Was a privately owned Louisiana cemetery automatically exempt from parish property tax?

Short answer No. The AG said operating land as a cemetery did not itself make it tax-exempt. The assessor had to determine whether its owner was a qualifying nonprofit and whether the property met the constitutional requirements, including income-tax exemption and no unrelated commercial use.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 05-0104
Issued
March 18, 2005
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
Pam C. Jones, Lincoln Parish assessor

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

Lincoln Parish's assessor asked whether a privately owned cemetery that sold burial lots and paid state and federal income tax was assessable for property tax. In 2005, the Attorney General said cemetery use alone did not create an exemption. The Louisiana Constitution required the owner and property to meet the criteria for the designated-place-of-burial exemption. If an inquiry showed the owner was not a nonprofit corporation or association, or was not exempt from federal or state income tax, the assessor could conclude the cemetery property was taxable.

The AG did not make a final tax determination for the named cemetery. It said that factual decision belonged to the assessor, subject to review by the Louisiana Tax Commission and courts. It also described the other conditions: the nonprofit's designated purpose, no net earnings benefiting private members or shareholders, and no property use for unrelated commercial purposes. Depending on the facts, property could be partly or wholly nonexempt.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2005. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Was every cemetery exempt from Louisiana property tax?

No. The AG said the mere operation of property as a cemetery was insufficient. Its owner had to satisfy the constitutional nonprofit and tax-exemption conditions, and the property could not be used for unrelated commercial purposes.

Did paying income tax matter to the property-tax inquiry?

Yes. The constitutional provision discussed in the opinion required the qualifying nonprofit to be declared exempt from federal or state income tax. The AG said an assessor who determined the owner lacked that exemption could find the cemetery land nonexempt.

Did the AG decide whether Forest Lawn's land was taxable?

No. The opinion said assessment of a particular taxpayer's facts belonged to the parish assessor, with review by the tax commission and ultimately the courts. It supplied the legal criteria for that determination.

Background and statutory framework

Assessor Pam C. Jones asked about Forest Lawn, Inc., a privately owned cemetery selling lots to the public. La. Const. Article VII, Section 21 set the property-tax exemption for certain nonprofit property. The AG read its conditions strictly and said a cemetery could qualify only if the owner and property met all four requirements identified in the opinion. It left the factual application to the assessor.

Citations

  • La. Const. Article VII, Section 21 (property-tax exemption criteria).

Source

Original opinion text

March 18, 2005
Opinion Number 05-0104

4 ASSESSORS
119 TAXATION – Exemptions, general
La. Const. Article VII, Section 21
Ms. Pam C. Jones, DLA
Assessor, Lincoln Parish
The mere fact that property is operated as a cemetery
does not make the property exempt from ad valorem
P. O. Box 1218
taxation; the entity owning the cemetery must be a non-
Ruston, Louisiana 71273-1218
profit corporation or association and meet the four basic
requirements set forth in La. Const. Article VII, Section 21.
Dear Ms. Jones:

You have requested an opinion of the Attorney General, with respect to Forest Lawn, Inc., as follows:

“In regard to Constitution of the State of Louisiana Article VII, Section 21, paragraph (B), is the land for a privately owned cemetery where lots are sold to the public assessable for property taxes? This corporation pays federal and state income tax.”

Initially, it should be noted that the authority to determine whether a particular taxpayer may be exempt from the payment of ad valorem taxes is a factual determination exclusively reserved by the Louisiana Constitution and State law to the Assessor, subject to the review of the Louisiana Tax Commission and, ultimately, the courts. Attorney General’s Opinions Nos. 01-144, 00-54, 96-438 and 94-603. While the Attorney General does not have the authority to determine whether particular taxpayers and property is subject to tax exemption, we would like to assist you as to the applicable law which may be used in making your determinations.

The jurisprudence of this State has consistently held that constitutional and statutory grants of exemptions from taxation must be strictly construed in favor of the taxing body and against the taxpayer desiring the exemption. Any possible doubt is fatal. Thus, an exemption, being an exceptional privilege, must be clearly, unequivocally and affirmatively established. Zapata Haney Corp. v. Larpenter, 583 So.2d 867 (La. App. 1st Cir. 1991) writ denied. Further, in Mattingly v. Vial, 193 La. 1, 190 So. 313 (1931), our Supreme Court held:

There is no principle of interpretation more firmly and uniformly established by the jurisprudence of this and other States that the unbroken rule that exemptions from taxation are to be strictly construed against the person claiming the exemption and that any plausible doubt is fatal.


Page 2

Opinion Number 05-0104
Ms. Pam C. Jones, DLA
Assessor, Lincoln Parish
Page -2-

La. Const. Article VII, Section 21 pertinently provides:

“Section 21. In addition to the homestead exemption provided for in Section 20 of this Article, the following property and no other shall be exempt from ad valorem taxation:


(B)(1)(a) Property owned by a nonprofit corporation or association organized and operated exclusively for religious, designated places of burial, charitable, health, welfare, fraternal, or educational purposes, no part of the net earnings of which inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or member thereof and which is declared to be exempt from federal or state income tax;


None of the property listed in Paragraph (B) shall be exempt if owned, leased, or used for commercial purposes unrelated to the exempt purposes of the corporation or association.”

In interpreting the above constitutional provision, we have consistently opined that in order to qualify for an exemption under Section 21(B)(1)(a), property must meet all four of the basic requirements set forth therein, to wit:

1. The organization must be a nonprofit corporation or association organized exclusively for one of the designated purposes;

2. No part of the net earnings inure to the benefit of any stockholder or member thereof;

3. Said nonprofit corporation or association must be exempt from federal or state income tax;

4. None of the property of the nonprofit corporation or association is owned, operated, leased or used for commercial purposes unrelated to the exempt purposes of the corporation or association.

In accord: Attorney General”s Opinions Nos. 01-371, 97-211, 95-60 and 93-488.

Previous opinions of this office state that an Assessor must inquire into the facts to determine whether the taxpayer in question complies with the criteria necessary to qualify for the exemption. Attorney General’s Opinions Nos. 91-298, 87-675. If the Assessor determines that the operations of a “nonprofit corporation or association”, with respect to the property in question, satisfy the four requirements set forth above, an exemption from ad valorem taxes would be appropriate. Conversely, should the facts,


Page 3

Opinion Number 05-0104
Ms. Pam C. Jones, DLA
Assessor, Lincoln Parish
Page -3-

as determined by the assessing authority, reflect noncompliance, the property may be partially or totally nonexempt.

This office has previously determined that the mere fact property is operated as a cemetery does not make the property exempt from ad valorem taxation; the entity owning the cemetery must be a non-profit corporation or association and meet the four basic requirements listed above. Attorney General’s Opinion No. 85-796. Accordingly, if proper inquiry has lead you to the conclusion that the taxpayer in question is not a non-profit corporation, or is not exempt from federal or state income tax, it would be appropriate for you to conclude that the taxpayer’s cemetery property is not exempt from ad valorem taxation.

Trusting this adequately responds to your inquiries, I am

Yours very truly,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
Attorney General

BY: _________
JEANNE-MARIE ZERINGUE BARHAM
Assistant Attorney General

CCF, jr./JMZB/dam


Page 4

Opinion Number 05-0104
Syllabus

4 ASSESSORS
119 TAXATION – Exemptions, general
La. Const. Article VII, Section 21

The mere fact that property is operated as a cemetery does not make the property exempt from ad valorem taxation; the entity owning the cemetery must be a non-profit corporation or association and meet the four basic requirements set forth in La. Const. Article VII, Section 21.

Ms. Pam C. Jones, DLA
Assessor, Lincoln Parish
P. O. Box 1218
Ruston, Louisiana 71273-1218

Date Received:

Date Released: March 18, 2005

Jeanne-Marie Zeringue Barham
Assistant Attorney General

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace