Did a firefighter employed by a private nonprofit have to join Louisiana's Firefighters' Retirement System?

Short answer The AG concluded that an employee of a private nonprofit fire provider was not required to join or contribute to the Firefighters' Retirement System because the nonprofit was not one of the public employers in the statute. The system's board of trustees had final authority in a doubtful eligibility case.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 15-0024
Issued
March 26, 2015
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Honorable Bryan J. Adams, State Representative, District 85

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2015. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

In 2015, the Louisiana Attorney General concluded that a firefighter paid by a private nonprofit fire provider was not required to enroll in the Firefighters' Retirement System. The membership definition in La. R.S. 11:2252 and 11:2253 tied covered employment to a municipality, parish, or fire protection district. Receiving state supplemental firefighter pay did not change the nonprofit employer into one of those public entities. The AG noted that, if eligibility remained doubtful, the system's trustees had the final decision.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2015. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Was a private nonprofit firefighter required to contribute to the retirement system? A: The AG said no under the employer definition it analyzed. A private nonprofit corporation was not a municipality, parish, or fire protection district.

Q: Did state firefighter supplemental pay make retirement enrollment mandatory? A: The AG said no. It distinguished eligibility for supplemental pay under La. R.S. 40:1666.1 from the separate retirement membership rules.

Q: Who decided an uncertain eligibility case?
A: The AG quoted La. R.S. 11:2253 as making the retirement system's board of trustees the sole judge in a case of doubt. It said a different final determination by the board would prevail.

Background and statutory framework

A state representative asked about an employee of a private nonprofit providing fire protection. The AG compared the retirement statute's definitions of employee and employer with the broader supplemental-pay provision for nonprofit firefighters. Its answer rested on who employed and paid the firefighter, while recognizing the trustees' statutory role.

Citations and references

  • La. R.S. 11:2252 and 11:2253, firefighter retirement definitions and membership.
  • La. R.S. 40:1666.1, supplemental pay discussed separately.

Source

Original opinion text

~tate of 1liouisiana
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
P.O. BOX 94005
BATON ROUGE
JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL
70804-9005
ATIORNEY GENERAL

MAR 26 2015
OPINION 15-0024

The Honorable Bryan J. Adams
92-A-2-(rn)- Retirement- Firefighters
State Representative, District 85
La. R.S. 11:2252
La. R.S. 11:2253
P.O. Box 1387
Gretna, LA 70054
An employee of a private, non-profit, 503(c) corporation
engaged in providing fire protection services is not required to enroll andcontribute to the Firefighters' Retirement System.
Dear Representative Adams:

You have requested an Attorney General's opinion as to whether an employee of a private, non-profit, 503(c) corporation engaged in providing fire protection services is required to enroll and contribute to the Firefighters' Retirement System (FRS).

For purposes of membership in the FRS, La. R.S. 11 :2253 provides, in relevant part:

A. The membership of the retirement system shall be composed as follows:
(1 )(a)(i) Except as provided in R.S. 11 :2252(12), and except as provided further in this Paragraph, any person who becomes an employee as defined in R.S. 11 :2252 on and after January 1, 1980, shall become a member as a condition of his employment.

D. In any case of doubt, the board of trustees shall be the sole judge as to eligibility for membership.

To this end, La. R.S. 11 :2252 reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

(10) "Employee" shall mean any full-time firefighter or any person in a position as defined in the municipal fire and police civil service system who is employed by a fire department of any municipality, parish, or fire protection district of the state of Louisiana, excepting Orleans and Lafayette Parishes, and who is earning at least three hundred seventy-five dollars per month excluding state supplemental pay.

(11) "Employer" shall mean any municipality, parish, or fire protection district in the state of Louisiana, excepting Orleans and Lafayette


Page 2

OPINION 15-0024
Representative Bryan J. Adams
Page 2

Parishes, which employs a full-time fireman, and the Firefighters' Retirement System.

(13) "Member" shall include any employee, as defined in Paragraph (10) of this Section, included in the membership of this system as provided in R.S. 11:2253 and may, at.the employee's option, include any employee of the retirement system.

Thus, in order to be a member of the FRS, the individual needs to meet the following criteria: (1) work full-time as a firefighter or hold a position as defined in the municipal fire and police civil service system; (2) be employed by a fire department of any municipality, parish or fire protection district (excepting Orleans and Lafayette parishes); and (3) earn more than $375 a month (excluding supplemental pay).

Clearly, a private, non-profit fire department cannot be considered an employer for the purposes of the FRS because it is not a municipality, parish, or fire protection district. Since the private employee is not employed by any of the entities listed in La. R.S. 11:2252 (10) and (11), the second prong is not met and said individual cannot become a member of the FRS.

Further, we note that the FRS' letter attached to your request links the volunteer firefighters' supplemental pay to mandatory enrollment in the retirement system. The FRS reasons that "if [volunteer firefighters] are receiVing state fire supplemental pay, then they probably should be enrolled in the FRS."

La. R.S. 40:1666.1 provides for extra compensation by the state to local fire department employees, including firefighters working for non-profit corporations.' However, the enjoyment of this benefit does not automatically give private firefighting corporations the same prerogatives as those of the fire departments operated by public entities. For example, volunteer fire departments are not required to establish a classified civil service because volunteer fire departments are "operated" by their membership, and not by the municipality and therefore the provisions for civil service are inapplicable." Also, volunteer fire department employees are excluded from the Firefighter's Bill of Rights.3 Moreover, employees of a volunteer fire department are not considered public employees for the purposes of the Dual Officeholding and Dual Employment Laws."

, The enactment of Act 1000 of 1991 (granting supplemental pay to employees of a non-profit contracting with a fire department or fire district) was the legislature's response to La Atty. Gen. Op. No. 90-667 (stating that supplemental payments were illegal because the employee must be on the payroll of a municipal, parish or fire protection district fire department). See Terrytown Fifth Dist. Volunteer Fire Dep't, Inc. v. Wilcox, 707 So. 2d 449, (La.App. 5 Gir. 1/14/98), writ denied, 98-0381 (La. 3/27/98), 716 So. 2d 890. 2 See Heintz v. City of Gretna, 96-555 (La.App. 5 Gir. 11126/96), 683 So.2d 926. 3 See Marks v. Third Dist. Volunteer Fire Dep't,13-383 (La.App. 5 Gir. 12/30/13), 131 So.3d 1099. 4 La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 13-0021A.


Page 3

OPINION 15-0024
Representative Bryan J. Adams
Page 3

By enacting La. RS. 11 :2253, the legislature specifically defined the firefighters who are required to be members of FRS. Individuals who work for a non-profit corporation are not among them. If the legislature had intended for the mandatory membership in FRS to be applicable to employees of private corporations providing firefighting services, it would have specifically included them in the listed entities of La. RS. 11 :2252(10) and (11), just like it did in La. R.S. 40:1666.1.5

In sum, it appears that if a firefighter is not employed and paid by a municipality, parish or fire protection district (excepting Orleans and Lafayette parishes), he is not eligible to be a member of the FRS. As such, it is our opinion that the employee of a private, non­ profit, 503(c) corporation engaged in providing fire protection services is not required to enroll and contribute to FRS. However, we point out that under La. RS. 11 :2253(0), in any case of doubt, the board of trustees is the sole judge as to eligibility for membership. In the event that the Board of Trustees reaches a different conclusion, the Board's final determination prevails.

We trust this adequately responds to your request. However, if our office can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours very truly,

JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL
AnOR~ GE ERAL

By:
Ethel Solache G aham
Assistant Attorney General

JDC: ESG

'The settled rule of statutory construction that the mention of one thing in a statute implies the exclusion of another thing, i.e., the doctrine of "Expressio Unius est Exclusio Allerius," dictates that when the legislature specifically enumerates a series of things, the legislature's omission 01 other items, which could have easily been included in the statute, is deemed intentional. Filson v. Windsor Court Holel, 2004-2893, p.6 (La. 6/29/05), 907 So.2d 723, 728.

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2015. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace