Could the Orleans Levee Board reduce office rent after Hurricane Katrina left its building without electricity?

Short answer Only if the tenants’ lease agreements gave them a right to reduced or remitted rent under the circumstances. The AG said an abatement without a legal obligation would be a prohibited donation and declined to decide whether the sample lease clause actually applied.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 06-0048
Issued
May 16, 2006
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Michael P. McCrossen, President, Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2006. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

After Hurricane Katrina, commercial offices in the Orleans Levee Board's Lake Vista Community Center lacked electricity until November 15, 2005. The board asked whether it could waive rent for the affected period. The AG said the lease terms controlled: if a lease entitled the tenant to rent reduction or remission in these circumstances, abatement would satisfy a legal obligation and would not be a prohibited donation of public value.

The AG reviewed a sample clause concerning fire or other casualty and premises unfit for occupancy. It said an argument could be made for applying that clause, but declined to decide that factual question. Without an applicable lease obligation or other legal duty, the board could not simply give up rent due to it.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2006. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Could the board waive rent solely because the building had no power?

The AG said it could not abate rent without a legal obligation. It treated the lease agreements, rather than a general hardship rationale, as controlling the answer.

Did the sample casualty clause require rent abatement?

The AG did not decide. It said that whether the clause covered the described loss of electricity and access was a factual question outside its determination.

If a lease entitled the tenant to rent reduction, would that violate the donation ban?

No. The AG said fulfilling a lease-based right to rent reduction or remission would not be a prohibited donation under Article VII, Section 14.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion applied La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14's bar on donating public funds or things of value. It treated a lease-based duty to reduce rent as the possible legal obligation permitting abatement and expressly left application of the sample clause to the actual facts.

Citations

  • La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14 (public donation prohibition).
  • City of Port Allen v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Agency (legal-obligation principle cited).

Source

Original opinion text

May 16, 2006
OPINION NUMBER 06-0048

Mr. Michael P. McCrossen, President
90-A-2 PUBLIC FUNDS – Loan, Pledge or
Board of Commissioners of the
Grants
Orleans Levee District
La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14
Suite 202 – Administration Building
Discussion of the abatement of lease payments
by theOrleans Levee Board.
6001 Stars and Stripes Blvd.
New Orleans, Louisiana 70126-8006

Dear Mr. McCrossen:

On behalf of the Industrial Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District (the “Board”), you have requested an Attorney General’s opinion regarding lease payments related to certain property owned by the Board. You indicated the Board leases commercial office space in the Lake Vista Community Center in the lake front area of New Orleans. The building did not suffer significant damage or flooding during the hurricane, however, electricity was unavailable until November 15, 2005. Additionally, you note that at one point, residents and business owners were prohibited from returning to Orleans Parish. For a period of time in September 2005, the residents and business owners were only permitted to visit and to assess damages as opposed to being able to stay and occupy their property.

The Board has been advised by its real estate consultant that, in the private sector, rent is generally being abated for the period of time electricity was unavailable, as it is a practical necessity for use of the space for the purposes intended. You question whether it is permissible, and not a prohibited donation, for the Board to abate rental payments due to the Board for the period from September 1, 2005 to November 15, 2005, due to lack of electricity available to the tenants of commercial office space, as a result of Hurricane Katrina.

As you are aware, Article VII, Section 14 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 prohibits the donation of public funds. Article VII, Section 14 provides, in pertinent part, the following:

“Section 14. (A) Prohibited Uses. Except as otherwise provided by this constitution, the funds, credit, property, or things of value of the state or of any political subdivision shall not be loaned, pledged, or donated to or for any person, association, or corporation, public or private…”


Page 2

Article VII, Section 14 clearly prohibits the donation of public funds. Thus, the state or any of its political subdivisions may not loan, pledge or donate its funds or anything of value to or for any person when it is under no obligation to do so. See City of Port Allen v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Agency, 439 So.2d 399 (La. 1983); Beaird-Poulan, Inc. v. Department of Highways, 362 F.Supp. 547 (W.D.La.1973). We have interpreted legal obligation to mean that the expenditure of funds be sanctioned, authorized by law, or in the discharge of a legal duty. Attorney General Opinion Nos. 02-0162 and 00-0014.

The Board may not abate lease payments unless it has a legal obligation to do so, or such abatement would constitute a prohibited donation under Article VII, Section 14. Whether the Board has an obligation to reduce or abate lease payments, under the circumstances described above, is governed by the lease agreements between the Board and its tenants. If the leases allow or require the abatement of lease payments, then the abatement would not be a prohibited donation.

The Board provided our office with a sample lease which contains the following provision:

XXIV.

If, through no fault, neglect, or design of Lessee the premises are destroyed by fire or other casualty or damaged to such extent as to render them wholly unfit for occupancy, then this lease shall be cancelled. If, however, the premises can be repaired within one hundred and twenty (120) days from date of fire or casualty, then lease shall not be cancelled and Lessor shall notify Lessee within thirty (30) days from date of fire or casualty that lessor will repair the damage, and Lessee shall be entitled only to such reduction or remission of rent as shall be just and proportionate.

While an argument can be made that this provision is applicable to the situation you have described, a determination as to whether or not this provision is applicable is a question of fact, which our office is not in a position to make. It is the opinion of our office that, if this provision, or any other lease provision, gives the lessee the right to a reduction or remission of rent under the circumstances you have described, then the abatement of lease payments would not constitute a prohibited donation under Article VII, Section 14.


Page 3

Trusting this adequately responds to your request, we remain

Yours very truly,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: _________
KENNETH L. ROCHE, III
Assistant Attorney General

CCF, JR/KLR, III/jv


Page 4

OPINION NUMBER 06-0048

90-A-2 PUBLIC FUNDS – Loan, Pledge or Grants

La. Const. Art. VII, Sec. 14

Discussion of the abatement of lease payments by
the Orleans Levee Board.

Mr. Michael P. McCrossen, President
Board of Commissioners of the
Orleans Levee District
Suite 202 – Administration Building
6001 Stars and Stripes Blvd.
New Orleans, Louisiana 70126-8006

Date Received:

Date Released: May 16, 2006

KENNETH L. ROCHE, III
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2006. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace