ME Maine AG Opinion 2012-08-08 2012-08-08

Did Maine's 2012 AG opinion say the Penobscot Nation or the State has authority to regulate hunting and fishing on the main stem of the Penobscot River?

Short answer: The AG concluded that the Penobscot Nation may regulate hunting on, and restrict access to, the islands from Medway to Old Town that make up its Reservation, but may not regulate activities on the Penobscot River itself or restrict public access to it. Except for those Reservation islands, the river is held in trust by the State for all Maine citizens, and Maine law applies there. The State has exclusive regulatory jurisdiction over activities on the river.
Currency note: this opinion is from 2012
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Maine Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Maine attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked at the bottom of this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Acts (state at 30 M.R.S. section 6201 et seq.; federal at 25 U.S.C. section 1721 et seq.) settled centuries of land-claim litigation between Maine and the Wabanaki tribes (Penobscot Nation, Passamaquoddy Tribe, Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, Aroostook Band of Micmacs) in 1980. The settlement allocated land and money, recognized the tribes, and divided jurisdiction between the State and the tribes for many regulatory matters, including hunting and fishing.

The Commissioner of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and the Maine Warden Service asked this office to clarify, for state and tribal game wardens and for recreational users, who regulates hunting and fishing on the main stem of the Penobscot River. The AG drew a clean line: the Penobscot Nation may lawfully regulate hunting on, and restrict access to, the islands within the river from Medway to Old Town that comprise its Reservation, but it may not regulate activities on, nor restrict public access to, the river itself. Except for those Reservation islands, the river is open for public use, and the State of Maine has exclusive regulatory jurisdiction over activities taking place on it.

The opinion grounded that conclusion in the division of authority set out in the Maine Indian Claims Settlement Acts. The Nation's exclusive authority to regulate the taking of wildlife runs to its Indian Territory (30 M.R.S. § 6207(1)(A)), which includes the Reservation islands but not the river. The river, by contrast, is held in trust by the State for all Maine citizens, and state hunting law applies there (30 M.R.S. § 6204).

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2012. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Background and statutory framework

The Maine Indian Claims Settlement Acts (state at 30 M.R.S. §§ 6201, et seq.; federal at 25 U.S.C. §§ 1721, et seq.) were enacted in 1980 to resolve tribal land claims, and they set out how the Penobscot Nation and the State may each regulate activities such as hunting and fishing (30 M.R.S. § 6207).

The opinion turned on the difference between the Nation's Indian Territory and the river. The Nation has exclusive authority to regulate hunting, trapping and other taking of wildlife within its Indian Territory (30 M.R.S. § 6207(1)(A)), which the statute defines to include the Penobscot Indian Reservation plus additional trust land (30 M.R.S. § 6205(2)). The Reservation itself is defined as the islands in the Penobscot River reserved to the Nation, "consisting solely of Indian Island ... and all islands northward thereof" (30 M.R.S. § 6203(8)). Like a private landowner, the Nation may restrict access to those islands.

The river itself, however, is not part of the Reservation. The AG concluded it is held in trust by the State for all Maine citizens, so state hunting and fishing law applies fully there (30 M.R.S. § 6204) and the public is not subject to additional restrictions from the Nation. The opinion noted that the Nation must conspicuously post any land or water it regulates so the public has notice (30 M.R.S. § 6207(5)).

Common questions

Can the Penobscot Nation close part of the river to the public?
On the islands that make up its Reservation, yes; the Nation may restrict access just as a private landowner could. On the river itself, no. The river is open to the public, and only the State regulates activity there.

Whose hunting and fishing rules apply to someone canoeing or fishing the main stem?
Maine's. The AG concluded the public on the river is subject to Maine law just as elsewhere in the State, with no additional Penobscot Nation restrictions.

How does a member of the public know where the Nation's authority applies?
The opinion points to 30 M.R.S. § 6207(5), which requires the Nation to conspicuously post any land or water it regulates so the public has reasonable notice.

Citations

  • 30 M.R.S. §§ 6201, et seq.
  • 30 M.R.S. § 6207
  • 30 M.R.S. § 6207(1)(A)
  • 30 M.R.S. § 6207(5)
  • 30 M.R.S. § 6205(2)
  • 30 M.R.S. § 6203(8)
  • 30 M.R.S. § 6204
  • 25 U.S.C. §§ 1721, et seq.

Source

Original opinion text

MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE

    The following document is provided by the
   LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY

at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library
http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib

Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied
(searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions)
REGIONAL OFI'ICES,
2012 - 03 84 HARLOW ST., ZND FLOOR
BANGOR, MAINE 04401
TEL, (207) 941,3070
FAX: (207) 941,3075
William J. Schneider 415 CONGRESS ST., STE. 301
ATTORNEY GENERAL PORTLAND, MAINE 04101
Tm, (207) 822-0260
FAX: (207) 822-0259

                                       STATE OF MAINE                                    14 ACCESS HlGHWAY, STE.1

TEL: (207) 626-8800 OPFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CARlBOU, MAINJ-~04736
TEI, (207) 4%-3792
TTY: 1-800-577-6690 6 STATE HOUSE STATION FAX, (207) 496-3291
AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333,0006

                                           August 8, 2012

Chandler Woodcock, Commissioner
Department of Inland Fisheries and \.Vikllife
41 State House Station
Augusta, ~,rn 04333-0041

Colonel Joel T. Wilkinson
Maine Warden Service
41 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333-0041

Dear Commissioner Woodcock and Colonel Wilkinson:

        You have requested an Opinion from this Office regarding the respective regulatory

jurisdictions of the Penobscot Indian Nation ("Penobscot Nation") and the State of Maine
("State") relating to hunting and fishing on the main stem of the Penobscot River ("River"). This
Opinion is intended to clarify the jurisdictional issue for state and tribal game wardens, as ,vell as
for those engaged in recreational activities on the River. As will be explained in more detail
below, the Penobscot Nation may lawfully regulate hunting on, and restrict access to, the islands
within the River from lv1edway to Old Town that comprise its Reservation, but may not regulate
activities occurring on, nor restrict public access to, the River itself. With the exception of the
islands that form the Penobscot Indian Reservation, the River is open for public use and
enjoyment, m~d the State of Maine has exclusive regulatory jurisdiction over activities taking
place on the River.

       The division ofregulatory jurisdiction as bet\veen the Penobscot Nation and the State is

set forth in An Act to Implement the Maine Indian Land Claims Settlement Act, 30 M.R.S.
§§ 6201, et seq., ,:vhich was ratified and confirmed by Congress in the 1,1aine Indian Claims
Settlement Ac/, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1721, el seq. Among other things, these statutes carefully explain
how the Penobscot Nation and the State, respectively, may regulate activities such as hunting and
fishing. 30 M.R.S. § 6207.

      The Penobscot Nation has exclusive authority to regulate hunting, trapping and other

taking of v,1ildlife within its Indian Territory. 30 M.R.S. § 6207(l)(A). Its Territory is defined in
the law to include both the Penobscot Indian Reservation, as well as additional land purchased by
the United States Secretary of the Interior on the Penobscot Nation's behalf. 30 M.R.S.

                                         Piur--·n;n ON l{f.l'Yt:Lf.P PAPER

§ 6205(2). The Penobscot Indian Reservation is defined to include ''the islands in the Penobscot
River reserved to the Penobscot Nation by agreement with the States of Massachusetts and
Maine consisting solely of Indian Island . , . and all islands northward thereof that existed on
June 29, 1818, excepting any islands transferred to a person or entity after that date." 30 M.R.S.
§ 6203(8). 1

                  For the purposes of your inquiry, which involves activities occurring on the main stem of
          the River, this means the Penobscot Nation has authority to regulate hunting and fishing on those
          islands included in its Reservation from Indian Island in Old Town, northward to the confluence
          of the East and West branches in Medway.2 Like private landowners, the Penobscot Nation may
          also restrict access to their lands, here islands, as it sees fit. However, the River itself is not part
          of the Penobscot Nation's Reservation, and therefore is not subject to its regulatory authority or
          proprietary control. The Penobscot River is held in trust by the State for all Maine citizens, and
          State law, including statutes and regulations governing hunting, are fully applicable there.
          30 M.R.S. § 6204. Accol'dingly, members of the public engaged in hunting, fishing or other
          recreational activities on the waters of the Penobscot River are subject to Maine law as they
          would be elsewhere in the State, and are not subject to any additional restrictions from the
          Penobscot Nation.

                                      To avoid friction on the Penobscot River, it is important that state and tribal officials, as

· · · · · · · · · · · · ·· · - · · ,vellasmembers ofthe·PenobseotNationand·· the generalpublic, have a-clear understanding of
the regulatory jurisdictions of the Penobscot Nation and the State of Maine. Both the State and
the Penobscot Nation must encourage citizens to respond civilly to uniformed tribal and state
game wardens performing their official duties. All citizens must heed and comply with
ordinances promulgated by the Penobscot Nation governing the islands it owns> as well as State
laws and regulations governing the River.

                                                                            Sincerely,



                                                                           &~ HNEl:R, 1       1




          1
            This definition was amended twice with the agreement of the Penobscot Nation to add lands to the
          Reservation. In 1988, the statute was amended to add Smith Island, and 24 acres of land located at
          Matagamon Dam Lot on the East Branch of the River. 30 M.R.S. § 6203(8). In 2009, it was amended
          again to add 714 acres of land in Arg)1le, known as the Argyle East Parcel. As part of its Reservation, and
          therefore Territory, hunting on these additional lands is subject to regulation by the Penobscot Nation.
          Man-made boom piers in the River are not within the scope of this definition and therefore not part of
          Penobscot Indian Territory.

          2
           By law, the Penobscot Nation must conspicuously post any land or water it regulates in order to provide
          reasonable notice to the public of any such restrictions. 30 M.R.S. § 6207(5).


                                                                      2