Could Plaquemines Parish voters abolish their civil-service system with a local referendum?

Short answer No. Because Plaquemines Parish adopted its civil-service system under the constitution's permanent local-option provision, the AG said neither the council nor parish voters could abolish it by local ordinance or referendum. A state constitutional amendment and statewide ratification were required.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 05-0152
Issued
August 18, 2005
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Kevin D. Conner, counsel, Plaquemines Parish Council

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

Plaquemines Parish asked how it could abolish a civil-service system its voters adopted in 1995. In 2005, the Attorney General found that the parish had used the local-option method in Article 10, Section 14 of Louisiana's 1974 Constitution. That provision said the adopted civil-service protections applied permanently. A local vote or parish ordinance could not repeal this system; only a state constitutional amendment could do so.

The AG distinguished a civil-service system created under separate statutory authority, for which the legislature had not imposed the same permanence. Plaquemines' original council resolution and ballot proposition had expressly invoked the constitutional route. The office also concluded that requiring statewide ratification of a constitutional change, even one affecting only Plaquemines, did not violate federal or state due process or equal protection. It said a nonbinding advisory parish straw vote was unavailable as a way to test voter preference before council action.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2005. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

What this means for you

Plaquemines Parish Council and election officials

The 1995 resolution and ballot proposition chose the constitutional civil-service system. Under the AG's analysis, neither a council ordinance nor another parish referendum could abolish it, and the council could not use a nonbinding parish straw vote to gauge support for repeal.

Civil-service employees and state legislators

The opinion treated the adopted protections as permanent under Article 10, Section 14. It identified a state constitutional amendment, ratified statewide, as the route to abolition; its discussion of a more flexible statutory system did not change Plaquemines' chosen system.

Common questions

Could the parish repeat the local vote that originally adopted civil service?

The AG said no. The 1995 adoption used a constitutional provision making the system permanent once accepted, so a later local referendum alone could not abolish it.

Could the parish council repeal the system by ordinance?

No for this constitutionally adopted system. The AG contrasted it with a separate statutory route for establishing parish civil service, but Plaquemines' records showed it had chosen the constitutional route.

Did statewide ratification violate Plaquemines voters' equal protection rights?

The AG said no. It reasoned that the state constitution belonged to all state voters and required statewide ratification for amendment, even where a proposed change would affect one parish.

Could the council ask parish voters in a nonbinding straw vote?

The AG said nonbinding advisory votes could not be put to parish electors simply to gauge preferences before possible council action.

Background and statutory framework

Article 10, Section 14 of the 1974 Louisiana Constitution supplied the local-option process and permanence rule. Section 15 allowed a distinct statutory path, discussed alongside R.S. 33:1236(34). The AG checked Plaquemines' founding resolution and ballot wording to determine which path it had used. The PDF text extraction renders some section signs as “∋”; the cited constitutional entries above preserve that source glyph, while the explanation here names the sections in words.

Citations

  • La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋14 (constitutional adoption and permanence; source glyph for the section sign).
  • La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋15 (separate civil-service creation route).
  • R.S. 18:1299 (advisory vote restriction discussed by the opinion).
  • R.S. 33:1236(34) (statutory parish civil-service authority).

Source

Original opinion text

August 18, 2005
Opinion 05-0152

15-A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
84 PARISHES
U.S. Const. 14th Amendment
Mr. Kevin D. Conner
La. Const. (1974) art. 1, ∋2; La. Const. (1974) art. 1, ∋3; La. Const. (1974) art. 10,
∋14; La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋15; La. Const. (1974) art. 13, ∋∋1 and 2 Counsel, Plaquemines Parish Council R.S. 18:1299; R.S. 33:2456; R.S. 33:2531; R.S. 33:1236(34)
Plaquemines Parish Government
Having been adopted under La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋14, the Plaquemines Parish
civil service system is governed by the provisions therein providing for its
106 Avenue G
permanence. Requiring that any change to the state constitution be approved by the
Belle Chasse, LA 70037
electorate of the whole state at a ratification election, even if the motive for the
constitutional change is to accommodate only one parish, does not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection clauses of the federal or state constitutions.
Dear Mr. Conner:

You explain that the Plaquemines Parish Council has asked you to request our legal opinion on how to abolish the parish civil service system, adopted by a majority of the voters of Plaquemines Parish in 1995, if it chose to do so. You further explain that debate has centered around two methods of doing soΧviz., (1) by the same method it was adopted in the first place, that is, by a vote of a majority of the voters of Plaquemines Parish and (2) only by amendment to the Louisiana Constitution. You ask an additional question: If the only way to abolish this parish civil service system is by amendment to the state constitution, would this method violate the Equal Protection or Due Process clauses of the federal or state constitutions by taking away the power of the Plaquemines Parish voters to decide for themselves whether or not they want this parish civil service system without statewide intervention? In summary, you would like to know what is the appropriate way to abolish this parish civil service system if the citizens of Plaquemines Parish desired to do so.

We, in turn, requested further information about the parish council=s resolution and the proposition put to the voters of Plaquemines Parish whereby the civil service system was established in the first place. We needed to verify under what provisions this parish civil service system was established, for there appear to be more than one way to create a parish civil service system.

La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋14 provides as follows:

Α∋ 14. Acceptance of Act; Other Cities, Parishes, City and Parish Governed Jointly

ΑSection 14. (A) Local Option. Each city having a population exceeding ten thousand but not exceeding four hundred thousand, each parish, and each parish governed jointly with one or more cities under a plan of government, having a population exceeding ten thousand, according to the latest official


Page 2

Opinion No. 05-0152
Mr. Kevin D. Conner, Counsel
Plaquemines Parish Council
Page: -2-

decennial federal census, may elect to be governed by this Part by a majority vote of its electors voting at an election held for that purpose. The election shall be ordered and held by the city, the parish, or the city-parish, as the case may be, upon (a) the adoption of an ordinance by the governing authority calling the election; or (b) the presentation to the governing authority of a petition calling for such an election signed by electors equal in number to five percent of the registered voters of the city, the parish, or the city-parish, as the case may be.

Α(B) Acceptance. If a majority of the electors vote to adopt this Part, its provisions shall apply permanently to the city, the parish, or the city-parish, as the case may be, and shall govern it as if this Part had originally applied to it. In such case, all officers and employees of the city, the parish, or the city-parish, as the case may be, who have acquired civil service status under a civil service system established by legislative act, city charter, or otherwise, shall retain that status and thereafter shall be subject to and be governed by this Part and the rules and regulations adopted under it.

Α(C) Rejection. If a majority of the electors vote against the adoption of this Part, the question of its adoption shall not be resubmitted to the voters of the political subdivision within one year thereafter.≅

At the same time, La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋15, provides the following:

∋ 15. City, Parish Civil Service System; Creation; Prohibition

ΑSection 15. Nothing in this Part shall prevent the establishment by the legislature, or by the respective parish governing authority, of a parish civil service system in one or more parishes, applicable to any or all parish employees, except teaching and professional staffs and administrative officers of schools, or the establishment by the legislature or by the respective municipal governing authority of a municipal civil service system in one or more municipalities having a population of less than four hundred thousand, in any manner now or hereafter provided by law. However, paid firemen and paid municipal policemen in a municipality operating a regularly paid fire and police department and having a population exceeding thirteen thousand, and paid firemen in all parishes and in fire protection districts, are expressly excluded from such a civil service system.

ΑNothing in this Part shall permit inclusion in the local civil service of officials and employees listed in Section 2 of this Article.


Page 3

Opinion No. 05-0152
Mr. Kevin D. Conner, Counsel
Plaquemines Parish Council
Page: -3-

ΑNo law enacted after the effective date of this constitution establishing a civil service system applicable to one or more parishes or to one or more municipalities having a population of less than four hundred thousand shall be effective in any parish or in any municipality until approved by ordinance adopted by the governing authority of the parish or municipality.≅

Ordinarily, the Louisiana Constitution is a limitation on the plenary power of the legislature to enact any laws not constitutionally forbidden. New Orleans Firefighters Association et al. v. Civil Service Comm. of City of New Orleans, 422 So.2d 402 (La. 1982); Aguillard v. Treen, 440 So.2d 704 (La. 1983); and authorities cited therein. But here in article 10, ∋15, the Louisiana Constitution is explicitly disavowing a limitation on the legislature to provide for the establishment of parish civil service systems, except that the actual establishment of a particular parish civil service system must have the concurrence of the parish governing authority. Moreover, the usage, in this state constitutional provision, of the words Αprovided by law≅ indicates that the power resides in the legislature. Aguillard v. Treen, supra. Thus, the legislature retains the power and discretion to provide a statutory method whereby a parish governing authority may establish a parish civil service system, in addition to the existing constitutional method spelled out in La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋14, above. The legislature has exercised this power and discretion in R.S. 33:1236(34), which, in turn, authorizes parish governing authorities to adopt a parish civil service system covering any or all of its employees with the basic and essential civil service protections described in this statutory provision.1 It would seem that a parish governing authority could implement this statutory power by means of a mere ordinance. The legislature does not appear to have placed any limitations on abolishing a parish civil service system so created pursuant to this statutory, not constitutional, authority.2

However, our review of the materials you sent to us by which Plaquemines Parish adopted its parish civil service system reveals that it was adopted by the constitutional method, in accordance with La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋14, which was expressly cited in the Plaquemines Parish Council=s resolution calling for the referendum election which established the parish civil service system. Moreover, this parish civil service system was

1
In accordance with state constitutional provisions, paid firemen and policemen of parishes are separately provided for by R.S. 33:2531, which requires mandatory civil service coverage. 2 See, for example, R.S. 33:2456, which provides authority for the governing authority of the municipality of St. Martinville to create a civil service system and also provides the method by which such civil service system may be abolished.


Page 4

Opinion No. 05-0152
Mr. Kevin D. Conner, Counsel
Plaquemines Parish Council
Page: -4-

established by a referendum vote of the electors of Plaquemines Parish adopting a proposition explicitly requiring the creation of a ΑConstitutional Civil Service System≅ for the parish. Furthermore, non-binding, merely advisory, straw votes cannot be put to the electors of the parish to discover their collective desires, so that the parish council can then try to follow those desires with a subsequent ordinance. R.S. 18:1299; St. John the Baptist Parish Association of Educators v. Brown, 465 So.2d 674 (La. 1985). See also Attorney General Opinions Nos. 97-63, 96-352, 96-78, 89-414, 88-477, and 87-229.

Having been adopted under La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋14, the Plaquemines Parish civil service system is governed by the provisions thereof, including the provision in Subsection ΑB≅ which reads, in pertinent part, ΑIf a majority of the electors vote to adopt this Part, its provisions shall apply permanently toΨthe parishΨand shall govern it as if this Part had originally applied to it.≅ This ΑPart≅ includes provisions of the state constitution directly providing for and governing constitutionally mandated civil service, which is beyond abolition by the legislature, beyond abolition by a governing authority, and beyond abolition by parish electors voting at a parish referendum. In our opinion, the only way to abolish such a parish civil service system is by amending the state constitution to provide for its abolition.

In addition, it is our opinion that requiring such an amendment to the state constitution, which must be ratified by a majority of electors of the whole state, to allow for the abolition of this parish civil service system does not violate either the Due Process or Equal Protection clauses of the federal or state constitutions, even if the motive for the constitutional change is to accommodate only one parish. The state constitution belongs to all of the people of the state. It was the vote of all the electors of the state at ratification which made it our state constitution. City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Comm=rs of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690 (La. 7/5/94), at pp. 14-18, 640 So.2d 237, 247-248; Radiofone, Inc. v. City of New Orleans et al., 93-0962 (La. 1/14/94), at p. 6, 630 So.2d 694, 698; and the authorities cited therein. Accordingly, it can be changed only by the vote of all the electors of the state at a ratification election. La. Const. (1974) art. 13, ∋∋1 and 2. And it must be remembered that it was Plaquemines Parish itself which chose to create its parish civil service system under these constitutional provisions rather than under any other statutory provisions. Once this parish civil service system was created in this manner, these constitutional provisions providing for its permanence, which pre-existed the creation of this parish civil service system and which informed Plaquemines Parish of its effects, apply to it.


Page 5

Opinion No. 05-0152
Mr. Kevin D. Conner, Counsel
Plaquemines Parish Council
Page: -5-

Trusting that this opinion has adequately answered your questions, however if you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Very truly yours,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
Attorney General

By:
THOMAS S. HALLIGAN
Assistant Attorney General

CCF, Jr./TSH/jd
cc: Mr. William Paradelas, Civil Service


Page 6

Opinion No. 05-0152
Mr. Kevin D. Conner, Counsel
Plaquemines Parish Council
Page: -6-

SYLLABUS

OPINION NUMBER 05-0152

15-A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
84 PARISHES

U.S. Const. 14th Amendment

La. Const. (1974) art. 1, ∋2; La. Const. (1974) art. 1, ∋3; La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋14; La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋15; La. Const. (1974) art. 13, ∋∋1 and 2

R.S. 18:1299; R.S. 33:2456; R.S. 33:2531; R.S. 33:1236(34)

Having been adopted under La. Const. (1974) art. 10, ∋14, the Plaquemines Parish civil service system is governed by the provisions therein providing for its permanence. Requiring that any change to the state constitution be approved by the electorate of the whole state at a ratification election, even if the motive for the constitutional change is to accommodate only one parish, does not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection clauses of the federal or state constitutions.

Mr. Kevin D. Conner
Counsel, Plaquemines Parish Council
Plaquemines Parish Government
106 Avenue G
Belle Chasse, LA 70037

DATE RECEIVED:

DATE RELEASED: August 18, 2005

Thomas S. Halligan
Assistant Attorney General

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace