Could Zwolle's mayor inspect police department files for traffic cases in the mayor's court?

Short answer The 1998 opinion said direct review of unfiled citation evidence would generally be improper for the mayor acting as judge. The police department instead had to deposit traffic citations with the mayor's court or the appropriate violations bureau.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 98-0212
Issued
July 6, 1998
Issued by
Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General of Louisiana
Requested by
Marvin Frazier, Chief of Police, Zwolle Police Department

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion, issued in 1998. AG opinions are advisory and reflect the law at the time; they are not binding court precedent. This page is historical context, not current legal advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

Zwolle's police chief asked whether the mayor could enter the police department and use its computer to review files for matters before the mayor's court. The mayor clarified that he wanted access to traffic citations he said had not been forwarded to the court. The 1998 attorney general opinion said direct access to review evidence that had not been filed with the mayor's court would generally be improper for the mayor acting as judge. It likened such review to an ex parte communication.

The office also said the police department had a duty under the traffic-citation statute to deposit citations with the mayor's court or the appropriate traffic violations bureau. If a citation went to the court, the deposit had to be adequate for the court to do its work. The opinion identified no statutory deadline for deposit; absent a town directive, it called for a sufficient and reasonable time. It said compliance with that filing duty should remove the mayor's stated need to enter the police department for the citations at issue.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1998. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Mayor's court officials at the time

The opinion treated the Zwolle mayor as exercising a court's role in traffic matters under the town's special charter. It generally disapproved reviewing unfiled police evidence for a pending citation outside the court's normal filing process.

Police officers at the time

The office said traffic citations had to be deposited with the court having jurisdiction or the appropriate violations bureau. For a citation sent to Zwolle's mayor's court, the court needed an adequate deposit to dispose of the case.

Common questions

Q: Could Zwolle's mayor use a police computer to examine unfiled traffic-case evidence?
A: The opinion said access for that purpose would generally be prohibited because reviewing material not properly filed with the court was akin to an ex parte communication.

Q: Where did the police department have to send traffic citations?
A: The office applied LSA-R.S. 32:398.2 and said traffic ordinance citations had to be deposited with the mayor's court or the appropriate traffic violations bureau.

Q: Did the statute set a fixed number of days for filing citations?
A: The opinion found no specified period. It said the town's governing body might set one; absent that, deposit should occur in enough time for the mayor to perform court duties.

Q: What did the opinion say about intentional failure to perform these duties?
A: It warned that intentional failure or refusal could subject public officers to a malfeasance charge under LSA-R.S. 14:134. It did not say that anyone had committed that offense.

Background and statutory framework

Zwolle had a special charter, so the opinion did not apply the Lawrason Act's general municipal framework. It quoted the town charter's grant of mayor's-court powers and LSA-R.S. 32:398.2's rules on filing and disposing of traffic citations. The office reasoned that the charter gave the mayor jurisdiction over town traffic ordinance cases, while the citation statute required police to place those matters before the court or violations bureau through the prescribed channel.

Citations and references

  • LSA-R.S. 32:398.2 (traffic-citation deposit and disposition)
  • LSA-R.S. 14:134 (malfeasance warning in the opinion)
  • Zwolle Town Charter, Article VII (mayor's-court powers quoted in the opinion)

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

~tate o{ ~ouisimca
One American Place
301 Main Street, Suite 600
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
P.O. Box 94005
CIVIL DIVISION
TEL.: (504) 342-7013
FAX: (504) 342-2090
BATON ROUGE
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
70804-9005
ATTORNEY GENERAL

J U L Y 0 61998

OPINION NUMBEI~ 98-2’12

71 - Municipalities - Special Charters
77 - Officers - local & municipalities
LSA-R.S. 33:321, et seq.
Mr. Marvin Frazier
LSA-R.S. 32:398.2
Chief of Police
LSA-R.S. 14:134
Zwolle Police Department
P.O. Box 546
Authority and duties of the Mayor’s Court, pursuant to the
Town of Zwolle’s Special Charter.
Zwolle, LA 71486

Dear Mr. Frazier:

You have asked this office for an opinion on whether the Mayor of the Town of Zwolle may have access to the Zwolle Police Department in order to review files pertinent to items before the Mayor’s Court.

The Town of Zwolle is a "special charter" town, and therefore not subject to the provisions of the Lawrason Act, LSA-R.S. 33:321 et seq. Article VII of Zwolle’s Town Charter, relating to the powers of the Mayor, states:

The mayor shall preside at all meetings of the town council, but can vote only in case of a tie vote; he shall try all persons charged with the violation of any and all offenses against the town government or infractions of town laws; he shall have power to impose fines and pass sentence to imprisonment, either in local prison or public streets, on all persons convicted by him for the violation of town ordinance [sic]; and he shall have power to appoint special officers to assist the marshal, to suppress riots, breaches of the peace, to disperse unlawful or immoral assemblages, and in all other cases where he deems it necessary to maintain law and order.

He shall have power to appoint special officers to assist the marshal in maintaining good behavior, and good order at all peaceable assembles.

You state that the Mayor wishes to have access to the Police Department in order to perform his duties in the Mayor’s Court. You also state that the Mayor desires training on the Police Department’s computer in furtherance of these duties.


Page 2

~’Mr. Marvin Frazier
OPINION NUMBER 98-212
Page ~2~

The Mayor clarified that he only desires access to the Police Department in order to access traffic citations that he states have not been properly forwarded to the Mayor’s Court for proper disposition. The Mayor also clarifies that the computer access is desired to review records pertinent to the traffic citations. He further states that these access requests would be unnecessary if the traffic citations were forwarded to the Mayor’s Court in a timely manner.

The Mayor’s Court acts as any court with proper jurisdiction in determining the disposition of cases before it. Access to and the review of any item not properly filed with the Mayor’s Court is tantamount to ex parte communications. Therefore, access to the Zwolle Police Department for purposes of reviewing evidence pertinent to a citation before the Mayor’s Court would generally be prohibited.

However, with regard to the proper disposition of traffic citations, we refer you to LSA- R.S. 32:398.2 which, in pertinent part, states:

A. Each traffic enforcement officer upon issuing a traffic citation to an alleged violator of any provision of the motor vehicle laws of this state or of any traffic ordinance of any city or town shall deposit the original citation or a copy of such traffic citation with a court having jurisdiction over the alleged offense or with the appropriate traffic violations bureau.
However, a citation for a violation of R.S. 32:80(A) shall be deposited only with a court and not with a traffic violations bureau.

B. Upon the deposit of the original citation or a copy of the traffic citation with a court having jurisdiction over the alleged offense or with the traffic violations bureau as set forth herein, the original citation or copy of such traffic citation shall be disposed of only by trial in the court of proper jurisdiction or any other official action by a judge of the court, including forfeiture of the bail, or by the deposit of sufficient bail with the traffic violations bureau or payment of a fine to said bureau by the person to whom such traffic citation has been issued. However, a citation or its copy alleging a violation of R.S. 32:80(A) shall be disposed of only by trial or acceptance of a plea in open court.

Article VII of the Zwolle Town Charter gives the Mayor, "the power to impose fines and pass sentence to imprisonment...on all persons convicted by him for the violation of town ordinance [sic]". This implicitly gives the Mayor jurisdiction over traffic ordinance citations under LSA-R.S. 32:398.2. Therefore, pursuant to that same statute, the Zwolle Police Department is mandated to deposit traffic ordinance citations with either the Mayor’s Court or "the appropriate traffic violations bureau".


Page 3

I~Ir. Marvin Frazier
OPINION NUMBER 98-212
Page ~3~

Should the Mayor’s Court receive the citation, adequate deposit should be made such that the Mayor’s Court may properly carry out its function and duties pursuant to Article VII of the Zwolle Town Charter.

While no specific period of time has been designated within which to deposit citations pursuant to LSA-R.S. 32:398.2, the Town of Zwolle’s governing body may desire delinating a number of days in which to do so. Absent this directive, citation deposits should be made within an amount of time sufficient and reasonable for the Mayor to perform his duties.

Should the provisions of LSA-R.S. 32:398.2 be adhered to, the Mayor should have no need for access to the Police Department for the citations at issue. This office strongly urges all parties involved to adhere to the mandates of LSA-R.S. 32:398.2 and Article VII of the Zwolle Town Charter. Any intentional failure or refusal to perform these duties may subject these public officers to a criminal charge of malfeasance in office pursuant to LSA-R.S. 14:134.

I trust this sufficiently addresses your concerns. If our office may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours very truly,

RICHARD P. IEYOUB
AT’/~RNEY ,/GiENERAL

(~cA~RLos M. FINA-LET, III
Assistant Attorney General

RPI:CMF:glb

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1998. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace