Can a Louisiana justice require a constable at every hearing and reduce the constable's share of civil fees?

Short answer The AG said a justice of the peace could require a constable to attend court proceedings under the court's inherent authority. For civil matters, the justice and constable offices each received half of fees and deposits; attendance and crossing ward lines did not change that statutory split.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 05-0193
Issued
July 28, 2005
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
P. Wallace Gottschalk, constable, Ward 1

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

A Ward 1 constable asked whether a justice of the peace could demand attendance at every court proceeding and whether civil fees changed with attendance or travel across ward lines. In 2005, the Attorney General said the justice could require the constable's presence under the court's inherent authority, citing an earlier opinion that noncompliance could result in contempt.

For civil filings and services, La. R.S. 13:2590 (B) required an even division: half of each fee and deposit for the justice's office and half for the constable's office. The AG found no statutory exception permitting a smaller constable share for missed proceedings or a larger share when the constable responded across ward lines. It said the constable's share covered office expenses such as mileage.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2005 under the cited court-power and fee provisions. Verify current statutes before requiring attendance or dividing fees.

What this means for you

Justices of the peace

The opinion said a justice could require a constable to be present for proceedings. It also said the justice could not vary the mandatory civil-fee split based on whether the constable attended or traveled from another ward.

Constables

The AG treated the constable's half as the statutory share for fees and operational expenses, including mileage. It did not identify an added payment above that half for crossing ward lines.

Common questions

Could a justice require a constable at every proceeding?

The AG said yes, relying on the court's inherent power to conduct proceedings and enforce lawful orders. It cited earlier advice that a constable who disobeyed a required appearance could face contempt.

Could the justice reduce the constable's fee share after an absence?

No. The opinion said the civil fee-and-deposit split was mandatory and contained no attendance-based reduction.

Could a constable get more than half for work outside the constable's ward?

No. The AG said crossing ward lines did not change the statutory distribution.

Background and statutory framework

La. C.Cr.Pro. Art. 17 described courts' inherent powers to exercise jurisdiction and enforce orders. La. R.S. 13:2590 (B) assigned fifty percent of civil fees and deposits to each office's fees and operational expenses. The AG read the latter as mandatory regardless of attendance or ward boundaries.

Citations

  • La. C.Cr.Pro. Art. 17 (inherent court authority).
  • La. R.S. 13:2590 (B) (civil fee-and-deposit distribution).

Source

Original opinion text

July 28, 2005
OPINION NO. 05-0193

57 - JUSTICE OF THE PEACE
15 - COURTS

La. C.Cr.Pro. Art. 17
La. R.S. 13:2590 (B)

A justice of the peace can force a constable to be present at every court proceeding pursuant to La. C.Cr.Pro. Art 17. See La. Atty. Gen.
Op. No. 03-0042. There is no provision in the law that allows for a Honorable P. Wallace Gottschalk reduction of, or variance in, the statutorily-mandated percentage for
Constable, Ward 1
the distribution of fees and deposits. Therefore, for civil matters, a
76021 Country Road
constable should receive one-half of all fees and deposits received by
the justice of the peace. Regardless of whether a constable is
Covington, LA 70435-0632
required to cross ward lines to respond to an order of a justice of the
peace, the relevant statute, La. R.S. 13:2590 (B), still only allows the
Dear Mr. Gottschalk: constable to collect one-half of the fees and deposits received
by the justice of the peace.

Your request for an Attorney General’s opinion has been forwarded to me for research and reply. Your questions, as I understand them, are as follows:

1. Can a justice of the peace force a constable to be present at every court proceeding?

2. Does the proper distribution of fees between a constable and justice of the peace vary depending upon whether the constable appears in Court?

3. If a justice of the peace requests that a constable who lives in another ward to perform services or make civil filings, does that affect the fee schedule set forth in La. R.S. 13:2590 (B)?

Your first question invokes La. C.Cr.Pro. Art. 17. This statute is entitled “Inherent power and authority of courts” and states the following:

A court possesses inherently all powers necessary for the exercise of its jurisdiction and the enforcement of its lawful orders, including authority to issue such writs and orders as may be necessary or proper in aid of its jurisdiction. It has the duty to require that criminal proceedings shall be conducted with dignity and in an orderly and expeditious manner and to so


Page 2

Opinion No. 05-0193
Hon. P. Wallace Gottschalk
Constable, Ward 1
Page: -2-

control the proceedings that justice is done. A court has the power to punish for contempt.

As stated above, “[a] court possesses inherently all powers necessary for the exercise of its jurisdiction and the enforcement of its lawful orders. …” This office has expressed the opinion that

[a] court, including a justice of the peace court, has the power to punish anyone, including a constable, for contempt if he or she interferes with the court’s duty to conduct proceedings with dignity and in an orderly and expeditious manner. Therefore, if the justice of the peace requires the constable to attend, he may be held in contempt if he does not comply. [Emphasis added.] La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 03-0042.

Your second question deals with La. R.S. 13:2590(B). In reference to civil filings and services, this statute reads as follows:

Fifty percent of each fee and deposit shall be retained by the justice of the peace for fees and operational expenses of the office and court and fifty percent of the fees and deposits shall be used for fees and operational expenses of the constable’s office.

With respect to the distribution of fees and deposits, the statute uses the word “shall,” thereby speaking in mandatory terms. There is no provision in the law that allows for a reduction of, or variance in, the statutorily mandated percentage for the distribution of fees and deposits. Therefore, for civil matters, a constable should receive one-half of all fees and deposits received by the justice of the peace. These fees would be used by you, as constable, to cover expenses such as mileage. La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 97-342.

Your final inquiry concerns whether the fee and deposit distribution schedule changes if a constable residing in one ward responds to an order of a justice of the peace who lives in another ward. The statute does not provide any sort of exception under such circumstances. Regardless of whether a constable, who resides in one ward, responds to the order of a justice of the peace who lives in another ward, the clear wording of the statute mandates that the justice of the peace shall only pay fifty percent of all fees and deposits collected under La. R.S. 13:2590 (B).


Page 3

Opinion No. 05-0193
Hon. P. Wallace Gottschalk
Constable, Ward 1
Page: -3-

We hope that this sufficiently answers your inquiry, but if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours very truly,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL

By:_____
Christopher D. Matchett
Assistant Attorney General


Page 4

OPINION NO. 05-0193

57 - JUSTICE OF THE PEACE

15 - COURTS

La. C.Cr.Pro. Art. 17
La. R.S. 13:2590 (B)

A justice of the peace can force a constable to be present at every court proceeding pursuant to La. C.Cr.Pro. Art 17. See La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 03-0042. There is no provision in the law that allows for a reduction of, or variance in, the statutorily-mandated percentage for the distribution of fees and deposits. Therefore, for civil matters, a constable should receive one-half of all fees and deposits received by the justice of the peace. Regardless of whether a constable is required to cross ward lines to respond to an order of a justice of the peace, the relevant statute, La. R.S. 13:2590 (B), still only allows the constable to collect one-half of the fees and deposits received by the justice of the peace.

Honorable P. Wallace Gottschalk
Constable, Ward 1
76021 Country Road
Covington, LA 70435-0632

DATE RECEIVED:

DATE RELEASED: July 28 , 2005
Christopher D. Matchett
Assistant Attorney General

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace