot status.

Election officials. The AG approved the summary’s legal content and form under § 116.175.4, RSMo. The letter does not assess the petition’s policy merits.

Common questions

What fiscal impact did the summary estimate?

No costs or savings for state and local governmental entities.

Why did it estimate no costs or savings?

The letter gives no reason. It quotes the estimate and approves the summary’s legal content and form.

Did the AG endorse the petition?

No. The letter expressly disclaims endorsement and any view on the proponents’ objectives.

Background and statutory framework

The State Auditor submitted a fiscal note and summary under § 116.175, RSMo. The AG approved the summary’s legal content and form under § 116.175.4, RSMo. Read the official letter.

Citations

  • § 116.175, RSMo (fiscal note submission).
  • § 116.175.4, RSMo (AG review).

Source

Original opinion text

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI
ERIC SCHMITT
July 26, 2019
OPINION LETTER NO. 139-2019
The Honorable Nicole Galloway
Missouri State Auditor
State Capitol, Room 121
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Dear Auditor Galloway:
This office received your letter of July 17, 2019, submitting a fiscal note and fiscal note summary prepared under § 116.175, RSMo, for an initiative petition submitted by Winston Apple (20·093). The fiscal note summary that you submitted is as follows: State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings from this proposal. Under § 116.175.4, RSMo, we approve the legal content and form of the fiscal note summary. Because our review of the fiscal note summary is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the initiative petition or as the expression of any view regarding the objectives of its proponents. Very truly yours,

ERIC S. SCHMITT
Attorney General

Supreme Court Building
207 W. High Street
P.O. Box 899
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: (573) 751-3321
Fax: (573) 751-0774
www.ago.mo.gov

OP-2019-0164

What does Missouri law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2019. Ezel checks the current Missouri statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace