Did Missouri approve ballot wording allowing citizen challenges and protecting citizen-enacted laws?

Plain-English summary

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey approved the legal content and form of the proposed summary statement for Jamie Howard's initiative petition 2026-064. The statement described prohibiting repeal, amendment, or undermining of any citizen-enacted law or constitutional provision unless 80% of legislators referred the change to voters.

It also described preventing legislatively referred constitutional amendments from limiting initiative or referendum powers, citizen challenges and immediate court rewriting of misleading ballot titles, general-election placement for most measures unless 80% of legislators and the governor approved a special election, and retention of existing majority-vote and signature thresholds. The opinion did not endorse the petition.

What this means for you

Missouri voters and initiative proponents

The reviewed statement described protection for citizen-enacted laws and constitutional provisions and retention of existing majority-vote and signature thresholds.

State legislators and election officials

The statement described an 80% legislative referral threshold and general-election placement for most measures unless the stated special-election threshold was met.

Courts, citizens, and election lawyers

The statement described citizen challenges to misleading ballot titles and immediate court rewriting to make them completely unbiased, clear, and accurate.

Common questions

Q: What threshold did the statement identify for legislative changes?
A: Eighty percent of legislators to refer the change to voters.

Q: Could citizens challenge ballot titles?
A: Yes. The statement described citizen challenges and immediate court rewriting.

Q: When would most ballot measures be held?
A: At general elections unless 80% of legislators and the governor approved a special election.

Q: What petition rules would remain?
A: Existing majority-vote and signature thresholds.

Background and statutory framework

The Missouri Secretary of State requested review on July 2, 2025. The attorney general reviewed the proposed summary statement under § 116.334, RSMo and approved it on July 11, 2025.

The proposal was identified as Jamie Howard's petition 2026-064. The opinion reproduced the statement's five provisions concerning citizen measures, legislative thresholds, elections, ballot titles, and petition requirements.

Citations and references

Statute: § 116.334, RSMo.

Source

• Landing page: https://ago.mo.gov/other-resources/ag-opinions/
• Original PDF: https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/125-2025.pdf

Original opinion text

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI
ANDREW BAILEY

July 11, 2025

OPINION LETTER NO. 125-2025

The Honorable Denny Hoskins
Missouri Secretary of State
James C. Kirkpatrick State Information Center
600 West Main Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101

Dear Secretary Hoskins:

This opinion letter responds to your request dated July 2, 2025 for our review under § 116.334, RSMo of a proposed summary statement prepared for the petition submitted by Jamie Howard, 2026-064. The proposed summary statement is as follows:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:

• Prohibit the legislature from repealing, amending, or undermining any law or constitutional provision enacted by citizen initiative unless 80% of legislators refer the change to voters;

• Prevent legislatively referred constitutional amendments from limiting the powers of initiative or referendum;

• Allow citizens to challenge misleading ballot titles and require courts to immediately rewrite them to be completely unbiased, clear, and accurate;

• Require most ballot measures to appear at general elections unless a special election is approved by 80% of legislators and the governor; and

• Retain existing majority vote and signature thresholds?

Pursuant to § 116.334, RSMo, we approve the legal content and form of the proposed statement. Because our review of the statement is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition, nor as the expression of any view regarding the objectives of its proponents.

Very truly yours,

ANDREW BAILEY
Attorney General

OP-2025-137

Supreme Court Building
207 W. High Street
P.O. Box 899
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: (573) 751-3321
Fax: (573) 751-0774
www.ago.mo.gov