Can a Louisiana court clerk or deputy use personal or community funds to post bail for someone?

Short answer The AG concluded that district court clerks and their deputies were covered by the statewide ban on becoming bail sureties or providing bail money or property, including for themselves, relatives and friends. The opinion distinguished a spouse acting on the spouse's own behalf.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 14-0151
Issued
May 11, 2015
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Ms. Malise Prieto, Clerk of Court, 22nd Judicial District Court

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2015. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

In 2015, the Louisiana Attorney General concluded that a district court clerk and deputy clerk were ministerial officers covered by La. C.Cr.P. art. 320. In the AG's reading, its bar on serving as a bail surety or providing bail money or property applied statewide, including when the defendant was the clerk or deputy, a spouse, a relative, or a friend. The opinion said the bar reached cash bonds, commercial sureties, and personal sureties. It also distinguished a clerk's or deputy's spouse using community property for the spouse's own bail.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2015. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Did the AG treat a district court clerk or deputy as a ministerial officer under the bail rule? A: Yes. The opinion relied on court clerks' statutory duties and State v. Babin's description of court officers to conclude that both clerks and deputies came within La. C.Cr.P. art. 320.

Q: Did the restriction apply only to cases in the clerk's own court? A: No. The AG read Article 320 as a statewide prohibition for clerks and deputies, relying in part on its earlier opinion about city police officers and the article's revision history.

Q: Could a clerk use personal or community money to post bail for a spouse or friend? A: The AG said no. It found no exception for the clerk's own bail or for bail on behalf of a spouse, other family member, or friend, whether the clerk used personal or community funds.

Q: Did Article 320 bar the clerk's spouse from using community property for the spouse's own bail? A: The AG said it did not. The opinion added that both spouses must concur if the bail transaction alienates or encumbers a community immovable under La. C.C. art. 2347.

Background and statutory framework

La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibited an attorney, judge, or ministerial court officer from becoming a surety or providing money or property for bail. The AG treated the clerk and deputy as ministerial officers, then applied the restriction to the six questions posed by the St. Tammany Parish clerk. Its separate answer about a spouse concerned the spouse acting on the spouse's own behalf.

Citations and references

  • La. C.Cr.P. art. 320, bail restriction for ministerial court officers.
  • La. C.C. art. 2347, concurrence for a community immovable.
  • State v. Babin, 50 So. 825, 826 (La. 1909), discussing ministerial court officers.

Source

Original opinion text

~tate of 1fioUtStaUa
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
P.O. BOX 94005
BATON ROUGE
JAMES O. "BUDDY" CALDWELL
70804-9005
ATIORNEY GENERAL

May 11, 2015
OPINION 14-0151

Ms. Malise Prieto
10 CLERKS OF COURT
Clerk of Court
La. C.Cr.P. art. 320
22nd Judicial District Court
La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits the District Clerk of Court and the
Parish of St. Tammany
Deputy Clerk, as ministerial officers of the court. from using separate
P.O. Box 1090
or community property to become a surety or provide money or
property for bond statewide for themselves, spouses, family
Covington, Louisiana 70434
members, or friends. La. c.cr.P. art. 320 does not prohibit the
spouses of a District Court of Clerk and a Deputy Clerk of Court from using community property for bail.
Dear Ms. Prieto:

Our office received your request for an opinion on whether La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits the District Clerk of Court ("Clerk") and the Deputy Clerk of Court ("Deputy") from posting bond for themselves, spouses, family members, or friends. You have requested an opinion of the Attorney General addressing the following questions:

(1) Are a Clerk and a Deputy considered ministerial officers of the court for the purposes of La. C.Cr.P. art. 320?

(2) Does La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibit a Clerk and a Deputy from posting bonds statewide?

(3) Does La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibit a Clerk and a Deputy from using personal or community funds to post a cash bond or purchase a commercial surety on behalf of themselves, spouses, family members, or friends?

(4) Does La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibit a Clerk and a Deputy from providing an unsecured personal surety for themselves, spouses, family members, or friends?

(5) Does La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibit a Clerk and a Deputy from using community property to post a secured personal surety on behalf of themselves or their spouses?

(6) Does La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibit a Clerk and a Deputy from using community property to post bond for themselves?


Page 2

OPINION 14-0151
Ms. Malise Prieto
Page 2

Louisiana Constitution Article 1, Section 18 provides for a constitutional guaranty of bail before and during trial, except for capital offenses where the proof is evident and the presumption of guilt is great. Bail is the security given by a person to assure his appearance before the proper court whenever required. La. C.Cr.P. art. 311. Bail may be with a commercial surety, a personal secured surety, an unsecured personal surety, cash bond or without surety (with or without security). La. C.Cr.P. art. 312.

Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 320 prohibits attorneys, judges and ministerial officers of a court from being a surety or providing money or property for bail and, in pertinent part, states:

A person shall not be released on bail for which an attorney at law, judge, or ministerial officer of a court becomes a surety or provides money or property for bail; but the invalidity of such bail shall not be a defense to an action to forfeit and enforce the bail.

Your first inquiry is whether a Clerk and a Deputy are considered ministerial officers of a court for the purposes of La. C.Cr.P. art. 320. Louisiana Constitution Article V, Section 28(A) states as follows:

In each parish a clerk of the district court shall be elected for a term of four years. He shall be ex officio notary public and parish recorder of conveyances, mortgages, and other acts and shall have other duties and powers provided by law. The clerk may appoint deputies with duties and powers provided by law ....

The Clerk is the legal custodian of all court records and is responsible for their safekeeping and preservation. La. C.C.P. art. 251. The Clerk is responsible for the issuance of a/l court processes and retaining all pleadings, documents and exhibits filed in court proceedings. La. C.C.P. arts. 252 and 253. The Deputy is subject to the supervision of the Clerk and may perform any of the duties and functions of the Clerk. La. C.C.P. art. 255. The Clerk and the Deputy may be held in contempt of court for failure to perform any ministerial duty. La. C.C.P. art. 257.

The courts have characterized the Clerk's duties as ministerial. The Louisiana Supreme Court held that duties of the Clerk are not only ministerial but mandatory. See Lemoine v. Ducote, 12 So. 939 (La. 1893). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal held that the Clerk has a ministerial duty to permit the inspection and copying of the court's records. See Keko v. Lobreno, 497 So.2d 353 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1986).

The Louisiana Supreme Court examined the act which is currently La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 in the case of State v. Babin, 50 So. 825, 826 (La. 1909), and interpreted ministerial officer of the court as follows: "[T]his act has reference exclusively to those officers,


Page 3

OPINION 14-0151
Ms. Malise Prieto
Page 3

such as judges, clerks, and sheriffs, and their deputies, criers, stenographers, etc., who more directly than the lawyer constitute the machinery of the court."

While the comment made in Babin is dicta, it is the only available definition of the term "ministerial officer of a court," as used in La. C.Cr.P. art. 320. Both "Clerks" and "Deputies" are expressly included in the definition provided by the Babin court.

In La. Atty. Gen. Op, No. 98-0128, our office relied on the definition provided in Babin to support its determination that La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 applied to a city police officer and that he would be considered a ministerial officer of the court.

Based on the above cited statutory provisions, the jurisprudence and our prior opinion, it is the opinion of this office that a Clerk and a Deputy are considered ministerial officers of the court for the purposes of La. C.Cr.P. art. 320.

Your second inquiry relates to whether a Clerk and a Deputy are prohibited from posting bonds statewide. In La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 13-0072, this office was asked whether city police officers, as ministerial officers of the court, were prohibited from serving as sureties statewide. This office opined that the prohibition set forth in La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 is a statewide bar. In concluding that the prohibition was statewide, our office went through a comprehensive history of La. C.Cr.P. art. 320, which illustrates that the Legislature contemplated the prohibition as a statewide prohibition for attorneys, judges, and ministerial court officers. The legislative history discussed in La. Atty. Gen. Op, No. 13­ 0072 would be applicable to the question posed here and is as follows:

The first piece of law that limited who might be a surety from bail was adopted in 1880 and stated:
It shall not be lawful for any judicial or ministerial officer of any of the courts of this State, to go bail for any prisoner or other person in any prosecution or criminal proceeding in their respective courts, or to become surety for the appearance of any prisoner or other person before their respective courts to answer to any criminal charge.
As originally adopted, the legislation, though bearing similarities to the article today, only purported to restrain judges and ministerial officers of courts from acting as sureties on bail under the purview of their courts' authority.

In 1928, a new Code of Criminal Procedure was adopted by the Legislature. The codification included the prohibition against judges and ministerial court officers from posting bail for criminal matters in their court.
It also included a new provision that "no practicing attorney or counselor shall become security or bail for the appearance of any person charged with a felony or a misdemeanor in any criminal cause." Juxtaposing these


Page 4

OPINION 14·0151
Ms. Malise Prieto
Page 4

two rules, the bar against attorneys was clearly meant to be a statewide bar where the judge and ministerial court officer bar was constrained to only matters within their courts.

When the Code of Criminal Procedure was revised again in 1967, these two provisions combined into then-Article 326, and the language is identical to present-Article 320, adopted in 1993. In the current version, there is no distinction between any officers, and instead, a general prohibition was enacted against attorneys, judges and ministerial court officers serving as sureties, and the Legislature removed any qualification as to how this prohibition applies. The Official Revision Comments which accompanied the 1967 Code of Criminal Procedure, when this new article was first adopted, states "[t]he state-wide application of this article to an attorney is retained from Art. 88 of the 1928 Code of Criminal procedure but statewide application to a judge or a court official goes further than former R.S. 15:88.1, which prohibited only going bail for persons charged in his own court."

La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 13-0072. (footnotes omitted.)
Based on the legislative history and our prior opinion, it is the opinion of this office that La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits a Clerk and a Deputy from posting bonds statewide.

Your third inquiry relates to whether La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits a Clerk and a Deputy from using personal or community funds to post a cash bond or purchase a commercial surety on behalf of themselves, spouses, family members, or friends.

The starting point for the interpretation of any statute is "the language of the statute itself." Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La. 5/20/97), 694 So.2d

  1. The basic tenets of statutory construction and interpretation are found in the
    Louisiana Civil Code and Title 1 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. La. C. C. art. 12 states: "When the words of a law are ambiguous, their meaning must be sought by examining the context in which they occur and the text of the law as a whole."

La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 clearly states that no person shall be released on bail for which a ministerial officer of a court becomes surety or provides money or property for bail. The language of La. C.Cr.P. 320 is not ambiguous. La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits a ministerial officer from posting bail and does not make an exception to this prohibition for the ministerial officer, his/her spouse, his/her family members, or his/her friends. La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits a Clerk and a Deputy from using either personal or community


Page 5

OPINION 14-0151
Ms. Malise Prieto
Page 5

funds to post a cash bond or purchase a commercial surety on behalf of themselves, their spouses, family members and frlends.'

Your fourth inquiry relates to whether La. C.Cr.P art. 320 prohibits a Clerk and a Deputy from providing an unsecured personal surety for themselves, spouses, family members, or friends. As discussed above, there is no exception. La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits a Clerk and a Deputy from providing an unsecured personal surety for unsecured personal surety for themselves, spouses, family members, or friends.

Your fifth inquiry relates to whether La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits a Clerk and a Deputy from using community property to post a secured personal surety on behalf of themselves or their spouses." La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits a Clerk and a Deputy from using community property to post a secured personal surety on behalf of themselves or their spouses.

Your sixth inquiry relates to whether La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits the spouses of a Clerk and/or a Deputy from using community property for bail for themselves. Subject to the provisions of La. C.C. art. 2347 which requires both spouses to concur in the alienation or encumbrance of a community immovable, La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 does not prohibit the spouses of a Clerk and a Deputy from using community property for bail for themselves.

In conclusion, it is the opinion of this office that a District Clerk of Court and a Deputy Clerk of Court are considered ministerial officers of the court for the purposes of La. C.Cr.P. art. 320. It is the further opinion of this office that La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 prohibits a District Clerk of Court and a Deputy Clerk from becoming a surety or providing money or property for bail statewide for themselves, spouses, family members, or friends. La. C.Cr.P. art. 320 does not prohibit the spouses of a District Clerk of Court and a Deputy Clerk of Court from using community property for bail.

1 The nature of the funds is immaterial as each spouse owns an undivided one-half interest in community property and either spouse may acting alone manage, control, or dispose of community funds. See La. C.C. art. 2336 and La. C.C art. 2346. 2 A secured personal surety specifically mortgages immovable property located in the State of Louisiana. La. C.Cr.P. art. 318.


Page 6

OPINION 14-0151
Ms. Malise Prieto
Page 6

We hope that this opinion adequately addresses the legal issues you have raised. If our office can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

With best regards,

JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL
ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: rt/J:JdbnJ3) 2(CJ;(),Cnytltu
Madeline S. Carbonette
Assistant Attorney General

JDC: MSC:jr

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2015. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace