Could Lake Charles donate city land to a nonprofit for affordable housing after Hurricane Rita?

Short answer The AG said Lake Charles could donate land for its affordable-housing program for needy families if the program had objective eligibility requirements. For a donation through the proposed cooperative agreement, the city also had to determine whether the public benefit was proportionate to the property's cost.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 06-0125
Issued
August 4, 2006
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Randy Roach, Mayor of Lake Charles

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2006. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

After Hurricane Rita damaged homes and apartments, Lake Charles proposed donating city land to a qualified nonprofit to build affordable homes through its Southwest Louisiana Housing Initiative. The AG said the donation could fit the constitutional exception for programs aiding the needy, including when made under a cooperative agreement. The initiative's housing mission qualified, but the AG emphasized objective eligibility requirements so the program actually served families in need.

The opinion also considered the cooperative agreement's public purpose and proportional benefit. It said affordable housing served a public purpose, while the city itself had to determine whether the benefit was proportionate to the value transferred. It did not make that factual determination for the city.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2006. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Could Lake Charles give land to a nonprofit housing developer?

The AG said yes as part of a qualifying social-welfare program for the aid and support of the needy. The proposed nonprofit would develop homes through the city's housing initiative, but eligibility had to be defined objectively to reach genuinely needy households.

Did a cooperative agreement alone justify a land donation?

The AG addressed the agreement as part of the needy-family housing program. It said the social-welfare exception meant the usual legal-obligation requirement did not bar that transfer, while the cooperative endeavor still had to serve a public purpose and yield a benefit proportionate to cost.

Did the AG decide whether the city's land value matched the benefit?

No. It expressly assigned that proportional-benefit determination to the city. Its approval of a donation through the proposed agreement depended on the city making it.

Did the program cover every family seeking a less expensive home?

The AG described low- and moderate-income and otherwise needy households, but insisted on objective eligibility rules that would ensure aid went to families truly in need. It did not define an automatic entitlement for all potential buyers.

Background and statutory framework

La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14 generally restricted gifts of public property. Subsection (B) allowed use of public resources for programs of social welfare aiding the needy, while subsection (C) addressed public-purpose cooperative endeavors. The AG applied those provisions to the city's hurricane-related housing initiative and proposed nonprofit partnership. It relied on the needy-aid exception for the legal basis of the donation, then examined public purpose and proportional benefit.

Citations

  • La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14 (general gift prohibition, needy-aid exception, and cooperative endeavors).
  • 42 U.S.C.A. §5301(b) and (c) (federal affordable-housing objective cited in the opinion).
  • City of Port Allen v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency, Inc. (ordinary legal-obligation rule discussed by the AG).

Source

Original opinion text

August 4, 2006
OPINION NUMBER 06-0125

90-A POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS
90-A-2 PUBLIC FUNDS Loan, Pledge or Grants

La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14

Hon. Randy Roach
The City of Lake Charles’ Southwest Louisiana Housing Initiative
Mayor, City of Lake Charles
(“SWLAHI”) is a program for the aid and support of the needy. As
part of the SWLAHI program, the City may donate real property to a
P.O. Box 900
qualified non-profit organization. The City may also donate real
Lake Charles, Louisiana 70602-0900 property pursuant to a cooperative endeavor agreement, as part of the SWLAHI program, for the aid and support of the needy.

Dear Mayor Roach:

You requested an Attorney General’s opinion regarding a proposed donation of real property owned by the City of Lake Charles (“City”). You indicate that Hurricanes Rita and Katrina created a housing crisis throughout the State of Louisiana, causing thousands of Louisiana residents to be displaced from their homes. More particularly, as it related to this request for an opinion, the City, as well as other Southwest Louisiana localities, took a devastating blow by Hurricane Rita and consequently, is experiencing an unprecedented shortage of affordable housing. Hundreds of homes, and a significant number of the area’s large apartment complexes, were destroyed or severely damaged by the hurricane. The most noticeable impact of this has been on those low to moderate income families who are still displaced because their homes were either uninsured or underinsured, or because they are not homeowners and affordable rental properties are not available. The City’s housing shortage is further intensified by the fact that many displaced families from surrounding localities, as well as families from the New Orleans area, have migrated to, or desire to, move into the City.

In an effort to ameliorate the housing problem, the City has implemented the Southwest Louisiana Housing Initiative (“SWLAHI”). This is a multi-tiered housing development program designed to devise both short-term and long-term solutions to the area’s affordable housing problem. The initial tier of the SWLAHI, which is ongoing, is to coordinate efforts with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to provide emergency temporary housing. However, long-term housing solutions must be a priority. While a portion of the City’s housing needs will be met once the apartment complexes are repaired and in full operation, you feel that the City’s long term housing needs can best be effectuated by providing homeownership opportunities.


Page 2

Hon. Randy Roach
OPINION NUMBER 06-0125
Page - 2 -

Congress has established, per the Housing and Community Development Act, the development of affordable housing as a national objective, its primary purpose being to provide decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunities for persons of low to moderate income. 42 U.S.C.A. §5301(b) and (c). The SWLAHI has been organized in a manner consistent with these purposes, i.e. its primary mission is to develop, finance, and promote affordable, safe and decent housing for low to moderate income individuals, recognizing however, that there may be families who do not fall within the low income guidelines, but are otherwise in need of an affordable home. To accomplish this mission, the City, through its SWLAHI, hopes to undertake several proposed projects that specifically focus on the City’s long term affordable housing needs, the first being the Hillcrest Project.

The Hillcrest Project, and possible future projects like it, involves the City entering into a cooperative endeavor agreement with a qualified non-profit organization, for example, Habitat for Humanity, with whom the City could partner to build and develop affordable homes. The City will donate real property, and possibly use HUD funds for infrastructure expenditures. In consideration thereof, the said non-profit organization would provide the City with direct assistance in all aspects of administering the development project, including but not limited to, developing and building affordable homes, screening and processing potential buyers, implementing and managing a self help component of the project, and other technical assistance as may be necessary. The homes would then be sold to low to moderate income families, or those who are otherwise in need of affordable housing. You feel that the above described donation is sanctioned pursuant to the exceptions contained within Article 7, Section 14 of the Louisiana Constitution. Your questions are as follows:

  1. Can the City donate real property to a qualified nonprofit organization pursuant to
    La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14(B)(1), for programs of social welfare for the aid and support of the needy?

  2. Is the SWLAHI a program of social welfare for the aid and support of the needy?

  3. Can the City donate real property as part of a cooperative endeavor agreement
    pursuant to La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14(C)?

As you are aware, La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14 provides in part as follows:

Section 14. (A) Prohibited Uses. Except as otherwise provided by this constitution, the funds, credit, property, or things of value of the state or of any political subdivision shall not be loaned, pledged, or donated to or for any person, association, or corporation, public or private. . . .


Page 3

Hon. Randy Roach
OPINION NUMBER 06-0125
Page - 3 -

(B) Authorized Uses. Nothing in this Section shall prevent (1) the use of public funds for programs of social welfare for the aid and support of the needy; . . . .

(C) Cooperative Endeavors. For a public purpose, the state and its political subdivisions or political corporations may engage in cooperative endeavors with each other, with the United States or its agencies, or with any public or private association, corporation, or individual.

The answer to your first question is in the affirmative. We note that Section 14(A) generally prohibits the loan, grant and/or donation of public funds and/or property to public and private entities and individuals. An exception to this prohibition is found in Section 14(B) which permits the donation of public funds and/or property for programs of social welfare for the aid and support of the needy. This provision has been construed to include the use of public property as well as funds for social welfare purposes. Attorney General Opinion Nos. 98-293, 97-236, 87-587 and 84-161. Further, we have recognized, as a threshold criterion, that a systematic program with objective eligibility requirements should be implemented to insure that the program serves only those individuals and/or families that are truly needy. Attorney General Opinion Nos. 97- 236, 92-543 and 82-115.

Your second question is whether SWLAHI is a program of social welfare for the aid and support of the needy. You indicate that the primary mission is to develop, finance, and promote affordable, safe and decent housing for low to moderate income individuals. It is the opinion of our office that this mission is consistent with, and constitutes, a program of social welfare for the aid and support of the needy pursuant to Section 14(B). In accord is Attorney General Opinion No. 98-238. We note that income will be one of the criteria for eligibility for this program. We again remind you that as a threshold criterion, SWLAHI must have objective eligibility requirements to insure that the program serves only those individuals and/or families that are truly needy.

The answer to your third question depends on the purpose of the cooperative endeavor. Generally, a cooperative endeavor must meet a three-part test to be constitutionally valid. First, the public agency must have a legal obligation to expend the public funds at issue. Second, the expenditure must be for a public purpose. Third, the expenditure must create a public benefit proportionate to its cost. Attorney General Opinion Nos. 00- 215, 97-457, 93-787.

The requirement for a "legal obligation" for the expenditure or transfer of public funds has been recognized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in City of Port Allen v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency, Inc., 439 So.2d 399 (La.1983). As stated in the City of Port Allen decision, "even if political subdivisions cooperate for a public purpose, they still may not give away their assets ... merely for a public purpose." Our office has


Page 4

Hon. Randy Roach
OPINION NUMBER 06-0125
Page - 4 -

interpreted legal obligation to mean that the expenditure of funds be sanctioned, authorized by law, or in the discharge of a legal duty. Attorney General Opinion Nos. 03- 0444, 02-0162 and 00-14. In the situation you describe, where the City would donate real property pursuant to a cooperative endeavor agreement, as part of a program of social welfare for the aid and support of the needy, the “legal obligation” requirement need not be met. The donation of real property in that instance would not be a prohibited donation under Art. VII, Section 14(B), and therefore no legal obligation on the part of the City is required.

Next, the expenditure must be for a public purpose. Our office agrees with your contention that decent and affordable housing is vital to the general health, safety, and welfare of the public. Therefore, it is our opinion that a cooperative endeavor to provide affordable housing is a valid public purpose. Whether the expenditure creates a public benefit proportionate to its cost is a determination that must be made by the City. If the City makes such a determination, then it is our opinion that, the City may donate real property pursuant to a cooperative endeavor agreement, as part the SWLAHI program, for the aid and support of the needy.

Trusting this adequately responds to your request, we remain

Yours very truly,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: _________
KENNETH L. ROCHE, III
Assistant Attorney General

CCF, JR/KLR, III/jv


Page 5

OPINION NUMBER 06-0125

90-A POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS
90-A-2 PUBLIC FUNDS Loan, Pledge or Grants

La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14

The City of Lake Charles’ Southwest Louisiana Housing Initiative (“SWLAHI”) is a program for the aid and support of the needy. As part of the SWLAHI program, the City may donate real property to a qualified non-profit organization. The City may also donate real property pursuant to a cooperative endeavor agreement, as part of the SWLAHI program, for the aid and support of the needy.

Hon. Randy Roach
Mayor, City of Lake Charles
P.O. Box 900
Lake Charles, Louisiana 70602-0900

Date Received:

Date Released: August 4, 2006

KENNETH L. ROCHE, III
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2006. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace