Could a Louisiana town council require police to issue enough tickets to meet budgeted fine revenue?

Short answer No. The AG concluded that a Lawrason Act town council could not set direct or indirect traffic-ticket quotas for the police department. A budget forecast of fine revenue did not transfer the police chief's law-enforcement supervisory authority to the council.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 05-0038
Issued
April 19, 2005
Issued by
Office of the Louisiana Attorney General
Requested by
James Garner, Chief of Police, Haynesville Police Department

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory; they inform Louisiana officials but are not binding precedent like a court ruling. This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Louisiana attorney before relying on the opinion for a specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

In 2005, the Louisiana Attorney General concluded that the Haynesville town council could not impose a direct or indirect traffic-ticket quota on its police department. The town budget forecast $40,000 in “Police Fines,” and the chief reported that council members expected the department to generate that amount. The AG said the chief of police, not the council, held general responsibility for law enforcement in a Lawrason Act municipality.

The opinion did not say ticket quotas were categorically forbidden. It described earlier AG opinions as recognizing the chief's ability to set traffic-ticket quotas, while denying the council authority to impose or restrict them. Its holding concerned which municipal actor controlled police operations.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2005. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Could the council require enough tickets to meet its fine forecast? A: No. The AG said a Lawrason Act council could not set a ticket quota, directly or indirectly.

Did the $40,000 budget estimate change that authority? A: No. The opinion considered that forecast but still placed law-enforcement supervision with the chief.

Did the AG say the police chief could never set a quota? A: No. It recounted earlier AG opinions recognizing the chief's power to set traffic-ticket quotas. The restriction in this opinion was on the council.

Background and statutory framework

Chief James Garner asked whether Haynesville's council could turn forecast fine revenue into a required number of traffic citations. The AG quoted La. R.S. 33:423, giving the chief “general responsibility for law enforcement in the municipality.” It also cited earlier AG opinions and court decisions on the chief's supervisory authority. Its final answer said the council lacked power “to set quotas, either directly or indirectly, for the amount of traffic tickets that must be issued by the police department.”

Citations

  • La. R.S. 33:423 (police-chief authority quoted in the opinion).
  • Lentini v. City of Kenner, 211 So.2d 311 (La. 1968) and Cogswell v. Town of Logansport, 321 So.2d 774 (La. App. 2 Cir. 1975) (chief-supervision decisions cited in the opinion).

Source

Original opinion text

April 19, 2005
OPINION NUMBER 05-0038

77 Officers
71 Municipalities
Mr. James Garner
La. R.S. 33:423
Chief of Police
The town council of a Lawrason Act municipality
does not have the authority to set quotas, either
Haynesville Police Department
directly or indirectly, for the amount of traffic tickets
10053 Hwy. 79
that must be issued by the police department
Haynesville, Louisiana 71038

Dear Chief Garner:

You requested an Attorney General’s opinion regarding the town budget and the amount of income to be produced by the enforcement of traffic laws. You indicated that the budget for the Town of Haynesville, which is prepared by City Hall personnel, currently forecasts $40,000 in income from “Police Fines”. One or more members of the Town Council have decided that the police department must produce this amount of income from traffic fines. Per our telephone conversations, you estimate that the Haynesville Police Department would have to issue five traffic tickets per day in order to produce the $40,000 indicated in the budget. This number takes into account the fact that some offenders are found not guilty, some only receive a warning and some are ordered to pay a fine. You stated that your specific question is whether the town council has the right to set quotas of any kind on the police department.

La. R.S. 33:423 sets forth the responsibilities of the chief of police and provides in pertinent part as follows:

“A. The marshal shall be the chief of police and shall be ex officio a constable. He shall have general responsibility for law enforcement in the municipality, and shall be charged with the enforcement of all ordinances within the municipality and all applicable state laws. He shall perform all other duties required of him by ordinance.”

This office previously concluded that the chief of police of a Lawrason Act municipality is charged with the general responsibility for law enforcement, and the obligation to enforce municipal ordinances and applicable state laws. We have further concluded that the chief of police’s authority includes the ability to set quotas for traffic tickets, and that the town council may not limit or restrict that authority by attempting to set their own quotas. See Attorney General Opinions No. 88-115, 93-13 and 97-470. These conclusions are founded not only upon the language of the statute itself, but also on two


Page 2

OPINION NUMBER 05-0038
Mr. James Garner
Page – 2 –

Louisiana Supreme Court decisions that unequivocally established the chief of police as having supervisory power over the entire operation of the police department. See Lentini v. City of Kenner, 211 So.2d 311 (La. 1968) and Cogswell v. Town of Logansport, 321 So.2d 774 (La. App. 2 Cir. 1975).

Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the town council of a Lawrason Act municipality does not have the authority to set quotas, either directly or indirectly, for the amount of traffic tickets that must be issued by the police department.

Trusting this adequately responds to your request, we remain

Yours very truly,

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
Attorney General

BY: _________
KENNETH L. ROCHE, III
Assistant Attorney General

CCF, JR/KLR, III/mjb


Page 3

OPINION NUMBER 05-0038

77 Officers
71 Municipalities

La. R.S. 33:423

The town council of a Lawrason Act municipality does not have the authority to set quotas, either directly or indirectly, for the amount of traffic tickets that must be issued by the police department

Mr. James Garner
Chief of Police
Haynesville Police Department
10053 Hwy. 79
Haynesville, Louisiana 71038

Date Received:

Date Released: April 19, 2005

KENNETH L. ROCHE, III
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace