Did Louisiana law cap additional parish salary for district attorneys in the Twentieth Judicial District?

Short answer No. The AG concluded that La. R.S. 16:14 removed any ceiling on additional salary that parish governing authorities could pay the district attorney or assistant district attorneys. It said the older Twentieth Judicial District provisions did not limit those additional payments.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 15-0165
Issued
February 25, 2016
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
John J. Rouchon, Parish Manager, East Feliciana Parish

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2016. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

East Feliciana Parish asked whether statutes specific to the Twentieth Judicial District limited additional parish-paid salaries for district attorneys or assistant district attorneys. In February 2016, the Attorney General concluded that La. R.S. 16:14 imposed no ceiling on those additional salaries.

The opinion read La. R.S. 16:14’s “notwithstanding” language as removing restrictions that might otherwise arise from La. R.S. 16:431 or 16:434. It also noted that the no-ceiling provision was enacted later than the district-specific statutes. The conclusion concerned the amount of additional salary paid by local governing authorities under the cited framework.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2016. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Did the district-specific provisions set an upper limit on parish-paid additions?

The AG said no. It treated La. R.S. 16:14 as controlling over the earlier provisions for this issue.

Did the opinion say the parish had to pay any particular supplement?

No. It answered whether a statutory ceiling limited the amount of additional salary a parish governing authority could pay.

Did the answer cover assistant district attorneys?

Yes. The AG expressly included both district attorneys and assistant district attorneys in the no-ceiling conclusion.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion compared La. R.S. 16:14 with La. R.S. 16:431 and 16:434. It emphasized the later statute’s explicit removal of a “restriction, limitation or ceiling” on additional salaries paid by parish governing authorities.

Source

Original opinion text

State of Louisiana
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
CIVIL DIVISION
P.O. BOX 94005
BATON ROUGE
70804-9005
JeffLandry
Attorney General

February 25,2016
OPINION 15-0165
22 - DISTRICT ATTORNEYS
90-A-2 - PUBLIC FUNDS
John J. Rouchon
La. RS. 16:14
Parish Manager
La. RS. 16:431
Parish of East Feliciana
La. RS. 16:434
12064 Marston Street
Under the plain ianguage of La. R.S. 16:14, there is no
P.O. Box 427
limitation, restriction, or ceiling placed on the additional
salaries paid to district attorneys or assistant district attorneys
Clinton, LA 70722
for the Twentieth Judicial District.

Dear Mr. Rouchon:

On behalf of the East Feliciana Parish Police Jury, you have requested an opinion from this office regarding the payment of additional salaries to assistant district attorneys in the Twentieth Judicial District. Specifically, you have asked this office about the interpretation of La. R.S. 16:14, as it relates to La. R.S. 16:431 and La. R.S. 16:434.

La. R.S. 16:14(A) states:

Notwithstanding any provision of the law to the contrary, there shall be no restriction, limitation or ceiling placed on the amount of additional salary that may be paid to a district attorney or an assistant district attorney by the governing authorities of the several parishes of the state as provided for in R.S. 16:10 and R.S. 16:11.

Under this provision, which was added by Act 118 of 1973, the additional salaries paid by the local governing authorities to district attorneys and assistant district attorneys cannot be limited. Despite this provision, La. R.S. 16:431 states that the district attorney for the Twentieth Judicial District shall receive an annual additional salary of three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500.00). Also, La. R.S. 16:434 provides that additional compensation for assistant district attorneys of the Twentieth Judicial District shall not be in excess of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) per year from both East Feliciana Parish and West Feliciana Parish.

The confusion appears to arise from the fact that La. R.S. 16:14 appears to remove any ceiling or limitations on the additional salaries that can be paid to district attorneys and


Page 2

John J. Rouchon
Opinion 15-0165
Page -2­

assistant district attorneys, while La. RS. 16:431 and La. RS. 16:434 appear to place ceilings or limitations on such additional compensation. Fortunately, the legislature made its intentions clear in La. RS. 16:14(C), which, in relevant part, states as follows:

... provisions of this section are to be construed in removing the restrictions, limitation, or ceiling which may previously have existed on the amount of additional salary that the governing authorities of the several parishes of this state could pay to district attorneys and assistant district attorneys...

Thus, it was the clear intent of the legislature to remove any ceilings, limitations, or restrictions on the additional salaries paid to district attorneys and assistant district attorneys. Thus, neither La. RS. 16:431 or La. RS. 16:434 can be used to limit the amount of additional compensation paid to district attorneys or assistant district attorneys of the Twentieth Judicial District. Further, La. RS. 16:14 was added by the legislature in Act 118 of 1973, while La. RS. 16:431 and La. R.S. 16:434 were added by Act 113 of 1959 and Act 56 of 1964, respectively. Accordingly, La. RS. 16:14 is the latest expression of the legislative will, and thus, its provisions are controlling over those of La. RS. 16:431 and La. RS. 16:434. Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 11 (La. 4/4/06) 925 SO.2d 1202, 1210; see also International Paper Co., Inc. v. Hilton, 07-0290 (La. 10/16/07); 966 So.2d 545.

It is the opinion of this office that, under the clear language of La. RS. 16:14, there is no limitation or ceiling placed on additional salaries paid to district attorneys and assistant district attorneys for the Twentieth Judicial District.

We trust this adequately responds to your request. However, if our office can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours very truly,

JEFF LANDRY
ATIORNEY GENERAL

By:
J n C. Morris IV
A sistant Attorney General
JLlJCMIV

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2016. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace