Could off-duty Broussard police use city patrol cars for paid private security work?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
Broussard’s police chief asked whether officers working private security while off duty could use city patrol cars and whether a private organization could reimburse the department for the cars. In 2005, the Attorney General answered yes to both for a security detail within city limits.
The AG said an agency could allow off-duty officers to contract for private security and use issued equipment, including patrol cars. It also said a private organization could pay the officer directly and reimburse the department for car use; the precise division of contracts did not change its answer. The opinion warned that the agency might face liability for an officer’s conduct because the officer still appeared to carry the agency’s authority.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 2005. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Common questions
Could an off-duty officer use a city patrol car on a private security detail?
The AG said yes when the chief authorized the arrangement and the detail was within Broussard’s municipal limits.
Could the private organizer pay the officer and reimburse the city separately?
Yes. The AG said a separate officer payment and department car reimbursement did not change its conclusion.
Did the AG say the police department had no responsibility for off-duty conduct?
No. It warned that the department could face liability because an officer using police authority and equipment appeared to act for the agency.
Background and statutory framework
The opinion concerned a Lawrason Act municipality and private security within its territory. The AG relied on earlier opinions permitting off-duty security work and reimbursement for police personnel and equipment. It did not analyze details outside the municipality or establish a specific reimbursement rate.
Citations
- La. R.S. 33:321 (Lawrason Act provision cited for Broussard).
- La. R.S. 14:140 (cited through the earlier security-reimbursement opinion).
- Atty. Gen. Op. No. 84-125 (earlier private security arrangement discussed by the AG).
Source
- Landing page: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinions
- Original PDF: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinion/Download/05-0389
Original opinion text
December 12, 2005
OPINION NO. 05-0389
77 – OFFICERS – Local & Municipal; Selection, Qualifications & Tenure; vacancies
Honorable Brannon J. Decou
La. R.S. 33:321
La. R.S. 14:140
Chief of Police
Broussard Police Department A chief of police can authorize his police officers to use city
414 East Main Street
patrol cars to a security detail within the city limits on their
Broussard, Louisiana 70518 off-duty time and can accept payment or reimbursement from a private organization for the use of the city’s patrol car by an off-duty police officer on a private security detail.
Dear Chief Decou:
Your request for an Attorney General’s opinion has been referred to me for research and reply. You have asked this office to respond to questions about the use of and payment for patrol cars by off-duty police officers as follows:
1. Is it legal for a chief of police to authorize his police officers to use city police cars to work a security detail within city limits on their off-duty time?
2. May a chief of police accept payment from a private organization for the use of its police cars by off-duty police officers performing security work?
The answer to your first question is in the affirmative. The provisions of La. R.S. 33:321, et seq. govern the City of Broussard, a Lawrason Act municipality. This office has long observed that a law enforcement agency may allow its police officers to contract for private security work during those officers’ off-duty hours. The officers may be allowed to use their police issued equipment including city patrol cars. The law does, however, provide that the agency may face liability for the officers’ actions since the officers are clothed with the apparent power and authority of that agency. See Atty. Gen. Op. No. 02-0026.
The answer to your second question is in the affirmative as well. The facts indicate that a private concern wants to hire an off-duty police officer in order to provide security at a specific location. Under the proposed arrangement, the private concern would pay the off-duty police officer directly and reimburse the police department for the use of the City’s patrol car. A similar factual scenario was addressed in Atty. Gen. Op. No. 84-
- That opinion discussed whether a chief of police could accept payment from a
private organization for the use of the town’s police officers and police cars. Citing La. R.S. 14:140 and Atty. Gen. Op. No. 80-582, the opinion concluded that the police
Page 2
Hon. Brannon J. Decou
OPINION NO. 05-389
Page 2
department could contract with a private organization for the purpose of providing security in return for reimbursement of salaries and expenses of the police officers involved as long as the security work was within the territorial bounds of the municipality.
In this case, the private organization might be entering into separate contracts to provide security services: one with the police officer for the payment of his fee or salary; the other with the police department for reimbursement of the use of the patrol car. Whether the private organization contracts with the police department, the police officer assigned to the detail or both is immaterial. It is the opinion of this office that a chief of police can accept payment or reimbursement from a private organization for the use of the City’s patrol car by an off-duty police officer on a private security detail.
We hope that this sufficiently answers your inquiry, but if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:________
Christopher D. Matchett
Assistant Attorney General
CCF,Jr.:CDM:lrs
Page 3
OPINION NO. 05-0389
77 – OFFICERS – Local & Municipal; Selection, Qualifications & Tenure; vacancies
La. R.S. 33:321
La. R.S. 14:140
A chief of police can authorize his police officers to use city patrol cars to a security detail within the city limits on their off-duty time and can accept payment or reimbursement from a private organization for the use of the city’s patrol car by an off- duty police officer on a private security detail.
Honorable Brannon J. Decou
Chief of Police
Broussard Police Department
414 East Main Street
Broussard, Louisiana 70518
DATE RECEIVED:
CHRISTOPHER D. MATCHETT
DATE RELEASED: December 12, 2005
Assistant Attorney General
What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace