How could a Louisiana marina remove a boat from a rented slip after a tenant failed to leave?

Short answer The AG said the marina owner had to use the eviction process. After required notice and a court eviction order, the constable could execute a warrant by removing the boat from the slip.
State
Louisiana
Opinion
La. Atty. Gen. Op. 03-0390
Issued
November 20, 2003
Issued by
Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General of Louisiana
Requested by
Honorable Astrid Koppenol, Justice of the Peace, St. Tammany Parish

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2003. Ask about yours and see what current Louisiana law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is a historical Louisiana Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are advisory and are not binding court precedent. This page is informational and is not legal advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as an official web page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (official page)

Plain-English summary

In Opinion 03-0390, a St. Tammany Parish justice of the peace asked how a marina owner could evict a month-to-month boat-slip tenant and remove a boat that remained after judgment. The AG said the justice of the peace court had concurrent jurisdiction over eviction suits involving leased residential and commercial property. It described notice and court proceedings before a constable could execute a warrant of eviction by removing the boat from the slip.

The letter emphasized that a lessor who wrongfully dispossessed a tenant could owe damages. Its enclosed 1981 opinion addressed service on the boat, a constable's authority to board for service, and the limit on a marina owner's attempt to hold a boat to collect rent. These were the AG's conclusions under the law discussed in 2003.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2003. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

What the opinion meant at issuance

Marina owners and boat-slip tenants

The AG described eviction through notice, a court proceeding, and execution of a warrant. It warned that a lessor could face damages for wrongful dispossession if it bypassed the legal process. The enclosed earlier opinion said a marina owner could not simply take possession of a tenant's boat to collect rent without a permissive statute or court-granted seizure.

Justices of the peace and constables

The AG said a justice of the peace could hear eviction matters within the concurrent jurisdiction described by La C.C.P. art. 4911, regardless of rent amount under La. C.C.P. art. 4912. Following final notice and court procedures, the constable would remove the boat from the slip under a warrant of eviction. If it could not be secured nearby, the AG said to regard it as other abandoned property.

Common questions

Could the marina owner remove the boat without going to court?

The opinion described notice and judicial eviction procedures and warned that wrongful dispossession could make a lessor liable for damages.

Who would physically remove the boat after eviction?

The AG said the constable would execute the warrant of eviction by removing the boat from the slip under La. C.C.P. art. 4734.

Could a justice of the peace hear a boat-slip eviction even if rent was high?

The AG said the court's eviction jurisdiction was concurrent with the district court's and was not limited by the monthly or yearly rent or rent remaining in the lease term.

Could the marina owner hold the boat until the rent was paid?

The enclosed 1981 AG opinion said the owner could not take possession of the tenant's boat to collect rent without statutory permission or a seizure granted by a court.

Background and statutory framework

The request concerned a month-to-month tenant at a marina. The AG cited La C.C.P. art. 4911 and La. C.C.P. art. 4912 for justice of the peace eviction jurisdiction, then discussed the notice and summary eviction process. It quoted the then-existing La. C.C. art. 2686 on ending a month-to-month lease. For removal after judgment, it identified the constable's warrant under La. C.C.P. art. 4734. The signed letter enclosed Opinion 81-186, which addressed service and removal of boats from marina slips.

Citations and references

  • La C.C.P. art. 4911 and La. C.C.P. art. 4912: justice of the peace eviction jurisdiction discussed by the AG.
  • La. C.C. art. 2686: then-existing month-to-month lease provision quoted in the opinion.
  • La. C.C.P. art. 4734: execution of a warrant of eviction.
  • LSA-R.S. 13:2590: eviction filing and service fees discussed in the closing paragraph.
  • Bill Kassel Farms, Inc. v. Paul, Sunbelt Security Services, Inc. v. Delahoussaye, and Richard v. Broussard: cases the AG cited on lease remedies.

Source

Original opinion text

~t~te o~ ~oui~i~u~
One American Place
301 Main Street, Suite 600
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
P.O. Box 94005
CIVIL DIVISION
TEL.: (225) 342-7013
FAX: (225) 342-2090
BATON ROUGE
RICHARD P IEYOUB
70804-9005
ATTORNEY GENERAL

NOV 2 0 2003
OPINION NUMBER 03-0390

57- Justices of the Peace
A Justice of the Peace court has concurrent jurisdiction with the
Honorable Astrid Koppenol
distdct courts over suits involving eviction of occupants of leased
Justice of the Peace, St. Tammany Parish
residential and commercial property.

Ward 1
3 Alice Street
Madisonville, Louisiana 70447

Dear Honorable Koppenol:

We are in receipt of your opinion request wherein you have asked a series of questions relating to a marina owner’s eviction rights against a month-to-month tenant. Specifically, you seek an opinion of the following questions:

(1) What are his options in JP court?
(2) Does a marina owner file a petition to evict?
(3) If so, and judgment is entered for eviction, but the boat owner still doesn’t remove the boatmhow does the marina owner have the boat removed?
(4) What is the proper procedure for removal?
(5) If it were removed at his cost, would he be in worse shape than he is in now?

Pursuant to La C.C.P. art. 4911, the civil jurisdiction of the justice of the peace court is concurrent with the district court over suits by landlords or lessors for the eviction of occupants or tenants of leased residential and commercial property.
As such, a justice of the peace can hear all eviction matters regardless of the amount of monthly or yearly rent or the rent for an unexpired term of the lease.
La. C.C.P. art. 4912.

In answer to your second question regarding whether the marina owner files a petition to evict, generally, when a lessee defaults on a lease agreement, the lessor has two options available: (1) he may sue to cancel the lease and recover accrued rentals due, or (2) he may sue to enforce the lease and recover both accrued rentals and future accelerated rentals if the lease specifies such. Bill Kassel Farms, Inc. v. Paul, 690 So.2d 807, 96-462 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/98), See, Sunbelt Security Services, Inc. v. Delahoussaye, 572 So.2d 598 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1990), citing Richard v. Broussard, 495 So.2d 1291 (La. 1986). Most importantly, these remedies are mutually exclusive. Prior to deciding which


Page 2

Honorable Astrid Koppenol
Opinion Number 03-0390
Page - 2 -

remedy to pursue, a lessor should take into consideration that a lessor who wrongfully dispossesses the lessee from the premises is answerable in damages, unless he complies with the substantive law and judicial processes created to effectuate evictions. La. C.C.P. art. 4701, et seq. Accordingly, a lessor must take into consideration the nature of the rental agreement itself for purposes of eviction. Therefore, a review of La. C.C. art. 2686 is necessary. It provides as follow:

If the renting of a house or other edifice ..... has been made without fixing its duration, the lease shall be considered to have been made by the month. The parties must abide by the agreement as fixed at the time of the lease. If no time for its duration has been agreed on, the party desiring to put an end to it must give notice in writing to the other, at least ten days before the expiration of the month, which has begun to run. La. C.C. art. 2686, Management One of Louisiana, Inc. v. Thibodeaux, 598 So.2d 1224 (La.App. 4th Cir.
1992). (Emphasis Added).

In addressing your third question regarding removal of the boat if and when a judgment has been entered, "[a] notice to vacate in and of itself is only the initial stage in effectuating an eviction and it is upon lessee’s failure to vacate the leased premises after receiving such notice that the lessor must proceed summarily to have the lessee evicted." Bill Kassel Farms, Inc., supra. Based upon statutory law and jurisprudence relative to this issue, this office has stated that an initial notice for possession of a boat slip should be delivered by the owner in accordance with Louisiana Civil Code of Procedure Article 4701, et seq. La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 81-186. However, if the whereabouts of the occupant is unknown, all notices, process, pleadings, and orders required to be delivered or served may be attached to a door of the premises, which shall have the same effect as delivery to, or personal service. La. C.C.P. art 4701. This office is of the opinion that if an occupant refuses to accept a landlord’s certified letter, then his refusal to accept is tantamount to his whereabouts being unknown. In that instance, the notice may be attached to the ship or the door of the boat if it is more convenient. La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 81-186.

In answer to your final questions, after final notice and the procedures set forth in La C.C.P. art. 4731 et seq., have been followed, the proper procedure for having property removed is to have the constable execute a warrant of eviction in accordance with La. C.C.P. art. 4734 by removing the boat from the slip. If the boat cannot be secured nearby the boat should be regarded as any other abandoned property. La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 81-186.

In conclusion, a justice of the peace court may demand and receive eighty dollars for filings and services in eviction proceedings which shall also be used


Page 3

Honorable Astdd Koppenol
Opinion Number 03-0390
Page - 3 -

for fees and operational expenses of the constable’s office in his effort to remove a tenant’s property from the premises. LSA-R.S. 13:2590.

We hope this opinion has sufficiently addressed your concerns. If our office may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours very truly,

RICHARD P. IEYOUB
ATTORNEY GENEI

CHARLENE
Assistant Attorn~ General

RPI/CP;mjb
Enclosure


Page 4

CR~M,NAL D{VISION
WILLIAM J. GUSTE, JR.
234 LOYOLA AVE.

ATTORNEY GENERAL
SUITE 821
70112

OPINION NO. 81-186
107 . . . SHERIFFS
57 .... JUSTICES OF THE PEACE
Hon. Althea M. Wildgen
Owner may have boat evicted
Justice of the Peace
from a marina slip with constabl
4th Ward - St. Tammany Parish
performing his duties as set
2142 Monroe Street
forth in La. C.C.P. Art. 4701
Mandeville, LA 70448
et seq.
Dear Judge Wildgen: La. C.C.p. Art. 4701
Your inquiry of recent date addressed to Attorney General William J. Guste, Jr. has been directed to me for attention and reply.
You ask the following questions relative to requests for eviction of boats from a private marina:
(i) HOW doe~ the Constable serve the first notice?
(2) Where does he put the notice?
(3) Can he board the boat since the marina is connected to navig- able waters?
(4) After final notice how does the constable handle the final eviction? and
(5) Could the marina owner chain the boat to the dock in an effort to collect the rent due?
In the final analysis it appears this problem is primarily a civil matter and the lessor of the boat slips should be advised to procure legal counsel for guidance.
However, insofar as your questions relate to your office and the official function of the constable we are pleased to answer your requests.


Page 5

Hon. Althea M. Wildgen
Opinion No. 81-186
June 18, 1981
Page 2

(I) In the first instance assuming jurisdiction in your court under the provisions of La. C.C.P., Art. 4841 et seq., the first notice for possession of the slip should be delivered by the owner in accordance with La. C.C.P. 4701 et seq.
(2) If it is customary for the constable to serve first notices, and the lessee cannot otherwise be found, the said notice may be attached to the ship or the door of the boat if it is more convenient. Please see Article 4703.
(3) Therefore, the owner or constable may serve the first notice and the constable may serve any other notices, process, pleadings and otherwise comply with the orders of court under La. C.C.P. Art. 4703 by boarding the said boat. The criminal statute in R.S. 14:63.3 prohibiting the boarding of water craft is of no concern here since the first words of the statute reads "No person shall without authority go...upon...water craft". As stated above the authority is present by virtue of La. C.C.P. Art. 4703.
(4) After final notice and the procedures set forth in La. C.C.P. 4731 et seq. the constable shall execute the warrant of eviction in accordance with Article 4734 by removing the boat from the slip. If the boat cannot be secured nearby the boat should be regarded as any other abandoned property. This becomes the area where the owner pursuing his civil remedies might wish to prosecute his rights as a lessor and creditor as set forth in Article 4705.
(5) Your last question is concerned only with a civil matter. In the absence of permissive statutes or a seizure granted by the court the owner could not assert possession of the lessee’s boat.


Page 6

Hon. Althea M. Wildgen
Opinion No. 81-186
June 18, 1981
Page 3

I trust the above will satisfactorily answer your inquiry, but if you have any other questions regarding this matter please contact our office.
Sincerely yours,
WILLIAM J. GUSTE, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL

HARRY H~ HOWARD
Assistant Attorney General
HHH:mb

What does Louisiana law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2003. Ezel checks the current Louisiana statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace