Could Louisiana’s medical board obtain final malpractice panel opinions after a payment was reported?

Plain-English summary

The Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners asked whether a 2004 law stopped it from obtaining medical review panel opinions after it received reports of malpractice payments. The AG said it did not. The amendment prohibited reporting the filing of a request for panel review; the AG treated a final panel opinion as different. On the facts described, the Patients' Compensation Fund Oversight Board could furnish a requested opinion to the medical board after a payment report.

The opinion tied that distinction to the medical board's duty to evaluate physician conduct after reported malpractice payments. It acknowledged bill-digest language describing both panel reports and requests as nonreportable, but read the operative statutory prohibition as limited to filing a request. Its conclusion addressed the medical board's requested opinions after payment reports, not general publication of panel records.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2006. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Did filing a request for medical review have to be reported to the medical board?

No. The AG quoted Act 306's prohibition on reporting the filing of a request for review to the medical board and other listed bodies.

Could the fund board send the resulting panel opinion to the medical board?

The AG said yes when the medical board had received a malpractice-payment report and requested the opinion. It distinguished the opinion from the initial filing.

Why did the medical board seek the opinions?

The opinion said malpractice-payment reports reached the licensing board under a separate statute, and the board used the underlying panel opinions to assess a physician's conduct.

Did the AG resolve broader access to panel opinions?

No. It answered the specific request concerning delivery from the fund board to the medical board after a reported payment.

Background and statutory framework

Act 306 amended LSA-R.S. 40:1299.47A(1)(a) to restrict reporting the filing of review requests. The AG read that language alongside LSA-R.S. 40:1299.48's malpractice-payment reporting requirement and the medical board's public-protection role. It concluded that furnishing a completed panel opinion on the described request did not violate the filing-report prohibition.

Citations

• LSA-R.S. 40:1299.47A(1)(a) (review-request reporting restriction).
• LSA-R.S. 40:1299.48 (malpractice-payment reports to licensing boards).
• La. Rev. Stat. 37:1261 (medical board public-protection role).

Source

• Landing page: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinions
• Original PDF: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinion/Download/06-0150

Original opinion text

November 9, 2006
OPINION NUMBER 06-0150
62-B Legislature- Acts And Bills

LSA-R.S. 37:1261; LSA-R.S. 40:1299.47A(1)(a) LSA-R.S. 40:1299.48 et seq.
Kim Edward Leblanc, M.D., Ph.D.
Act 306 of the 2004 Regular Legislative Session does not prohibit the
Interim Executive Director
Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund Oversight Board from
Louisiana State Board of
furnishing medical review panel opinions requested by the Louisiana
State Board of Medical Examiners, in those instances where the Board
Medical Examiners
has received a report that a medical malpractice payment has been
630 Camp Street
made.
New Orleans, LA 70130-0250

Dear Ms. Leblanc, M.D., Ph.D.,

We received your request for an Attorney General Opinion regarding Act 306 of the 2004 Regular Legislative Session. Specifically, you ask whether Act 306 of the 2004 Regular Legislative Session prohibits the Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund Oversight Board (the “PCFOB”) from furnishing medical review panel opinions requested by the Louisiana Board of Medical Examiners in those instances where the Board has received a report that a medical malpractice payment has been made. In short, we believe Act 306 of the 2004 Regular Legislative Session does not prohibit reporting medical review panel opinions by the PCFOB to the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, as will be discussed below.

As you state in your request, prior to the passage of Act 306 (2004), upon receipt of a report that a malpractice payment has been made, the Board has, over the past thirty years, requested and received a copy of the underlying medical review panel opinions relative to such claim from the Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund, and more recently its Oversight Board. The issue that now arises is whether the passage of Act 306 (2004) will affect this practice. Act 306 amended and reenacted LSA-R.S. 40:1229.39.1A(1)(a) and 40:1299.47A(1)(a), respectively, to state as follows:

All malpractice claims against the state, its agencies, or other persons covered by this Part, other than claims wherein the patients are prisoners and claims compromised or settled by the claimant and the division of administration with the concurrence of designated legal counsel for the state, shall be reviewed by a state medical review panel established as provided in this Section, to be administered by the commissioner of administration, hereinafter referred to as commissioner. The filing of a request for review by a

Page 2

Kim Edward Leblanc, M.D., Ph.D
OPINION NUMBER 06-0150
Page -2-

state medical review panel as provided for in this Section shall not be reportable by any health care provider or any other entity to the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, to any licensing authority, committee, or board of any other state, or to any credentialing or similar agency, committee, or board of any clinic, hospital, health insurer, or managed care company. (Emphasis added.)

                 *                    *                 *

All malpractice claims against health care providers covered by this Part, other than claims validly agreed for submission to a lawfully binding arbitration procedure, shall be reviewed by a medical review panel established as hereinafter provided for in this Section.
The filing of a request for review by a medical review panel as provided for in this Section shall not be reportable by any health care provider, the Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund, or any other entity to the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, to any licensing authority, committee, or board of any other state, or to any credentialing or similar agency, committee, or board of any clinic, hospital, health insurer, or managed care company.

Our research reflects that Act 306 of the 2004 Session amended LSA-R.S. 40:1299.47A(1)(a) to change the law to prohibit reporting the filings of request for review and reports by the PCFOB, to the Board of Medical Examiners and other identified entities. The Digest of the bill instructs us as to the change between prior and proposed law:

Prior law allowed medical review panel reports and requests for a medical review panel to be reportable to various boards, credentialing agencies, clinics, hospitals, and health insurers.

New law makes medical review panel reports and requests for medical review panels non-reportable.

We attach Senate Bill 302 of the 2004 Regular Legislative Session for your further review.

The significant question herein, is whether the amendment to LSA-R.S. 40:1299.47A (1)(a), is intended to encompass furnishing “medical review panel opinions” that are produced by the medical review panel to the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners. The Board argues that it has not solicited medical review panel “requests” per se, however, the PCFOB expresses concern that the

Page 3

Kim Edward Leblanc, M.D., Ph.D
OPINION NUMBER 06-0150
Page -3-

opinions issued by the medical review panel could arguably be viewed as “reporting” of panel requests.

It is the opinion of this office that the prohibition on reporting the “filing of a request for review” by the PCFOB to the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners does not extend to medical review panel opinions. Therein, note that a filing of a request for review is distinguishable from a medical review panel opinion.

Further research of Act 306 (2004), revealed the legislative intent and purpose of this amendment. In presentation of Senate Bill 302 (Act 306), to the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure1, Senator Donald Hines, the author of Senate Bill 302 (Act 306), explained that the new law prevents physicians that are exonerated by a medical review panel from having to report going before the medical review panel. Senator Hines further explained that, the purpose for this Bill is to eliminate confusion with having to explain to health plans and credentialing agencies the difference between a lawsuit and medical review panel process, when nearly ninety (90) percent of physicians are exonerated. Specifically, because there are several named physicians in these “filings for requests for review,” who may have had minimal involvement in the case, but have to report on credentials when applying for staffing privileges that they appeared before a medical review panel. Additionally, the amendment alleviates the extensive administrative burden medical practice administrators experience when physicians have to respond and provide detailed reports to the various agencies, committees, or health insurers.

One of the principal functions of the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners is to protect the health, welfare, and safety of Louisiana citizens against “unprofessional, improper, unauthorized and unqualified practice of medicine.”2 In carrying out this function, the Board requests medical review panel opinions to assist in evaluating a physician’s conduct in instances when a medical malpractice claim has been paid. This procedure does not appear to conflict with the legislative intent of Senate Bill 302 (2004), and the purpose for which the statute was amended and enacted.

It is important to note that LSA-R.S. 40:1299.47A(1)(a) must be read in para materia with 40:1299.48 et seq., which provides in pertinent part:

A. For the purpose of providing the various licensing boards of Louisiana health care providers, as defined by R.S.
40:1299.41(A)(1), with information on malpractice claims paid by

1
See: House Civil Law Committee Archives, May 25, 2004 @1:08:01 2
La. Rev. Stat. 37:1261

Page 4

Kim Edward Leblanc, M.D., Ph.D
OPINION NUMBER 06-0150
Page -4-

insurers or self insurers on behalf of health care providers in this state, each insurer of such health care provider, and each health care provider in Louisiana who is self insured shall, within thirty days of the date of payment, provide a written report to the licensing board of this state having licensing authority over the health care provider on whose behalf payment was made… (Emphasis added.)

Therein note, the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners are informed, pursuant to LSA-R.S. 40:1299.48 et seq., that there may be a medical review panel opinion, in which case the Board would then request the opinion to assist it in carrying out its duties.

The construction that the PFCOB seeks to place upon R.S. 40:1299.47A(1)(a), appears to be somewhat broad. The purpose of the statute is to eliminate confusion and alleviate administrative burdens placed on physicians who are exonerated, from reporting filings for requests for review to the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, any licensing authority, committee, or board of any other state, or to any credentialing or similar agency, committee, or board of any clinic. Furthermore, to extend the statute to encompass anything other than the limited prohibition of reporting filings of requests for review, would not give effect to the legislative will and would hinder the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners’ ability to fulfill their duties as mandated by law.

With respect to Act 306, which amends and reenacts La. R.S. 40:1299.47A(1)(a), we again conclude that it does not prohibit the PCFOB from furnishing medical review panel opinions requested by the Louisiana Board of Medical Examiners, in those instances where the board has received a report that a medical malpractice payment has been made.

We hope the foregoing is helpful to you. Should you have any further inquiries in which we may provide assistance please contact this office.

Yours very truly,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL

By: _______
LaTonya L. Ozene
Assistant Attorney General
CCF, Jr:LLO/jv
Enclosure

Page 5

Kim Edward Leblanc, M.D., Ph.D
OPINION NUMBER 06-0150
Page -5-

OPINION NUMBER 06-0150

62-B Legislature- Acts And Bills

LSA-R.S. 37:1261
LSA-R.S. 40:1299.47A(1)(a)
LSA-R.S. 40:1299.48 et seq.

We conclude that Act 306 of the 2004 Regular Legislative Session does not prohibit the Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund Oversight Board from furnishing medical review panel opinions requested by the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, in those instances where the Board has received a report that a medical malpractice payment has been made.

Kim Edward Leblanc, M.D., Ph.D.
Interim Executive Director
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
630 Camp Street
New Orleans, LA 70130-0250

Date Received:
Date Released: November 9, 2006

LaTonya L. Ozene
Assistant Attorney General