Could a parish retiree receive unused sick leave pay if pension payments began later?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2005. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
In 2005, the Louisiana Attorney General concluded that Beauregard Parish employee Alvie Aaron Williams was entitled to payment for accumulated sick leave under the parish's personnel manual. He had left parish employment in 2002 after acquiring retirement service credit, but began receiving pension benefits only when he turned 65 in 2003. The AG read the manual as not requiring an employee to be able to collect a pension immediately upon leaving in order to receive accrued sick leave pay.
The answer was deliberately narrow. The personnel form characterized Williams's departure as “Retirement, Pension” and “Full Time Employee Retiring,” rather than quitting. The AG said its opinion was “limited to the unique facts and circumstances” of his situation and should not be applied automatically to other employees who had left parish service.
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 2005. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Common questions
Did Williams lose accrued sick leave pay because his pension started later? A: No. The AG said the 1996 parish manual did not limit payment to employees eligible to begin pension benefits immediately when they stopped working.
Why did the parish question whether he had retired? A: The parish argued that only someone already eligible to collect a pension upon leaving could count as retired under its manual. The AG found that the manual did not define “retirement” and “quit” clearly enough to support that limit in Williams's case.
Did the opinion resolve annual leave pay as well?
A: No. A footnote said Williams had already been paid his accrued annual leave in 2002, so the AG addressed only sick leave.
Did this ruling govern every parish employee who left before pension eligibility? A: No. The AG explicitly confined the conclusion to Williams's circumstances and suggested the parish clarify its manual's definitions for future cases.
Background and personnel policy
The parish's 1996 personnel manual allowed up to 60 days of accumulated sick leave to carry forward until retirement. Section 6.02 said a retiree could choose added retirement time or a lump sum and that “No pay will ever be received for sick leave if an employee quits or is terminated.” The opinion found no definition of “retirement” or “quit” in the manual, and read it together with the form recording Williams's departure as retirement.
The AG expressly suggested revising the manual with counsel to state the parish's intended treatment of employees who leave before pension eligibility. That suggestion did not change the opinion's conclusion for Williams under the manual then in force.
Citations
- Beauregard Parish Police Personnel Procedures Manual, 2nd ed. (1996), § 6.02 (quoted and interpreted in the opinion).
Source
- Landing page: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinions
- Original PDF: https://www.ag.state.la.us/Opinion/Download/05-0002
Original opinion text
April 20, 2005
Opinion Number 05-0002
90-A -1 PUBLIC FUNDS & CONTRACTS
92-A-2-(e) - Parochial Employees
Mr. F. Steve Landreneau
Pertains to a particular employee’s entitlement
Assistant District Attorney - 36th JDC
to payment for accrued sick leave.
Parish of Beauregard
P. O. Box 99
DeRidder, Louisiana 70634
Dear Mr. Landreneau:
On behalf of the Beauregard Parish Police Jury you have requested an Attorney General’s Opinion regarding whether or not a retired parish employee, Mr. Alvie Aaron Williams, is entitled to payment of accrued sick leave.1
It is our understanding that Mr. Williams ceased working for the Parish in 2002, after having attained seven years of service credit with the Parochial Employees Retirement System, but had not yet reached the age of 65, the required retirement eligibility age. When Mr. Williams did reach 65 in 2003 he began receiving his retirement benefits. At that time, Mr. Williams sought payment from the Parish of Beauregard for the accumulated sick leave which he had accrued prior to ceasing work.
Apparently, it is the Parish’s position that only someone entitled to immediately begin receiving retirement benefits at the time they cease working can be considered to have ‘retired’ from parish service, thereby entitling them to receive payment for accrued sick leave. The Parish questions whether Mr. Williams is entitled to his accrued sick leave, in light of the fact that at the time Mr. Williams ceased working, he was not yet entitled to receive his retirement benefit.
Please be advised that after examination of pertinent provisions of the Beauregard Parish Police Personnel Procedures Manual, 2nd Edition, 1996 the (“Manual”), as well as the correspondence and documentation submitted with your request, it is the opinion of this office that Mr. Williams is entitled to receive payment for his accrued sick leave.
Pertinently, Section 6.02, entitled “Sick Leave, of the Beauregard Parish Police Personnel Procedures Manual, 2nd Edition, 1996 (the “Manual”), provides as follows:
1
Although you requested our opinion with respect to Mr. Williams’s annual, as well as his sick leave, we address only his entitlement to sick leave. In accordance with documentation supplied with your request, as confirmed by Ms. Betty Cunningham, Parish Secretary-Treasurer, Mr. Williams received payment for his accrued annual leave in 2002.
Page 2
Opinion Number 05-0002
Mr. F. Steve Landreneau th
Assistant District Attorney - 36 JDC
Parish of Beauregard
Page -2-
“B. …Sick leave may be accumulated and accrued, not to exceed 60 days. Accumulated time, not to exceed 60 days, will carry forward until retirement. At that time, the retiree will have the option to choose to let sick leave accumulated go toward added time to retirement, or be paid sick leave as a lump sum.
D. Upon retirement…an employee will receive full pay for accumulated sick leave not to exceed the 60-day limit. No pay will ever be received for sick leave if an employee quits or is terminated by process of termination for reason.” (Emphasis added).
In our opinion, Section 6.02 of the Manual indicates that an employee’s sick leave carries forward until the employee retires, and is payable upon “retirement”. Although the Manual also indicates that employee will not receive pay for accrued sick leave if he or she “quits”, no definition of the word “retirement” or the word “quit”, as those words are used in the Manual is given, nor, unfortunately, are the words distinguished from each other. We note that both terms can be used to refer to someone who ceases working, with or without retirement benefits. The term “quits” could also be meant to refer to someone who walks off the job without formerly resigning or properly notifying his or her employer.
A fair reading of the Manual indicates that an employee who separates from service is not required to be immediately eligible to receive retirement benefits in order to obtain payment for his accrued sick leave. The Manual does not appear to limit eligibility to receive payment for accrued sick leave to such a situation. Indeed, the words “Accumulated time…will carry forward until retirement” indicate that the Manual contemplates the very situation Mr. Williams apparently believes he is in, namely that of someone who ‘retires’ (as opposed to someone who ‘quits’) but is simply not yet eligible to receive retirement benefits from the System.2 In support of this interpretation of the Manual, as applied to Mr. Williams’s unique situation, we note that one of the documents submitted with your request (copy attached) signed by Ms. Rebecca L. Clouse on April 9, 2002, in the section entitled “Reason for Leaving” indicates that the reason Mr. Williams left the Parish’s employ was “Retirement, Pension”, not “Voluntary Leaving (Quit)”. Furthermore, the Explanation given for Mr. William’s separation from service is “Full Time Employee Retiring”.
Please note that our opinion herein is limited to the unique facts and circumstances arising in connection with Mr. Williams situation, and should not be considered as
2
Although Mr. Williams was not entitled to begin receiving Retirement System benefits at the time he ceased working, it is our understanding that he did begin receiving Social Security retirement benefits at that time.
Page 3
Opinion Number 05-0002
Mr. F. Steve Landreneau th
Assistant District Attorney - 36 JDC
Parish of Beauregard
Page -3-
applying to other parish employees who have or will separate from Parish service. In order to avoid any future misunderstandings, we suggest the Parish consider revising the Manual, with the assistance of its legal counsel, to clearly reflect the Parish’s intention with respect to the payment of accrued sick leave. In this regard, “quit” might be defined to mean separating from service prior to reaching eligibility to receive retirement benefits, and “retire” and “retirement” might be defined to refer only to employees who are immediately eligible to receive, and who immediately begin receiving, retirement benefits.
We trust the foregoing to be of assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions.
Yours very truly,
CHARLES C. FOTI, JR.
Attorney General
BY: _________
JEANNE-MARIE ZERINGUE BARHAM
Assistant Attorney General
CCF, jr./JMZB/dam
xc: Ms. Betty Cunningham,
Beauregard Parish Police Jury
Page 4
Opinion Number 05-0002
Syllabus
90-A -1 PUBLIC FUNDS & CONTRACTS
92-A-2-(e) - Parochial Employees
Pertains to a particular employee’s entitlement to payment for accrued sick leave.
Mr. F. Steve Landreneau
Assistant District Attorney - 36th JDC
Parish of Beauregard
P. O. Box 99
DeRidder, Louisiana 70634
Date Received:
Date Released: April 20, 2005
Jeanne-Marie Zeringue Barham
Assistant Attorney General
What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2005. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace