MD 85 Op. Att'y Gen. 259 September 28, 2000

Under Maryland's firearms law, does a common law assault or battery conviction count as a 'crime of violence' that bars someone from possessing a regulated firearm, and does that same 'crime of violence' definition sweep in every crime punishable by more than a year in prison?

Short answer: Common law assault or battery does count, but the broader category is narrower than it might sound. The opinion concluded a conviction for common law assault or battery falls within the firearms law's 'assault in the first or second degree' crime-of-violence category, and that the law's final catch-all category only covers assault committed with intent to commit a serious offense, not literally every crime punishable by more than one year in prison.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2000. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Maryland law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 2000
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Maryland Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority in Maryland but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Maryland attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Baltimore City State's Attorney Patricia C. Jessamy asked the Attorney General to interpret two categories in Maryland's statutory definition of "crime of violence" under the firearms law, a definition that matters because a person convicted of a crime of violence cannot legally possess a regulated firearm and faces a mandatory minimum five-year sentence for doing so. Her questions, prompted by the newly passed Responsible Gun Safety Act of 2000: did a conviction for common law assault or battery fall within the statute's "assault in the first or second degree" category, and did the statute's final catch-all category (assault with intent to commit certain offenses, or "any offense punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year") sweep in every crime carrying over a year of potential prison time, regardless of whether it involved an assault?

The opinion answered yes to the first question and no to the second. On common law assault and battery, it traced a 1996 statutory revision that introduced "first degree assault" and "second degree assault" and defined "assault" to retain its judicially developed common law meaning, concluding that a conviction for either common law assault or battery is legally a "second degree assault" conviction and therefore a crime of violence. On the catch-all category, the opinion concluded, based on the statute's structural pattern, grammar, and six decades of legislative history dating to 1941, that the phrase only covers an assault committed with intent to commit a serious offense, not literally any offense carrying more than a year of potential imprisonment; reading it that broadly would have made the other sixteen listed categories pointless and would have swept in offenses like unlicensed insurance sales or counterfeit lottery ticket sales that nobody would ordinarily call violent.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2000. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule or definition mentioned here. The opinion's own editor's note states that Article 27, §441(e) has since been recodified as §5-101(c) of the Public Safety Article.

Common questions

If someone was convicted of ordinary common law assault, did that make them a felon barred from owning a firearm in Maryland under this law?
Yes, according to the opinion. It concluded that Maryland's 1996 revision of the assault statutes, which introduced "first degree assault" and "second degree assault" while preserving the judicially developed common law meanings of assault and battery, meant a conviction for common law assault or battery is legally a "second degree assault" conviction, which the firearms law lists as a crime of violence.

Did every crime that could carry more than a year in prison count as a "crime of violence" for firearms purposes?
No. The opinion rejected that broad reading of the statute's final catch-all category, concluding it only covers assault committed with intent to commit a serious offense (either one of the other listed crimes or any offense punishable by more than a year), not any standalone offense punishable by more than a year regardless of whether it involved an assault at all.

Why did the opinion think the broader reading of the statute couldn't be right?
It gave several reasons: the statute's structure lists distinct numbered categories of offenses, and the broad reading would improperly cram two different concepts into one category; the more natural grammatical reading links "assault with intent to commit" to both following phrases; the historical 1941 version of the law used clearly parallel assault-based language; and reading the catch-all broadly would have made the other sixteen categories legally pointless, sweeping in things like unlicensed insurance sales and counterfeit lottery ticket sales that the Legislature never signaled it meant to treat as violent crimes.

Background and statutory framework

Under the Maryland firearms law, a person convicted or adjudicated delinquent of a "crime of violence" may not possess a regulated firearm (Article 27, §445(d)(1)), with violations carrying a mandatory minimum five-year sentence and up to a $10,000 fine (Article 27, §449(e)-(f), as amended by the Responsible Gun Safety Act of 2000, Chapter 2, Laws of Maryland 2000). A crime-of-violence indictment or conviction also affects a person's ability to hold a regulated firearms dealer license under Article 27, §443(h)-(i). The statute's 17-category definition of "crime of violence," Article 27, §441(e), lists specific offenses from abduction and arson to murder and robbery, ending with "assault with intent to commit any of the aforesaid offenses or any offense punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year."

The opinion traced the "crime of violence" definition back to its original 1941 enactment (Chapter 622, Laws of Maryland 1941), which already used similar assault-based language, through a 1996 reorganization (Chapters 561, 562, Laws of Maryland 1996) that added "any of the aforesaid offenses or" to the final category, and a separate 1996 revision (Chapter 632, Laws of Maryland 1996) that added "assault in the first or second degree" as its own category and redefined "assault" to retain its judicially determined common law meaning, corrected the following year by Chapter 14, Laws of Maryland 1997 after a codification error.

Citations and references

Statutes:
- Article 27, §441(d), (n), and (r), defining "regulated firearm" to include handguns and listed assault weapons
- Article 27, §441(e) and its numbered subsections, including §441(e)(3) ("assault in the first or second degree") and §441(e)(17) (the final catch-all category), defining "crime of violence"
- Article 27, §443(h)-(i), governing suspension and revocation of a regulated firearms dealer license upon indictment or conviction for a crime of violence
- Article 27, §445(d)(1), prohibiting possession of a regulated firearm by a person convicted of a crime of violence
- Article 27, §449(e)-(f), the mandatory minimum sentence and fine for illegal possession, as amended by Chapter 2, Laws of Maryland 2000
- Article 27, §12(b), §12A, and §12A-1, the 1996-revised assault statute defining "assault" to retain its common law meaning and establishing "first" and "second" degree assault
- Article 27, §48A, cited as an example of a non-violent offense that would improperly become a "crime of violence" under the rejected broad reading
- Article 27, §531A(4) (1941), the original 1941 definition of "crime of violence"
- Business Regulation Article, §14-228; Insurance Article, §27-405 and §27-408; and State Government Article, §9-124, cited as examples of non-violent offenses that would sweep into the definition under the rejected broad reading
- Public Safety Article, §5-101(c), the current recodification of the "crime of violence" definition
- Chapter 622, Laws of Maryland 1941, the original enactment of the "crime of violence" definition
- Chapters 561, 562, Laws of Maryland 1996, reorganizing the firearms law and adding language to the final catch-all category
- Chapter 632, Laws of Maryland 1996, revising the assault statutes and adding "assault in the first or second degree" as a crime-of-violence category
- Chapter 14, Laws of Maryland 1997, the corrective bill fixing a codification error from the 1996 revisions
- Chapter 2, Laws of Maryland 2000 (Responsible Gun Safety Act of 2000), enhancing penalties for illegal possession by a person previously convicted of a crime of violence

Cases:
- Johnson v. State, 67 Md. App. 347, 507 A.2d 1134 (1986), describing the firearms law's purpose of preventing those who have demonstrated a propensity for violence from possessing handguns
- Sangster v. State, 70 Md. App. 456, 521 A.2d 811 (1987), aff'd 312 Md. 560, 541 A.2d 637 (1988), noting that for many years simple assault and battery were not included in the "crime of violence" definition

Source

Original opinion text

Gen. 259] 259

                    CRIMINAL LAWS

F IREARMS ) D EFINITION OF "C RIME OF V IOLENCE" U NDER
F IREARMS L AW

                    September 28, 2000

Ms. Patricia C. Jessamy
State's Attorney for Baltimore City

  You have requested our opinion on two questions related to the

part of the State firearms law that makes it a crime for a person who
has previously been convicted of a "crime of violence" to possess a
firearm. You note that the term "crime of violence" is defined in
Article 27, §441(e) and ask for our interpretation of two of the
categories of offenses listed in that definition:

  (1) Does a conviction for assault or battery under common

law fall within the category of "assault in the first or second degree"
set forth in §441(e)(3)?

  (2) What offenses are included in the final category of that

definition, §441(e)(17), which refers to "assault with intent to
commit any of the aforesaid offenses or any offense punishable by
imprisonment for more than 1 year"? In particular, should the
second clause of that category be construed to include as a crime of
violence any offense for which a defendant could receive more than
one year imprisonment, regardless of whether it involved an assault?

 For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that:

  (1) A conviction for common law assault or common law

battery is included in §441(e)(3).

  (2) The final category of the definition of "crime of violence"

includes assault with intent to commit any offense punishable by
imprisonment for more than 1 year. However, it does not encompass
all offenses that carry a potential penalty in excess of one year
imprisonment.

                                   I

                         Crime of Violence

A. Maryland Firearms Law

  Under the Maryland firearms law, a person who has been

convicted (or adjudicated delinquent) of a "crime of violence" may
not possess a regulated firearm.[1] Annotated Code of Maryland,
Article 27, §445(d)(1). A person who possesses a regulated firearm
in violation of that statute is subject to a mandatory minimum
sentence of five years imprisonment and a fine of up to $10,000.
Article 27, §449(e)-(f) (as amended by Chapter 2, Laws of Maryland
2000).[2] The statute is "intended to prevent those who have already
demonstrated a propensity for violence, as evidenced by a conviction
of a crime of violence, from possessing handguns." Johnson v.
State, 67 Md. App. 347, 378, 507 A.2d 1134, cert. denied, 307 Md.
260, 513 A.2d 314, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 993 (1986).

  Indictment for, or conviction of, a "crime of violence" also

restricts the ability of a person to hold a license as a regulated
firearms dealer under the firearms law. In particular, indictment for
such an offense results in the suspension of a license. Article 27,
§443(h). Conviction is grounds for revocation of the license.
Article 27, §443(i).

  The law defines "crime of violence" to mean:

          (1)       Abduction;
          (2)       Arson in the first degree;
          (3)       Assault in the first or second degree;
          (4)     Burglary in the first, second, or third
                  degree;
          (5)     Carjacking and armed carjacking;
          (6)     Escape in the first degree;
          (7)     Kidnapping;
          (8)     Voluntary manslaughter;
          (9)     Maiming;
          (10)    Mayhem as previously proscribed
                  under former §384 of this article;
          (11)    Murder in the first or second degree;
          (12)    Rape in the first or second degree;
          (13)    Robbery;
          (14)    Robbery with a dangerous or deadly
                  weapon;
          (15)    Sexual offense in the first, second, or
                  third degree;
          (16)    An attempt to commit any of the
                  aforesaid offenses; or
          (17)    Assault with intent to commit any of
                  the aforesaid offenses or any offense
                  punishable by imprisonment for more
                  than 1 year.

Article 27, §441(e). Your inquiry is focused on categories (3) and
(17).

B. Common Law Assault

  You ask whether a conviction for assault or battery under

common law falls within the definition of "crime of violence" as a
result of the inclusion of "assault in the first or second degree"
among the list of those crimes. Article 27, §441(e)(3).

  For many years, simple assault and battery were not included

in the definition of "crime of violence." See Sangster v. State, 70
Md. App. 456, 477, 521 A.2d 811 (1987), aff'd, 312 Md. 560, 541
A.2d 637 (1988). In 1996, the General Assembly added the category
of "assault in the first or second degree" to the list of crimes of
violence. Chapter 632, Laws of Maryland 1996.[3] This amendment
was part of a bill that generally revised the criminal assault statutes
and introduced the terms "assault in the first degree" and "assault in
the second degree" into the law. Under this nomenclature, a person
who commits an assault is guilty of the misdemeanor of second
degree assault. Article 27, §12A.[4] The revised statute generally
defines the term "assault" to mean "the offenses of assault, battery,
and assault and battery, which terms retain their judicially
determined meanings." Article 27, §12(b). The committee that
drafted the revision explained that it believed that those meanings
had been "extensively developed at common law and case law." See
Chapter 632, Laws of Maryland 1996 at p. 3619 (Committee Note).

  Thus, by definition, the term "second degree assault" includes

common law assault and common law battery. A conviction for
either offense would be considered a crime of violence for purposes
of the firearms statute.

C. Assault with Intent to Commit Certain Offenses

  The final category of offenses in the definition of "crime of

violence" is "assault with intent to commit any of the aforesaid
offenses or any offense punishable by imprisonment for more than
1 year." Article 27, §441(e)(17). You ask what crimes are included
by the second clause of this provision. We understand your question
to be whether this clause should be read to include only "assault with
intent to commit any offense punishable by imprisonment for more
than 1 year," or, more broadly, to include any offense punishable by
more than one year in prison.

   For several reasons, we believe that the narrower reading of

this provision is the correct one. Logic, grammar, and the history of
the statute all dictate this conclusion. First, §441(e) defines "crime
of violence" by listing various categories of offenses in separate
numbered categories. The broader reading of §441(e)(17) would
violate this pattern by including two disparate offense categories -
i.e., (1) "assault with intent to commit any of the aforesaid offenses"
and (2) "any offense punishable by imprisonment for more than 1
year - in a single category. If the Legislature had meant to define
"crime of violence" in this way, it would have simply created an 18th
category for all offenses punishable by more than one year in prison.

  Second, in our view, a more grammatically felicitous reading

of the conjunction "or" in §441(e)(17) would link the two phrases
that begin with the word "any." In other words, the conjunction
provides alternative objects for the introductory verbal clause. Thus,
the phrase "assault with intent to commit" would be read to precede
"any offense punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year."

  Third, the historical development of this section confirms this

reading. The definition of "crime of violence" first appeared in the
firearms section of the criminal code in 1941. Chapter 622, Laws of
Maryland 1941. At that time it read as follows:

            The term "crime of violence" means
        murder, manslaughter, rape, mayhem,
        kidnaping, burglary, housebreaking; assault
        with intent to kill, commit rape, or rob; assault
        with a dangerous weapon, or assault with
        intent to commit any offense punishable by
        imprisonment for more than one year.

Article 27, §531A(4) (1941) (emphasis added). In later years, the
list of offenses that constituted "crimes of violence" was refined on
several occasions. However, throughout those revisions, "assault
with intent to commit any offense punishable by imprisonment for
more than one year" remained the final category of offense in the
definition.

  In 1996, as part of a reorganization and revision of the firearms

law, the list of offenses was modified in certain respects and the
phrase "any of the aforesaid offenses or" was inserted after the word
"commit" in the final category. Chapters 561, 562, Laws of
Maryland 1996. This amendment of the final category, which has
always designated certain types of assaults, thus simply appears to
expand the types of intent with which an applicable assault offense
could be committed. This modification may simply be a recognition
that, prior to the revision of the assault statute in 1996 to label
assault offenses by "degrees," the criminal code proscribed
aggravated assault by describing the intent that accompanied the
assault.

  Finally, we note that, if §441(e)(17) were read to include any

offense punishable by more than one year in prison, it would
dramatically expand the scope of the definition of "crime of
violence," encompassing many crimes not ordinarily considered to
involve violence.[5] Indeed, the prior 16 categories in the definition
would become superfluous as they all would be subsumed by this
final clause. There is no evidence in the legislative history of the
statute that the Legislature contemplated such a dramatic expansion
of this term.

                               II

                          Conclusion

  In our opinion, a conviction for common law assault or

common law battery is included in the definition of "crime of
violence" in §441(e)(3). The final category of the definition of
"crime of violence" should be construed to include an assault with
intent to commit any of the offenses enumerated in Article 27,
§441(e) and assault with intent to commit any offense punishable by
imprisonment for more than 1 year. It does not include all offenses
punishable by more than one year in prison.

                                          J. Joseph Curran, Jr.
                                          Attorney General

                                          Robert N. McDonald
                                          Chief Counsel
                                           Opinions and Advice

Editor's Note:

 Article 27, §441(e) has been recodified as §5-101(c) of the

Public Safety Article.


[1] The statute defines "regulated firearm" to include "any handgun"
- i.e., "any firearm with a barrel less than 16 inches in length including
signal, starter, and blank pistols" - or "any assault weapon" as listed in the
Firearms Law, Article 27, §441(d), (n), (r).

[2] In your letter requesting this opinion, you indicate that your
inquiry is prompted by the passage of the Responsible Gun Safety Act of
2000, Chapter 2, Laws of Maryland 2000. Among other things, that law
enhanced the penalty for individuals convicted of possessing a regulated
firearm after having been convicted of a "crime of violence." We note
that this legislation did not amend the definition of "crime of violence" in
§441(e) and therefore does not affect the answers to your questions.

[3] This addition to the law was not immediately reflected in the
code, apparently because §441 was also substantially revised that same
session in the Maryland Gun Violence Act of 1996. See Chapters 561,
562, Laws of Maryland 1996. The error was remedied the following year
in the annual corrective bill. Chapter 14, Laws of Maryland 1997.

[4] The statute defines "first degree assault" as an aggravated form
of assault - i.e., the offender intentionally causes or attempts to cause
serious physical injury or uses a firearm. See Article 27, §12A-1.

[5] For example, under this reading, the following crimes, among
many others, would be "crimes of violence": willful sale of an
unregistered franchise (Annotated Code of Maryland, Business Regulation
Article, §14-228), knowingly acting as an insurance agent without a
license (Insurance Article, §§27-405, 27-408), sale of counterfeit lottery
tickets (State Government Article, §9-124), and trademark counterfeiting
(Article 27, §48A).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2000 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Maryland statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.