Could a St. Mary Parish hospital district pay for a chiller its private hospital lessee was obligated to buy?

Short answer No. The AG read the hospital lease to make the private operator responsible for equipment purchases and found no district obligation to replace the chiller. Paying for it with public funds would therefore be a prohibited donation.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 06-0080
Issued
April 25, 2006
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Nicholas F. LaRocca, Jr., counsel for Hospital Service District No. 2 of St. Mary Parish

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2006. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

St. Mary Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 asked whether it could buy a replacement chiller for Lakewood Medical Center, which a private company operated under a lease. The AG said the district could not pay for it. The lease put maintenance, improvements, and equipment purchases on the lessee, PHC-Morgan City. The district therefore had no legal obligation to buy the chiller, and spending public money on it would be a prohibited donation.

The opinion compared an earlier AG opinion about the same lease and other construction expenses. Its answer turned on the specific allocation of equipment responsibility in that lease, not on a general rule that hospital districts can never purchase equipment.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2006. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Who was responsible for the chiller under the lease reviewed?

The AG said PHC, the private lessee, was responsible for equipment purchases and maintenance or improvements described in the agreement.

Why could the district not pay instead?

It had no lease-based obligation to do so. The AG applied the constitutional rule against giving public funds or value when the public entity owes no legal duty.

Did the earlier opinion about this lease affect the answer?

Yes. The AG cited Opinion 03-0240, which similarly found no district duty to pay for a demolition and medical-office development under the PHC lease.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion described the hospital district's creation under R.S. 46:1051 and the AG-approved hospital lease. It quoted the lessee's maintenance and equipment-purchase terms and applied Article VII, Section 14's public-donation restriction to the proposed chiller payment.

Citations

  • La. R.S. 46:1051 (district creation).
  • La. R.S. 40:2115.11 (lease approval authority cited).
  • Article 7, Section 14 of the Louisiana Constitution (public donation prohibition).

Source

Original opinion text

April 25, 2006
Opinion Number 06-0080

90-A-1 Public Funds & Contracts
Article 7, Section 14 of the La. Const.
Mr. Nicholas F. LaRocca, Jr., Counsel
La. R.S. 46:1051
for Hospital Service District No. 2
La. R.S. 40:2115.11
Parish of St. Mary
District may not pay for equipment when it is
P.O. Box 2466
under no obligation to do so.
Morgan City, LA 70381-2466

Dear Mr. LaRocca:

Hospital Service District No. 2 of St. Mary Parish questions whether or not it may use public funds to replace a chiller unit within the physical plant at Lakewood Medical Center in Morgan City, Louisiana. In short, it is our opinion that the District is under no obligation to replace the unit. To do otherwise would be tantamount to a donation of public funds and that is expressly prohibited by Article 7, Section 14 of the Louisiana Constitution.

Hospital Service District No. 2 was created pursuant to the provisions of La. R.S. 46:1051 et seq. The District owned and operated Lakewood Medical Center in Morgan City until the operation of the hospital was assumed by PHC-Morgan City, L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary of Province Healthcare Company. The District and PHC entered into a lease agreement. The lease was approved by the Attorney General pursuant to La. R.S. 40:2115.11, et seq.

The lease specifically provides that the lessee, PHC, at its own expense, will maintain all parts of the improvements in at least as good condition as they now are, except for ordinary wear, tear, depreciation or obsolescence.1 The lease further provides that the lessee, PHC, shall make additional improvements, repairs and renovations to the hospital and premises for the benefit of the business and operations of the hospitals and premises and shall make equipment purchases for the hospital and premises…2

Pursuant to the lease, therefore, the lessee, PHC is obligated for the maintenance and improvements of the hospital and is specifically responsible for equipment purchases. PHC has asked the District to pay for the purchase of a chiller unit, i.e. equipment. Pursuant to the lease, the District is not obligated to do so. To do otherwise is tantamount to a donation of public funds and that is specifically prohibited by Article 7,

1
Lease, Section 4.3 (a)
2
Third amendment to Annex A to the lease agreement, Section 7.8 (b)


Page 2

Opinion Number 06-0080
Mr. Nicholas F. LaRocca, Jr., Counsel
for Hospital Service District No. 2
Parish of St. Mary
Page -2-

Section 14 of the Louisiana Constitution. The state cannot donate public funds or anything of value when it is under no obligation to do so.

You refer to Attorney General Opinion Number 03-0240 in your request. This opinion concluded that the District was not obligated to pay for the demolition of a building and to develop and construct a medical office building and parking facility. That opinion concluded that pursuant to the lease agreement, the District was not obligated to do so. PHC agreed to maintain, at its sole expense, the premises during the term of the lease. We believe this opinion is applicable to this request. Although it involved a different request for payment, the District was not obligated pursuant to its lease with PHC for the payment.

We trust that this responds to your request. If you have any questions, please contact our office.

With kindest regards,

Yours very truly,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
Attorney General

BY: _________
TINA VICARI GRANT
Assistant Attorney General

CCF, jr./TVG/dam


Page 3

Opinion Number 06-0080
Syllabus

90-A-1 Public Funds & Contracts
Article 7, Section 14 of the La. Const.
La. R.S. 46:1051
La. R.S. 40:2115.11

District may not pay for equipment when it is under no obligation to do so.

Mr. Nicholas F. LaRocca, Jr., Counsel
for Hospital Service District No. 2
Parish of St. Mary
P.O. Box 2466
Morgan City, LA 70381-2466

Date Received:

Date Released: April 25, 2006

Tina Vicari Grant
Assistant Attorney General

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2006. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace