Could a homeowner keep Louisiana's homestead exemption after an LLC acquired naked ownership?

Short answer No, on the facts described. The AG said a retained usufruct and continued occupancy did not preserve the exemption when an LLC held naked ownership, because the constitutional exemption extended only to natural persons and qualifying trusts.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 13-0215
Issued
January 17, 2014
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
James J. Petitjean, Acadia Parish Assessor

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2014. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

In 2014, the Louisiana Attorney General concluded that a homestead was ineligible for the property-tax exemption when an LLC held naked ownership, even though the former natural-person owner retained a usufruct, continued living there, and had qualified before the transfers. The constitution extended the exemption to natural persons and certain trusts. The AG treated an LLC as a juridical person outside those categories.

The opinion said the exemption might be restored if the LLC transferred naked ownership back to a natural person, including the usufructuary. It also stressed that the assessor, subject to Tax Commission and court review, made the actual fact-based tax determination.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2014. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Did living in the home preserve the exemption after the LLC acquired ownership?

No. The AG said occupancy and the former owner's usufruct did not overcome the constitutional rule limiting eligible owners to natural persons and qualifying trusts.

Was the retained usufruct itself the problem?

The opinion said the usufruct provision ordinarily could have supported the exemption for a qualifying prior owner who continued to occupy the home. The LLC's later naked ownership was the obstacle in the facts presented.

Did the AG decide an individual taxpayer's assessment?

No. It stated that the assessor, with administrative and judicial review available, had the authority to determine the facts of a particular exemption claim.

Did the opinion identify a way the exemption might return?

It said the exemption might be restored if the LLC transferred naked ownership back to a natural person or persons, including the usufructuary. That was a possibility, not a ruling that a specific later transfer would qualify.

Background and statutory framework

The assessor described a sequence in which an owner transferred a homestead to natural persons while retaining a usufruct, and those persons then transferred naked ownership to an LLC. The AG read La. Const. art. VII, § 20(A)(4)'s usufruct provision together with § 20(A)(5)'s limitation to natural persons and certain trusts. It concluded that the LLC ownership defeated eligibility under that sequence.

Citations

  • La. Const. art. VII, § 20(A)(4) and § 20(A)(5) (usufruct and eligible owner provisions).
  • La. Civ. Code art. 24 (natural-person definition cited by the opinion).

Source

Original opinion text

~tate llf Iii nuisiana
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
P.O. BOX 94005
BATON ROUGE
70804-9005
JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL
ATIORNEY GENERAL

JAN 17 2014
OPINION 13-0215

1"25 - TAXATION - Homestead exemption
Mr. James J. Petitjean, CLA La. Const. art. VII, § 21 .
Acadia Parish Assessor
A bona fide homestead under La. Const. art. VII, § 20(A)(1) is
P. O. Box 1329
not eligible for the homestead exemption if an LLC owns such
Crowley, Louisiana 70527
homestead subject to a usufruct in favor of a natural person
who owned the homestead immediately prior to the granting of such usufruct, qualified for the homestead exemption before
Dear Mr. Petitjean: the transfer, and continues to occupy the residence on the
homestead.

Your "request for an Attorney General's opinion has been assigned to me for research and reply. You ask whether a bona fide homestead under La. Const. art. VII, § 20(A)(1) is eligible for the homestead exemption under the following circumstances:

1. the bona fide homestead in question was transferred by the immediate prior owner to multiple natural persons;
2. the immediate prior owner is a natural person who retained a usufruct over the property after the transfer, qualified for the homestead exemption before the transfer, and continues to occupy the residence; and 3. the multiple natural persons subsequently transferred their naked ownership of the bona fide homestead to a limited liability company ("LLC").

First, we note that the authority to determine whether a particular taxpayer may be exempt from the payment of ad valorem taxes is a factual determination exclusively reserved by the Louisiana Constitution and state law to the assessor, subject to the review of the Louisiana Tax Commission and, ultimately, the courts. 1 While the Attorney General does not have the authority to determine whether a particular taxpayer's property is exempt from taxation, we direct your attention to the applicable law that may
be used in making your determination.
.

The first and foremost principle in a tax exemption case is that an exemption, being an exceptional privilege, must be expressly and clearly conferred in plain terms. 2 Exemption provisions are strictly construed against the taxpayer claiming the benefit of

1
La. Atty. Gen. Op. Nos. 01-144, 00-54, 96-438, and 94-603.
2
Showboat Star Partnership v. Slaughter, 00-1227, p.10 (La.4/3/01), 789 SO.2d 554, -560;
McNamara v. Central Marine Service, Inc., 507 SO.2d 207, 208 (La.1987).


Page 2

Mr. James J. Petitjean, CLA
Opinion 13-0215
Page -2­

an exemption and must be unequivocally and affirmatively established by the taxpayer. 3 The taxpayer's stringent burden is to overcome the judicial maxim that "to doubt is to deny the exemption.,,4

The homestead exemption requirements are set forth in La. Const. art. VII, § 20(A), which provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

(1) The bona fide homestead, consisting of a tract of land or two or more tracts of land even if the land is classified and assessed at use value pursuant to Article VII, Section 18(C) of this constitution, with a residence on one tract and a field with or without timber on it, pasture, or garden on the other tract or tracts, not exceeding one hundred sixty acres, buildings and appurtenances, whether rural or urban, owned and occupied by any person or persons owning the property in indivision, shall be exempt from state, parish, and special ad valorem taxes to the extent of seven thousand five hundred dollars of the assessed valuation. The same homestead exemption shall also fully apply to the primary residence, including a mobile home, which serves as a bona fide home and which is owned and occupied by any person or persons owning the property in indivision, regardless of whether the homeowner owns the land upon which the home or mobile home is sited; however, this homestead exemption shall not apply to the land upon which such primary residence is sited if the homeowner does not own the land.


(4) The homestead exemption shall extend to property where the usufruct of the property has been granted to no more than two usufructuaries who were the immediate prior owners of the homestead and the homestead is occupied as such by a usufructuary. The provisions of this Subparagraph shall apply only to property which qualified for the homestead exemption immediately prior to the granting of such usufruct, or which would have qualified for the homestead exemption if such usufruct had not been granted.

(5) The homestead exemption shall extend only to a natural person or persons and to a trust created by a natural person or persons, in which the

3
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Parish School Board of the Parish of Sf. Charles, 01-0511, p. 11 (La.11/28/01), 802 SO.2d 1270, 1278; Showboat, 00-1227 at 10,789 SO.2d at 560. 4 Sherwood Forest Country Club v. Litchfield, 2008-0194, p. 6 (La. 12/19/08), 998 SO.2d 56, 61, • citing Citifinancial Retail Services Division of Citicorp Trust Bank, FSB v. Weiss, 372 Ark. 128, 271 S.W.3d 494 (2008).


Page 3

Mr. James J. Petitjean, CLA
Opinion 13-0215
Page -3­

beneficiaries of the trust are a natural person or persons provided that the provisions of this Paragraph are otherwise satisfied.

Here, the issue is that the usufructuary occupies the homestead but no longer owns it. 5 Generally, the ownership issue would not be a problem under La. Const. art. VII, § 20(A)(4), since the usufruct of the property has been granted to one usufructuary who was the immediate prior owner of the homestead, the homestead is occupied as such by the usufructuary, and the property qualified for the homestead exemption immediately prior to the granting of such 'usufruct.

However, La. Const. art. VII, § 20(A)(5) expressly provides that the homestead exemption shall extend only to a natural person and certain trusts. Since the current instance does not involve a trust, to qualify for the homestead exemption, the naked owner can only be natural persons, which are human beings. 6 An LLC is an entity to which the law attributes personality. Therefore, it is a juridical person.?

Considering the forgoing constitutional, codal, and jurisprudential authority, it is the opinion of this office that a bona fide homestead under La. Const. art. VII, § 20(A)(1) is not eligible for the homestead exemption if an LLC owns such homestead subject to a usufruct in favor of a natural person who owned the homestead immediately prior to the granting of such usufruct, qualified for the homestead exemption before the transfer, and continues to occupy the residence on the homestead. 8

Finally, we note that the homestead exemption might be restored if the LLC transfers naked ownership back to a natural person or persons, including the usufructary.

We trust this adequately responds to your request. However, if our office can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours very truly,

JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL
Attorney General
By: ~lliIIIJ--~. _U·. . .J:iti' BENJAMIN A. HUXEN II
Assistant Attorney General
JDC/BAH II

5
Under La. Civ. Code art. 535, usufruct is a real right of limited duration on the property of another.
6
La. Civ. Code art. 24.
7 Id.
8
In accord is La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 13-0110.

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2014. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace