Who transported and paid for a patient under Louisiana emergency mental-health certificates?

Short answer The AG said the sheriff where a patient was located executed a properly issued physician emergency certificate, regardless of the patient's residence. Commitment costs were paid by an able patient or responsible relative, otherwise under the domicile rules the opinion quoted; coroner fees could depend on whether the patient lived inside a municipality.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 05-0220
Issued
August 18, 2005
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Raymond Rouse, Catahoula Parish Coroner

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

Catahoula Parish's coroner asked in 2005 about transport, examination fees, and who could sign emergency custody paperwork for patients with mental illness or substance abuse. The Attorney General said transport under a properly executed physician emergency certificate belonged to the sheriff in the parish where the patient was located, regardless of the patient's residence.

For commitment costs, the opinion quoted R.S. 28:141: a financially able patient or legally responsible relative paid; otherwise a resident patient's parish of domicile or the state division for a nonresident paid. It separately discussed coroner examination fees and noted that municipal residence could shift responsibility for a coroner's emergency-certificate fee to the municipality. A coroner who was not a physician had to deputize a physician to perform the examination; the AG said that coroner could not sign the order of custody himself.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2005. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy.

Common questions

Which sheriff transported a patient under a physician emergency certificate?

The AG referred to the sheriff of the parish where the patient was located when the certificate was executed. It said the patient's residence did not control that transport question.

Who paid commitment costs if the patient could not afford them?

Under R.S. 28:141 as quoted in the opinion, the parish of domicile paid for a resident patient; the state division paid for a nonresident. A financially able patient or legally responsible relative paid first.

Could a municipality owe a coroner's certificate fee?

The opinion said it might. It cited earlier opinions dividing responsibility by whether the patient resided inside or outside an incorporated area, while also discussing parish payment of the usual coroner fee.

Could a nonphysician coroner sign the emergency custody order?

The AG said no. It read R.S. 28:53 to require the coroner to deputize a physician to make the examination and determination.

Background and statutory framework

The opinion drew on several earlier Attorney General opinions. It separated transport jurisdiction, general commitment costs under R.S. 28:141, coroner examination fees under R.S. 33:1556, and the physician-examination requirement in R.S. 28:53. Those were distinct questions, so its payment discussion did not reduce every bill to one payer.

Citations

  • R.S. 28:141 (commitment costs).
  • R.S. 33:1556 (coroner examination fees).
  • R.S. 28:53 (examinations and certificates).

Source

Original opinion text

August 18, 2005
OPINION 05-0220

13 - Coroners
64-1-c – Mental Health
Mr. Raymond Rouse
R.S. 28:141
Catahoula Parish Coroner
R.S. 33:1556
2805 Fourth Street
Discusses responsibility for transporting
Jonesville, LA 71343
a patient to a treatment facility under
emergency certificates and payment
Dear Mr. Rouse: of the doctor or coroner for the certificate.

This office is in receipt of your request for an opinion of the Attorney General involving involuntary commitment of a person who is mentally ill or suffering from substance abuse under a Physician’s Emergency Certificate - P.E.C., or a Coroner’s Emergency Certificate - C.E.C.. You ask the following:

What parish is responsible for transporting the patient to a facility for treatment?

Who is responsible for paying the doctor for the C.E.C.?

If the patient lives in the city limits of a municipality, does the city pay the bill?

If a person is taken to the hospital or doctor, by a friend or family member and the doctor signs a P.E.C. who is responsible for paying the doctor?

Not being a doctor, can you as coroner sign an order of protective custody or does a judge need to sign it?

In response to your first question as to what parish is responsible for transporting a patient to a facility for treatment, we note in Atty. Gen. Op. 00-363 that this office observed as follows:

The patient’s place of residence is of little consequence in determining which law enforcement agency transports a patient under a physician emergency certificate as long as the PEC is properly executed. As stated in Atty. Gen. Op. No. 89-583, “the civil powers of the sheriff may be exercised in only the parish in which he or she was elected,” therefore “it (the PEC) is a civil order than only the


Page 2

Mr. Raymond Rouse
OPINION 05-0220
Page 2 sheriff * * * has jurisdiction to execute.” If the PEC is executed properly by the sheriff of the parish in which the patient is located at the time of the execution, the patient’s place of residence is irrelevant.

In your second question you ask who is responsible for paying the doctor for the C.E.C., and we find R.S. 28:141 is pertinent wherein it provides, “If financially able, the patient or his legally responsible relative shall pay all costs of commitment * * *, otherwise the parish of domicile in the case of a resident or the division in the case of a non-resident shall pay these costs.”

However, the statute continues by providing, “Fees for services rendered by coroners or other experts in the commitment of patients shall be in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 267 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Rights of accused; extradition hearing) and special laws relating to the fees of coroners and assisting physicians in interdiction proceedings.”

In Atty. Gen. Op. 99-381 this office recognized under R.S. 33:1556 that the coroner shall receive a reasonable fee for any physical or mental examination or investigation when requested by the district attorney, any judge, sheriff, chief of police, or by any responsible citizen or resident, but it must be read with R.S.
28:53 in the Mental Health provisions requiring a second examination at the facility unless the examiners are one and the same person. The first examiner and the reexaminer shall be entitled to the fee unless one and the same.

The opinion then provides that when the person is confined in a facility other than a state institution, the examining coroner where the patient is confined shall be entitled to the usual fee paid for this service to the coroner of the parish in which the patient is domiciled or residing, and when confined in a state institution in a parish other than his domicile, the examining coroner shall be entitled to the fee authorized in his parish for the service.

As to who is responsible for the fee, it was concluded therein that in either case, the fee shall be paid by the governing authority of the parish in which the patient is domiciled or residing, from parish funds designated for the purpose of payment of the coroner.

This is consistent with the conclusion by this office in Atty. Gen. Op. 96-383 that when a person is admitted to a treatment facility for mental illness or substance abuse under emergency certificates, the coroner that issued either the first or second emergency certificate is entitled to a fee for issuance of the certificate by the parish of the patient’s domicile.


Page 3

Mr. Raymond Rouse
OPINION 05-0220
Page 3
In your next question, you ask if the patient lives in the city limits of a municipality, does the city pay the bill, and this office responded to this question in Atty. Gen. Op. 99-381 with reliance upon earlier opinions. Therein it was concluded as follows:

Therefore, based upon earlier opinions of this office and a reading of the statutes together, it appears under R.S. 33:1556(A)(3) that the geographical location determines responsibility for payment for a coroner’s emergency certificate by dividing the responsibility by geographical location of the individual’s residential location between those in an incorporated area and those outside of an incorporated area in the parish, and the mental health law refers to the usual payment authorized in the parish. However, the payment in the Parish may be the responsibility of a municipality.

Insofar as who is responsible for paying a doctor when a person is taken to a hospital or doctor by a friend or family and the doctor signs a P.E. C., we would follow the reasoning in response to your second question as to who is responsible for paying the doctor for the C.E.C., and therein we concluded in accordance with R.S. 28:141 “if financially able, the patient or his legally responsible relative shall pay all costs of commitment * * * otherwise the parish of domicile in the case of a resident or the division in the case of a non-resident shall pay these costs.”

You point out that you are not a doctor and ask if you can sign an order of custody or does a judge need to sign it.

R.S. 28:53 sets forth the duties of the coroner and provides in paragraph (B)(1) that any physician or psychologist may execute an emergency certificate “only after an actual examination of a person”.

It further provides when a party is financially unable to afford a private physician or cannot immediately obtain an examination by a physician, it is the obligation of the parish coroner to render “or cause to be rendered” an actual examination of the person alleged to be mentally ill or suffering from substance abuse.

However, significant to a response to your question is that the statute provides, “If the coroner is not a physician he shall deputize a physician to perform his duty.” This was recognized as the proper procedure by this office in Atty. Gen.
Op. 81-1216 wherein this office stated, “The clear intent is that a emergency certificate be executed by a physician.”

Accordingly, we do not find that you can sign an order of custody but must deputize a physician to make this determination.


Page 4

Mr. Raymond Rouse
OPINION 05-0220
Page 4
We hope this sufficiently, answers your inquiry, but if we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL

By:_____
BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE
Assistant Attorney General
CCF,Jr./BBR


Page 5

Mr. Raymond Rouse
OPINION 05-0220
Page 5

OPINION 05-0220

13 – Coroners
64-1-c – Mental Health
R.S. 28:141
R.S. 33:1556

Discusses responsibility for transporting a patient to a treatment facility under emergency certificates and payment of the doctor or coroner for the certificate.

Mr. Raymond Rouse
Catahoula Parish Coroner
2805 Fourth Street
Jonesville, LA 71343

Date Received:
Date Released: August 18, 2005

BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace