Who could sell Natchitoches Parish Hospital, and what approvals and uses of the proceeds were required?

Short answer The AG said ownership was a factual question: the district would sell if it owned the hospital, or the parish would sell if it owned it. It said a sale required voter and Attorney General approval, outstanding district bonds should be satisfied first, and remaining proceeds had to serve appropriate health care purposes.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 05-0372
Issued
November 15, 2006
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Ms. Catherine Hamilton, Natchitoches Parish Administrator

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2006. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

Natchitoches Parish asked who could sell its hospital and what approvals and use of proceeds a sale would require. In 2006, the Attorney General declined to decide who owned the property. It said the hospital service district would be the seller if the district owned it; the parish governing authority would be the seller if the parish owned it. The opinion said the sale of a hospital service district hospital required voter approval and Attorney General approval.

The AG said any outstanding district bonds should be satisfied first. Remaining proceeds had to be used for appropriate health care purposes, and the AG concluded that a nonprofit foundation should control and manage them. It found no statute specifically requiring Police Jury approval of the sale, although parish governing authorities had powers over districts they created. If the parish abolished the district and its property reverted to the parish, the parish could sell the hospital subject to the same voter and AG approvals. Citizens could ask for a sale, but the AG found no law requiring officials to act on that request.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2006. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Did the AG decide whether the district or parish owned the hospital?

No. It said ownership was a factual question it could not answer. The owner would be the proper seller under the opinion’s conditional analysis.

Could officials sell the hospital without a public vote?

The AG said no. It applied the voter-approval provision for revenue-producing public property and also required Attorney General approval under the hospital acquisition law.

What could happen to sale proceeds?

The opinion said outstanding district bonds should be paid first and remaining money must serve appropriate health care purposes. It recommended a nonprofit foundation to control and manage the proceeds.

Could residents force a sale by requesting one?

No. The AG said residents could request a sale, but it found no law requiring the district or parish governing authority to act on the request.

Background and statutory framework

The AG applied La. R.S. 33:4341 to the referendum question and La. R.S. 40:2115.11 and related provisions to Attorney General review and the protection of health care assets. It cited La. R.S. 33:1415 for a parish’s authority to abolish a district it created. It analyzed seller identity conditionally because the source request did not establish title to the hospital.

Citations

  • La. R.S. 33:4341 (voter approval for sale of revenue-producing public property).
  • La. R.S. 40:2115.11 (Attorney General acquisition review cited by the opinion).
  • La. R.S. 40:2115.17 and La. R.S. 40:2115.18 (sale proceeds and community health care criteria).
  • La. R.S. 33:1415 (parish authority regarding districts it created).

Source

Original opinion text

November 15, 2006
OPINION NUMBER 05-0372

53 Hospitals
La. R.S. 33:4341; R.S. 40:2115.11, et seq.
Ms. Catherine Hamilton
Parish Administrator
Discussion of issues regarding the sale of a
Natchitoches Parish
hospital service district hospital.
P.O. Box 799
Natchitoches, Louisiana 71458-0799

Dear Ms. Hamilton:

You requested an Attorney General’s opinion regarding the Natchitoches Parish Hospital (“Hospital”). With respect to a sale of the Hospital, you have presented a number of questions for our review.

In an effort to present our answers in an orderly and non-repetitive fashion, we have grouped your questions together, where appropriate, for response.

If the Natchitoches Parish Hospital Service District is an agency of the Parish governing authority, who owns the Natchitoches Parish Hospital?
Is the Parish governing authority the proper party to act in the capacity as seller of the Hospital?

The question of who owns the Hospital is a factual question, which our office is not in a position to answer. However, if the Hospital is owned by the Natchitoches Parish Hospital Service District (“District”), then the District would be the proper party to act in the capacity as seller. If the Hospital is owned by Natchitoches Parish, then the Parish, through the Parish governing authority, would be the proper party to act in the capacity as seller.

Must the Parish governing authority and voters of the Parish approve the sale of the Hospital?

Provisions of Louisiana law require the approval of both the electorate and the Attorney General in connection with the sale of hospitals. With respect to voter approval of a sale of a hospital, La. R.S. 33:4341(A) pertinently provides:


Page 2

Ms. Catherine Hamilton
Opinion Number 05-0372
Page -2-

Any...political subdivision or taxing district...may sell or lease any revenue- producing properties owned by it, including all proper franchises to operate the properties...provided the governing authorities have been first authorized to do so by a vote of a majority of the qualified electors, voting at an election held for that purpose...

Attorney General's Opinion No. 94-443 determined, and it remains our opinion, that a hospital facility owned by a political subdivision constitutes property of a revenue- producing utility as defined in La. R.S. 33:4341. That opinion further concluded the sale of such a facility could only be accomplished after approval of same by the referendum of the electorate.

Additionally, La. R.S. 40:2115.11, et seq., provides that "the state has an interest in assuring the continued existence of accessible, affordable health care facilities that are responsive to the needs of the communities in which they exist", and further, that a not- for-profit hospital shall not be acquired "unless and until the acquisition is reviewed and approved by the attorney general." La. R.S. 40:2115.11. In accordance with these provisions of law, it is our opinion that the approval of the Attorney General is required in connection with the sale of a hospital service district hospital. With respect to the approval of the Police Jury, our research did not reveal any provision of law which specifically requires same. However, we note that La. R.S. 33:1415 gives parish governing authorities the authority to abolish any district it has created, and to exercise budgetary and fiscal controls over such a district.

If the Hospital is sold, where should the proceeds from the sale of the Hospital be deposited? How can the proceeds be used?

First, if the District has any outstanding bonded indebtedness, the proceeds should be used to satisfy those obligations. If the District has any outstanding bonds, we recommend you contact bond counsel prior to any transaction involving the sale of the Hospital. Any remaining proceeds must be used for appropriate health care purposes. La. R.S. 40:2115.17 provides in relevant part:

A. The attorney general shall approve the application unless he finds that the acquisition is not in the public interest. An acquisition is not in the public interest unless appropriate steps have been taken to safeguard the value of charitable assets and ensure that any proceeds of the transaction are used for appropriate health care purposes as provided for in R.S.
40:2115.18.

B. In determining whether the acquisition meets such criteria under this Subpart, the attorney general shall consider:


Page 3

Ms. Catherine Hamilton
Opinion Number 05-0372
Page -3-

                            *     *      *      *      *

(7) Whether the sale proceeds will be used for appropriate health care purposes consistent with the seller's original purpose or for the support and promotion of health care in the affected community and whether the proceeds will be controlled as funds independently of the purchaser or parties to the acquisition.

(8) Whether any corporation established to hold the proceeds of the sale will be broadly based in the community and be representative of the affected community, taking into consideration the structure and governance of such corporation.

La. R.S. 40:2115.18 provides in pertinent part:

In making a decision whether to approve or disapprove an application, the attorney general shall also determine whether the acquisition affects the continued existence of accessible, affordable health care facilities that are responsive to the needs of the community. In making this determination, the attorney general shall consider:

(1) Whether sufficient safeguards are included to assure the affected community continued access to affordable care.

(2) Whether the purchaser and parties to the acquisition have made a commitment, at least comparable to the seller, to provide health care to the disadvantaged, the uninsured, and the underinsured and to provide benefits to the affected community to promote improved health care.
Activities and funding provided by the seller or its successor nonprofit corporation or foundation to provide such health care or to provide support or medical education and teaching programs or medical research programs shall be considered in evaluating compliance with this commitment.

Additionally, LAC 48:XXV, Section 307(B)(24) provides in relevant part:

24. Foundation Issues:

(a) Attach as Appendix P the detailed written plan of the preservation, protection, and use of any and all proceeds from the dissolution of the nonprofit, or the sale to or merger with the acquirer. State and fully explain whether any money, property, or proceeds resulting from the transaction referred to in your Notice or the operation of the foundation will benefit any


Page 4

Ms. Catherine Hamilton
Opinion Number 05-0372
Page -4-

director, officer or for-profit person or entity, directly or indirectly. The detailed plan shall include bylaws, a conflict of interest statement, a defined mission, the proposed investment policy, and granting procedures.

(b) Attach as Appendix Q proof that any asset purchase agreement or other contract, by whatever name, does not incorporate or place any restrictions which any for-profit entity may place on the use of charitable or nonprofit funds and any other funds or property, either now or in the future, by any foundation created or endowed to preserve, disburse, or protect the funds.

Based upon the foregoing rule and statutes, it is the opinion of our office that a non- profit foundation should be formed to control and manage the proceeds of any sale of the Hospital. These proceeds must be used for appropriate health care purposes as provided for in the above-referenced statutes and rule.

Can the Parish governing authority abolish the Natchitoches Parish Hospital Service District Board if the Board refuses to cooperate with the Parish governing authority? Once the Board is abolished, can the Parish governing authority sell the Hospital?

As indicated above, La. R.S. 33:1415 gives parish governing authorities the authority to abolish any district it has created, and to exercise budgetary and fiscal controls over such a district. If the Parish governing authority abolishes the District, and the property of the District reverts to the Parish, then the Parish governing authority can sell the Hospital, subject to approval of both the electorate of the Parish and the Attorney General.

Can the citizens of the Parish request that the District or the Parish governing authority sell the Hospital?

While the citizens of the Parish may request that the District or the Parish governing authority sell the Hospital, we are not aware of, and our research did not reveal, any provision of law which would require the District or the Parish governing authority to act upon such a request.


Page 5

Ms. Catherine Hamilton
Opinion Number 05-0372
Page -5-

Trusting this adequately responds to your request, we remain

Yours very truly,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: _________
KENNETH L. ROCHE, III
Assistant Attorney General

CCF, JR/KLR, III/crt


Page 6

Opinion Number 05-0372

53 Hospitals

La. R.S. 33:4341; R.S. 40:2115.11, et seq.

Discussion of issues regarding the sale of a hospital service district hospital.

Ms. Catherine Hamilton
Parish Administrator
Natchitoches Parish
P.O. Box 799
Natchitoches, Louisiana 71458-0799

Date Received:

Date Released: November 15, 2006

Kenneth L. Roche, III
Assistant Attorney General

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2006. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace