Could Maine parochial school teachers receive state study loans and cancel them by teaching at a religious school?

Short answer The 1986 Maine Attorney General said parochial school teachers were eligible for Blaine House study loans under the statute, although an agency rule excluded them. He concluded that proposed loan cancellation for service in religious schools would violate the Establishment Clause under the case law he applied.
State
Maine
Opinion
AG Opinion 1986-01-06
Issued
January 6, 1986
Issued by
James E. Tierney, Attorney General of Maine
Requested by
Honorable N. Paul Gauvreau

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ask about yours and see what current Maine law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Maine Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Maine attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

In 1986, Maine Attorney General James Tierney separated loan eligibility from loan cancellation under the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program. He read the statute making graduate-study and continuing-education loans available to “a teacher in a Maine school” as including teachers at parochial or other religious schools. Yet he concluded that proposed legislation canceling those loans in exchange for teaching at a religious school would violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause under the Supreme Court decisions he applied at the time.

There was an additional practical distinction. An Education Department rule then in force excluded teachers in sectarian schools from receiving loans. The Attorney General said the statute did not require that exclusion and that the rule could be changed to permit those teachers to receive loans. The opinion did not say the rule had already changed. Under the program as described in the opinion, a teacher could cancel a loan by return service in a public school or a private school approved for tuition purposes; such approval required a nonsectarian school. Teaching in a parochial school therefore did not qualify as return service for cancellation under the existing statute.

The proposed bill, L.D. 1143, would have extended cancellation to teachers who served in parochial schools. The Attorney General found its educational purpose secular but concluded that forgiving state loans for that service would have a constitutionally impermissible effect of advancing religion. He also reasoned that monitoring teachers to ensure only secular instruction would entangle the state with religious schools. He distinguished direct loans to teachers from canceling repayment because they taught in those schools. These were historical constitutional conclusions based on the 1986 statutory scheme and case law.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1986. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Did the 1986 loan statute include teachers at religious schools?
A: The Attorney General said yes. He read “a teacher in a Maine school” in 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12505(2) to include parochial or religious school teachers.

Q: Could those teachers actually receive loans under the agency rule then in force?
A: The opinion said the Education Department's rule excluded sectarian-school teachers. It concluded that exclusion was not required by the statute and the rule could be altered to allow eligibility.

Q: Could teaching at a parochial school cancel a state study loan under the existing program?
A: No. The opinion said qualifying return service was in public schools or private schools approved for tuition purposes, and the latter category required nonsectarian schools.

Q: How did the AG assess a bill allowing forgiveness for religious-school teaching?
A: He concluded that such legislation would violate the Establishment Clause under the Supreme Court precedent he applied in 1986, despite finding the bill's stated educational purpose secular.

Q: Did the opinion say a teacher could never cancel a loan after working at a religious school?
A: It said a religious-school teacher could receive a loan under the statute and could seek cancellation through later qualifying service in a public school or approved private school. It objected to cancellation for service at the religious school itself.

Background and statutory framework

The program authorized interest-free loans for qualified students and teachers. 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12505(2) described eligible teachers broadly as those in a Maine school. 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12508 allowed cancellation through specified return service, while 20-A M.R.S.A. § 2951(2) required a tuition-approved private school to be nonsectarian. The opinion also described an implementing rule that excluded religious-school teachers at the loan-eligibility stage, a restriction the Attorney General found broader than the statute. On the proposed cancellation amendment, he applied the then-prevailing Establishment Clause framework from Supreme Court decisions including Lemon v. Kurtzman and discussed both the effect of loan forgiveness and the state monitoring that a secular-teaching condition would require.

Citations and references

  • 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12505(2): teacher eligibility for the loans.
  • 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12508: return-service cancellation provision discussed in the opinion.
  • 20-A M.R.S.A. § 2951(2): nonsectarian condition for tuition-approved private schools cited in the opinion.

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain — the linked PDF is authoritative.

JAMES E. TIERNEY
86-1'
ATTORNEY GENERAL

STATE OF MAINE

DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE HOUSE STATION 6
AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333

January 6, 1986

Honorable N. Paul Gauvreau
56 Tampa Street
Lewiston, Maine 04240

Dear Senator Gauvreau:

This will respond to your letter of September 13, 1985, in which you request an Opinion of this Department concerning the following questions:

1. May parochial school teachers apply for and receive Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance loans under the provisions of 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12505(2)?

2. Would passage of legislation applying the loan cancellation provisions of the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program to parochial school teachers constitute enactment of a law respecting the establishment of religion and, thus, violate the First.
Amendment to the United States Constitution as made· applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment?

For the reasons discussed below, it is the Opinion of this Department that, pursuant to 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12505(2), parochial school teachers in Maine are eligible to apply for and receive loans under the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Act. This Department further concludes, however, that legislation applying the loan cancellation provisions of the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program to teachers in parochial schools would, if enacted, violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
-2-

I. The Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program During its third special session, the 111th Legislature enacted 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12501-12510 (P.L. 1985, c. 859, Part F) and established the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program "to recognize Maine high school graduates who attain high academic achievement, and to provide financial assistance for post-secondary education of high school students and advanced degree or continued study by teachers." 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12502. Under this Program, qualified students and teachers may receive interest-free loans "of up to $1,500 per academic year or $6,000 total • • • • " 20-A M.R.S.A.
§ 12504. The eligibility criteria for teachers are stated in 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12505(2) as follows:
Graduate study or continuing education_ loans shall be given only to a teacher in a Maine school. Preference shall be given to teachers of subjects which have been determined to be underserved.".!/
(emphasis supplied)
A loan given to a qualified teacher under the Program may be cancelled, in whole or in part, under certain circumstances, as described in 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12508:
Each recipient of a loan designated for teachers pursuing an advanced degree or continued study may cancel the total amount of the loan by completing 2 years of return service in the public schools or private schools approved for tuition purposes in the State. The repayment period shall be one year if return service is performed in underserved subject areas or in geographically isolated areas as determined

1/ The term "underserved subject areas" is defined to mean:
• • • those subjects or programs, required or authorized to be taught in the public schools for which there is an insufficient supply of teachers, as may be determined by the commissioner, including but not limited to, special education, computer studies, science and math.
20-A M.R.S.A. § 12501(7).
-3- by the commissioner. Return service may also cancel the loan on a proportional basis, reducing the total amount of the debt by 50% for each year of return service.
Return service for this purpose shall be performed within 3 years of graduation from the institution of higher education or completion of the course or courses for which the funds were given.1/

Among other requirements, in order for a private school to be "approved for tuition purposes," it must be "a nonsectarian school in accordance with the First Amendment of the United States Constitution." 20-A M.R.S.A. § 2951(2). Accordingly, "return service" by a teacher in a parochial or religious school does not qualify for cancellation of loans awarded under the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program.l/

Finally, a Program loan which has not been cancelled, either in whole or in part, must be repaid to the State "within 3 years of graduation from the institution of higher education or courses for which the funds were given according to a schedule established by the commissioner." 20-A M.R.S.A.
§ 12508(2).

II. Eligibility of Parochial School Teachers to Apply for and Receive Loans under the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program

Your first question seeks this Department's interpretation as to whether, under existing provisions of law, parochial or

2/ The term "return service" is defined to mean:

• • • teacher service in public elementary or secondary schools in Maine or a Maine private school approved for tuition purposes for a full school year.

ll Blaine House Scholar loans made to high school graduates may also be cancelle~ by completing the required "return service" "in the public schools or private schools approved for tuition purposes." 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12507. In the case of such loans, total cancellation of the loan requires 4 years of "return service" or 2 years in underserved subject areas, and partial cancellation at the rate of 25% per year of return service is also allowed.
-4-
religious school teachers may apply for and receive Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program loans. It is
•the Opinion of this Department that they may.
As noted above, the only eligibility criterion for graduata study or continuing education loans under the Program is that the recipient be "a teacher in a Maine school." 20-A M.R.S.A.
§ 12505(2). In contrast, the Legislature clearly expressed its intention that the provisions governing the cancellation of Program loans be limited to "return service" in public schools and private schools "approved for tuition purposes," thereby excluding "return service" in parochial or religious schools from qualifying for loan cancellation. It thus appears that the Legislature made a deliberate choice to make Program loans available, within budgetary limitations, to any teacher "in a Maine school." It is, of course, a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation that the words of a statute are to be given their common meaning, unless specifically defined otherwise. 1 M.R.S.A. § 72(3). See generally State v. Vaine, 466 A.2d 471, cert. denied, 104 S.Ct. 2385 (1983); Concord General Mutual Ins. Co. v. Patrons-Oxford Mutual Ins. Co., 411 A.2d 1017 (1980). Accordingly, it is the Opinion of this Department that the phrase "a teacher in a Maine school" in 20-A M.R.S.A.
§ 12505(2) means exactly what it says and includes a teacher in a parochial or religious school in Maine.~@

~/ Pursuant to 20-A M.R.S.A. § 12510, the Co~issioner of Educational and Cultural Services has promulgated rules implementing the Blaine House Scholars Program. See Rules for the Conduct of the Blaine House Scholars Program, Me. Dep't. of Ed. & Cult. Services Reg. ch. 136 (Jan. 24, 1985 and Nov. 20, 1985), a copy of which is attached. Section 1 of these rules defines the term "teacher" to mean only those persons who are employees of "a public school or private school approved for tuition purposes" and certain state operated schools. Thus, the Department's rules prohibit teachers in sectarian· schools from receiving loans in the first instance. While this provision may repres~nt a reasonable administrative policy on the part of the Department, it is not, as indicated in Part II of this Opinion, required by the statute. Nor, as indicated in Part III of this Opinion, would permitting eligibility for loans to sectarian school teachers violate the Establishment Clause. Thus, the rule may safely be altered to permit such eligibility.
-5-

III. Constitutionality of Legislation Permitting Return Service in Parochial or Religious Schools to Qualify for Loan Cancellation
Your second question calls ~pon this Office to express its Opinion on the constitutionality of legislation permitting "return service" in parochial or religious schools to cancel loans awarded pursuant to the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program. While recognizing that cases arising under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment have presented "some of the most perplexing questions to come before" the United States Supreme Court,5/ it is the Opinion of this Department, based upon existing Supreme Court precedent, that the enactment of legislation to accomplish the purpose described above would violate that constitutional provision.
In Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), the United States Supreme Court articulated a three-part test to "serve • • • as guidelines with which to identify instances in which the objectives of the Establishment Clause have been impaired." Meek v. Pittenger, 421 U.S. 349, 359 (1975).
Every analysis in this area must begin with consideration of the cumulative criteria developed by the Court over many years.
Three such tests may be gleaned from our cases. First, [in order not to violate the Establishment Clause] the statute must have a secular legislative purpose; second, its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion;. finally, the statute must not foster 'an excessive governmental entanglement with religion.'
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. at 612-613. The United States Supreme Court has recently reaffirmed "that state action alleged to violate the Establishment Clause should be measured

~/ Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756, 760 (1972).
-6-
against the Lemon criteria. 11 !/ Grand Rapids School District v. Ball, --u.s.--, 105 s.ct. 3216, 3223 (1985).

You have informed this Department that during the First Session of the 112th Legislature, you sponsored legislation to amend the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program to permit "return service" for loan cancellation purposes to be performed in "parochial schools approved by the commissioner." (See Legislative Document No. 1143). After examining L.D. 1143, it is the Opinion of this Department that it has a secular purpose and, consequently, would not violate the Establishment Clause on that basis.

The Statement of Fact accompanying L.D. 1143 provides, in relevant part:

This bill will accord to parochial school teachers the same opportunity to secure forgiveness to [sic] their school loans as is now provided to teachers in public schools or private schools approved for tuition purposes. Parochial schools provide an educational opportunity for hundreds of elementary and secondary students. Frequently parochial school teachers receive lower wages and benefits than their counterparts in the public school system. The need for quality exists as strongly in the parochial school system as it does in the public sector. This bill encourages bright individuals to enter the teaching profession without regard to the religious orientation of the teaching unit.

!/ Before applying the three-part analysis described above, it is necessary to clarify certain terms. In your letter of September 13, 1985, you refer simply to "parochial" schools. The Supreme Court has observed that not alL religious schools share the same characteristics. Nevertheless, in evaluating various programs providing some form of aid to "parochial" schools, the Court has attempted to determine whether the institutions benefitting therefrom are "pervasively sectarian," i.e., characterized by an affirmative purpose to promote religious beliefs. Grand Rapids School District v. Ball, 105 s.ct. at 3223; Hunt v. McNair, 413 U.S. 734, 735 (1973); Walz v. Tax Commission, 397 U.S. 664, 671 (1970). Throughout the course of this Opinion, it is in that sense that the term "parochial" or "religious" school is used.
-7-
It seems apparent that the legislative purpose of L.O. 1143 was secular in nature, namely, to improve the quality of education provided to school-age children, regardless of whether they are attending public or private-schools. Such a purpose is clearly secular in nature and would not violate the "purpose" test as formulated by the Supreme Court. See Sloan v. Lemon, 413 U.S. 825, 829-30 {1973); Committee for~bl1c Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist, 413 U.S. at 773; Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 {1971). Compare Wallace v. Jaffree, --u.s.--, 105 s.ct. 2479, 2490 {1985) {expressed purpose of Alabama statute was to return voluntary prayer to public schools and therefore statute had no secular purpose).
As is often the case, however, legislative enactments which have secular purposes may nevertheless violate the Establishment Clause because they have a primary or principal effect which advances religion or because they create the potential for excessive governmental entanglement with religion. If legislation similar to L.D. 1143 were enacted, its primary and principal effect would be to allow individuals to cancel state-paid loans in return for teaching in parochial or religious schools. Based upon an examination of relevant Supreme Court precedent, it is this Department's Opinion that such an "effect" would violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Moreover, attempts by government officials to monitor teachers in religious schools to make certain that only secular subjects were taught would excessively entangle the State with religion and violate the Establishment Clause for that reason as well.
In Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 {1971), the Supreme Court invalidated a Rhode Island law which provided for a direct 15% reimbursement to teachers in sectarian elementary and secondary schools, and a Pennsylvania law giving a limited reimbursement to sectarian elementary and secondary schools for teacher salaries, text books and instructional materials. Although the salary reimbursements were available only to teaches who taught secular subjects, the Supreme Court rejected the argument that secular teaching and religious instruction can be isolated in a pervasively religious environment.
We • • • recognize that a dedicated religious person, teaching in a school affiliated with his or her faith and operated to inculcate its tenets, will inevitably experience great difficulty in remaining religiously neutral. Doctrines and faith are not inculcated or advanced by neutrals. With the best of intentions such a teacher would find it hard to make a total -8- separation between secular teaching and religious doctrine.

Id. at 618-169.

The same result was reached in Meek v. Pittenger, 421 U.S.
349 (1975) in which the Court struck down a statute providing for the loan of state-paid professional staff - including teachers - to non-public schools to provide remedial and accelerated instruction, guidance counseling and testing, and other services on the premises of non-public schools. The Court held that the prqgrams in question involved an unacceptable risk that state-sponsored instructional personnel would "advance the religious mission of the church-related schools in which they serve," since "[w]hether the subject is 'remedial reading', 'advanced reading,' or simply 'reading,' a teacher remains a teacher, and the danger that religious doctrine will become intertwined with secular instruction persists." Id. at 370.

During its 1984-1985 Term, the Supreme Court invalidated two programs operated by the Grand Rapids School District whereby public school teachers taught secular subjects in parochial schools either during the regular school day or after school. Once again, the Court ruled the programs unconstitutional because of the danger that teachers in a pervasively religious environment "may well subtly (or overtly) conform their instruction to the environment in which they teach • • • • " Grand Rapids School District v. Ball, 105 s.ct. 3225. Moreover, the Court explained

• • • that an important concern of the effects test is whether the symbolic union of church and state effected by the challenged governmental action is sufficiently likely to be perceived by adherents of the controlling denominations as an endorsement, and by the nonadherents as a disapproval, of their individual religious choices. The inquiry into this kind of effect must be conducted with particular care when many of the citizens perceiving the governmental message are children in their formative years. The symbolism of a union between church and state is most likely to influence children of tender years, whose experience is limited and whose beliefs consequently are the function of environment as much as of free and voluntary choice.

105 s.ct. at 3226.
-9-
While the Blaine House Scholars and Financial Assistance Program significantly differs from the programs described above and invalidated by the Supreme Court, a provision providing for the cancellation of state loans for teaching in religious schools would raise many of the same concerns under the Establishment Clause. For example, although the statute could be redrafted so th·at the loans could only be cancelled by teaching secular subjects, the Supreme Court has emphatically rejected the notion that secular and religious instruction can be neatly separated in the environment which characterizes most parochial or religious schools. Moreover, the fact that the State is willing to cancel repayment of loans made with public funds because the recipient teaches in a parochial school may very well be the type of symbolic message which the Supreme Court described as "an impermissible effect under the Establishment Clause." Grand Rapids School District v. Ball, 105 s.ct. at 3227.
Finally, it might be suggested that in those instances where loan cancellation is being accomplished by teachers in parochial schools, th~ State could adopt a procedure_ to supervise and monitor the teacher to assure that only secular subjects were taught and to minimize any perception that an impermissible, "symbolic union" between church and state was being created. The Supreme Court, however, has held that such a program of supervision would itself violate the Establishment Clause by resulting· in the "excessive entanglement of church and state, an Establishment Clause concern distinct from that addressed by the effects doctrine." Aguilar v. Fenton, --U.S.
--, 105 S.Ct. 3232, 3237 (1985). · In Aguilar, the Court invalidated New York City's program of using federal funds under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Assistance Act of 1965 (29 U.S.C. § 2701 e t ~ . ) to provide instructional services to parochial school students on the premises of parochial schools. The City attempted to save the constitutionality of its program by adopting a system designed to monitor the religious content of the publicly-funded classes in the religious schools. The Court held that in order for the City to be certain that public funds were not being used for religious purposes, a "permanent and pervasive State presence in the sectarian schools receiving aid" would be required. g. at 3238. The Court went on to conclude:
This pervasive monitoring by public authorities in the sectarian schools infringes precisely those Establishment
Clause values at the root of the prohibition of excessive entanglement. Agents of the State must visit and inspect the religious school regularly, alert for the subtle or overt presence of religious matter in
-10-
Title I classes . . . . In addition, the religious school must obey these same agents when they make determinations as to what is and what is not a 'religious symbol' and thus off limits in a Title I classroom. In short, the religious school, which has as a primary purpose the advancement and preservation of a particular religion must endure the ongoing presence of state personnel whose primary purpose is to monitor teachers and students in an attempt to guard against the infiltration of religious thought.

Id. at 3238-3239.

In view of the foregoing, it is the Opinion of this Department that the enactment of legislation similar to that proposed in L.D. 1143 would violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. This is not to say, of course, that there is any constitutional difficulty in extending.loans to teachers in private or religious schools in the first instance. If such teachers were to receive such loans, and to seek cancellation of them by return service in public schools or private schools approved for tuition purposes, the Establishment Clause would not be violated because the beneficiary of their improved skills would not be private or religious institutions.

I hope this information is helpful to you, and please do not hesitate to contact thi~ Off•ice if we can be of further assistance.
ely,

TIERNEY
General

JET/ec
cc: Commissioner Robert E. Boose

Rep. Patrick E. Paradis
Rep. Alfred L. Brodeur
Rep. James R. Handy
Sponsors of L.D. 1143

Sen. Larry M. Brown
Rep. Ada K. Brown
Chairper~ons, Joint Standing
Committee on Education
05-
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL .SERVICES

071 BUREAU OF SCHOOL MANAGEMENT

Chapter 136 RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE BLAINE HOUSE SCHOLARS PROGRA!'.

SUM.MARY: CMR 136 details the rules to be utilized in the conduct of the Blaine House Scholars Program

  1. Definitions

    A. Academic Achievement. Academic achievement is defined as graduation in
    the top one-half of the class.

    B. Duly Enrolled. Duly enrolled is defined as th~ time at which an eligible
    individual has attended the first class meeting.

    C. Eligible Individuals. El~gible individuals means students and teachers
    who meet eligibility requirements as determined in sections 12505 and 12507 of 20-A, M.R.S.A., chapter 428.

    D. Institution of Higher Education. An institution of higher education is
    defined as a postsecondary educational institution offering two year, four year, or graduate level programs which lead to the attainment of Associate, Baccalaureate, Master or Doctorate Degrees and vocational-technical institutes offering at least a two year program of study beyond grade 12. The institution of higher education shall be located within this state, another state or a foreign country, the District of Columbia or United States Trust Territories. Federally subsidized military academies will not be eligible.

    E. Teacher. A teacher is defined as a person certified by the Department of
    Educational and Cultural Services who is an employee of a public school or private school approved for tuition purposes or a state operated school including elementary and secondary teacher, specialized subject teacher, vocational-
    -industrial teacher as defined in the certification rules of the State Board of Education and also includes by position title the following, unless subsequently modified by future legislation:

        1.   Classroom teacher
        2.   Itinerant teacher
        3.   Guidance counselor
        4.   Librarian-media specialist
        5.   Special education teacher
        6.   Special teacher of reading
        7.   Speech clinician teacher
    

    r. Preservice. Preservice is defined as preparation to become a teacher
    either through completion of a four year teacher training program or through a liberal arts program and teaching pedagogy leading to certification in the
    .subject area or areas to be taught.

    G. Return Service. Return service is defined as teacher service in public
    elementary and secondary schools in Maine or in a Maine private school approved for tuition purposes or in a state operated school for a full school year. 2.

    H. Underserved Subject Ari:a.s. Underserved subject c:.reas are defined as
    those subjects or programs required or authorized to be taught in the p~~lic schools for which there is an insufficient supply of teachers as may be · determined by the Commissioner including, but not limited to, special ~ducation, computer studies, science and math,

  2. General Rules

A. All applications for loans shall be made on forms provided by the Commissioner.

 B.
                         -
      Deadlines for filing applications shall be February 15.

 C.   Recipients of loans under this program shall be notified by March 15.

D: Loans of up to $1,500 per academic year or $6,000 total may be made to

eligible individuals. Loans shall be for one academic year.

E. Blaine House Scholars shall be so recognized by the Governor after

consultation with the Commissioner who shall have caused a review and evaluation to be made of all submitted applications which are received annually from eligible individuals who show evidence of aca.demic achievement.

 F.   Loans shall be made to eligible recipients without interest.

G. Students who receive loans in one category of eligibility (scholars

entering preservice-50\ of funds, scholars not entering preservice-25\ of funds) who subsequently change their program to one other than that for which the loan was originally granted shall, if eligible, receive a renewal loan from funds provided for the category to which they have moved as a result of the program change.

  1. Student Eligibility (Graduating High School Seniors)

    A. Initial Loan Eligibility

      (1)   The student must be a graduate of a Maine high school.
    
      (2)   The student must be in the upper~ of the graduati~g class.
    
      (3)   The student must be a resident of the state.
    
      (4)   The student must be intending to pursue a postsecondary
            education at an institution of higher education on a full-
            time basis as determined by standards of the institution.
    
      (5)   The student must sign an agreement which will detail
            conditions to be met for receipt of a loan.
    
      (6)   The student must be recognized as a Blaine House Scholar.
    
      (7)   Preference shall be given to students enrolled in a program
            which has been determined to be an underserved subject area.
    

    3.

    B. Renewal Loan Eligibility

       (1)   The student must have received an initial loan.
    
       (2)   The student must apply annually for a loan but renewal shall
             be automatic provided that the student maintains a grade
             point average of 2.5 based on a 4.0 grade point system.
    
       (3)   The student must be pursuing a postsecondary education at
             an institution of higher education on a full-time basis as
             determined by standards of the institution.
    
       (4)   A student granted an approved leave of absence by the
             postsecondary institution may be eligible to'renew the loan
             at the termination of the leave of absence provided that all
             other requirements of this section are met.
    
      (5)    The student must sign an agreement which will detail
             conditions to be met for receipt of a loan.
    
  2. Student Eligibility (Maine High School Graduates)

    A. Initial Loan Eligibility

      (1)    The student must be currently enrolled in an institution of
             higher education.
    
      (2)    The student must be a resident of the state.
    
      ·(3)   The student must be a graduate of a Maine high school.
    
      (4)    The student must have graduated in the upper~ of the class at
             the time of graduation from high school.
    
      (5)    The student must have a 2.5 grade point average on a 4.0 grade
             point system.
    
      (6)    The student must be enrolled on a full-time basis as determined
             by standards of the institution.
    
      (7)      The student must sign an agreement which will detail conditions
             · to be met for receipt ·of a loan~ · -·
    
      (B)    The student must be recognized as a Blaine House Scholar.
    
      (9)    Preference shall be given to students enrolled in a program
             which has been determined to be an underserved subject area.
    

    B. Renewal Loan Eligibility

      (1)    The student must have received an initial loan.
    
      (2)    The student must apply annually for a loan but renewal shall
             be automatic provided that the student maintains a grade point
             average of 2.5 based on a 4.0 grade point system.
    

    4.

       (3)    The student must be pursuing a postsecondary education at a~
              institution of higher education on a full-time basis as
              determined by standards of the institution.
    
       (4)    A student granted an approved leave of absence by the
              postsecondary institution may be eligible to renew the loan
              at the termination of the leave of absence provided that all
              other requirements of this section are met.
    
       (5)    The student must sign an agreement which will detail conditions
              to be met for receipt of a loan.
    
  3. Teacher Loan Eligibility

    A. Initial Loan Eligibility

       (1)    The teacher must be employed in a Maine school.
    
       (2)    The teacher must be employed on at least a half-time basis as
              determined by the local school unit.
    
       (3)    The teacher must be seeking enrollment in a course or program
              which is related to improvement and/or expansion of teaching
              competence.
    
       (4)    The teacher must sign an agreement which will detail conditions
              to be met for receipt of a loan.
    
       (5)    Preference shall be given to those teachers presently teaching
              or intending to teach either in an underserved subject area or
              in a geographically isolated area.
    

    B. Renewal Loan Eligibility

        (1)   The teacher must have received an initial loan.
    
        (2)    The teacher must apply annually for loan renewal but such
               renewal shall be automatic provided that the teacher maintains
               a grade point average of 2.5 based on a 4.0 grade point system.
    
        (3)   The teacher must sign an agreement which will detail conditions
              to be met for receipt of a loan.
    
  4. Payment Provisions

    A. Checks shall be made co-payable to the student and the school ar.d ffiailed
    directly to the institution of higher education for credit to the student's or teacher's account and be disbursed within 60 days follo~ing evidence that the student or teacher has become duly enrolled at the postsecondary institution.

B. Loans for students shall be disbursed in the amount requested but on a semester basis, one-half for the first semester and one-half for the second semester. 5.

C. Loans for teachers shall be disbursed in the amount requested although

this shall not exceed $1,500 per academic year.

D. If a recipient of a loan withdraws from an institution and if the stude~t

or teacher is entitled to a refund of tuition, fees or other charges, the institution shall pay directly to the state from that refund a sum which represents the portion of the loan paid to the student or teacher for the portion of the academic year that the student or teacher did not complete.

  1. Repayment and Return Service Provisions

    A. Student Recipient

      (1)   Each recipient of a loan may cancel the total amount of the loan
            repayment by completing 4 years of return service in the public
            or private schools approved for tuition purposes in the state or
            in a state operated school.
    
      (2)   Each recipient of a loan may cancel the total amount of the loan
            repayment by completing.!. years of return service in the public
            schools or private schools approved for tuition purposes in the
            state or in a state operated school if such service is performed
            in underserved subject areas or in geographically isolated areas
            as determined by the ·commissioner.
    
      (3)   Each recipient may cancel the total amount of loan on a proportional
            basis reducing the debt by 25% for each complete year of return
            service performed in the public schools or private schools approved
            for tuition purposes in the state or in a state operated school or
            soi for each year, if such return service is in an underserved
            subject ar~a or a geographically isolated area as determined by
            the Commissioner.
    
      (4)   Return service shall be performed within 5 years of graduation
            from the institution of higher education.
    
      (5)   Failure to fulfill the return option will necessitate repayment
            to the state as follows:
    
            a." The debt shall include the total amount of the loan less
                 the amount, if any, which has been cancelled by return service.
    
            b.   The total debt shall be repaid to the state within 5 years of
                 graduation from the institution of higher education according
                 to a schedule established by the Commissioner who shall also
                 set due dates for repayment.
    
      (6)   Once a recipient has begun fulfilling the return service option by
            teaching in. an underserved subject area or teaching in a
            geographically isolated area as determined by the Commissioner,
            under 20-A Chapter 602 sec. 15612 sub-sec. 2,A he/she shall be
            allowed to complete this option even though the subject area or
            geographically isolated area is removed from the list of this
            designated.
    

    6.

    (7) Recipients who fail to successfully complete the cours~ or
    courses for which the funds were given will not te. allowed to
    exercise tbe return service option.

B. Teacher Recipient

(1) Each recipient of a loan designed for teachers pursuing an advanced degree or continued study may cancel the totnl amount of the loan by completing I years of return service in the public schools or private schools approved for tuition purposes in the state or in a state operated school.

(2) Each recipient of a loan designated for teachers pursuing an advanced degree or continued study may cancel the total amount of the loan by completing 1 year of return service in the public schools or private schools-approved for tuition purposes in the state or in a state operated school, if such service is performed in underserved subject areas or in geographically isolated areas as determined by the Commissioner.

(3) Each recipient of a loan designed for teachers may cancel the total amount of the loan on a proportional basis reducing the debt by 50% for each complete year of return service· in the public schools or private schools approved for tuition purposes in the state or in a state operated school or by 100% for 1 year if such return service is in an underserved subject area or geographically isolated area.

(4) Return service shall be performed within 3 years of graduation from the institution of higher education or completion of the course or courses for which the funds were given.

(5) Failure to fulfill the return service option will necessitate repayment to the state as follows:

a. The debt shall include the total amount of the loan less the amount, if any, which has been cancelled by return service.

b. The total debt shall be repaid to the state within 3 years of graduation from the institution of higher education or completion of courses for which the funds were given according to a schedule established by the Commissioner who shall also set due dates for repayments.

(6) Once a recipient has begun fulfilling the return service option by teaching in an underserved subject area or teaching in a geographically isolated area as determined by the Commissioner, under 20-A Chapter 602, section 15602, sub-sec. 2,A he/she shall be allowed to complete this option even though the subject area or geographically isolated area is removed from the list of those designated.

(7) Recipients who fail to successfully complete the course or courses for which the funds were given-will not be nllowed to exercise the return service option.
7.

  1. Selection Criteria - Student (Graduating High School Seniors)

    Recipients of loans under this program will be determined utilizing the
    following selection criteria:

    A. Academic Standing

       (1)    Analysis of higp school transcript.
    
       (2)    Analysis of standardized test scores.
    

    B. Academic Awards/Achievements/Honors

    C. Preference shall be given to students enrolled in a program which
    has been determined to be an underserved subject area, however efforts
    will be made to reflect an equitable distribution of awards to other
    subject areas.

  2. Selection Criteria - Student (Maine High School Graduates)

    Recipients of loans under this program will be determined utilizing the
    following selection criteria:

    A. Academic Standing
    Grade point average

    B. Academic Awards/Achievements/Honors

    C. Preference shall be given to students enrolled in a program which
    has been determined to be an underserved subject area, however efforts
    will be made to reflect an equitable distribution of awards to other
    subject areas.

  3. Selection Criteria - Teacher

    Recipients of loans under this program will be determined utilizing the
    following selection criteria:

    A. Preference shall be given to teachers of subjects which have been
    determined ·to··be underserved~·- ,,,,. .q,,....· ,. ·· ·, · ·· · · ·.• •·., · .... ,,· ·· · · '· · ·

    B. Preference shall be given to teachers currently teaching in
    geographically isolated areas as determined by the Commissioner.

    C. Geographical distribution will be a factor considered in the selection
    of loan recipients.

  4. Selection Process

    A. Graduating High School Seniors

       (1)   Selection Committee will review materials submitted in the
             application process in light of identified criteria.
       (2)   Selection Committee to be composed of 15 individuals appointed by
             the Commissioner.
    

    8.

    (3) Each application and accompanying information to be read by at
    least two committee members.

    (4) Following reading by the committee, applications will be ra~k
    ordered and loans made within the limits of available funds.

    (5) Selection Committee will recommend to the Commissioner the
    names of applicants who should be considered for designation
    as Blaine House Scholars.

    (6) The Governor, after consultation with the Conunissioner, shall
    announce the names of those individuals who are recognized as
    Blaine House Scholars.

B. Maine High School Graduates

(1) Selection Committee will review materials submitted in the ·application process in light of identified criteria.

(2) Selection Corranittee to be composed of 10 individuals appointed by the Commissioner.

(3) Each application and accompanying information to be read by at least two Committee members.

(4) Following reading·by the Committee, applications will be rank ordered and loans made within the limits of available funds.

(5) Selection Committee will recommend to the Commissioner the names of applicants who should be considered for designation as Blaine House Scholars.

(6) The Governor, after consultation with the Commissioner, _shall announce the names of .those individuals who are recognized as Blaine House Scholars.

C. . Teachei:-

(1) Selection Committee shall review materials submitted in the application process in light of identified criteria.

(2) Selection Committee to be composed of 5 individuals appointed by the Commissioner with the majority of the members to be teachers.

(3) Each application and accompanying information to be read by at least two Committee members.

(4) Selection Committee will recommend to the Commissioner the names of applicants who should be considered for receipt of a loan.

(5) The Commissioner shall designate those who shall receive a loan.
9.

BASIS STATEMENT: This chapter fulfills the requirements of 20-A M.R.S.A., Chapter 428, to establish rules for the conduct of the Blaine House Scholars Program.

AVTHORITY: 20-A M.R.S.A., Chapter 428

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 24, 1985

AMENDED: November 20, 1985

REPRESENTATIVE COMMENTS: None

What does Maine law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1986. Ezel checks the current Maine statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace