Did Louisiana’s interior design board have to record or broadcast all its public meetings?

Short answer The AG concluded that the unelected interior design board did not have to record or broadcast all public meeting proceedings under Act 363 because it lacked authority to levy a tax. It could choose to record or broadcast under the general permission in the meetings statute.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 13-0113
Issued
August 9, 2013
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Sandy Edmonds, State Board of Examiners of Interior Designers

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

A new Louisiana law required unelected boards with tax-levying authority to record or broadcast their public meetings. The State Board of Examiners of Interior Designers asked whether that requirement covered it. The 2013 opinion concluded it did not. The board was unelected, but its license and other regulatory fees were not taxes, and its statutes gave it no power to levy a tax.

The AG said the board could still elect to video or audio record, film, or broadcast a meeting under the general permissive provision.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2013. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Historical summary

Interior design board members

The AG treated the board's appointed status as meeting one condition of Act 363. It found the second condition missing because the board collected regulatory fees rather than levying taxes.

Public meeting administrators

The opinion distinguished the law's mandatory recording rule for certain taxing boards from its permission for other public bodies to record or broadcast proceedings.

Common questions

Did this board have to record every public meeting?

The AG said no under Act 363, because the board lacked tax-levying power.

Did charging licensing fees count as levying a tax?

The AG said no for the fees identified in the board's statute; they served its regulatory function rather than revenue raising.

Could the board record meetings voluntarily?

Yes. The AG pointed to the general statutory permission for public meeting recording and broadcasting.

Background and statutory framework

Act 363 amended La. R.S. 42:23(A), requiring all-proceeding recordings for an unelected board or commission with power to levy a tax. The AG examined the interior design board's powers and the fees in La. R.S. 37:3182, then found no taxing authority.

Citations

  • La. R.S. 42:23(A): meeting recording rule and permission.
  • La. R.S. 37:3182: regulatory fee authority.

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain — the linked PDF is authoritative.

~tat.e of 1fi.ouisiana
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
P.O. BOX 94005
BATON ROUGE
70804-9005
JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWEll
ATTORNEY GENERAL

August 9, 2013
OPINION 13-0113

63 - B - LICENSING - For professions or occupations 90 - B - 4 - PUBLIC MEETINGS - State & Local Goveming Bodies
Ms. Sandy Edmonds La. RS. 37:3173 La. RS. 42:23
Executive Director La. RS. 37:3174 La. RS. 44:36
State Board of Examiners of La. RS. 37:3182 La.Const. art. VII, §1

Interior Designers
The State Board of Examiners of Interior Designers is a nonelected
11736 Newcastle Avenue
board without the authority to levy a tax. Thus. Act 363 of the 2013
Louisiana Legislative Session, which requires that a nonelected
Building 2, Suite C
board or commission with the authority to levy a tax video or audio
Baton Rouge, LA 70816
record, film or broadcast live the proceedings of a public meeting,
does not apply to the Board. However, while the Board is not mandated to do so, La. RS. 42:23(A) still permits the Board, if it so chooses, to video or tape record, film or broadcast live the proceedings of its meetings.
Dear Ms. Ed monds:

Our office received an opinion request from you submitted on behalf of the State Board of Examiners of Interior Designers ("Board") concerning whether Act 363 of the 2013 Louisiana Legislative Session ("Act 363") applies to the Board.

Act 363 amended and reenacted La. R.S. 42:23(A) to provide:

All of the proceedings in a public meeting may be video or tape recorded, filmed, or broadcast live. However, any nonelected board or commission that has the authority to levy a tax shall video or audio record, film, or broadcast live all proceedings in a public meeting.

Act 363 also enacted La. R.S. 44:36(F) to provide:

All existing records or records hereafter accumulated pursuant to R.S.
42:23 shall be preserved and maintained for a period of at least two years from the date on which the public record was made.

You have asked whether this applies to the Board. Such a conclusion depends upon whether the Board is a nonelected board or commission with the authority to levy a tax.
As specified by La. R.S. 37:3173(A), the seven members of the Board are appointed by the governor. Thus, the Board is nonelected. With respect to the authority to levy a tax, La.Const. art. VII, §1 (A) prOVides, "Except as otherwise provided by this constitution, the power of taxation shall be vested in the legislature, shall never be surrendered,


Page 2

OPINION 13-0113
Ms. Sandy Edmonds
Page No.2

suspended, or contracted away, and shall be exercised for public purposes only.,,1 Thus, it is relevant to examine the specific authority granted to the Board by the legislature.

The authority of the Board is defined by La. R.S. 37:3174, which provides:

The board shall have the following powers and authority:
(1) To enforce the provisions of this Chapter and incur such expenses as are necessary within the operating budget of the board.
(2) To adopt and promulgate rules of organization, practice, and procedure; establish criteria for eligibility for licensing; and to provide for the taking of examinations.
(3) To adopt, promulgate, and enforce rules and regulations governing the standards of education, service, conduct, and practice of persons licensed under this Chapter.
(4) To maintain an official roster showing the name, license number, and address of each interior designer licensed under this Chapter and in good standing.
(5) To employ an executive director, legal counsel, and such other assistants and clerical staff and other employees as it deems necessary.

Additionally, the legislature has granted the Board limited authority to collect fees, as d~scribed by La., R.S. 37:3182:

The applicant shall pay the actual cost of any examination. In addition, the board may establish fees that shall not exceed the following amounts:
(1) For licensing, one hundred fifty dollars.
(2) For each annual renewal, one hundred fifty dollars.
(3) For restoration of an expired certificate of registration or for reactivation of an inactive certificate of registration, one hundred fifty dollars.
(4) For restoration of a revoked or suspended certificate of registration, one hundred fifty dollars. The board may assess a penalty not to exceed one hundred fifty dollars that shall be paid prior to the restoration of a revoked or suspended certificate of registration.
(5) For issuance of original or duplicate certificate of registration, twenty­ five dollars.
(6) For failure to renew a certificate of registration within the time period to be set by the board, fifty dollars.
(7) For approval of a continuing education provider, two hundred dollars.

Nowhere in the statutes establishing the Board does the legislature grant the Board the authority to levy a tax. Although the Board has the authority to impose fees, such fees

1 La.Const. art. VI, §29 is an example of a provision "otherwise provided by this constitution," which specifically grants authority to the governing authority of a local governmental subdivision or school board to levy sales and use taxes, as qualified therein.


Page 3

OPINION 13·0113
Ms. Sandy Edmonds
Page No.3

are not a tax. As stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Audubon Ins. Co. v. Bernard, 434 So.2d 1072, 1074 (La.1983):

It is well settled generally and in Louisiana that not every imposition of a charge or fee by the government constitutes a demand for money under its power to tax. If the imposition has not for its principal object the raising of revenue, but is merely incidental to the making of rules and regulations to promote public order, individual liberty and general welfare, it is an exercise of the police power. (Citations omitted). In similar fashion, the police power may be exercised to charge fees to persons receiving grants or benefits not shared by other members of society. (Citations omitted).
But if revenue is the primary purpose for an assessment and regulation is merely incidental, or if the imposition clearly and materially exceeds the cost of regulation or conferring special benefits upon those assessed, the imposition is a tax. (Citations omitted).2

It does not appear that the fees authorized by La. R.S. 37:3182 have the object of raising revenue, but rather are fees incidental to the regulation of the interior design profession. Thus, the Board does not meet the second qualifying characteristic for the application of Act 363.

In conclusion, the Board is a nonelected board without the authority to levy a tax. Thus, Act 363, which requires that a nonelected board or commission with the authority to levy a tax video or audio record, film or broadcast live the proceedings of a public meeting, does not apply to the Board. However, while the Board is not mandated to do so, La. R.S. 42:23(A) still permits the Board, if it so chooses, to video or tape record, film or broadcast live the proceedings of its meetings.

We hope that this opinion has adequately addressed the legal issues you have raised. If our office can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

With best regards,

JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL
ATTORNEY GENERAL

JDC:EAB

2 See also Ewell v. Board of Supervisors, 100 SO.2d 221 (La.19S8) and La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 90-677.

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2013. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace